`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 108 Filed 07/08/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`WESTERNDISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`WACO DIVISION
`
`ParkerVision,Inc.
`
`vs.
`
`Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
`
`Case No.: 6:22-cv-01162-ADA
`
`MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
`
`Comes now
`
`Austin J. Ciuffo
`
`, applicant herein, and
`
`movesthis Court to grant admission to the United States District Court for the Western District of
`
`Texas pro hac vice to represent ParkerVision,Inc.
`
`in this case, and
`
`would respectfully show the Court as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Applicant is an attorney and a memberofthe law firm (or practices under the nameof)
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`
`with officesat:
`
`Mailing address: 8229 Boone Boulevard, Suite 450
`City, State, Zip Code: Vienna, VA 22182
`
`Telephone:
`
`7047995641
`
`Facsimile:
`
`2.
`
`Since
`
`January 11, 2024
`
`, Applicant has been andpresentlyis a
`
`memberofandin goodstanding with the Bar ofthe State of Texas
`Applicant's bar license numberis 24139142
`
`3.
`
`Applicant has been admitted to practice before the following courts:
`
`Court:
`
`Eastern District of Texas
`
`Admissiondate:
`
`October 24, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 108 Filed 07/08/24 Page 2 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 108 Filed 07/08/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`Applicant is presently a memberin goodstanding ofthe bars of the courts listed above,
`
`except as provided below(list any court named in the preceding paragraph before which
`
`Applicant is no longer admitted to practice):
`
`have [ have not previously applied to Appear Pro Hac Vicein this district
`I
`court in Case[s]:
`Number: §:29-cv-00397-ADA
`
`on the 21 day of June
`
`2024
`
`
`Number: 7:22-cv-00244-ADA
`
`on the 2 day of August
`
`Number:
`
`onthe _—_—_— dayoof
`
`2023
`
`
`,
`
`Applicant has never been subject to grievance proceedings or involuntary removal
`
`proceedings while a memberofthe bar of any state or federal court, except as
`
`provided:
`
`Applicant has not been charged,arrested, or convicted of a criminal offense or offenses,
`
`except as provided below (omit minortraffic offenses):
`
`Applicant has read and is familiar with the Local Rules of the Western District of Texas
`
`and will comply with the standards ofpractice set out therein.
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 108 Filed 07/08/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`8th
`
`July
`
`2024
`
`
`
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 108 Filed 07/08/24 Page 4 of 4
`Case 6:22-cv-01162-ADA Document 108 Filed 07/08/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`WACODIVISION
`
`ParkerVision,Inc.
`
`VS.
`
`Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
`
`Case No.: 6:22-cv-01162-ADA
`
`ORDER
`
`BE IT REMEMBEREDonthis day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for
`
`Admission Pro Hac Vicefiled by Austin J. Ciuffo
`
`, counsel for
`
`ParkerVision,Inc.
`
`the following order:
`
`, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters
`
`IT IS ORDEREDthat the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED,and
`
`Austin J. Ciuffo
`
`in the above case.
`
`may appear on behalf of ParkerVision,Inc.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat Austin J. Ciuffo
`
`, if he/she
`
`has not already doneso, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S.
`
`District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2).
`
`SIGNEDthis the
`
`day of
`
`, 20
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
