`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document111-5 Filed 07/12/24 Page 1 of 3
`
`EXHIBIT E
`
`EXHIBIT E
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 111-5 Filed 07/12/24 Page 2 of 3
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Zak Ellis
`Wang, Grace; PH-RLTK-PV-I; Ron Daignault; Chandran Iyer; Jason Charkow; Scott Samay; Stephanie Mandir; raymort@austinlaw.com; PV; Nguyen, Lisa K.
`Mark Siegmund; Thomas, Jerrice
`[EXT] RE: ParkerVision v. Realtek (No. 6:22-cv-01162) Realtek"s Notice of Subpoenas and Notice of Depo 30b6
`Wednesday, June 26, 2024 5:10:22 PM
`image001.png
`
`--- External Email ---
`
`
`
` Report Suspicious
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`For good cause, ParkerVision is moving for a protective order to forbid Realtek’s requested discovery from Intel. Please
`let us know by COB tomorrow if Realtek will withdraw its subpoena to resolve this dispute.
`
`Best,
`Zak
`
`
`
`From: Thomas, Jerrice <jerricethomas@paulhastings.com>
`Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 10:46 PM
`To: Ron Daignault <rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com>; Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com>; Jason Charkow
`<jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com>; Scott Samay <ssamay@daignaultiyer.com>; Stephanie Mandir <smandir@daignaultiyer.com>; Zak
`Ellis <zellis@daignaultiyer.com>; raymort@austinlaw.com; PV <PVLit@daignaultiyer.com>
`Cc: PH-RLTK-PV-I <PH-RLTK-PV-I@paulhastings.com>
`Subject: ParkerVision v. Realtek (No. 6:22-cv-01162) Realtek's Notice of Subpoenas and Notice of Depo 30b6
`
`
`Counsel,
`
`Please see the attached notices for service:
`
`
`Notice of Subpoena to Buffalo Inc.
`Notice of Subpoena to Intel Corporation
`Notice of Subpoena to Hisense International Corporation, Ltd.
`Defendant Realtek Semiconductor Corp.’s Notice of Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition of ParkerVision, Inc.
`
`
`
`Best Regards,
`
`Jerrice Thomas
`
`
`
`
`Jerrice Thomas | Specialist Paralegal
`Paul Hastings LLP | 2050 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Direct: +1.202.551.1201 |
`Main: +1.202.551.1700 | Fax: +1.202.551.1705 | jerricethomas@paulhastings.com |
`www.paulhastings.com
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`If you reply to this message, Paul Hastings may collect personal information including your name, business name
`and other contact details, and IP address. For more information about Paul Hastings’ information collection, privacy
`and security principles please click HERE. If you have any questions, please contact Privacy@paulhastings.com.
`This transmission, and any attached files, may contain information from the law firm of Daignault Iyer LLP which is
`confidential and/or legally privileged. Such information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this
`transmission is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
`distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmitted information is strictly prohibited, that
`copies of this transmission and any attached files should be deleted from your disk directories immediately, and that any
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 111-5 Filed 07/12/24 Page 3 of 3
`
`printed copies of this transmission or attached files should be returned to this firm. If you have received this transmission in
`error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail immediately, and we will arrange for the return to Daignault Iyer LLP of any
`printed copies.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
