throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 8
`
`Exhibit 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.eom
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CASBN 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`V.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
`UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`
`i 2 3 4 5 6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`ll
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2 0
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`l
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOQ24
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”), by and through its counsel, provides the
`following initial disclosures to Plaintiff Apple, Inc. under Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`Procedure. These disclosures are made to the best of VoIP-Pal’s ability and are based on the
`information reasonably available to VoIP-Pal or in its possession as of this date, following a good
`faith inquiry in accordance with Rule 26. VoIP-Pal’s investigation of possible witnesses and
`documents is ongoing. VoIP-Pal thus reserves the right to supplement, amend, or correct these
`disclosures in accordance with Rule 26(e) and as otherwise allowed by the Court or any applicable
`rules, to produce additional information and to rely on such information as evidence in this action.
`These disclosures are made without waiver of, or prejudice to, any objection VoIP-Pal may have
`regarding the subject matter of these disclosures, persons identified, or any documents or information
`identified, including but not limited to: (1) relevance; (2) any applicable privilege, including but not
`limited to attorney-client privilege; (3) work product protection; (4) the admissibility in evidence ot
`these disclosures and any information disclosed herein; (5) objections based on confidential,
`proprietary, and/or trade secret materials or information of VoIP-Pal or any third parties; or (6)
`objections regarding the use at trial of any of the information disclosed in this document or any
`document or thing produced pursuant to Rule 26. VoIP-Pal reserves all objections. The inclusion ot
`any individual’s identity or the identification or production of any document or document category
`does not constitute an agreement or concession that the individual will be produced or that the
`documents exist or are discoverable.
`
`I. RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(i): INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE
`INFORMATION THAT VOIP-PAL MAY USE TO SUPPORT ITS CLAIMS OR
`DEFENSES
`Under Rule 26(a)(1), VoIP-Pal identifies the following individuals likely to have discoverable
`information that VoIP-Pal may use in support of its claims or defenses. Any current and former
`employees of VoIP-Pal may be contacted only through counsel of record for VoIP-Pal, Hudnell Law
`Group, P.C., Mountain View, California 94040 Tel: (650) 564-3698. VoIP-Pal’s investigation,
`research, and analysis of the issues in this case are ongoing, as is discovery. VoIP-Pal expressly
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOP-GOOGLE0000025
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`reserves the right to supplement its identification of individuals under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) as its
`investigation continues.
`Name
`
`Contact information
`
`Mr. Maksym Sobolyev
`
`New Westminster, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Mr. Johan Emil Viktor Bjorsell
`
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Mr. Penti Kalevi Huttunen
`
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Mr. Emil Malak
`
`Dr. Colin Tucker
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Substance of Information
`Known
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`conception, reduction to
`practice, and technologies
`involved in inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-
`Suit.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`conception, reduction to
`practice, and technologies
`involved in inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-
`Suit. Knowledgeable
`regarding Digifonica
`International, Inc., its
`organization and its
`activities.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`conception, reduction to
`practice, and technologies
`involved in inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-
`Suit.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`activities ofVoIP-Pal.com,
`Inc. Knowledgeable
`regarding Digifonica
`International, Inc., its
`organization and its
`activities. Knowledgeable
`about communications
`between the parties.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`activities ofVoIP-Pal.com,
`Inc.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7 8
`
`9
`10
`li
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`2
`
`VOP-GOOGLE0000026
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`Mr. David Gileff
`
`Mr. Kevin Williams
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Waco, Texas
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Knobbe Olsen Marten & Baer
`LLP
`
`San Diego, California
`
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`prosecution of the Patents-in-
`Suit
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`activities ofVoIP-Pal.com,
`Inc.
`
`Knowledge regarding the
`prosecution of the Patents-in-
`Suit
`
`Apple, Inc.
`
`Believed to be known Apple
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`Apple’s products, processes,
`methods and systems,
`including without limitation,
`communications technology
`and network services.
`; Knowledge regarding
`Apple’s claims and defenses
`Other individuals not specifically known to VoIP-Pal at the present time may possess relevant
`information. VoIP-Pal incorporates by reference: (i) any person identified in the initial disclosures ol
`Apple in this action and by any of the parties in any related actions concerning the Patents-in-Suit;
`(ii) any person identified in any answer to any interrogatory by any party to this action and by any ol
`the parties in any related actions concerning the Patents-in-Suit, and (iii) any experts identified by
`any party to this action and by any of the parties in any related actions concerning the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`II. RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(ii): DOCUMENTS IN VOIP-PAL’S POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR
`CONTROL THAT VOIP-PAL MAY USE TO SUPPORT ITS CLAIMS OR
`DEFENSES
`Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii), VoIP-Pal provides the following description by
`category and location of documents, data compilations, and tangible things in its possession, custody,
`or control that it may use to support its claims or defenses. VoIP-Pal does not represent or admit that
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`3
`
`VOP-GOOGLE0000027
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`21
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`documents falling within any of these categories exist, or that any documents that do exist are
`discoverable, and all objections are reserved. VoIP-Pal’s investigation, research, and analysis of the
`issues in this case are ongoing. VoIP-Pal expressly reserves the right to supplement its identification
`of categories of documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) as its investigation continues.
`
`CATEGORY
`The Patents-in-Suit and their file histories
`
`LOCATION
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Documents regarding VoIP-Pal and its technologies Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Communications between Apple and VoIP-Pal
`
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Communications regarding the Patents-in-Suit
`
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Pleadings and disclosures from previous VoIP-Pal
`cases
`
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`III.RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(iii): COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES
`VoIP-Pal does not have a claim for damages at this time. VoIP-Pal believes that it will be
`entitled to costs and attorneys’ fees at least because this case should be found unreasonable and
`vexatious under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. VoIP-Pal will seek its costs and attorneys’ fees at the appropriate
`time and will provide its basis for calculation. The amount of such fees and costs is not ascertainable
`at this time. VoIP-Pal reserves the right to supplement, amend, or modify this response as it obtains
`information through discovery or otherwise and if and when it asserts a claim for patent infringement.
`IV. RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(iv): INSURANCE AGREEMENTS
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`4
`
`VOP-GOOGLE0000028
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6
`
`7 8 9
`
`1 0
`li
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`At this time, VoIP-Pal is not aware of any insurance agreements under which an insurance
`business may be liable to satisfy all or part of a possible judgment in this action or to indemnify or
`reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment.
`
`Dated: October 7, 2021
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CASBN 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C,
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5
`
`6 7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`5
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOQ29
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-3 Filed 05/06/22 Page 8 of 8
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I certify that I have caused VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
`26(a)(1) and the accompanying documents to be served on all counsel of record listed below via
`electronic mail.
`
`John M. Desmarais
`amodi@desmaraisllp.com
`Ameet A. Modi
`idesmarais@desmaraisllp.com
`Peter Curtis Magic
`pmagic@desmaraisllp.com
`Desmarais LLP
`101 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`415-573-1900
`Fax: 415-573-1901
`
`Joze Faye Welsh
`iwelsh@desmaraisllp.com
`Raymond Nathan Habbaz
`rhabbaz@desmaraisllp.com
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`26th Floor
`New York, NY 10169
`212-808-2980
`Fax: 212-351-3401
`
`Dated: October 7, 2021
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`1 0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05110-JD
`
`6
`
`VOP-GOOGLE0000030
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket