throbber
Case: 14-1437 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 03/02/2015
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`14-1437 - Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
`
`Response and Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant, Wi-Lan, Inc.
`
`ORDER
`
` The foregoing, having been received and examined is not in compliance with the rules of this court and is
`therefore rejected for filing at this time.
`
` A corrected brief or appendix must be filed within 14 days from the date of this order or there could be adverse
`consequences. Please read this letter carefully as some of the items may not apply to your appeal.
`
`•
`
`•
`
`If the submission is rejected due to the principal attorney not filing an Entry of Appearance and/or
`Docketing Statement, you do not need to comply with the below mentioned items. Promptly submit the
`required form(s) [form(s) can be obtained on the court's website www.cafc.uscourts.gov]. Once the entry of
`appearance and/or docketing statement is received, your brief will be accepted for filing.
`If the submission is rejected for being out of time, leave of court, requested by motion, to file the submission
`out of time is required.
`
` The deficiencies are set forth in the attached listing. The following shall apply when making corrections:
`
`3.
`
`1. Counsel may elect to make corrections to the rejected version held in the Clerk's Office, or file a new,
`corrected brief. (Applies to briefs filed in paper format only.)
`2. To make corrections to the copies held in the Clerk's Office. Corrections must only be made by counsel of
`record or by designee. Briefs cannot leave the Clerk's Office. (See Practice Note 32) (Applies to briefs filed in
`paper format only.)
`Inserts cannot extend beyond the original pages and cannot be left loose in the brief. (Applies to briefs filed
`in paper format only.)
`4. The corrected brief must have the word "CORRECTED" on the cover.
`5. The corrected version must be served on all counsel.
`6. The corrected version must be accompanied by a new proof of service.
`7. The deficiencies cited in this order must be the only changes made to the brief or appendix.
`
` Calculation for the next filing starts from the mail service date of the original version, not the corrected version.
`
`FOR THE COURT
`
`
`/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
`Daniel E. O'Toole
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`March 02, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cc: Samuel Franklin Baxter
`Jason Blackstone
`Richter Darryl Burke
`Brett E. Cooper
`Robert A. Cote
`Mark S. Davies
`Brian Philip Goldman
`Seth R. Hasenour
`Katherine M. Kopp
`Ashlee N. Lin
`
`

`
`Case: 14-1437 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 03/02/2015
`
`
`
`Will Melehani
`T. Vann Pearce Jr.
`Miguel Jesus Ruiz
`Mark C. Scarsi
`Andrew D. Silverman
`Rosemary T. Snider
`Dirk D. Thomas
`Siddhartha M Venkatesan
`
`
`
`

`
`Case: 14-1437 Document: 53 Page: 3 Filed: 03/02/2015
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`14-1437 - Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
`
`The Response and Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant, Wi-Lan, Inc. has been rejected for following reasons:
`
`• The brief submitted is out of time. Fed. R. App. P. 31(a); Fed. Cir. R. 31(a) NOTE: The brief was due on
`February 27, 2015.
`
`• A proportionally spaced type face must be 14-point or larger including footnotes. Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5)(A);
`also see Practice Note 32
`
`• The table of contents of the nonconfidential brief must include a paragraph describing the general nature of
`the confidential material that has been deleted. Fed. Cir. R. 28(d)(1)(B)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket