`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 6:22-CV-01162-ADA
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Joint or Unopposed Requests to Change
`
`Deadlines, Plaintiff ParkerVision, Inc. and Defendant Realtek Semiconductor Corp. hereby notify
`
`the Court of the parties’ agreement to extend the deadline for Plaintiff’s Final Infringement
`
`Contentions. In accordance with the Court’s March 20, 2024 order for Realtek to facilitate sufficient
`
`access to its Cadence software to allow ParkerVision to create its own schematics, Realtek informed
`
`ParkerVision on March 26, 2024 that it expected to make its Cadence software available to
`
`ParkerVision in Taiwan as of April 1, 2024. Realtek confirmed this on March 28, 2024 and made its
`
`Cadence software available on April 1, 2024. Given the significant travel involved and to
`
`accommodate its expert’s schedule, ParkerVision intends to begin its review on April 9, 2024.
`
`Accordingly, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiff’s Final Infringement
`
`Contentions to April 26, 2024. Realtek will not agree to additional extensions to this deadline, to
`
`the extent Plaintiff relies on materials already produced or made available, including source code
`
`and documents.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 95 Filed 04/08/24 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 8, 2024
`
`
`By: /s/ Jason Charkow
`
`Raymond W. Mort, III
`Texas State Bar No. 00791308
`THE MORT LAW FIRM, PLLC
`501 Congress Avenue, Suite 150
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel/Fax: 512-865-7950
`raymort@austinlaw.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Ronald M. Daignault* (pro hac vice)
`Chandran Iyer (pro hac vice)
`Jason Charkow* (pro hac vice)
`Scott Samay* (pro hac vice)
`Stephanie Mandir (pro hac vice)
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150 Vienna, VA 22182
`rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`ssamay@daignaultiyer.com
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`
`*Not admitted in Virginia
`
`Counsel for ParkerVision, Inc
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /s/ Mark D. Siegmund
`
`Lisa K. Nguyen
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 320-1800
`Fax: (650) 320-1900
`lisanguyen@paulhastings.com
`
`Mark D. Siegmund
`State Bar No. 24117055
`CHERRY JOHNSON
`SIEGMUND JAMES PLLC The
`Roosevelt Tower 400 Austin
`Avenue, 9th Floor Waco, Texas
`76701 Telephone: (254) 732-2242
`Fax: (866) 627-3509
`msiegmund@cjsjlaw.com
`
`Grace I. Wang (pro hac vice)
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: (212) 318-6000
`Fax: (212) 319-4090
`gracewang@paulhastings.com
`
`Emily P. Lipka (pro hac vice)
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`2050 M Street NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: (202) 551-1700
`Fax: (202) 551-1705
`emilylipka@paulhastings.com
`
`Counsel for Realtek Semiconductor
`Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 95 Filed 04/08/24 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 8, 2024, a true and correct copy of the above and
`
`foregoing document has been served by electronic mail on all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark D. Siegmund
`Mark D. Siegmund
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
