throbber
Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`WESTERNDISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`WACO DIVISION
`
`PARKERVISION,INC.,
`
`VS.
`
`Case No.: 6:22-cv-01162-ADA
`
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTORCORP.,
`
`MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`TO THE HONORABLE JUDGEOF SAID COURT:
`
`Comes now
`
`Megan M.Ines
`
`applicant herein, and
`
`movesthis Court to grant admission to the United States District Court for the Western District of
`
`Texaspro hac vice to represent Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
`
`in this case, and
`
`would respectfully show the Court as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Applicant is an attorney and a memberofthe law firm (or practices under the nameof)
`
`Allen & Overy LLP
`
`with officesat:
`
`1101 New York Avenue NW
`Mailing address:
`City, State, Zip Code: Washington DC 20005
`
`Telephone:
`
`(202) 683-3881
`
`Facsimile:
`
`(202) 683-3999
`
`2.
`
`August 20, 2014
`
`Since
`, Applicant has been and presently is a
`memberofand in good standing with the Bar ofthe State of California
`Applicant's bar license numberis 298246
`
`3.
`
`Applicant has been admitted to practice before the following courts:
`
`Court:
`
`California
`
`New York
`
`Admission date:
`
`August 24, 2014
`
`November21, 2016
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 2 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`Applicant is presently a member in good standing of the bars of the courts listed above,
`
`except as provided below (list any court named in the preceding paragraph before which
`
`Applicant is no longer admitted to practice):
`
`have [| have not previously applied to Appear Pro Hac Vicein this district
`I
`court in Case[s]:
`Number: §:22-cv-00032
`
`on the 29 day of June
`
`2022 —
`
`
`Number: 9:22-cev-00350
`
`on the 29 day of June
`
`2022 —
`
`
`Number:
`
`onthe _—__— day of
`
`ee
`
`Applicant has never been subject to grievance proceedings or involuntary removal
`
`proceedings while a memberofthe bar of any state or federal court, except as
`
`provided:
`
`Applicant has not been charged, arrested, or convicted of a criminal offense or offenses,
`
`except as provided below (omit minortraffic offenses):
`
`Applicant has read and is familiar with the Local Rules of the Western District of Texas
`
`and will comply with the standards ofpractice set out therein.
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 3 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`9.
`
`Applicant will file an Application for Admission to Practice before the United States
`
`District Court for the Western District of Texas, if so requested; or Applicant has
`
`co-counsel in this case who is admitted to practice before the United States District
`
`Court for the Western District of Texas.
`
`Co-counsel: Lisa K. Nguyen
`
`Mailing address: 5° High Street
`City, State, Zip Code: Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Telephone:
`(650) 388-1724
`
`100
`Should the Court grant applicant's motion, Applicant shall tender the amount of $100.00 pro hac
`
`vice fee in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-I(f)(2) [checks made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District
`
`Court].
`
`Wherefore, Applicant prays that this Court enter an order permitting the admission of
`
`MeganM.Ines
`
`to the Western District of Texas pro hacvice forthis case only.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Megan M.Ines
`[printed name of Applicant]
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of this motion upon each attorney of
`
`record and the original upon the Clerk of Court on this the 16
`
`day of May
`
`, 2023 _
`
`Megan M.Ines
`[printed name of Applicant]
`
` Applicant]
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 4 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 45 Filed 05/16/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`WACO DIVISION
`
`PARKERVISION,INC.,
`
`vs.
`
`Case No.: 6:22-cv-01162-ADA
`
`REALTEK SEMICONDUCTORCORP.,
`
`ORDER
`
`BE IT REMEMBEREDonthis day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for
`
`Admission Pro Hac Vicefiled by Megan M.Ines
`
`, counsel for
`
`Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
`
`, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters
`
`the following order:
`
`IT IS ORDEREDthat the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED,and
`
`Megan M.Ines
`
`in the above case.
`
`may appear on behalf of Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat Megan M.Ines
`
`, if he/she
`
`has notalready doneso, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S.
`
`District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2).
`
`SIGNEDthisthe
`
`day of May
`
`, 20
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket