throbber
Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 48 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`RFCYBER CORP.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`
`VISA U.S.A. INC,
`
`Defendants
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 6:22-cv-697-ADA
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`ORDER SEVERING AND STAYING CLAIMS OF THE ’009 PATENTS
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiffs RFCyber Corp. and Defendant Visa U.S.A. Inc.’s Joint
`
`Motion to Stay Litigation of the ’009 Patent Pending Any Appeals of Inter Partes Review
`
`Decisions (ECF No. 42).
`
`
`
`In the Joint Motion to Stay (ECF No. 42), the Parties note that in July 2022, the Patent Trial
`
`and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) instituted inter partes review (“IPR”) on two of the four asserted
`
`patents in this case. See Apple Inc. v. RFCyber Corp., IPR2022-00412 (IPR of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,189,787 (“’787 Patent”)); Apple Inc. v. RFCyber Corp., IPR2022-00413 (IPR of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,240,009 (“’009 Patent”)). On July 18, 2023, the PTAB found all claims of the ’009 Patent
`
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). On the same day, the PTAB held that petitioner Apple Inc.
`
`did not meet its burden to demonstrate that claims of the ’787 Patent were unpatentable. Plaintiff
`
`RFCyber Corp. has indicated it intends to appeal to the Federal Circuit the PTAB’s decision
`
`finding the ’009 Patent unpatentable.
`
`
`
`Noting that the Motion is joint, the Court is of the opinion it should be GRANTED.
`
`However, in order to promote judicial efficiency and to effectively distribute Court resources, the
`
`Court also believes the case should be severed with respect to litigation of the ’009 Patent. The
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 48 Filed 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`Court has informed both parties of its intention to sever the case via e-mail, and both parties
`
`informed the Court that neither had objections to this course of action.
`
`Therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to sever all infringement claims of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,240,009 against Visa U.S.A. Inc. In the severed case, the Clerk of Court is also directed to
`
`include all docket entries that existed on the original case. Further, in the severed case, litigation
`
`of the ’009 Patent is hereby stayed pending RFCyber’s appeal to the Federal Circuit of the PTAB’s
`
`July 18, 2023 decision finding the ’009 Patent unpatentable.
`
`The parties are further ORDERED to file a joint status report concerning their respective
`
`positions on whether any of the severed and stayed claims should be reinstated within 14 days
`
`from the latter of either (1) the completion of the last appeal (including any petitions for certiorari),
`
`or (2) the expiration of the period within which RFCyber Corp. must seek any such appeal. Id.
`
`SIGNED this 13th day of October, 2023.
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket