throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 1 of 8
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-cv-665-ADA
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`FACEBOOK, INC, and
`WHATSAPP, INC.
`Defendants.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-cv-667-ADA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AMAZON.COM, INC.;
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC; and
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-cv-668-ADA
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-cv-672-ADA
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-cv-674-ADA
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;
`CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON
`WIRELESS;
`VERIZON SERVICES, CORP.; and
`VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK
`SERVICES, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`T-MOBILE US, INC.; and
`T-MOBILE USA, INC.
`Defendants.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`On September 14, 2021, the parties filed their respective Joint Case Readiness Status Report in
`
`each of the above-identified cases. As such, the Case Management Conference (CMC) is deemed to have
`
`been held for calendaring purposes on September 28, 2021. After meeting and conferring, the parties
`
`jointly submitted the following proposed schedule to be entered in these cases. Accordingly, the Court
`
`enters the following schedule:
`
`Date
`October 19, 2021
`
`November 2, 2021
`
`Event
`Plaintiff shall serve preliminary1
`infringement contentions in the form of a
`chart setting forth where in the accused
`product(s) each element of the asserted
`claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall also
`identify the priority date (i.e., the earliest
`date of invention) for each asserted claim
`and produce: (1) a copy of the file history
`for each patents in suit
`The Parties shall submit an agreed
`Scheduling Order. If the parties cannot
`agree, the parties shall submit a separate
`Joint Motion for entry of Scheduling Order
`briefly setting forth their respective positions
`on items where they cannot agree. Absent
`agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff shall
`be responsible for the timely submission of
`this and other Joint filings.
`
`Plaintiff shall also produce: (1) all
`documents evidencing conception and
`reduction to practice for each claimed
`invention, and (2) a copy of the file history
`for each patent in suit. If Plaintiff has not
`
`
`1 The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity
`contentions without leave of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts
`to prepare its preliminary contentions and the amendment is based on material identified after
`those preliminary contentions were served, and should do so seasonably upon identifying any
`such material. Any amendment to add patent claims requires leave of court so that the Court can
`address any scheduling issues.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`Date
`
`January 25, 2022
`
`February 8, 2022
`
`February 22, 2022
`
`Event
`voluntarily waived privilege as to documents
`evidencing conception and reduction to
`practice for each claimed invention by this
`date, it shall be precluded from relying on
`the content of the privileged documents for
`the purpose of establishing an invention date
`earlier than the priority date of the patents in
`these cases.23
`Defendant shall serve preliminary invalidity
`contentions in the form of (1) a chart setting
`forth where in the prior art references each
`element of the asserted claim(s) are found,
`(2) an identification of any limitations the
`Defendant contends are indefinite or lack
`written description under section 112, and
`(3) an identification of any claims the
`Defendant contends are directed to ineligible
`subject matter under section 101. Defendant
`shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced
`in the invalidity contentions and (2)
`technical documents, including software
`where applicable, sufficient to show the
`operation of the accused product(s).
`Parties exchange claim terms for
`construction.
`Parties exchange proposed claim
`constructions.
`
`2 Plaintiff did not provide any documents evidencing conception and reduction to practice with its
`preliminary infringement contentions. Rather, Plaintiff claimed that these documents were
`privileged. Defendants maintain their objection to Plaintiff relying on privileged material to try to
`establish conception and/or reduction to practice.
`VoIP-Pal states that, at this time, VoIP-Pal has not identified any non-privileged documents
`3
`evidencing conception and reduction to practice that it intends to rely on to establish an earlier date of
`invention. VoIP-Pal intends to identify its conception and reduction to practice documents on a
`privilege log and will produce this log by the agreed November 2 deadline. VoIP-Pal is willing to
`waive privilege as to one or more of the documents identified on VoIP-Pal’s privilege log if the
`parties can reach agreement on the scope of the waiver. If VoIP-Pal later discovers other documents
`evidencing conception and reduction to practice not listed on its privilege log, then, to the extent
`necessary, VoIP-Pal will follow the Court’s procedures for amending its preliminary infringement
`contentions.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`Date
`March 1, 2022
`
`March 8, 2022
`
`March 8, 2022
`
`April 5, 2022
`
`April 19, 2022
`
`May 3, 2022
`
`May 6, 2022
`
`Event
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The
`parties shall disclose any extrinsic evidence,
`including the identity of any expert witness
`they may rely upon with respect to claim
`construction or indefiniteness. With respect
`to any expert identified, the parties shall
`identify the scope of the topics for the
`witness’s expected testimony.4 With respect
`to items of extrinsic evidence, the parties
`shall identify each such item by production
`number or produce a copy of any such item
`if not previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms
`in dispute and exchange revised list of
`terms/constructions.
`Defendant files Opening claim construction
`brief, including any arguments that any
`claim terms are not indefinite.
`Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction
`brief.
`Defendant files a Reply claim construction
`brief.
`Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction
`brief
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction
`Statement.
`
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding
`providing copies of the briefing to the Court
`and the technical adviser (if appointed).
`
`4 Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied
`upon by the other party.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`Date
`May 10, 2022
`
`May 20, 2022
`
`May 23, 2022
`
`June 28, 2022
`July 12, 2022
`
`September 6, 2022
`
`November 15, 2022
`
`December 2, 2022
`December 9, 2022
`
`Event
`Parties submit optional technical tutorials to
`the Court and technical adviser (if
`appointed).5
`Markman Hearing at 4:00 pm.
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve
`Initial Disclosures per Rule 26(a)
`Deadline to add parties.
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and
`Invalidity Contentions. After this date, leave
`of Court is required for any amendment to
`Infringement or Invalidity contentions.
`
`This deadline does not relieve the Parties of
`their obligation to seasonably amend if new
`information is identified after initial
`contentions.
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is
`not required unless the amendment adds
`patents or patent claims. (Note: This
`includes amendments in response to a 12(c)
`motion.)
`Deadline for the first of two meet and
`confers to discuss significantly narrowing
`the number of claims asserted and prior art
`references at issue. Unless the parties agree
`to the narrowing, they are ordered to contact
`the Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a
`teleconference with the Court to resolve the
`disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`5 The parties should contact the law clerk to request a Box link so that the party can directly upload
`the file to the Court’s Box account.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`Date
`January 10, 2023
`February 7, 2023
`February 14, 2023
`
`February 21, 2023
`
`March 7, 2023
`
`March 21, 2023
`
`March 28, 2023
`
`April 4, 2023
`
`April 11, 2023
`
`Event
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`Deadline for the second of two meet and
`confer to discuss narrowing the number of
`claims asserted and prior art references at
`issue to triable limits. To the extent it helps
`the parties determine these limits, the parties
`are encouraged to contact the Court’s Law
`Clerk for an estimate of the amount of trial
`time anticipated per side. The parties shall
`file a Joint Report within 5 business days
`regarding the results of the meet and confer.
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert
`motion deadline.
`
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding
`providing copies of the briefing to the Court
`and the technical adviser (if appointed).
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions,
`exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and
`deposition designations).
`Serve objections to pretrial
`disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures; file
`Motions in limine.
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial
`Submissions (jury instructions, exhibits lists,
`witness lists, discovery and deposition
`designations); file oppositions to motions in
`limine.
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript
`or Real Time Reporting. If a daily transcript
`or real time reporting of court proceedings is
`requested for trial, the party or parties
`making said request shall file a notice with
`the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter,
`Kristie Davis at kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 35 Filed 03/07/22 Page 8 of 8
`
`Date
`
`8 weeks before trial
`
`April 20, 2023
`
`April 25, 2023
`
`May 16, 20236
`
`Event
`remaining objections and disputes on
`motions in limine.
`Parties email the Court’s law clerk to
`confirm pretrial and trial dates
`File joint notice identifying remaining
`objections to pretrial disclosures and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court
`expects to set this date at the conclusion of
`the Markman Hearing.
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to
`set these dates at the conclusion of the
`Markman Hearing.7
`
`SIGNED this
`
`7th
`
` day of
`
`March
`
`2022.
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`6 If the actual trial date materially differs from the Court’s default schedule, the Court will consider
`reasonable amendments to the case schedule post-Markman that are consistent with the Court’s
`default deadlines in light of the actual trial date.
`7 Defendants contend that each Defendant is entitled to have a separate trial. The parties suggest
`discussing trial sequencing at an appropriate time later in the case.
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket