`Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 14-3 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-cv-06177-LHK Document 85 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 1Case 6:21-cv-00667-ADA Document 14-3 Filed 08/19/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AT&T CORP.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 18-CV-06177-LHK
`
`ORDER RELATING CASES
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 83
`
`
`
`
`
`On May 5, 2020, Plaintiff AT&T Corp. filed a motion to relate AT&T Corp. et al. v. VoIP-
`
`Pal.com, Inc., No. 20-cv-02995-JST (N.D. Cal. filed Apr. 30, 2020) (the “AT&T declaratory
`
`judgment action”), to the instant case, VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., Case No. 18-CV-
`
`06177-LHK. See ECF No. 83. On May 11, 2020, Defendant VoIP-Pal.Com, Inc. filed an
`
`opposition. ECF No. 94. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(a), the Court finds that the AT&T
`
`declaratory judgment action is related to the instant case. Accordingly, the Court hereby
`
`RELATES the AT&T declaratory judgment action to the instant action.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: May 22, 2020
`
`Case No. 18-CV-06177-LHK
`ORDER RELATING CASES
`
`______________________________________
`
`LUCY H. KOH
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`