Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 36
`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 36
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 36
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-955-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-1101-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-1104-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`AIRE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`AIRE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`AIRE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`REGARDING THE DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
`
`Plaintiff Aire Technology Limited (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”), Apple Inc. (“Apple”),
`
`and Google LLC (“Google”) (collectively, “Defendants”) anticipate that documents, testimony, or
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 3 of 36
`
`
`
`information containing or
`
`reflecting confidential, proprietary,
`
`trade secret, and/or
`
`commercially sensitive information are likely to be disclosed or produced during the course of
`
`discovery, initial disclosures, and supplemental disclosures in this case and request that the
`
`Court enter this Order setting forth the conditions for treating, obtaining, and using such
`
`information.
`
`Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds
`
`good cause for the following Agreed Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and Use of
`
`Discovery Materials (“Order” or “Protective Order”).
`
`1.
`
`PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
`
`(a)
`
`Protected Material designated under the terms of this Protective Order shall
`
`be used by a Receiving Party solely for this case, and shall not be used directly or indirectly for
`
`any other purpose whatsoever.
`
`(b)
`
`To the extent that any one of Defendants in this litigation provides Protected
`
`Material under the terms of this Protective Order to Plaintiff, Plaintiff shall not share that material
`
`with the other Defendants in this litigation, absent express written permission from the producing
`
`Defendant. This Order does not confer any right to any one Defendant to access the Protected
`
`Material of any other Defendant.
`
`(c)
`
`The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections
`
`on all disclosures during discovery, or in the course of making initial or supplemental disclosures
`
`under Rule 26(a). Designations under this Order shall be made with care and shall not be made
`
`absent a good faith belief that the designated material satisfies the criteria set forth below. If it
`
`comes to a Producing Party’s attention that designated material does not qualify for protection at
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 4 of 36
`
`
`
`all, or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, the Producing Party must
`
`promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing or changing the designation.
`
`2.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`(a)
`
`“Discovery Material” means all items or information, including from any
`
`non-party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among
`
`other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced, disclosed, or generated
`
`in connection with discovery or Rule 26(a) disclosures in this case.
`
`(b)
`
` “Outside Expert” or “Consultant” means (i) an outside expert or consultant
`
`retained to assist Outside Counsel in this action and (ii) the outside expert’s or consultant’s direct
`
`reports and other support personnel, such that the disclosure to an expert or consultant who
`
`employs others within his or her firm to help in his or her analysis shall count as a disclosure to a
`
`single consultant or expert. Such direct reports and other support personnel also must separately
`
`meet the criteria set forth in Section 8(b)(iii) and separately agree to be bound by the provisions of
`
`the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A.
`
`(c)
`
`“Outside Counsel” means (i) outside counsel who appear on the pleadings
`
`as counsel for a Party and (ii) partners, associates, and staff of such counsel to whom it is
`
`reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation.
`
`(d)
`
`“Patents-in-suit” means U.S. Patent Nos. 8,581,706; 8,205,249; 8,174,360;
`
`and—for Google and Samsung—8,816,827, as well as any other patent asserted in this action, as
`
`well as any related patents, patent applications, provisional patent applications, continuations,
`
`and/or divisionals.
`
`(e)
`
` “Party” means any party to this case, including all of its officers, directors,
`
`employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel and their support staffs.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 5 of 36
`
`
`
`(f)
`
`“Producing Party” means any Party or non-party that discloses or produces
`
`any Discovery Material in this case.
`
`(g)
`
`“Protected Material” means any Discovery Material that is designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL
`
`- OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE,” as provided for in this Order.
`
`Protected Material shall not include: (i) advertising materials that have been actually published or
`
`publicly disseminated; and (ii) materials that show on their face they have been disseminated to
`
`the public.
`
`(h)
`
`“Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery Material from
`
`a Producing Party.
`
`(i)
`
` “Source Code” means computer code, scripts, assembly, binaries, object
`
`code, source code listings (e.g., file names and path structure), descriptions of source code (e.g.,
`
`descriptions of declarations, functions, and parameters), object code listings and descriptions of
`
`object code, Hardware Description Language (HDL) or Register Transfer Level (RTL) files that
`
`describe the hardware design of any ASIC or other chip, and Computer Aided Design (CAD) files
`
`that describe the hardware design of any component.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPUTATION OF TIME
`
`The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Order shall be
`
`governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6.
`
`4.
`
`SCOPE
`
`(a)
`
`The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Discovery Material
`
`governed by this Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied or extracted
`
`therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony,
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 6 of 36
`
`
`
`conversations, or presentations by Parties or their counsel in court or in other settings that might
`
`reveal Protected Material.
`
`(b)
`
`Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s
`
`own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and nothing in this Order
`
`shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Protected Material to an individual who
`
`prepared the Protected Material.
`
`(c)
`
`Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to
`
`use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the Producing Party
`
`or by order of the Court.
`
`(d)
`
`This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or
`
`additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Order in any way, including,
`
`without limitation, an order that certain matter not be produced at all.
`
`5.
`
`
`
`DURATION
`
`Even after the termination of this case, the confidentiality obligations imposed by
`
`this Order shall remain in effect until a Producing Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order
`
`otherwise directs.
`
`6.
`
`ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
`
`(a)
`
` Basic Principles. All Protected Material shall be used solely for this case
`
`or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever, including without
`
`limitation any other litigation, patent prosecution or acquisition, patent reexamination or reissue
`
`proceedings, or any business or competitive purpose or function. Protected Material shall not be
`
`distributed, disclosed or made available to anyone except as expressly provided in this Order.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 7 of 36
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`Patent Prosecution and Acquisition Bar. Absent the written consent of the
`
`Producing Party, any person on behalf of the Plaintiff who receives one or more items designated
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” by a Defendant shall not be involved, directly
`
`or indirectly, in any of the following activities: (i) advising on, consulting on, preparing,
`
`prosecuting, drafting, editing, and/or amending of patent applications, specifications, claims,
`
`and/or responses to office actions, or otherwise affecting the scope of claims in patents or patent
`
`applications relating to the functionality, operation, and design of NFC, RFID, and mobile payment
`
`technologies (generally or as described in any Patents-in-suit), before any foreign or domestic
`
`agency, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and (ii) the acquisition of patents
`
`(including patent applications), or the rights to any such patents or patent applications with the
`
`right to sublicense, relating to the functionality, operation, and design of NFC, RFID, and mobile
`
`payment technologies. For the avoidance of doubt, these prohibitions are not intended to and shall
`
`not preclude counsel from participating in proceedings or assisting in proceedings on behalf of a
`
`Party challenging or defending the validity of any patent before a domestic or foreign tribunal
`
`(including but not limited to, inter alia, a reissue proceeding, ex parte reexamination, inter partes
`
`reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review, or covered business method review)
`
`provided that they do not advise on, consult on, prepare, draft, or edit any amendment to
`
`specifications or claims in or based on those proceedings. These prohibitions shall begin when
`
`access to “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” materials are first received by the affected
`
`individual, and shall end 18 months after the final resolution of this action, including all appeals.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 6
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 8 of 36
`
`
`
`(c)
`
`Secure Storage, No Export. Protected Material must be stored and
`
`maintained by a Receiving Party at a location in the United States and in a secure manner that
`
`ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. To ensure compliance
`
`with applicable United States Export Administration Regulations, Protected Material may not be
`
`exported outside the United States or released to any “Foreign Person” (even if within the United
`
`States), as that term is defined in the United States Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”).
`
`Each Party shall be responsible for its own compliance with Export Control Laws and Regulations
`
`including but not limited to the EAR. For the avoidance of doubt, the definitions of “U.S.
`
`Person(s)” and “Foreign Person(s)” in the EAR shall apply to this Protective Order in determining
`
`the status of an individual.
`
`(d)
`
`Legal Advice Based on Protected Material. Nothing in this Protective Order
`
`shall be construed to prevent counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case based in
`
`whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided counsel does not disclose the Protected
`
`Material itself except as provided in this Order.
`
`(e)
`
`Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way a Producing
`
`Party’s use or disclosure of its own Protected Material. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any
`
`way the use or disclosure of Discovery Material by a Receiving Party: (i) that is or has become
`
`publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (ii) that is lawfully acquired by or known
`
`to the Receiving Party independent of the Producing Party; (iii) previously produced, disclosed,
`
`and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an
`
`obligation of confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (iv) with the consent of the
`
`Producing Party; or (v) pursuant to order of the Court.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 7
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 9 of 36
`
`
`
`(f)
`
`Cross-Production of Defendant Confidential Material. No Defendant is
`
`required to produce its Protected Material to any other Defendant or Defendants, but nothing in
`
`this Order shall preclude such production. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Protective Order,
`
`Plaintiff shall not disclose one Defendant’s Protected Material to any other Defendant or
`
`Defendants through Court filings, oral argument in Court, expert reports, deposition, discovery
`
`requests, discovery responses, or any other means, without the express prior written consent of the
`
`Defendant that produced the Protected Material.
`
`7.
`
`DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
`
`(a)
`
`Available Designations. Any Producing Party may designate Discovery
`
`Material with any of the following designations, provided that it meets the requirements for such
`
`designations as provided for herein: “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE
`
`CODE.”
`
`(b) Written Discovery and Documents and Tangible Things. Written
`
`discovery, documents (which include “electronically stored information,” as that phrase is used in
`
`Federal Rule of Procedure 34), and tangible things that meet the requirements for the
`
`confidentiality designations listed in Paragraph 7(a) may be so designated by placing the
`
`appropriate designation on every page of the written material prior to production. For digital files
`
`being produced, the Producing Party may mark each viewable page or image with the appropriate
`
`designation, and mark the medium, container, and/or communication in which the digital files were
`
`contained. In the event that original documents are produced for inspection, the original
`
`documents shall be presumed “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” during the
`inspection and re-designated, as appropriate, during the copying process.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 10 of 36
`
`
`
`(c)
`
`Native Files. Where electronic files and documents are produced in native
`
`electronic format, such electronic files and documents shall be designated for protection under this
`
`Order by appending to the file names or designators information indicating whether the file
`
`contains
`
` “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE,” material, or
`
`shall use any other reasonable method for so designating Protected Materials produced in
`
`electronic format. When electronic files or documents are printed for use at deposition, in a court
`
`proceeding, or for provision in printed form to a pre-approved expert or consultant, the party
`
`printing the electronic files or documents shall affix a legend to the printed document
`
`corresponding to the designation of the Designating Party and including the production number
`
`and designation associated with the native file.
`
`(d)
`
`Depositions and Testimony. Parties or testifying persons or entities may
`
`designate depositions and other testimony with the appropriate designation by indicating on the
`
`record at the time the testimony is given or by sending written notice of how portions of the transcript
`
`of the testimony is designated within thirty (30) days of receipt of the transcript of the testimony.
`
`If no indication on the record is made, all information disclosed during a deposition shall be
`
`deemed “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” until the time within which it may
`
`be appropriately designated as provided for herein has passed. Any Party that wishes to disclose
`
`the transcript, or information contained therein, may provide written notice of its intent to treat the
`
`transcript as non-confidential, after which time, any Party that wants to maintain any portion of
`
`the transcript as Protected Material must provide designations within ten (10) days or an otherwise
`
`agreed-upon date or else the transcript may be treated as non-confidential. Any Protected Material
`
`that is used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to the provisions of this Protective
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 9
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 11 of 36
`
`
`
`Order, along with the transcript pages of the deposition testimony relating to such Protected
`
`Material. In such cases the court reporter shall be informed of this Protective Order and shall be
`
`required to operate in a manner consistent with this Protective Order. In the event the deposition
`
`is videotaped, the original and all copies of the videotape shall be marked by the video technician
`
`to indicate that the contents of the videotape are subject to this Protective Order, substantially along
`
`the lines of “This videotape contains confidential testimony used in this case and is not to be
`
`viewed or the contents thereof to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to the terms of the
`
`operative Protective Order in this matter or pursuant to written stipulation of the parties.”
`
`Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the right to exclude from oral depositions, other
`
`than the deponent, deponent’s counsel, the reporter and videographer (if any), any person who
`
`is not authorized by this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material based on the
`
`designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable only during
`
`periods of examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material.
`
`8.
`
`DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “CONFIDENTIAL”
`
`(a)
`
`A Producing Party may
`
`designate Discovery Material
`
`as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” if it contains or reflects confidential, proprietary, and/or commercially
`
`sensitive information.
`
`(b)
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” may be disclosed only to the following:
`
`(i)
`
`The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, such counsel’s immediate
`
`paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support services working at the direction
`
`of such counsel, paralegals, and staff;
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 10
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 12 of 36
`
`
`
`(ii)
`
`Not more than three (3) representatives of the Receiving Party who
`
`are officers or employees of the Receiving Party, who may be, but need not be, in-house counsel
`
`for the Receiving Party, as well as their immediate paralegals and staff, to whom disclosure is
`
`reasonably necessary for this case, provided that: (a) each such person has agreed to be bound by
`
`the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; and (b) no unresolved
`
`objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as set forth
`
`in Paragraph 12 below;
`
`(iii) Any Outside Expert or Consultant retained by the Receiving Party
`
`to assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such
`
`work; and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions
`
`of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a
`
`current officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the
`
`time of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a
`
`Party; (c) such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States only, and does not
`
`transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction; and (d) no unresolved objections
`
`to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as set forth in Paragraph
`
`12 below. Without the express prior written consent of the Defendant that produced the Protected
`
`Material, no expert or consultant retained by a Defendant in this matter shall have access to
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Discovery Material produced by another
`
`Defendant in this matter;
`
`(iv) Court reporters, stenographers, and videographers retained to record
`
`testimony taken in this action;
`
`(v)
`
`The Court, jury, and court personnel;
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 11
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 13 of 36
`
`
`
`(vi) Graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel,
`
`having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of
`
`Exhibit A;
`
`(vii) Mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing
`
`not to publicly disclose Protected Material and to keep any information concerning Protected
`
`Material confidential;
`
`(viii) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her
`
`staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this
`
`Protective Order; and
`
`(ix) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing
`
`Party.
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`
`DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`
`(a)
`
`A Producing Party may
`
`designate Discovery Material
`
`as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if it contains or reflects information that is
`
`extremely confidential and/or sensitive in nature and the Producing Party reasonably believes that
`
`the disclosure of such Discovery Material is likely to cause economic harm or significant
`
`competitive disadvantage to the Producing Party. The Parties agree that the following information,
`
`if non-public, shall be presumed to merit the “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`
`designation: trade secrets, pricing information, financial data, sales information, sales or
`
`marketing forecasts or plans, business plans, sales or marketing strategy, product development
`
`information, engineering documents, testing documents, employee information, and other non-
`
`public information of similar competitive and business sensitivity.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 12
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 14 of 36
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” may be disclosed only to:
`
`(i)
`
`The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, provided that such Outside
`
`Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States,
`
`730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party, and such
`
`Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support
`
`services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff;
`
`(ii) Any Outside Expert or Consultant retained by the Receiving Party
`
`to assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such
`
`work; and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions
`
`of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current
`
`officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time
`
`of retention to become an officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party;
`
`(c) such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S.
`
`Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a
`
`competitor of a Party; (d) such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States
`
`only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction; and (e) no
`
`unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given to all Parties as
`
`set forth in Paragraph 12 below. Without the express prior written consent of the Defendant that
`
`produced the Protected Material, no expert or consultant retained by a Defendant in this matter
`
`shall have access to “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Discovery
`
`Material produced by another Defendant in this matter;
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 13
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 15 of 36
`
`
`
`(iii) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record
`
`testimony taken in this action;
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`The Court, jury, and court personnel;
`
`Graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel,
`
`having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of
`
`Exhibit A;
`
`(vi) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her
`
`staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this
`
`Protective Order; and
`
`Party.
`
`(vii) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing
`
`(c)
`
`In addition, a Party may disclose arguments and materials derived from
`
`Discovery Material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to mock
`
`jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing not to publicly disclose Protected
`
`Material and to keep any information concerning Protected Material confidential. A Party may
`
`not disclose to mock jurors any original, as-produced materials or information (including, for
`
`example, documents, deposition testimony, or interrogatory responses) produced by another Party
`
`designated as “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`
`10.
`
`DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE”
`
`(a)
`
`To the extent production of Source Code becomes necessary to the
`
`prosecution or defense of the case, a Producing Party may designate Source Code as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” if it comprises
`
`or includes confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret Source Code.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 14
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 16 of 36
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a representation or admission
`
`that Source Code is properly discoverable in this action, or to obligate any Party to produce any
`
`Source Code.
`
`(c)
`
`Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Discovery Material designated as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” shall be
`
`subject to the provisions set forth in Paragraph 11 below, and may be disclosed, subject to
`
`Paragraph 11 below, solely to:
`
`(i)
`
`The Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel, provided that such Outside
`
`Counsel is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States,
`
`730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party, and such
`
`Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support
`
`services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff;
`
`(ii)
`
`Any Outside Expert or Consultant retained by the Receiving Party
`
`to assist in this action, provided that disclosure is only to the extent necessary to perform such
`
`work; and provided that: (a) such expert or consultant has agreed to be bound by the provisions of
`
`the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A; (b) such expert or consultant is not a current
`
`officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time
`
`of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party; (c)
`
`such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel
`
`v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of
`
`a Party; and (d) no unresolved objections to such disclosure exist after proper notice has been given
`
`to all Parties as set forth in Paragraph 12 below. Without the express prior written consent of the
`
`Defendant that produced the Protected Material, no expert or consultant retained by a Defendant
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 15
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 17 of 36
`
`
`
`in this matter shall have access to “CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`- SOURCE CODE” Discovery Material produced by another Defendant in this matter;
`
`(iii) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record
`
`testimony taken in this action;
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`The Court, jury, and court personnel;
`
`Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her
`
`staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this
`
`Protective Order; and
`
`Party.
`
`(vi) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing
`
`11. DISCLOSURE AND REVIEW OF SOURCE CODE
`
`(a)
`
`Any Source Code that is produced by Plaintiff shall be made available for
`
`inspection in electronic format at the Los Angeles office of its outside counsel, Russ August &
`
`Kabat, or any other location mutually agreed by the Parties. Any Source Code that is produced
`
`by Apple will be made available for inspection at the East Palo Alto office of its outside counsel,
`
`Ropes & Gray LLP, or any other location mutually agreed by the Parties. Any source code that is
`
`produced by Samsung will be made available for inspection at the Washington, D.C. office of its
`
`outside counsel, Fish & Richardson P.C., or any other location mutually agreed by the Parties.
`
`Any source code that is produced by Google will be made available for inspection at the Palo Alto
`
`office of its outside counsel, Paul Hastings LLP, or any other location mutually agreed by the
`
`Parties. Source Code will be made available for inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.
`
`on business days (i.e., weekdays that are not Federal holidays), although the Parties will be
`
`reasonable in accommodating reasonable requests to conduct inspections at other times.
`
`AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER – PAGE 16
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-01101-ADA Document 29-1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 18 of 36
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`Prior to the first inspection of any requested Source Code, the Receiving
`
`Party shall provide fourteen (14) days notice of the Source Code that it wishes to inspect. The
`
`Receiving Party shall provide three (3) business days notice prior to any additional inspections.
`
`(c)
`
`Source Code
`
`that
`
`is designated “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE” shall be produced for inspection and review
`
`subject to the following provisions, unless otherwise agreed by the Producing Party:
`
`(i)
`
`All Source Code shall be made available by the Producing Party to
`
`the Receiving Party’s outside counsel and/or experts in a secure room on a secured computer
`
`without Internet access or network access to other computers and on which all access ports have
`
`been disabled (except for one printer port), as necessary and appropriate to prevent and protect
`
`against any unauthorized copying, transmission, removal or other transfer of any Source Code
`
`outside or away from the computer on which the Source Code is provided for inspection (the
`
`“Source Code Computer” in the “Source Code Review Room”). The Producing Party shall install
`
`tools that are sufficient for viewing and searching the code produced, on the platform produced, if
`
`such tools exist and are presently used in the ordinary course of the Producing Party’s business.
`
`The Receiving Party’s outside counsel and/or experts may request that commercially available
`
`software tools for viewing and searching Source Code be installed on the secured computer,
`
`provided, however, that (a) the Receiving Party pos