throbber
Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 46 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`RFCYBER CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`VISA U.S.A INC.,
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION

`

`Case No. 6:22-cv-00697-ADA

`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED


`






`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`In accordance with the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 27), Plaintiff RFCyber Corp. (“RFCyber”) and
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Defendant Visa U.S.A Inc. (“Visa”) submit this Joint Claim Construction Statement. Pursuant to the
`
`Standing Order Governing Proceedings (OGP) 4.3 – Patent Cases, an editable copy of this statement
`
`is being emailed to the Court’s law clerks.
`
`The Asserted Patents are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,448,855 (“the ’855 patent”) and 9,189,787 (“the
`
`’787 patent”).1
`
`I.
`Term
`“PIN”
`
`“e-purse” /
`“electronic purse”
`
`“e-purse applet”
`
`AGREED CONSTRUCTIONS
`Patent(s) and Claims
`’855 Patent, All Claims
`
`’855 Patent, All Claims
`’787 Patent, All Claims
`
`’855 Patent, All Claims
`’787 Patent, All Claims
`
`Agreed Construction
`“personal identification number”
`
`“software that stores electronic financial
`information in a local device”
`
`“applet for use with an e-purse”
`
`
`1 The parties have agreed to stay litigation as to U.S. Patent No. 9,240,009. To narrow the disputes
`before the Court and streamline the case, RFCyber has withdrawn its infringement allegations
`against Visa as to U.S. Patent No. 8,118,218, claims 6 and 15 of the ’855 patent, and claims 1-10
`and 13 of the ’787 patent.
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 46 Filed 10/05/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`“smart card pre-
`loaded with an
`emulator” / “a
`SmartMX (SMX)
`module pre-loaded
`with the emulator”
`“security
`authentication
`module” and “SAM”
`“emulator”
`
`’855 Patent, Claims 2 and 11
`
`
`“smart card with an emulator loaded prior to
`the smart card being provided” / “a
`SmartMX (SMX) module with an emulator
`loaded prior to the SMX being provided”
`
`’855 Patent, All Claims
`’787 Patent, Claim 16
`
`“hardware or software module containing
`data necessary to authenticate transactions”
`
`’855 Patent, All Claims
`’787 Patent, All Claims
`
`“a hardware device or a program that
`pretends to be another particular device or
`program that other components expect to
`interact with”
`
`The parties request that the Court enter the above agreed constructions.
`
`II.
`
`DISPUTED TERMS
`
`The parties provide the following list of disputed terms for construction.
`
`Term
`“fund” / “fund stored
`in the emulator”
`
`“fund” / “funded” /
`“funding”
`
`Patent(s) and Claims RFCyber’s Construction Visa’s Construction
`’855 Patent, Claim 9
`Plain and ordinary
`“money balance” /
`’787 Patent, Claim
`meaning except for
`“money balance stored
`11
`“emulator”
`in the emulator”
`’855 Patent, Claim 1,
`Plain and ordinary
`“add / added / adding
`4, and 13
`meaning
`money balance to”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 5, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /s/ Richard M. Cowell
`Raymond W. Mort, III
`Texas State Bar No. 00791308
`Email: raymort@austinlaw.com
`THE MORT LAW FIRM, PLLC
`100 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 46 Filed 10/05/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel/Fax: 512-865-7950
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Richard M. Cowell (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 4617759
`Email: rcowell@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Road, Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`RFCYBER CORP.
`
`
` /s/ James C. Yoon (with permission)
`James C. Yoon (CA State Bar No. 177155)
`jyoon@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Fax: (650) 493-6811
`
`Lucy Yen (NY State Bar No. 4871653)
`(pro hac vice)
`lyen@wsgr.com
`Cassie Black (NY State Bar No. 5599303)
`(pro hac vice)
`cblack@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
`New York, NY 10019-6022
`Telephone: (212) 999-5800
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 46 Filed 10/05/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`Fax: (212) 999-5899
`
`
`Jamie Y. Otto (CA State Bar No. 295099)
`(pro hac vice)
`jotto@wsgr.com
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`633 West Fifth St., Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (650) 849-3109
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`VISA U.S.A. INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00697-ADA Document 46 Filed 10/05/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned, an attorney, hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`document has been served on October 5, 2023, via the Court’s CM/ECF system on all counsel of
`
`record who have consented to electronic service.
`
`
`
`/s/ Richard M. Cowell
` Richard M. Cowell
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket