Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 1 of 14
`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 1 of 14
`
`EXHIBIT 12
`EXHIBIT 12
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 2 of 14
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`OZMO LICENSING LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`
`
`DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. and
`DELL INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 6:22-cv-00642-ADA
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Scheduling Order (D.I. 24), Defendants Dell Technologies Inc. and Dell
`
`Inc. (collectively “Dell”) identify the following extrinsic evidence relating to the terms proposed
`
`for construction for U.S Patent Nos. 9,264,991 (“’991 patent); 10,873,906 (“’906 patent);
`
`8,599,814 (“’814 patent); 11,012,934 (“’934 patent); 11,122,504 (“’504 patent”); and 11,252,659
`
`(“’659 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`Dell identifies the extrinsic evidence below in support of its positions and in response to
`
`those of Plaintiff Ozumo Licensing LLC, as best as they are understood at this time. This list is
`
`based on information currently available to Dell. Dell has not received Plaintiff’s extrinsic
`
`evidence, including any testimony supplied by its expert in support of its briefing. Dell therefore
`
`reserves the right to revise, amend, supplement, or subtract from this list of extrinsic evidence
`
`based on further discovery, Plaintiff’s extrinsic evidence, or to the extent the disputes and/or terms
`
`or issues change. Nothing in this submission shall be construed as an admission by Dell.
`
`Where applicable, Dell has identified the expert witness who will offer opinion testimony
`
`in support of Dell’s constructions. Dell reserves the right to rely on and respond to any expert
`
`testimony relied on or offered by Plaintiff. Dell reserves the right to offer and rely on rebuttal
`
`expert testimony to respond to any expert testimony relied on or offered by Plaintiff. Dell reserves
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 3 of 14
`
`the right to respond to and/or rely on the level of skill of a person of ordinary skill in the art as
`
`identified by Plaintiff.
`
`Dell’s proposed constructions for the proposed terms are as follows:
`
`Defendants’ Construction
`a wireless network with a
`typical coverage range on
`the order of 30 feet
`
`No.
`1.
`
`Claim Term
` WPAN (Defendants)
` wireless personal area network
`(“WPAN”) – ‘814 patent,
`claim 5
` wireless personal area network
`(“WPAN”) – ‘991 patent,
`claims 11-12, 19-20
` wireless personal area network
`(WPAN) – ‘934 and ‘504
`patent, all claims
` WPAN – ‘659 patent, all
`claims
` wireless personal area network
`(“WPAN”) – ‘906 patent, all
`claims
`Personal Area Network (Plaintiff)
` All patents
`
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Minal Mishra et al., “Wireless
`Multimedia Personal Area
`Networks: An Overview”,
`Emerging Wireless
`Multimedia: Services and
`Technologies (2005) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026020): including
`Section 6.1.
`
`Newton Telecom Dictionary
`(22nd ed. 2006) (defining
`“WPAN”, “Wireless Personal
`Area Network”, and
`“Wireless”) (DELL-OZMO-1-
`026608).
`
`Webster’s New World
`Computer Dictionary (10th ed.
`2003) (defining “Personal
`Area Network” and
`“Bluetooth”) (DELL-OZMO-
`1-026656).
`
`IEEE 802.15.1 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-002696), including:
`§§1.1; 6.1.2.1.
`
`IEEE 802.15.3 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-003991), including:
`§§1.1; 5.1; 8.4.3.6.
`
`IEEE 802.15.4 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-004315), including:
`§§1.1; 3.30.
`
`13/340,465 Prosecution
`History, including
`Amendment dated August 21,
`2013 (DELL-OZMO-1-
`022058)
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 4 of 14
`
`No.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Defendants’ Construction
`
`a wireless network with a
`typical coverage range on
`the order of 300 feet
`
`2.
`
` WLAN (Defendants)
` wireless local area network
`(“LAN”) – ‘814 patent, claim
`3
` wireless LAN – ‘991 patent,
`claims 3-5
` wireless local area network
`(“WLAN”) – ‘991 patent,
`claims 19-20
` wireless local area network
`(WLAN) – ‘934, 504 patent,
`all claims
` WLAN – ‘659 patent, all
`claims
` wireless local area network
`(“WLAN”) – ‘906 patent, all
`claims
`
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No.
`2005/0286474 to Zelst
`(DELL-OZMO-1-026630)
`
`Under the Scheduling Order
`(Dkt. 24), Dell hereby
`identifies Dr. Jim Proctor as
`an expert witness who may
`offer opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`Minal Mishra et al., “Wireless
`Multimedia Personal Area
`Networks: An Overview”,
`Emerging Wireless
`Multimedia: Services and
`Technologies (2005) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026020): including
`Section 6.4.
`
`Newton Telecom Dictionary
`(22nd ed. 2006) (defining
`“WLAN”, “Wireless LANS”,
`and “Wireless”) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026608).
`
`IEEE 802.11-1999 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-001793)
`
`IEEE 802.11a-1999 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-002321)
`
`IEEE 802.11b-1999 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-002411)
`
`IEEE 802.11g-2003 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-002565)
`
`IEEE 802.15.1 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-002696), including:
`§§6.1.2.1
`
`Under the Scheduling Order
`(Dkt. 24), Dell hereby
`identifies Dr. Jim Proctor as
`an expert witness who may
`offer opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 5 of 14
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`Indefinite
`
`
`Indefinite
`
`IEEE 802.11-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`001793)
`
`IEEE 802.11a-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002321)
`
`IEEE 802.11b-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002411)
`
`IEEE 802.11g-2003
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002565)
`
`IEEE 802.11n – 2009
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`026053)
`
`Wikipedia page for
`802.11n-2009. (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026589)
`
`IEEE 802.11n
`Development: History,
`Process, and Technology
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`026594)
`
`13/340,465 Prosecution
`History, including
`Rejection dated July 20
`2012 (DELL-OZMO-1-
`022058)
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term
`and why it is indefinite.
`Webster’s New World
`Computer Dictionary
`(10th ed. 2003) (defining
`
`802.11x (Defendants)
`
`‘814 patent, claim 4
`
`‘991 patent, claims 7-8,
`19-20
`‘934 and ‘504 patents,
`all claims
`‘659 patent, claim 13, 24
`‘906 patent, all claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`protocol (Defendants)
`all claims
`
`set of rules
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 6 of 14
`
`“protocol”) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026656).
`
`Newton Telecom
`Dictionary (22nd ed. 2006)
`(defining “protocol”)
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`026608).
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`
`a second set of rules that
`has elements that are
`reuses of elements of a
`first set of rules to
`provide one or more
`advantages
`
`
`“partially consistent”
`means “consistent with
`some but not all”
`
`“partially consistent, but
`not entirely consistent”
`means “consistent with
`some but not all”
`
`“partially compliant”
`means “complies with
`some but not all”
`
`“maintaining wireless
`network connections”
`means “performing the
`
`IEEE 802.11-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`001793)
`
`5.
`
`
`
`6.
`
`
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`overlay protocol (Plaintiff and
`Defendants)
`
`‘814 patent, all claims
`
`‘991 patent, all claims
`
`‘934 and 504 patents, all
`claims
`‘659 patent, claim 4
`‘906 patent, all claims
`
`
`
`
`
`partially consistent / partially
`compliant (Plaintiff and
`Defendants)
` partially consistent –
`‘814 patent, all claims
` partially consistent –
`‘991 patent, claims 1-7,
`9, 11-14, 16-17
` partially consistent, but
`not entirely consistent –
`‘991 patent, claims 19-
`20
` partially compliant –
`‘934 and 504 patents, all
`claims
` partially compliant –
`‘659 patent, all claims
` partially complaint –
`‘906 patent, all claims
`
`
`maintaining wireless network
`connections / maintain network
`connections / maintain the
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 7 of 14
`
`second network connection
`during a mutually agreeable
`inactivity period (Defendants)
` maintaining wireless
`network connections –
`‘814 patent, all claims
` maintain network
`connections – ‘991
`patent, all claims
` maintain the second
`network connection
`during a mutually
`agreeable inactivity
`period – ‘991 patent,
`claim 8
`
`
`
`acts and storing the
`information required by
`the protocols to maintain
`the wireless network
`connections”
`
`“maintain network
`connections” means
`“perform the acts and
`store the information
`required by the protocols
`to maintain the network
`connections”
`
`“maintain the second
`network connection
`during a mutually
`agreeable inactivity
`period” means “perform
`the acts and store the
`information required by
`the second protocol to
`maintain the second
`network connection
`during a mutually
`agreeable inactivity
`period”
`
`
`8.
`
`
`
`at least partially disable the
`wireless connection (Plaintiff
`and Defendants) / disable the
`second connection (Defendants)
`
`at least partially disable
`the wireless connection
`– ‘934 and ‘504 patents,
`claims 1-6
`
`indefinite, alternatively,
`
`“at least partially
`disable the
`wireless
`connection”
`means “at least
`partially stop
`performing the
`acts and at least
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`IEEE 802.11a-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002321)
`
`IEEE 802.11b-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002411)
`
`IEEE 802.11g-2003
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002565)
`
`IEEE 802.15.1(DELL-
`OZMO-1-002696),
`including: §§11.2.2;
`11.2.5; 11.2.6; 8.10;
`8.10.8.1; 8.10.8.2;
`8.10.8.3; 8.10.8.4;
`8.10.8.4.3; G.6.
`
`IEEE 802.15.3 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-003991),
`including: §§7.5.1.1; 8.2;
`8.3.4; 8.13.3; 5.3.10;
`8.13; 8.13.1; 8.13.2.
`
`IEEE 802.15.4 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-004315),
`including: §§5.4.5;
`7.5.1.1; 7.5.3; 7.5.4.3;
`5.4.1; 5.4.5; 5.4.5.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`IEEE 802.11-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`001793)
`
`IEEE 802.11a-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002321)
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 8 of 14
`
` disable the second
`connection – ‘659
`patent, claim 6
`at least partially disable
`the wireless connection
`– ‘906 patent, all claims
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partially delete
`the information
`required by the
`protocol to
`maintain the
`connection”
`“disable the
`second
`connection”
`means “stop
`performing the
`acts and delete
`the information
`required by the
`protocol to
`maintain the
`connection”
`
`9.
`
`
`
`10.
`
`
`
`disabling at least a part of the
`wireless radio circuit following a
`start of the inactivity time
`(Defendants)
`
`‘659 patent, claim 8
`
`
`
`turn off at least a part of
`the wireless radio circuit
`following a start of the
`inactivity time
`
`the disabling / the at least part is
`disabled (Defendants)
`
`‘934 and ‘504 patents,
`claim 2
`
`indefinite
`
`7
`
`IEEE 802.11b-1999
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002411)
`
`IEEE 802.11g-2003
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`002565)
`
`IEEE 802.15.1 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-002696),
`including: §§8.10;
`8.10.8.1; 8.10.8.2;
`8.10.8.3; 8.10.8.4;
`8.10.8.4.3; G.6; 11.2.2;
`11.2.5; 11.2.6.
`
`IEEE 802.15.3 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-003991),
`including: §§5.3.10; 8.13;
`8.13.1; 8.13.2; 7.5.1.1;
`8.2; 8.3.4; 8.13.3.
`
`IEEE 802.15.4 (DELL-
`OZMO-1-004315),
`including: §§5.4.1; 5.4.5;
`7.5.1.1; 5.4.5; 7.5.3;
`7.5.4.3.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term
`and why it is indefinite.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 9 of 14
`
`
`
`logic to coordinate a mutually
`agreeable inactivity period
`(Defendants)
`
`‘814 patent, claims 5, 11
`
`‘991 patent, claims 11-
`12, 20
`
`
`
`logic for data forwarding
`between an originating node that
`is a node in of one of the first
`and second networks and a
`destination node that is a node in
`of the other of the first and
`second networks, the logic for
`data forwarding including logic
`for processing a data packet
`from the originating node to
`identify an address of the
`destination node in the data
`packet and using that address to
`transmit data into the second
`network
`(Defendants)
`
`‘991 patent, claims 19-
`20
`
`
`
`a routing module for receiving a
`poll request that contains
`information required to
`unambiguously identify a station
`that is a node in the second
`network, wherein the routing
`module coordinates retrieval of
`
`8
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: coordinate a
`mutually agreeable
`inactivity period
`
`Structure: none /
`indefinite
`
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: data
`forwarding between an
`originating node that is a
`node in of one of the first
`and second networks and
`a destination node that is
`a node in of the other of
`the first and second
`networks, the logic for
`data forwarding including
`logic for processing a
`data packet from the
`originating node to
`identify an address of the
`destination node in the
`data packet and using that
`address to transmit data
`into the second network
`
`Structure: processing
`unit 28 executing an
`algorithm to read the IP
`address on incoming
`packets and forward the
`packets to that IP address
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: receiving a poll
`request that contains
`information required to
`unambiguously identify a
`station that is a node in
`
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term
`and why it is indefinite.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term
`and why it is indefinite.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`
`Minoli-Cordovana’s
`Authoritative Computer
`& Network Security
`Dictionary (2006)
`(defining “poll” and
`“polling”) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026602).
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 10 of 14
`
`information from the station
`(Defendants)
`
`‘814 patent, claim 2
`
`‘991 patent, claims 2,
`19-20
`
`
`
`the second network,
`wherein the routing
`module coordinates
`retrieval of information
`from the station
`
`Structure:
`Processing unit 28
`executing the algorithm
`at 7:66-8:7 and 8:11-14.
`
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`
`
`logic for uniquely identifying the
`destination node from data
`received from the originating
`node such that the network-
`enabled hub can use that data to
`transmit data into the second
`wireless network (Defendants)
`
`‘814 patent, claim 11
`
`
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: uniquely
`identifying the
`destination node from
`data received form the
`originating node such
`that the network-enabled
`hub can use that data to
`transmit data into the
`second wireless network
`
`Structure: processing
`unit 28 executing an
`algorithm to read the IP
`addresses of incoming
`packets and forward the
`packets to that IP address
`
`
`
`wherein the network-enabled
`hub and the device include logic,
`in one or both of the network-
`
`indefinite
`
`9
`
`
`The Penguin Dictionary
`of Electronics (4th ed.
`2005) (defining
`“polling”) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026622).
`
`Dictionary of Computing,
`Bloomsbury (5th ed.
`2004) (defining “poll”)
`(DELL-OZMO-1-
`026014).
`
`Newtons Telecom
`Dictionary (22nd ed. 2006)
`(defining “poll”) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026608).
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`Webster’s New World
`Computer Dictionary
`(10th ed. 2003) (defining
`“IP address”) (DELL-
`OZMO-1-026656).
`
`Dictionary of Computing,
`Bloomsbury (5th ed.
`2004) (defining “IP
`address”) (DELL-OZMO-
`1-026014).
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 11 of 14
`
`enabled hub and the device, for
`initiating device discovery by
`sending broadcast discovery
`requests on a pre-defined
`channel (Defendants)
`
`‘991 patent, claim 9
`
`
`wherein the network-enabled
`hub and the device further
`include logic, in one or both of
`the network-enabled hub and the
`device, for indicating
`characteristics and/or state of the
`network-enabled hub and/or
`device (Defendants)
`
`‘991 patent, claim 10
`
`
`configured to agree / can agree /
`mutually agreeable (Plaintiff)
` All patents
`
`
`first [wireless] network / second
`[wireless] network (Plaintiff)
`
`‘814 patent, ‘991 patent,
`and ‘659 patent
`
`
`logic for processing data
`received via the wireless radio
`circuit (Plaintiff)
`
`‘814 patent
`
`
`
`logic for generating data to be
`transmitted by the wireless radio
`circuit (Plaintiff)
`
`‘814 patent
`
`
`
`logic for initiating and
`maintaining wireless network
`connections with nodes of a
`wireless network external to the
`network-enabled hub,
`maintaining at least a first
`
`10
`
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term
`and why it is indefinite.
`
`Under the Scheduling
`Order (Dkt. 24), Dell
`hereby identifies Dr. Jim
`Proctor as an expert
`witness who may offer
`opinion testimony
`regarding the proper
`construction of this term
`and why it is indefinite.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`indefinite
`
`jointly determine
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: processing
`data received via the
`wireless radio circuit
`
`Structure: processing
`unit 28
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: processing
`data received via the
`wireless radio circuit
`
`Structure: processing
`unit 28
`
`Means-plus-function
`
`Function: initiating and
`maintaining wireless
`network connections with
`nodes of a wireless
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 12 of 14
`
`wireless network connection
`using a first wireless network
`protocol and a second wireless
`network connection using a
`second wireless network
`protocol, that can be maintained,
`at times, simultaneously with
`each other in a common wireless
`space (Plaintiff)
`
`‘814 patent
`
`
`22.
`
`
`
`data forwarding logic (Plaintiff)
`
`‘814 patent
`
`
`
`network external to the
`network-enabled hub,
`maintaining at least a first
`wireless network
`connection using a first
`wireless network protocol
`and a second wireless
`network connection using
`a second wireless
`network protocol, that
`can be maintained, at
`times, simultaneously
`with each other in a
`common wireless space
`
`Structure: wireless
`circuit 27, processing unit
`28, and software platform
`36
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`
`
`Dated: March 20, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian K. Erickson
`John M. Guaragna
`Texas Bar No 24043308
`Brian K. Erickson
`Texas Bar No. 24012594
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`303 Colorado St., Suite 3000
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel: 512.457.7125
`Fax: 512.457.7001
`john.guaragna@dlapiper.com
`brian.erickson@dlapiper.com
`
`Erin P. Gibson (admitted pro hac vice)
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100
`San Diego, CA 92121
`Telephone: 858.677.1400
`Facsimile: 858.677.1401
`Erin.gibson@us.dlapiper.com
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 13 of 14
`
`
`Christopher Deck (admitted pro hac vice)
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`33 Arch Street, 26th Floor
`Boston, MA 02110-1447
`Telephone: 617.406.6000
`Facsimile: 617.406.6100
`Christopher.deck@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Chris Katsantonis (admitted pro hac vice)
`DLA Piper LLP US
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: 312.368.2184
`Facsimile: 312.251.2884
`Chris.katsantonis@us.dlapiper.com\
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. and
`DELL INC.
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:22-cv-00642-ADA Document 32-12 Filed 03/31/23 Page 14 of 14
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on March 20, 2023, to all counsel of record via electronic mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian K. Erickson
`Brian K. Erickson
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`