throbber
Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 183
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`ADVANCED TRANSACTIONS, LLC,
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`
`DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 6:24-cv-00103
`
` Jury Trial Demanded
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Advanced Transactions, LLC (“Advanced Transactions”) files this
`
`Complaint against DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. (hereinafter “DSW or “Defendant”) for
`
`infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,065,555; 7,386,594; 7,693,950; 7,979,057;
`
`8,150,736; 8,175,519; 9,747,608; and 10,783,529 (the “patents-in-suit”), and alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of
`
`the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 2 of 183
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Advanced Transactions is a limited liability company organized under
`
`laws of the State of Georgia with its principal place of business situated at the Day
`
`Building, Suite 230, 4725 Peachtree Corners Circle, Peachtree Corners, GA 30092.
`
`3.
`
`On information and belief, defendant DSW is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the state of Delaware with a principal place of business at 810
`
`DSW Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43219.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, DSW may be served with process through its
`
`registered agent, Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington,
`
`Delaware 19808 or anywhere it may be found.
`
`5.
`
`DSW has been authorized to do business in the State of Texas and the
`
`Western District of Texas since on or about March 28, 1994, under Texas SoS File
`
`Number 0009943106.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, DSW sells and offers to sell products and
`
`services throughout Texas, including in this judicial district, as well as throughout the
`
`United States, and introduces products and services that perform infringing processes
`
`into the stream of commerce knowing that they would be used, offered for sale, or sold
`
`in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States.
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, DSW has made, used, offered to sell and/or
`
`sold products and services, including the following specifically accused products and
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 3 of 183
`
`services: (1) DSW Marketing Emails;1 (2) DSW Mobile Apps;2 (3) DSW Gift Cards and e-
`
`Gift Cards;3 (4) the DSW website;4 (5) DSW online shopping services; 5 (6) DSW in-store
`
`shopping services;6 (7) DSW Rewards;7 (8) current or legacy products or services, which
`
`use, or have used, one or more of the foregoing products and services as a component
`
`product or component service; (9) combinations of products and/or services
`
`comprising, in whole or in part, two or more of the foregoing products and services;
`
`and (10) all other current or legacy products and services imported, made, used, sold, or
`
`offered for sale by DSW that operate, or have operated in a substantially similar manner
`
`as the above-listed products and services. (As used herein, one or more of the forgoing
`
`products and services are individually and collectively referred to as the accused “DSW
`
`Marketing Products and Services”).
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, DSW, as well as the hardware and software
`
`components comprising the DSW Marketing Products and Services and/or that enable
`
`the DSW Marketing Products and Services to operate, including but not limited to
`
`
`1 See https://www.dsw.com/en/us/legal/privacy-policy.
`
`2 See e.g., https://apps.apple.com/us/app/dsw-designer-shoe-warehouse/id918263528
`and https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dsw.android.
`
`3 See https://giftcards.dsw.com/.
`
`4 See https://www.dsw.com/.
`
`5 See https://www.dsw.com/en/us/shopping-bag /.
`
`6 See, e.g., https://stores.dsw.com/usa/tx.html /.
`
`7 See, e.g., https://www.dsw.com/en/us/vip.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 4 of 183
`
`servers, server software, webserver software, webserver hardware, email server
`
`hardware, email server software, website client software, mobile computing device
`
`client application software, networked communications hardware, network routers,
`
`network switches, network hubs, WIFI access point hardware, WIFI access point
`
`software, point-of-sale hardware, point-of-sale software, back-end hardware, back-end
`
`software, cloud-based software, cloud-based hardware, and other hardware and
`
`software computing systems and components (individually and collectively referred to
`
`herein as the accused “DSW Marketing System”), infringes (literally and/or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents) at least one claim of each of the patents-in-suit.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over DSW because it committed and
`
`continues to commit acts of infringement in this judicial district in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 271(a). In particular, on information and belief, DSW has made, used, offered to sell
`
`access to, and/or sold access to the accused DSW Marketing Products and Services in
`
`the Western District of Texas, and has made, used, offered to sell access to, and/or sold
`
`access to the DSW Marketing System in the Western District of Texas.
`
`10. On information and belief, DSW is subject to the Court’s jurisdiction
`
`because it regularly conducts and solicits business, or otherwise engages in other
`
`persistent courses of conduct in this judicial district, and/or derives substantial revenue
`
`from the use, sale, and distribution of goods and services, including but not limited to
`
`the accused DSW Marketing Products and Services provided to individuals and
`
`businesses in the Western District of Texas.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 5 of 183
`
`11. On information and belief, DSW infringes the patent-in-suit in the
`
`Western District of Texas, at least, by making, using, offering to sell access to, and/or
`
`selling access to the accused DSW Marketing Products and Services in the Western
`
`District of Texas, and its making, use, offering to sell access to, and/or selling access to
`
`the DSW Marketing System.
`
`12. On information and belief, DSW is a footwear store that operates more
`
`than 519 stores in the United States of America and Canada and online at
`
`https://www.dsw.com/.
`
`13.
`
`Indeed, on information and belief, DSW operates at least 46 retail stores in
`
`the State of Texas alone, see https://stores.dsw.com/usa/tx.html, with retail stores
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 6 of 183
`
`throughout this judicial district, including in Waco, Austin, El Paso, Round Rock, and
`
`San Antonio, among others.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 7 of 183
`
`
`
`14. On information and belief, the accused DSW Marketing Products and
`
`Services and/or the DSW Marketing System are made, used, sold and offered for sale
`
`by DSW, or its agents, at DSW retail stores, including those retail stores located in the
`
`Western District of Texas.
`
`15. On information and belief, DSW customers located in the Western District
`
`of Texas have obtained access to and used the accused DSW Marketing Products and
`
`Services and/or the DSW Marketing System while located in the Western District of
`
`Texas.
`
`16.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over DSW at least because it has
`
`continuous business contacts in the State of Texas and in the Western District of Texas;
`
`DSW has engaged in business activities including transacting business in the Western
`
`District of Texas and purposefully directing its business activities, including the sale or
`
`offer for sale of the DSW Marketing Products and Services to the Western District of
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 8 of 183
`
`Texas to aid, abet, or contribute to the infringement of third parties in the Western
`
`District of Texas.
`
`17.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over DSW because, inter alia, DSW, on
`
`information and belief: (1) has committed acts of patent infringement in this Western
`
`District of Texas; (2) maintains a regular and established place of business in the
`
`Western District of Texas; (3) has substantial, continuous, and systematic contacts with
`
`this State and the Western District of Texas; (4) owns, manages, and operates facilities in
`
`this State and the Western District of Texas; (5) enjoys substantial income from its
`
`operations and sales in this State and the Western District of Texas; (6) employs Texas
`
`residents in this State and the Western District of Texas, and (7) solicits business using
`
`the DSW Marketing Products and Services and DSW Marketing System in this State and
`
`the Western District of Texas.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 9 of 183
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), (c), (d) and/or 1400(b),
`
`at least because DSW, has committed acts of infringement in this judicial district, and
`
`has regular and established places of business in this judicial district.
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 10 of 183
`
`United States Patent No. 7,065,555
`
`19. On June 20, 2006, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent
`
`No. 7,065,555 (“the ’555 patent”) entitled “System and Method Related to Generating
`
`and Tracking an Email Campaign” to inventors Michael G. Foulger, Thomas R.
`
`Chipperfield, Jeremy S. Cooper, and Andrew C. Storms.
`
`20.
`
`The ’555 patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. § 282.
`
`21. Advanced Transactions owns all rights, title, and interest in the ’555
`
`patent.
`
`22. Advanced Transactions has not granted DSW an approval, an
`
`authorization, or a license to the rights under the ’555 patent.
`
`23.
`
`The ’555 patent relates to, among other things, a method and system for
`
`generating and tracking an email campaign.
`
`24.
`
`The claimed invention(s) of the ‘555 patent sought to solve problems with,
`
`and improve upon, existing marketing and market research and analysis systems. For
`
`example, the ‘555 patent states:
`
`The ability to market a product or service to individuals who are accessible on the
`Internet is becoming increasingly important. Effective ways of contacting these
`individuals are being sought. For instance, to market to these individuals, email
`may be sent to the individuals over the Internet, to provide information related to
`the product or service. Email systems exist today for sending email to a target set
`of email addresses for purposes such as marketing, information acquisition, and
`otherwise. A system for sending email to a number of email targets for such
`purposes may be called an email campaign.
`
`Present email campaigns may suffer from difficulties in locating a pool of relevant
`individuals to be contacted. In a small email campaign, each email sent is critical
`to the success of the campaign, and needs to be carefully created. In other
`situations, large numbers of individuals to be contacted may have been found.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 11 of 183
`
`This may result in increased difficulty in tailoring the large number of required
`email messages to the individuals for more effective contact.
`
`Furthermore, once an email campaign has been initiated, difficulties in measuring
`success of the email campaign are presented. Effective ways for determining
`whether email recipients have received email from the email campaign have been
`sought. Also, effective ways for allowing the email recipients to provide feedback
`have also been sought. It may be desirable for the email recipients to be able to
`respond with feedback, and for the quantity and content of the responses to be
`monitored and tracked.
`
`See ’555 Specification at col. 1, ll. 15-43.
`
`25.
`
`The ‘555 patent then states:
`
`In light of the foregoing, what is needed is an efficient way to create and track a
`email campaign.
`
`See ’555 Specification at col. 1, ll. 44-45.
`
`26.
`
`The invention(s) claimed in the ’555 patent solves various technological
`
`problems inherent in the then-existing existing marketing and market research and
`
`analysis systems to, among other things, function more efficiently.
`
`United States Patent No. 7,386,594
`
`27. On June 10, 2008, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent
`
`No. 7,386,594 (“the ’594 patent”) entitled “System and method related to generating an
`
`email campaign” to inventors Michael G. Foulger, Thomas R. Chipperfield, Jeremy S.
`
`Cooper, and Andrew C. Storms.
`
`28.
`
`The ’594 patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. § 282.
`
`29. Advanced Transactions owns all rights, title, and interest in the ’594
`
`patent.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 12 of 183
`
`30. Advanced Transactions has not granted DSW an approval, an
`
`authorization, or a license to the rights under the ’594 patent.
`
`31.
`
`The ’594 patent relates to, among other things, a method and system for
`
`generating an email campaign.
`
`32.
`
`The specification of the ’594 patent is the same as the ’555 patent
`
`specification, and solves the problems recited above and described in the ’555 patent
`
`specification.
`
`United States Patent No. 7,693,950
`
`33. On April 6, 2010, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent
`
`No. 7,693,950 (“the ’950 patent”) entitled “System and Method Related to Generating
`
`and Tracking an Email Campaign” to inventors Michael G. Foulger, Thomas R.
`
`Chipperfield, Jeremy S. Cooper, and Andrew C. Storms.
`
`34.
`
`The ’950 patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. § 282.
`
`35. Advanced Transactions owns all rights, title, and interest in the ’950
`
`patent.
`
`36. Advanced Transactions has not granted DSW an approval, an
`
`authorization, or a license to the rights under the ’950 patent.
`
`37.
`
`The ’950 patent relates to, among other things, a method and system for
`
`generating and tracking an email campaign.
`
`38.
`
`The specification of the ’950 patent is the same as the ’555 patent
`
`specification, and solves the problems recited above and described in the ’555 patent
`
`specification.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 13 of 183
`
`United States Patent No. 7,979,057
`
`39. On July 12, 2011, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent
`
`No. 7,979,057 (“the ’057 patent”) entitled “Third-Party Provider Method and System” to
`
`inventors Luis M. Ortiz and Kermit D. Lopez.
`
`40.
`
`The ’057 patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. § 282.
`
`41. Advanced Transactions owns all rights, title, and interest in the ’057
`
`patent.
`
`42. Advanced Transactions has not granted DSW an approval, an
`
`authorization, or a license to the rights under the ’057 patent.
`
`43.
`
`The ’057 patent relates to, among other things, novel marketing and
`
`commercial transaction systems.
`
`44.
`
`The claimed invention(s) of the ‘057 patent sought to solve problems with,
`
`and improve upon, existing marketing and merchandizing systems. For example, the
`
`‘057 patent states:
`
`The present invention is generally related to electronic hand held devices
`(hereinafter referred to as “hand held devices”) and electronic commerce (“E-
`commerce”). The present invention is also related to hand held devices, such as a
`Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), wireless telephone, pager, or other mobile
`computing and storage device adapted for use in E-commerce. The present
`invention is also related to wireless and wireline computer networks. The present
`invention is additionally related to the fields of electronic cash, credit, award,
`incentive, and/or product management usable with/for retail establishments,
`organizations, and customers. The present
`invention
`is also related to
`merchandising systems and systems for generating and redeeming negotiable
`economic credits and/or data (e.g., electro[nic] product discount coupons and
`other negotiable economic credits, such as enterprise awards, cash, credit, etc.).
`
`See ’057 Specification at col. 1, ll. 18-33.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 14 of 183
`
`45.
`
`The ‘057 patent then states:
`
`The recent shift in the consumer electronics industry from an emphasis on analog
`technology to a preference for digital technology is largely based on the fact that
`the former generally limits the user to a role of a passive recipient of information,
`while the latter is interactive and allows the user to control what, when, and how
`he or she receives and manipulates certain information.
`
`This shift in focus has resulted in the development and increasingly widespread
`use of, for example, a hand held digital device generically referred to as a
`“personal digital assistant” (PDA). These hand held devices are becoming
`increasingly popular for storing and maintaining information. Hand held devices,
`such as PDAs, may be connected to a desktop personal computer, networks or
`other PDAs via infrared, direct wire, or wireless communication links.
`
`See ’057 Specification at col. 1, ll. 35-49.
`
`46.
`
`The ‘057 patent then states:
`
`PDAs are increasingly being utilized to access information from remote computer
`networks, such as the “World Wide Web” and the “Internet,” both terms well
`known in the computer networking arts. PDA users can, for example, download
`e-mail from the Internet to the PDA. Web sites also exist that permit PDA users to
`access and download software that may be run on the PDA. For example, some
`web sites offer information to PDAs in the form of compressed news articles, stock
`quotes, and other data obtained from a wide variety of other electronic web-based
`sources.
`
`Based on the foregoing, it can be appreciated that a large number of users of hand
`held devices, such as PDAs, pagers and mobile telephony are increasingly relying
`on such devices to maintain and transmit a variety of personal and business
`information.
`
`See ’057 Specification at col. 2, ll. 13-27.
`
`47.
`
`The ‘057 patent then states:
`
`
`Discount coupons have long been distributed by manufacturers to merchandise
`their products and by retail stores or establishments to attract consumers to their
`particular stores. Discount coupons are a type of negotiable economic credit
`frequently utilized by enterprises for marketing products and services to the
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 15 of 183
`
`public. Enterprise awards, such as frequent flyer miles, are also negotiable
`economic credits relied upon by enterprises for marketing purposes.
`
`Coupons are typically distributed to attract customers to engage in commercial
`transactions. Such coupons are effective if utilized by a sufficiently high
`percentage of customers. Utilizing this gauge, free-standing inserts are not very
`effective. Their redemption rate is presently approximately 2.8 percent and
`dropping.
`
`Typically, coupons are physically collected at stores and credit is provided to the
`customer purchasing the corresponding product. The coupons are generally
`bundled and forwarded to a clearing house and then to a redemption center for
`sorting and counting. Reports are eventually forwarded to the manufacturers
`issuing the coupons in order to eventually generate a credit to the stores
`redeeming the coupons. It may unfortunately take several months before a store
`is reimbursed for coupons under present coupon redemption/processing
`methods.
`
`Another problem with coupons is a significant misredemption rate of between 20
`and 30 percent as a result of misidentification and outright fraud. The
`misredemption problem is exacerbated by the enormous amount of time, usually
`a number of months, that it takes to reimburse the retail stores for the discount
`given the customer.
`
`See ’057 Specification at col. 2, ll. 28-57.
`
`48.
`
`The ‘057 patent then states:
`
`Attempts have been made to address such problems. Such attempts, however,
`have resulted in additional problems, while not fully addressing the problems
`described above. For example, some companies have implemented a product
`specific micro-marketing system tied to a product point of selection and
`proprietary hardware in the form of an alerting platform attached to a grocery cart.
`A consumer within a retail establishment presses a button on the grocery cart
`alerting platform to select an electronic coupon when a coupon is graphically
`displayed at the exact product location within the retail establishment. The
`customer and the cart must be located at the point of selection to access the coupon.
`Such a micro-marketing system is proprietary in nature and requires a customer
`to retrieve a coupon only from the point of selection within the store. Thus,
`because of the proprietary nature of the system, the coupons, the alerting platform
`and other proprietary hardware cannot be utilized at other retail establishments.
`Further, the enterprise associated with the retail establishment is burdened by the
`maintenance, replacement, and repair of the proprietary hardware attached to the
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 16 of 183
`
`retail establishment's shopping carts due to use, abuse, the weather and so forth.
`Other systems known in the art utilize smart cards and card readers/writers at
`point of product selection for obtaining coupon data. Such systems, however, force
`the user to retrieve data at the point of product selection (i.e. point of selection),
`thereby tying their shopping activities to a proprietary system.
`
`Accordingly, alternatives are needed to traditional mass marketing and couponing
`techniques, and proprietary, point of selection type systems. A need exists for non-
`, or solely-, proprietary, based systems that are flexible, efficient and consumer
`friendly. Further a need exists for credit devices that are not completely owned by
`the enterprise or retail establishment, but owned by the customers themselves and
`which can be utilized at other retail establishments and enterprises. Such a device
`and associated systems and methods, should be ubiquitous in nature to avoid the
`problems inherently associated with prior micro-marketing systems.
`
`It has become apparent to the present inventors that the ability to acquire, store
`and use negotiable economic credits, such as coupons, on hand held devices
`would free users of the time consuming tasks of clipping, organizing and
`redeeming traditional paper coupons or credits (e.g., frequent flier redemption via
`paper-based request), and the problems associated with proprietary micro-
`marketing systems. It has also become apparent to the present inventors that for
`merchandisers and manufacturers, such hand held devices could be utilized to
`effectively market, compile and negotiate credit exchanges/redemption much
`more efficiently than the traditional paper processing methods or proprietary-
`based micro-marketing systems and methods.
`
`See ’057 Specification at col. 2, l. 58 - col. 3, l 43.
`
`49.
`
`The ‘057 patent then states:
`
`It is believed that aspects of the invention presently described herein solve the
`traditional problems associated with negotiable economic credits, including
`coupons, cash, credit and enterprise awards, and the problems associated with
`proprietary-based marketing systems thereof, while addressing an area of user
`control that has not yet been considered, anticipated, or utilized by coupon/credit
`merchandisers and manufacturers, namely, the increasing number of individuals
`who rely on hand held devices, such as PDAs, to maintain and store personal and
`business information.
`
`See ’057 Specification at col. 3, ll. 44–53.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 17 of 183
`
`50.
`
`The invention(s) claimed in the ’057 patent solves various technological
`
`problems inherent in the then-existing marketing and merchandizing systems to,
`
`among other things, (1) function more efficiently, (2) allow customers to become more
`
`actively engaged in retail marketing campaigns, (3) reduce the complexity, costs, and
`
`other problems associated with prior art marketing and merchandizing systems, (4)
`
`improve the security inherent in prior art marketing and merchandizing systems, and
`
`(5) improve accessibility and adoption of marketing and merchandizing systems over
`
`prior art marketing and merchandizing systems.
`
`United States Patent No. 8,150,736
`
`51. On April 3, 2012, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent
`
`No. 8,150,736 (“the ’736 patent”) entitled “Global Electronic Commerce System” to
`
`inventors Michel Horn and Thomas Scott Manaugh.
`
`52.
`
`The ’736 patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. § 282.
`
`53. Advanced Transactions owns all rights, title, and interest in the ’736
`
`patent.
`
`54. Advanced Transactions has not granted DSW an approval, an
`
`authorization, or a license to the rights under the ’736 patent.
`
`55.
`
`The ’736 patent relates to, among other things, a novel electronic shopping
`
`system.
`
`56.
`
`The claimed invention(s) of the ‘736 patent sought to solve problems with,
`
`and improve upon, existing electronic shopping systems. For example, the ‘736 patent
`
`states:
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 18 of 183
`
`The field of this invention is global sale of products and services using electronic
`means of (a) communications, (b) data storage and retrieval, (c) taking of orders,
`(d) fulfillment, (e) transfers of payments, and (f) providing customer service after
`the sale. Both business-to-business and business-to-consumer sales are
`effectuated.
`
`See ’736 Specification at col. 1, ll. 21-26.
`
`57.
`
`The ‘736 patent then states:
`
`The present invention is a system for use by even small manufacturers to meet a
`long-felt need to sell their products to Buyers around the world. The term
`“manufacturers” is meant to include manufacturers or authorized distributors for
`manufacturers; and the term “Buyers” is meant to include both individuals and
`organizations, including other manufacturers.
`
` A
`
` complete system, termed a Global Store, is disclosed, a system that overcomes
`barriers to global trade of language, culture, and nationality. The Global Store
`integrates communications and database software technologies, hardware
`infrastructure, and operating methods to market and sell products from
`manufacturers around the globe to Buyers in a multitude of locales around the
`globe. Stated another way, The Global Store assembles and operates various
`subsystems to provide the infrastructure for manufacturers to use a new channel
`of global commerce, a Virtual Channel.
`
`
`See ’736 Specification at col. 1, ll. 27-43.
`
`58.
`
`The ‘736 patent then states:
`
`A confluence of recognized needs and new technologies now sets the stage for a
`revolutionary change in how manufacturers bring their products to markets
`around the world.
`
`Advances in communications and information technology and their associated
`standards have made geography a much less salient factor in trade than in prior
`years. Electronic communications at the speed of light enables one to purchase a
`product on the other side of the world as quickly as across the street—even more
`quickly should one decide to walk across that street to make the purchase.
`Furthermore, increasing use of English as a de facto language of commerce and
`increasing access to good, real-time translation technology will inevitably lower
`language barriers.
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 19 of 183
`
`The Global Store system, described here, is a method that integrates revolutionary
`and evolutionary developments into a new system of global trade in the Virtual
`Channel. Only in the very recent past have the following compelling trends and
`powerful developments conjoined to permit the construction and operation of a
`complete and integrated system of global trade to meet long-felt needs:
`
`
`1) a quickly growing population of Internet users around the world who are
`ready to shop online 24 hours per day and 365 days per year,
`
`2) Websites to provide specialized functions such as online payments, online
`currency conversion tables, universal tax tables, and parcel tracking,
`
`3) third-party fulfillment services to support regional and global distribution,
`
`4) “pull” online marketing that allows customers greater opportunities to
`customize the products they purchase, as compared with the “push”
`marketing of ready-made products that is characteristic of brick-and-
`mortar retail channels,
`
`5) international agreements to eliminate tariffs on imports,
`
`6) globalization of sources of supply,
`
`7) efficiencies and economies of scale resulting from consolidation of
`marketing functions across markets,
`
`8) establishment of ubiquitous delivery services,
`
`9) availability of escrow services to assuage concerns of online Buyers about
`completing purchases after shopping baskets are filled,
`
`10) growth in telecommuting to work and in home-based internet businesses,
`allowing participants to avoid driving and, thereby, less occasion to stop at
`brick-and-mortar stores to shop,
`
`11) increased global travel and increased access to information from around the
`world using wide-band communications, thereby increasing interest in
`products from far-away locales,
`
`12) consolidation of warehousing and distribution centers for quicker and more
`efficient fulfillment of orders,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 20 of 183
`
`
`
`13) manufacturers' need to retain brand control by offering increasing levels of
`customer support from a single point,
`
`14) technology to implement Web-based multi-language global marketing
`systems using newly invoked international standards, locale-specific stored
`SQL procedures, integrated multi-locale Web-based relational data bases,
`and Unicode, and
`
`
`15) integration of manufacturers' Business-to-Consumer sales with their
`Business-to-Business strategies for procuring supplies, offering a means to
`couple direct online customer sales with procurements, thus completing the
`transition to a completely integrated “Pull” model: A custom product is
`created to satisfy a Buyer's needs, and suppliers are enabled to provide
`necessary Business-to-Business products and services on a timely basis.
`
`
`See ’736 Specification at col. 2, l. 16 - col. 3, l. 17.
`
`59.
`
`The ‘736 patent then states:
`
`Pent-up pressures for globalization have produced numerous examples of
`conventional e-commerce businesses attempting to expand globally. These
`businesses generally meet the challenge to provide information in multiple
`languages and across cultures by cloning Websites from one locale to another—
`reproducing some of the design of the original Website and some of the content.
`This multi-headed e-commerce approach is a crude interim step that fails to meet
`the emerging needs of manufacturers who desire global sales. Loss of the
`efficiencies and economies of a truly global approach make the prices of their
`products less competitive than should be possible, and there is the additional
`problem of entering and maintaining current and accurate information across
`multiple databases.
`
`In conventional e-commerce it is not uncommon for the unscrupulous to sell brand
`name goods through Websites when they are not authorized to do so. In response,
`manufacturers desire to maintain better control of prices, marketing information
`about their products, sales, fulfillment, and customer service—all in a global
`context and, ideally, from a single integrated site.
`
`Buyers are reluctant to make international purchases when they fear that they will
`have no practical recourse if they pay for a product but either do not receive it or
`find the product is not acceptable. What is needed for a hesitant Buyer is an escrow
`service that will complete settlement only after the product has been successfully
`delivered and the Buyer is satisfied.
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`Case 6:24-cv-00103-DAE Document 1 Filed 02/26/24 Page 21 of 183
`
`Many conventional e-commerce Websites have sought to sell products globally,
`but few if any have made a serious commitment to globalization by providing
`good translations in multiple l

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket