`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 6:21-cv-00667-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ROBERT W. UNIKEL IN SUPPORT OF THE REPLY
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE LLC’S
`OPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 59-1 Filed 05/13/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`I, Robert W. Unikel, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney with the law firm Paul Hastings LLP and counsel for Defendant
`
`Google LLC (“Google”). I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in the declaration and,
`
`if called upon to do so, I could and would testify competently to the matters set forth herein.
`
`2.
`
`During venue discovery in this case, VoIP-Pal asked Google to provide
`
`“[d]ocuments sufficient to show Google’s organizational structure[.]” After meeting and
`
`conferring to resolve disputes, Google produced charts indicating direct reports of certain
`
`individuals as well as who those individuals report to.
`
`3.
`
`In VoIP-Pal’s responses and objections
`
`to Google LLC’s venue-related
`
`interrogatories, in response to an interrogatory asking for the “Percentage of Time at Office
`
`Location” that Mr. Kevin Williams spends in Waco, Texas, VoIP-Pal responded “[p]art time in
`
`Waco office[.]”
`
`4.
`
`In Google’s February 28, 2022 objections and responses to VoIP-Pal’s
`
`interrogatories for venue purposes, Google repeatedly confirmed that
`
` being
`
`
`
`
`
` with the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a Liberty Virtual Office
`
`Application signed on behalf of VoIP-Pal.Com Inc. on May 15, 2020 as produced to Defendant
`
`bearing Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000031–33.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 59-1 Filed 05/13/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a Liberty Virtual Office
`
`Application signed on behalf of VoIP-Pal.Com Inc. on May 15, 2020 as produced to Defendant
`
`bearing Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000034–36.
`
`7.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of VoIP-Pal’s Initial
`
`Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) served in Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless et
`
`al., v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-05275 (N. D. Cal.), dated October 7, 2021, as produced to
`
`Defendant bearing Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000009–15, which states on page 4 that VoIP-
`
`Pal maintains certain documents in Mountain View, CA.
`
`8.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of VoIP-Pal’s Initial
`
`Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) served in AT&T Corp. et al., v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., No.
`
`3:21-cv-05078 (N.D. Cal.), dated October 7, 2021, as produced to Defendant bearing Bates
`
`numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000016–23, which states on page 4 that VoIP-Pal maintains certain
`
`documents in Mountain View, CA.
`
`9.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of VoIP-Pal’s Initial
`
`Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) served in Apple Inc., v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., No. 3:21-
`
`cv-05110 (N.D. Cal.), dated October 7, 2021, as produced to Defendant bearing Bates numbers
`
`VOP-GOOGLE0000024–30, which states on page 4 that VoIP-Pal maintains certain documents
`
`in Mountain View, CA.
`
`10.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of an agreement between
`
`VoIP-Pal and Business Legal Management LLC dated June 10, 2019, as produced to Defendant
`
`bearing Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000001–4.
`
`
`
`2
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 59-1 Filed 05/13/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of an agreement between
`
`VoIP-Pal and Business Legal Management LLC dated February 18, 2019, as produced to
`
`Defendant bearing Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000005–8.
`
`12.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a document entitled
`
`“Business Legal Management + VoIP-Pal Introduction of Principals” dated January 21, 2019, as
`
`produced to Defendant bearing Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000037–42.
`
`13.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of an agreement between
`
`VoIP-Pal and Intellion Analytics Group dated February 8, 2019, as produced to Defendant bearing
`
`Bates numbers VOP-GOOGLE0000058–62.
`
`14. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi was referred to actions concerning VoIP-
`
`Pal and its patent portfolio with the following N.D. Cal. case numbers, according to their headers
`
`and/or dockets on Docket Navigator: 5:18-cv-06217; 5:18-cv-06054; 5:18-cv-06177; 5:18-cv-
`
`04523; 5:18-cv-07020; 5:18-cv-06216; 5:20-cv-02460; 5:20-cv-03092; 5:20-cv-02995; 3:20-cv-
`
`02397; and 3:21-cv-09773.
`
`15.
`
`The Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless et al., v. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc., No.
`
`3:21-cv-05275 (N. D. Cal.) and Twitter, Inc. v. VoIP-Pal.Com, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-09773 (N. D.
`
`Cal.) cases relate to U.S. Patent Nos. 10,880,721 and 8,630,234 and are actively presided over by
`
`Judge James Donato.
`
`16.
`
`Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of a webpage from Lex Machina regarding
`
`Judge Alan D. Albright.
`
`17.
`
`Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of a webpage from Lex Machina regarding
`
`Judge James Donato.
`
`
`
`3
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 59-1 Filed 05/13/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of a webpage from Lex Machina regarding
`
`Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6th
`
`day of May in Chicago, Illinois.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Robert W. Unikel
`Robert W. Unikel
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`