throbber
Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 1 of 11
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 1 of 11
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 2 of 11
`
`From:
`To:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Stephanie Mandir
`Nguyen, Lisa; Jason Charkow; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com; Zak Ellis; Chandran Iyer; raymort@austinlaw.com;
`AO_Realtek_PV; Scott Samay
`RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Source Code Review
`Monday, January 1, 2024 7:00:05 PM
`image003.png
`
`Caution: non-A&O email
`
`Dr. Ricketts plans to begin his review on Wednesday, January 3.
`
`
`
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`Associate
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`202.270.5666
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`From: Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com <Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com>
`Sent: Monday, January 1, 2024 6:38 PM
`To: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com; Zak Ellis
`<zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir
`<smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; raymort@austinlaw.com; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com; Scott
`Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Source Code Review
`
`Jason, happy new year. Just confirming whether Dr. Ricketts plans to begin his review tomorrow.
` Thanks.
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 8:47:08 AM
`To: Nguyen, Lisa <Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com>; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com
`<MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran Iyer
`<cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>; AO_Realtek_PV
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Source Code Review
`
`
`Caution: non-A&O email
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 3 of 11
`
`Ricketts will not be able to come next week.
`
`But he will be there Jan 2-5.
`
`
`
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`914.843.8138
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`From: Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com <Lisa.Nguyen@AllenOvery.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 11:45 AM
`To: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com
`<MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran Iyer
`<cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Source Code Review
`
`Jason,
`
`To enter the building there is an intercom at the front of the building that will connect Dr. Ricketts to our
`reception. If there are any issues, please have Dr. Ricketts connect with our practice coordinator Tammy
`Miller at 209-221-5225. Please inform Dr. Ricketts that he will need to have his ID, and will only be
`allowed to have a bound notebook when reviewing the code and schematics.
`
`Please note that given the holidays, we will have limited staffing, and the office will only be open from
`9am – 5pm from December 26 to 29. For the benefit of our staff during this week, we would also
`appreciate it if Dr. Ricketts or someone on your team lets us know if Dr. Rickett’s plans change such that
`he will not be there at any period of time during the two week you have reserved.
`
`Lisa
`
`Lisa K. Nguyen
`Allen & Overy LLP
`
`550 High Street | Palo Alto | CA | 94301 | USA
`Direct +1 650 388 1724 | Mob +1 650 391 5373 | lisa.nguyen@allenovery.com
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 4 of 11
`
`
`
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 10:19 AM
`To: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran
`Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com; AO_Realtek_PV <AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay
`<ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`
`Caution: non-A&O email
`
`
`
`Counsel
`
`We plan to have Dr. Ricketts review schematics in your California office Dec 26-29 and
`Jan 2-5
`
`
`
`
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`914.843.8138
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 1:15 PM
`To: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran
`Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 5 of 11
`
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`Counsel
`
`We have now followed up multiple times on the PO. Over a month ago, you said that you
`would provide us with some edits to the PO so that the schematics could be moved to
`DC. We have not seen or heard anything about this to date.
`
`Please let me know where things stand today.
`
`
`Thanks
`Jason
`
`
`
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`914.843.8138
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 1:05 PM
`To: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran
`Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`What is status of Realtek's PO proposal? This has been pending for a while now.
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 6 of 11
`
`
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`914.843.8138
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 3:19 PM
`To: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran
`Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`We would agree to file jointly (and not oppose) if Realtek does not oppose our motion to
`supplement our claim construction brief to include the Declaration of Dr. Ricketts.
`
`
`
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`
`Partner
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`914.843.8138
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`From: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 7 of 11
`
`Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 1:29 PM
`To: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran
`Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com
`<AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`
`Jason,
`
`
`
`Following up on the below and our conversation last week. We are fine with keeping the
`opening of discovery per the current scheduling order despite our request to move the marking
`hearing. I would appreciate if this could be a joint request. If not, I will send the language
`below in red instead.
`
`
`
`DRAFT:
`
`
`
`Dear Law Clerks,
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s local rules, the Parties write to confirm the Markman date in the above
`reference case. The date in the scheduling order is January 10, 2024, currently. However, the
`parties (Realtek) respectfully request(s) the Court move the Markman date to the following
`week, January 16 -19th, to provide more time to prepare for the arguments after the holidays,
`as well as for Realtek’s client representative to participate in the hearing (who is located in
`Taiwan). (Plaintiff is unopposed to Realtek’s request.) Thank you for your time and
`consideration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mark D. Siegmund
`
`Partner
`
`CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND JAMES, PLLC
`
`(254)732-2242
`
`www.cjsjlaw.com
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 8 of 11
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:42 AM
`To: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir
`<smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; raymort@austinlaw.com;
`AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
` I
`
` would also like to discuss the po and see if we can get the review computer to Allen/overy
`DC Office
`
`From: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 11:39 AM
`To: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir
`<smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>;
`AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com <AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay
`<ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: Re: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`
`
`Mark
`
`
`
`Please give me a call when you free up. Thanks
`
`
`
`9148438138
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Mark Siegmund <MSiegmund@CJSJLAW.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 11:32:34 AM
`To: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; Zak Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>;
`Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir
`<smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; raymort@austinlaw.com <raymort@austinlaw.com>;
`AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com <AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com>; Scott Samay
`<ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 9 of 11
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`
`Please let us know your position on our request below.
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Mark
`
`
`
`Mark D. Siegmund
`
`Partner
`
`CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND JAMES, PLLC
`
`(254)732-2242
`
`www.cjsjlaw.com
`
`
`
`From: Mark Siegmund
`Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 3:33 PM
`To: Jason Charkow <jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; zellis@daignaultiyer.com; Chandran
`Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>;
`raymort@austinlaw.com; AO_Realtek_PV@AllenOvery.com; Scott Samay
`<ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>
`Subject: ParkerVision v. Realtek - Markman Hearing
`
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`
`
`As yall know, the Markman is currently set for January 10, 2024. Given this is right after the
`holidays, would yall be amenable to moving the date back one week to January 16th to give us
`a little more breathing room? We are happy to discuss further as well. If that works with yall,
`can we send a joint email to the court asking the Court to set the markman date on January
`16th (or as soon as it can that week)?
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 10 of 11
`
`Mark
`
`
`
`Mark D. Siegmund
`
`Partner
`
`CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND JAMES, PLLC
`
`(254)732-2242
`
`www.cjsjlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`This transmission, and any attached files, may contain information from the law firm of
`Daignault Iyer LLP which is confidential and/or legally privileged. Such information is
`intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this transmission is addressed. If
`you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
`distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmitted
`information is strictly prohibited, that copies of this transmission and any attached files should
`be deleted from your disk directories immediately, and that any printed copies of this
`transmission or attached files should be returned to this firm. If you have received this
`transmission in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail immediately, and we will arrange
`for the return to Daignault Iyer LLP of any printed copies.
`
`
`
`This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify
`us immediately by telephoning or e-mailing the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose
`its contents to any other person.
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto
`CA 94301
`Tel: +1 650 388 1650
`Fax: +1 650 388 1699
`http://www.allenovery.com
`
`Allen & Overy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number
`OC306763 and SRA number 401323. It is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of
`England and Wales. Allen & Overy LLP is a multi-jurisdictional legal practice with lawyers admitted to practice in
`a variety of jurisdictions. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or an employee or
`consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of Allen & Overy LLP and of the non-
`members who are designated as partners is open to inspection at its registered office, One Bishops Square London
`E1 6AD and at the above address.
`For further information about how Allen & Overy LLP is regulated, please see our website at
`www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/legal-notices
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 92-2 Filed 03/15/24 Page 11 of 11
`
`Our privacy policy is available at https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/legal-notices/privacy-policy
`
`
`This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify
`us immediately by telephoning or e-mailing the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose
`its contents to any other person.
`Allen & Overy LLP
`550 High Street
`Palo Alto
`CA 94301
`Tel: +1 650 388 1650
`Fax: +1 650 388 1699
`http://www.allenovery.com
`
`Allen & Overy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number
`OC306763 and SRA number 401323. It is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of
`England and Wales. Allen & Overy LLP is a multi-jurisdictional legal practice with lawyers admitted to practice in
`a variety of jurisdictions. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or an employee or
`consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of Allen & Overy LLP and of the non-
`members who are designated as partners is open to inspection at its registered office, One Bishops Square London
`E1 6AD and at the above address.
`For further information about how Allen & Overy LLP is regulated, please see our website at
`www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/legal-notices
`
`Our privacy policy is available at https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/legal-notices/privacy-policy
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket