Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 8
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`§
`
`§
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG
`§
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`
`RFCYBER CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`§
`
`§
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG
`§
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`§
`§
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`
`RFCYBER CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`In accordance with the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 29), Plaintiff RFCyber Corp. (“RFCyber”)
`
`and Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) submit this Joint Claim Construction Statement. Pursuant to
`
`the Standing Order Governing Proceedings (OGP) 4.1 – Patent Cases, an editable copy of this
`
`statement is being emailed to the Court’s law clerks.
`
`The Asserted Patents are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,118,218 (“the ’218 patent”); 8,448,855 (“the
`
`’855 patent”); 9,189,787 (“the ’787 patent”); 9,240,009 (“the ’009 patent”); 10,600,046 (“the ’046
`
`patent”); and 11,018,724 (“the ’724 patent”).
`
`I.
`
`AGREED CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`Term
`
`“emulator”
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 3, 6, 11-12, 14
`’855 patent, claims 1-2, 5-6, 9, 11, 14-15
`’787 patent, claims 1, 3, 10-11, 13, 16
`
`“payment gateway”
`
`’046 patent, claim 1
`
`“emulator device”
`
`’724 patent, claims 1, 3, 8
`
`“payment server”
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 3, 5, 7-8, 11, 14-16
`
`“security authentication module” / “SAM”
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 3, 11, 14
`’855 patent, claims 1, 9
`’787 patent, claims 6, 16
`
`
`“smart card”/“smart card module”/“card
`module”
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“hardware device or program that pretends to be
`another particular device or program that other
`components expect to interact with”
`
`“server or collection of servers for settling a
`
`payment”
`
`“hardware device, alone or containing software,
`that pretends to be another particular device or
`program that other components expect to interact
`with”
`“server for enabling payments”
`
`“hardware or software module containing data to
`authenticate transactions”
`
`No construction necessary; plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 11-12
`’855 patent, claims 1-3, 9-12
`’787 patent, claims 1, 6, 8-9, 11, 16, 18-19
`
`“smart card pre-loaded with the emulator”
`
`
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 11
`
`“midlet”
`
`
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 5, 7-8, 11, 15-16
`’855 patent, claims 1, 9
`’787 patent, claims 1, 10
`
`“personalization”/”personalizing”
`
`
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 4-6, 11-12
`’855 patent, claims 1, 3, 9, 12
`’787 patent, claims 1-2, 6-7, 11-12, 16-17
`’009 patent, claims 6-7, 17
`
`“security channel” / “secured channel”
`
`
`
`’218 patent, claims 1, 3, 11, 14
`’855 patent, claims 1, 4, 9, 13
`’787 patent, claims 1, 2, 6, 11, 12, 16
`’009 patent, claims 1, 4, 14
`’724 patent, claims 1, 8
`
`
`
`No construction necessary; plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`No construction necessary; plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`No construction necessary; plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`No construction necessary; plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties request that the Court enter the above agreed constructions.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`II.
`
`DISPUTED TERMS
`
`The parties provide the following list of disputed terms for construction.
`
`RFCyber’s Construction
`
`Apple’s Construction
`
`“software that stores electronic
`financial information in a local
`device”
`
`“software that stores electronic
`financial information, including
`electronic value, in a local
`portable device”
`
`No construction necessary other
`than “e-purse”
`
`Alternatively, “applet for use with
`an e-purse”
`
`“[applet] software that stores
`electronic financial information,
`including electronic value, in a
`local portable device”
`
`
`
`Term
`
`“e-purse”
`“electronic purse”
`’218 patent, claims 1,
`3, 5, 7, 10-11, 14-15,
`18
`
`’855 patent, claims 1,
`3-5, 9, 12-14
`
`’787 patent, claims 1,
`3, 11, 13
`
`’009 patent, claim 3
`
`’046 patent, claim 1
`
`Proposed by both
`parties
`“e-purse applet”
`
`’218 patent, claims 1,
`3-7, 11-12, 14-15
`
`’855 patent, claims 1,
`3-4, 6, 9, 12-13, 15
`
`’787 patent, claims 1-
`2, 5-6, 11-12, 15-16
`
`Proposed by Apple
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`Term
`
`RFCyber’s Construction
`
`Apple’s Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning, no
`construction necessary
`
`
`“software program suitable for
`being executed on a portable
`device”
`
`Alternatively, “software program
`suitable for being executed”
`
`“application”
`
`’787 patent, claims 1,
`11
`
`’009 patent, claims 1-
`4, 6, 9, 13-14
`
`’046 patent, claim 1
`
`’724 patent, claims 1,
`3, 7, 8
`
`Proposed by Apple
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`Dated: June 10, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /s/ Richard M. Cowell
`Raymond W. Mort, III
`Texas State Bar No. 00791308
`Email: raymort@austinlaw.com
`THE MORT LAW FIRM, PLLC
`100 Congress Avenue, Suite 2000
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel/Fax: 512-865-7950
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com
`Peter Lambrianakos (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com
`Richard M. Cowell (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`NY Bar No. 4617759
`Email: rcowell@fabricantllp.com
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
`Suite 206 South
`Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (212) 257-5797
`Facsimile: (212) 257-5796
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`RFCYBER CORP.
`
`
`/s/ Zachary Loney (with permission)
`John M. Guaragna (Bar No. 24043308)
`Zachary Loney (Bar No. 24092714)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, TX 78701
`Telephone: (512) 457-7000
`Facsimile: (512) 457-7001
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`john.guaragna@us.dlapiper.com
`zachary.loney@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Sean Cunningham (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Erin Gibson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Peter Maggiore (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: (619) 699-2700
`Facsimile: (619) 699-2701
`sean.cunningham@us.dlapiper.com
`erin.gibson@us.dlapiper.com
`peter.maggiore@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Stephanie Lim (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 368-4000
`Facsimile: (312) 630-7408
`stephanie.lim@us.dlapiper.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00916-ADA-DTG Document 68 Filed 06/10/22 Page 8 of 8
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on June 10, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of
`
`Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing via electronic mail to
`
`all counsel of record. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class U.S. mail.
`
`
`
` /s/ Richard M. Cowell
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
