Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 8
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.eom
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CASBN 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C.
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRNACISCO DIVISION
`
`CELLCO PARTNERSHIP dba VERIZON
`WIRELESS et al.,
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`Plaintiffs,
`V.
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
`UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`
`i 2 3 4 5 6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`ll
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`2 0
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`l
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOQ9
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”), by and through its counsel, provides the
`following initial disclosures to Plaintiff Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) under
`Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These disclosures are made to the best of
`VoIP-Pal’s ability and are based on the information reasonably available to VoIP-Pal or in its
`possession as of this date, following a good faith inquiry in accordance with Rule 26. VoIP-Pal’s
`investigation of possible witnesses and documents is ongoing. VoIP-Pal thus reserves the right to
`supplement, amend, or correct these disclosures in accordance with Rule 26(e) and as otherwise
`allowed by the Court or any applicable rules, to produce additional information and to rely on such
`information as evidence in this action. These disclosures are made without waiver of, or prejudice to,
`any objection VoIP-Pal may have regarding the subject matter of these disclosures, persons
`identified, or any documents or information identified, including but not limited to: (1) relevance; (2)
`any applicable privilege, including but not limited to attorney-client privilege; (3) work product
`protection; (4) the admissibility in evidence of these disclosures and any information disclosed
`herein; (5) objections based on confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret materials or information
`of VoIP-Pal or any third parties; or (6) objections regarding the use at trial of any of the information
`disclosed in this document or any document or thing produced pursuant to Rule 26. VoIP-Pal
`reserves all objections. The inclusion of any individual’s identity or the identification or production
`of any document or document category does not constitute an agreement or concession that the
`individual will be produced or that the documents exist or are discoverable.
`
`I. RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(i): INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE
`INFORMATION THAT VOIP-PAL MAY USE TO SUPPORT ITS CLAIMS OR
`DEFENSES
`Under Rule 26(a)(1), VoIP-Pal identifies the following individuals likely to have discoverable
`information that VoIP-Pal may use in support of its claims or defenses. Any current and former
`employees of VoIP-Pal may be contacted only through counsel of record for VoIP-Pal, Hudnell Law
`Group, P.C., Mountain View, California 94040 Tel: (650) 564-3698. VoIP-Pal’s investigation,
`research, and analysis of the issues in this case are ongoing, as is discovery. VoIP-Pal expressly
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOl 0
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`reserves the right to supplement its identification of individuals under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) as its
`investigation continues.
`Name
`
`Contact information
`
`Mr. Maksym Sobolev
`
`Westminster, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Mr. Johan Emil Viktor Bjorsell
`
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Mr. Pentti Kalevi Huttunen
`
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Mr. Emil Malak
`
`Dr. Colin Tucker
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Substance of Information
`Known
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`conception, reduction to
`practice, and technologies
`involved in inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-
`Suit.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`conception, reduction to
`practice, and technologies
`involved in inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-
`Suit. Knowledgeable
`regarding Digifonica
`International, Inc., its
`organization and its
`activities.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`conception, reduction to
`practice, and technologies
`involved in inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-
`Suit.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`activities ofVoIP-Pal.com,
`Inc. Knowledgeable
`regarding Digifonica
`International, Inc., its
`organization and its
`activities. Knowledge of
`communications with
`Verizon
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`activities ofVoIP-Pal.com,
`Inc.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7 8
`
`9
`10
`li
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`2
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOl 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`Mr. David Gileff
`
`Mr. Kevin Williams
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Vancouver, Canada
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.
`Waco, Texas
`
`Contact through Hudnell Law
`Group P.C.
`
`Knowledgeable regarding the
`prosecution of the Patents-in-
`Suit
`
`Knowledgeable regarding
`activities ofVoIP-Pal.com,
`Inc.
`
`Thorpe Norton & Western
`
`The Walker Center
`175 S. Main Street, Suite 900
`Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
`
`Knowledge regarding the
`prosecution of the Patents-in-
`Suit
`
`Verizon
`
`Believed to be known Verizon Knowledgeable regarding
`Verizon’s products,
`processes, methods and
`systems, including without
`limitation, communications
`technology and network
`services; Knowledge
`regarding Verizon’s claims
`and defenses
`Other individuals not specifically known to VoIP-Pal at the present time may possess relevant
`information. VoIP-Pal incorporates by reference: (i) any person identified in the initial disclosures of
`Verizon in this action and by any of the parties in any related actions concerning the Patents-in-Suit;
`(ii) any person identified in any answer to any interrogatory by any party to this action and by any of
`the parties in any related actions concerning the Patents-in-Suit, and (iii) any experts identified by
`any party to this action and by any of the parties in any related actions concerning the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`II. RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(ii): DOCUMENTS IN VOIP-PAL’S POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR
`CONTROL THAT VOIP-PAL MAY USE TO SUPPORT ITS CLAIMS OR
`DEFENSES
`Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii), VoIP-Pal provides the following description by
`category and location of documents, data compilations, and tangible things in its possession, custody,
`or control that it may use to support its claims or defenses. VoIP-Pal does not represent or admit that
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`21
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOl 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`documents falling within any of these categories exist, or that any documents that do exist are
`discoverable, and all objections are reserved. VoIP-Pal’s investigation, research, and analysis of the
`issues in this case are ongoing. VoIP-Pal expressly reserves the right to supplement its identification
`of categories of documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) as its investigation continues.
`
`CATEGORY
`The Patents-in-Suit and its fde history
`
`LOCATION
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Documents regarding VoIP-Pal and its technologies Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Communications between Verizon and VoIP-Pal
`
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Communications regarding the Patents-in-Suit
`
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`Pleadings and disclosures from previous VoIP-Pal
`cases
`
`Hudnell Law Group’s offices in Mountain
`View, CA
`
`III.RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(iii): COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES
`VoIP-Pal does not have a claim for damages at this time. VoIP-Pal believes that it will be
`entitled to costs and attorneys’ fees at least because this case should be found unreasonable and
`vexatious under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. VoIP-Pal will seek its costs and attorneys’ fees at the appropriate
`time and will provide its basis for calculation. The amount of such fees and costs is not ascertainable
`at this time. VoIP-Pal reserves the right to supplement, amend, or modify this response as it obtains
`information through discovery or otherwise and if and when it asserts a claim for patent infringement.
`IV. RULE 26(a)(l)(A)(iv): INSURANCE AGREEMENTS
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`4
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOl 3
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6
`
`7 8 9
`
`1 0
`li
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`At this time, VoIP-Pal is not aware of any insurance agreements under which an insurance
`business may be liable to satisfy all or part of a possible judgment in this action or to indemnify or
`reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment.
`
`Dated: October 7, 2021
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736)
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Nicolas S. Gikkas (CASBN 189425)
`nick@hudnelllaw.com
`HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C,
`800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180
`Mountain View, California 94040
`Telephone: 650.564.3698
`Facsimile: 347.772.3034
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5
`
`6 7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`5
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOl 4
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 54-1 Filed 05/06/22 Page 8 of 8
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I certify that I have caused VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
`26(a)(1) and the accompanying documents to be served on all counsel of record listed below via
`electronic mail.
`
`William Andrew Flector
`Venable LLP
`101 California Street, Suite 3800
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`415-653-3750
`Fax: 415-653-3755
`Email: wahector@venable.com
`
`Frank C Cimino
`Venable LLP
`600 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`202-344-4569
`Fax: 202-344-8300
`Email: FCCimino@venable.com
`
`Megan Sunkel Woodworth
`Venable LLP
`600 Massachusetts Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`202-344-4000
`Fax: 202-344-8300
`Email: MSWoodworth@Venable.com
`
`Dated: October 7, 2021
`
`/s/ Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`1 0
`ll
`
`12
`
`1 3
`
`1 4
`
`1 5
`
`1 6
`
`1 7
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`2 0
`
`2 1
`
`2 2
`
`2 3
`
`2 4
`
`2 5
`
`2 6
`
`2 7
`
`2 8
`
`VOIP-PAL’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(1)
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05275-JD
`
`6
`
`VOP-GOOGLEOOOOOl 5
`
`