Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 1 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 1 of 4
`
`Zachary Ellis
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Ce:
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Ray Mort
`Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:28 AM
`Jenn Haring
`Mark Siegmund; Ron Daignault; Chandran lyer; Zachary Ellis
`RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek
`Results list for_ SignalQuest_ Inc. v. Tien-Ming Chou _ Oncque Corp._ No. 11-cv-392_
`2012 U.S. Dist.pdf; Aop Orphan Pharms. Ag v. Pharmaessentia Corp._ 2021 U.S.pdf; SEC
`v. Alexander_ 248 F.R.D. 108.pdf; Power Integrations_ Inc. v. Sys. Gen. Corp. _ 2004
`U.S.pdf; Trueposition_ Inc. v. Sunon_Inc._ 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXI.pdf
`
`Follow Up Flag:
`Flag Status:
`
`Follow up
`Flagged
`
`Mark,
`
`To help Realtek reconsider its mistaken position that service by the Clerk using Federal Express mail is not proper, we are
`providing the attached casesfor review.
`
`If Realtek wishes to attempt to somehowdistinguish these cases, please let us know. However, based on thesecases,it
`is clear Realtek was properly served.
`
`Thanks,
`
`- Ray
`
`RAYMOND W. MORT, Til
`
`o*e
`THE Mort LAW FIRM, PLLC
`. M :
`
`501 CONGRESS AVE: SUITE 150
`o,6
`AUSTIN « TEXAS « 78701
`
`
`AustinLaw.com - (512)-677-6825 - RayMort@AustinLaw.com
`
`The statements contained herein are not intended to and do not constitute an opinion as to any tax or other matter. They are not intended or written to be used,
`and maynotberelied upon, by you or any other person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under any Federal tax law or otherwise.
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail messageis intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.
`This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this messageis not the
`intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this documentin error and that
`any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this messageis strictly prohibited. If you have received this communicationin error, please notify us
`immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
`
`From: Jenn Haring <Jenn@swclaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 8:52 AM
`To: Ray Mort <raymort@austinlaw.com>
`Ce: Mark Siegmund <mark@swclaw.com>
`Subject: ParkerVision v. Realtek
`
`Mr. Mort:
`
`Please see the attached correspondence from Mark D. Siegmund.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 2 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`Thank you,
`
`JENN HARING
`PARALEGAL
`
`STECKLER WAYNE CHERRY & LOVE, PLLC
`$416 OLD MCGREGOR ROAD
`
`WACO, TEXAS 76712
`254.651.3650
`
`254.651.3689 (fax)
`Wii swelawcam
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 3 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`Ray Mort
`Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:47 AM
`Jenn Haring
`Mark Siegmund; Ron Daignault; Chandran lyer; Zachary Ellis
`RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek
`SignalQuest_ Inc. v. Tien-Ming Chou & Oncque Corp._ 284.pdf
`
`Zachary Ellis
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Ce:
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Mark,
`
`Sorry, the SignalQuest case was mistakenly omitted and the result list for it was sent instead. Attached is the SignalQuest
`case.
`
`- Ray
`
`RAYMOND W. MORT, Til
`
`eo *%e
`THE Mort LAW FIRM, PLLC
`. M :
`
`501 CONGRESS AVE + SUITE 150
`oe,
`AUSTIN « TEXAS « 78701
`
`
`AustinLaw.com - (512)-677-6825 - RayMort@AustinLaw.com
`
`The statements contained herein are not intended to and do not constitute an opinion as to any tax or other matter. They are not intended or written to be used,
`and maynotberelied upon, by you or any other person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under any Federal tax law or otherwise.
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail messageis intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.
`This message may bean attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
`intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this documentin error and that
`any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this messageis strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
`immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
`
`From: Ray Mort
`Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 10:28 AM
`To: Jenn Haring’ <Jenn@swclaw.com>
`Cc: Mark Siegmund <mark@swclaw.com>; Ron Daignault <rdaignault @daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran lyer
`<cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Zachary Ellis <ZakEllis@austinlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek
`
`Mark,
`
`To help Realtek reconsider its mistaken position that service by the Clerk using Federal Express mail is not proper, we are
`providing the attached casesfor review.
`
`If Realtek wishes to attempt to somehowdistinguish these cases, please let us know. However, based on thesecases,it
`is clear Realtek was properly served.
`
`Thanks,
`
`- Ray
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 4 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 21-1 Filed 03/09/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`RAYMOND W.MorT,III
`
`e%e
`THE Mort LAW FIRM, PLLC
`: M :
`
`a 501 CONGRESS AVE - SUITE 150
`AUSTIN * TEXAS : 78701
`
`
`AustinLaw.com - (512)-677-6825 - RayMort@AustinLaw.com
`
`The statements contained herein are not intended to and do not constitute an opinion as to any tax or other matter. They are not intended or written to be used,
`and maynotberelied upon, by you or any other person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under any Federal tax law or otherwise.
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above.
`This message may bean attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
`intended recipient or an agent responsiblefor delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this documentin error and that
`any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this messageis strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
`immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
`
`From: Jenn Haring <Jenn@swclaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 8:52 AM
`To: Ray Mort <raymort@austinlaw.com>
`Cc: Mark Siegmund <mark@swclaw.com>
`Subject: ParkerVision v. Realtek
`
`Mr. Mort:
`
`Please see the attached correspondence from Mark D. Siegmund.
`
`Thank you,
`
`JENN HARING
`PARALEGAL
`
`STECKLER WAYNE CHERRY & LOVE, PLLC
`8416 OLD MCGHEGOR ROAD
`
`WACO, TEXAS TH712
`754.651.3690
`
`254.651.3689 (fax)
`Wii. Siwclawcom
`
`