`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 1 of 41
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLELLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES,INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 2 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 2 of 41
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Paper 10
`571-272-7822
`Date: October 7, 2022
`
` ÿÿ
`
`
` ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`
` !ÿ" # !"ÿ# ! ÿ#ÿ $#!%#$&ÿ'' (!ÿ
`)!'$!ÿ *!ÿ# ! ÿ $ #+ÿ#ÿ#!#+ÿ)#$ÿ
`,,+!ÿ++(ÿ
`
`- ÿ ÿ
` (*" $!#%ÿ !(*+, !"ÿ (ÿ
` - ÿ.- ÿ
` $/0ÿ
` - ÿ/0/ÿ)ÿ
`)1
` ÿ!)$#ÿ&ÿ" !*!"ÿ# !+ÿ2ÿ,#++ ,#ÿ -3ÿÿ
`#%)!$ÿ+ÿ*#,4ÿ567898:;<=;8>?ÿA=;?9;ÿBC6D?:Eÿ
`,#++ ,#ÿ567898:;<=;8>?ÿA=;?9;ÿBC6D?ÿÿ
`!( " ÿ
`, - -
`-ÿ
`1ÿF9;?<ÿA=<;?:ÿ$ .ÿ
`GHÿIEJEKEÿLÿGMNÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Before DEBRA K. STEPHENS, DANIEL J. GALLIGAN,and
`AMBERL. HAGY,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GALLIGAN,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 314
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 3 of 41
`
` ÿ
`
`
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ !"#$%ÿ$%ÿ'#((!)ÿ
`*++,-
`ÿ7
`/
`7
`--
`1BCÿ?ÿ ÿ
` 6ÿDEÿ+5ÿFÿ
`
`
`
`Bÿ
`
`
`ÿ 2
`2Kÿ
`
`7
`JA+21M
`1+ ÿ
`ÿ
`+ÿ
`
`2Kÿ
`7
` 6ÿ
`
`ÿ
`FJ22
`2Kÿ
`7
`A
` 6
`26ÿ5+2ÿ1 C1J1 ,ÿ
` ÿ8$9:!ÿ;!9:<ÿ2
`OPÿFÿQÿO?/
`4ÿ>A1@Aÿ72+=16
`Cÿ5+--+>CRÿ
`/
`4ÿSGFS.TA
`Kÿ +ÿ
`JA+21M
` ÿ1
`2
`2
`ÿA
`1 5+2B
`1+ ÿ72
` 6ÿ
`
`
` Kÿ2
`ÿA
`ÿ
`2
`C+
`U-
`ÿA
`1-ÿ>1Aÿ
`2
`ÿ-
`Cÿ?ÿ+5ÿA
`1BCÿ@A
`--
`W+2ÿA
`C+ Cÿ
`1
` ÿ8$9:!ÿ;!9:<ÿ2
`
`--ÿ@A
`--
`1BCÿ+ ÿ
`--ÿ,2+J 6Cÿ2
`1C
`2Kÿ
`51 61 ,Cÿ+5ÿ5
`@ÿ
` 6ÿ@+ @-JC1+ Cÿ61C@JCC
`2
`C
`
`2Kÿ2
`2ÿÿA1Cÿ
`-ÿ1Cÿ +ÿ
`ÿ
`51
`-ÿ6
`Cÿ+ÿA
`
`U1-1Kÿ+5ÿ
` Kÿ@A
`--
`1BÿÿX Kÿ51
`-ÿ
`6
`C
`-ÿ
`ÿY:Zÿ[!98:<ÿ8$ÿ\$9:!:<9ÿ
`
`
`
`
`ÿ+J@AC2
`Bÿ
`-ÿ
`7
`2K1 1
`7
`ÿ?ÿ
` ÿ
`
`
`
`Petitioner states that Google LLC is the real party-in-interest.
`
`Pet. 76.!
`
`C. Related Matters
`
`Petitioner and Patent Ownerindicate the ’289 Patent was asserted in
`
`the following district court proceeding: Touchstream Techs, Inc. v. Google,
`
`LLC, No. 6-21-cv-00569 (W.D. Tex.). Pet. 76-77; Paper 5 at 1. Petitioner
`
`further indicates that the ’289 Patent was asserted in the following district
`
`court proceeding: Touchstream Techs., Inc v. Vizbee, Inc., No. 1-17-cv-
`
`06247 (S.D.N.Y.). Pet. 76-77.
`
`D. The ’289 Patent (Ex. 1001)
`
`The ’289 Patent, titled “Play Control of Content on a Display
`
`Device,” issued December2, 2014. Ex. 1001, codes (45), (54). The
`
`°289 Patent describes a system that “allow[s] a personal computing device,”
`
`e.g., a mobile phone,“to be used to select different content to be played on a
`
`remote display,” e.g., a television set, and “allow[s] the user to control how
`
`the content is displayed on the display device using the personal computing
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 4 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 4 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`!"ÿ$%&'(%)ÿ+'((%,-ÿ
`
` .ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿ
`
`
`BB!ÿCÿ 1DEÿFGHÿI
`
`ÿ ÿÿ
`34
`
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`14ÿ1
` ÿFSHCTKÿÿ
`U"ÿ6:%ÿVWXYÿZ'(%>(ÿ[\]"ÿ^__^`ÿ
`I
`
`ÿ ÿ3ÿ
`ÿH
`ÿ
`H
`2Nÿ
`
`ÿ
`ÿa
`0fgÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ1c4 ÿ.
`
`ÿcd
`
`ÿ
`
`bÿ
`ÿ
` .ÿa
`0fgÿ
`
`
`ÿ.
`ÿ1c4 ÿ
`ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`ÿ4d.
`ÿ3ÿhhi ÿj. ÿ 1ÿ
`01ÿÿ
`ÿ4d.
`ÿ3ÿk
`d
` .ÿ
`ÿhhi ÿj. ÿ 1ÿ
` .ÿ
`k
`d
`
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`
`' Petitioner states that Google LLC is a subsidiary of XXVI HoldingsInc.,
`which is a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. and that XXVI Holdings Inc. and
`AlphabetInc. are not real parties-in-interest to this proceeding. Pet. 76 n.4.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 5 of 41
`
`Server System
`
`Switchboard
`
`36
`
`32
`
`28
`
`34
`
`Database
`
`Look-up
`Table
`
`Database
`
`24
`
`20
`
`q 0 - - 0
`
`21
`
`22
`
`tJ
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿ
`%&$)ÿ
` "
`*ÿ&&!("
` ÿ
` ÿ
`"+ÿ(+(
`ÿ
`,(ÿ(-$' ÿ ÿ-
` "
`*ÿ$.ÿ !"
`ÿ#
`&ÿ
`$*#! ÿ
` ÿ/
`(ÿ
`(ÿ
`ÿ$ "$&&
`
`ÿ
`ÿ(#&
`+ÿ 1ÿ2
` ÿ-
`
`(ÿ
`(ÿ
`ÿ"
`+ÿ$
`ÿ!(
` ÿ
`2-
` (ÿ-
`ÿ$"
`
`ÿ-
`&ÿ
`$*#! ÿ
`*#&
` ÿ%
`$**
`
`
`ÿ$
`ÿ
`ÿ
`(#
`ÿ#&
`+
`ÿ-
`ÿ#&
`+
`ÿ
`
` ÿ#&
`+ÿ-
`+ÿ ÿÿÿÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`
`O IU-
`
`0 □
`□
`□
`0 □ •
`@
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`Internet
`
`30
`
`Content Prov iders
`
`FIG. 1
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 6 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 6 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`Furthermore, personal computing device 20 controls the selection of
`
`and playback of content on television set 22 through server system 24, rather
`
`than through directly controlling television set 22. Ex. 1001, 3:10-18. In
`
`particular,
`
`[w]hen a user makes a selection using the personal computing
`device 20 for particular content to be displayed on the television
`display 23, a signal is sent through the Internet (or other network)
`21 to the server system 24. A corresponding commandsignal
`then is passed along [from server system 24] to the connected
`television set 22 which acts on a transmission code contained
`within the signal and performs specified commands.
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿ ÿ
`
`
` ÿ
`!"
`#ÿ ÿ
`
`
` ÿÿ
`
`
`ÿÿ+,-
`ÿ
`#
`ÿ
`ÿ ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿ
`!
`
`
`!ÿ (ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿÿ
` 'ÿÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
` ÿ+ ÿ
`
`ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
`, ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ
` $ÿ
`%&$ÿ''ÿ()' *'1ÿ233ÿ%&$ÿ''ÿ()(5*'ÿ.6
`
`!ÿ
` 7ÿ
`
`!ÿ
`
`ÿ ,
`ÿ6
`
`
`
`ÿ ÿ
`
`ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
`ÿ
`!"
`#ÿÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`!ÿ
`$ÿÿ
`%&$ÿ''ÿ()'*(5$ÿ
`9
`ÿ ÿ
`ÿ ÿ
`ÿ ÿ
`!"
`#/ÿÿ
`
` ÿ
`
`ÿ ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`6
`
` ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
` ÿ$ÿ$ÿ$ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ
`
`ÿ
`!
`
`
` ÿ.
`!ÿ
`
` ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`
`
`
` ÿÿ
`%&$ÿ''ÿ)* $ÿÿ:
`
` ÿ ÿ
`
`:ÿ.ÿ
`
` /ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Ex. 1001, 3:12—18; see Ex. 1001, 3:36—41 (“user-initiated play commands,”
`
`e.g., play pause, stop, rewind, fast forward, “are passed from the user’s
`
`personal computing device 20through the server system 24,to the television
`
`set 22”). Thus, personal computing device 20 sendsa signal for controlling
`
`media playback to server system 24; server system 24, in turn, sendsa signal
`
`to television set 22, which correspondingly displays the controlled media.
`
`Ex. 1001, 3:18-36.
`
`The signal from personal computing device 20 (which selects content
`
`or controls playback) is formatted and transmitted by personal computing
`
`device 20 in a message sent to server system 24. Ex. 1001, 4:27—29. That
`
`“message from the mobile phone 20 contains a transmission code that
`
`includes data regarding .
`
`.
`
`. the location and nameof the media playerfor the
`
`selected video the command(e.g., play, pause, rewind, etc.), and the video
`
`file to be acted upon.” Ex. 1001, 4:29-35, Fig. 3. That message “is
`
`transmitted over the Internet 21 and is received by the server system 24.”
`
`Ex. 1001, 4:40-42. Server system 24 then “converts the incoming
`
`commands from the mobile device 20 into the correct JavaScript (or other
`
`programming) code usedby the [television set] 22 to control the specific
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 7 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 7 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`player (block 120).” Ex. 1001, 5:65—6:3. The server “interpret[s] and
`
`convert[s| a standard or universal command(e.g., play, pause, etc.) into the
`
`specific commandrecognized by the media player” playing content on the
`
`television set 22. Ex. 1001, 5:58-62. Then, server system 24 “copies the
`
`converted version of the messageto the database 34 associated with the
`
`[television set] 22.” Ex. 1001, 6:3-6. Television set 22 then receives the
`
`server’s converter message and then “executes the message,”e.g., “load[s]
`
`and unload[s] different video players.” Ex. 1001, 6:19-S0.
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`
` -ÿ
` (
`ÿ'
` -
`-ÿÿ. *(
`ÿ//
` -ÿ
`ÿ
`.'
`'
` -ÿ
`ÿ
`
`* 0ÿ
`
` (
`0
`
`
`'
`''*
`
`+
`'
`0
` -ÿ&
`0
`-+',ÿ
`
` -ÿ.
`-+',ÿ-*11
`
`56ÿ899:;<=><?@AÿC9>?Dÿ
`E&
`
`*/ÿÿ*'ÿ
`ÿÿÿFÿ/
`* ÿ1ÿ
`ÿ
`
`* ÿ-
`ÿ
`-'ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ.
`*ÿ1ÿ-*11
`/
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ'
`0
`ÿ
`
`ÿ/.* 0ÿ-
`ÿ*'ÿ'
`
`
`''
` -ÿ'
`
`
`* ÿ-
`3&
`0
`
`* 1/
`* ÿ
`''*
`
`ÿ. *G.
`* ÿ-
`
`''*0
`* ÿ-
`ÿ1*
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`*.
`ÿ/
`ÿ
`
`
`* 0ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ/.
`*
`* ÿ
`
`
` -ÿ ÿ
`* ÿ1ÿ&
`ÿ
`
`* ÿ1ÿ&
`*.
`ÿ/
`ÿ
`
` -ÿ(ÿ* .-
` ÿ
`
`* ÿ ÿ//
` -ÿ1ÿ
`* ÿ1ÿ&
`&
`* ÿ-
`*.
`ÿ/
`ÿ
`
`
`* ÿ ÿ//
` -ÿ
`
`*.
`ÿ/
`ÿ
`
`.'* 0ÿ&
`* ÿ
`''*
`
`*-
`* ÿ-
`ÿ
`*'&* 0ÿ
` ÿ
`
`''*
`* ÿ
`ÿ/.* 0ÿ-
` -ÿ&
`
`* ÿ-
` -ÿ
`ÿ
`
`receiving, in a server system, one or more messages from a
`personal computing device that is separate from the server
`system and separate from the content presentation device,
`wherein the one or more messages,taken together,(i) include
`information associated with a unique identification code
`assigned to the content presentation device, (ii) specify a file
`to be acted upon,(iii) identify a particular media player for
`playing content from the specified file wherein the media
`player is a computer application operable to present content
`and control presentation of the content,
`(iv) identify a
`location of the particular media player, and (v) include an
`action control command for presentation of the content on
`the content presentation device by the particular media
`player, the action control command being independentof the
`particular media player;
`
`I.
`
`Illustrative Claim
`
`Challenged claim 1 is reproduced below.
`
`1. A method of controlling presentation of content on a content
`presentation device that loads any oneofa plurality of different
`media players, the method comprising:
`
`unique
`the
`associated with
`information
`the
`using
`identification code to store a record establishing an
`association between the personal computing device and the
`content presentation device; and
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 8 of 41
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
` ÿ
`
`
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
`
` ÿ
` ÿÿ
`
` ÿ
`
`
`!
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`
` ÿ
`
` ÿ
`
`
`!
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
` ÿ
` ÿ
`$%ÿ'()(*(+,(-ÿ'(/0(1ÿ234+ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`6"ÿ7#ÿ
`8!!9!
`
`
`ÿ
`#ÿ:;ÿ <= <>ÿ?<ÿ!
`<ÿ
`;
`
`
`CDÿ
`E
`
`ÿ:;ÿ<< ÿ ÿ!
`<ÿ
`ABE
`
`CDÿ
`
`ÿ
`
` ÿÿ
` ÿ#ÿ
` #F#ÿÿ!ÿÿÿ
`I%ÿJ--(*K(1ÿL*4M+1-ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ<ÿ ÿ
` ÿ>Nÿ
`
`
`
` ÿ! 5ÿÿ
`OPQRSTUVÿOXQPPYZ[Y\ÿ]^ÿ_`a`O`ÿbÿ
`cYdYeYZfYTUVghQURUÿ
`<ÿ ÿ>Nÿ
`<@A
`Dÿ
`8!!9!
`
`
`ÿ
`<ÿ ÿ>Nÿ
`<@A
`Dÿ
`8!!9!
`
`
`ÿE
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 9 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 9 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`Il. ANALYSIS
`
`A. Discretion Under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a)
`
`Patent Ownerargues that we should exercise discretion to deny
`
`institution under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) because the factors identified in Apple,
`
`Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (PTAB Mar. 20, 2020)
`
`(precedential) (“Fintiv Order’), weigh in favor of denying institution.
`
`Prelim. Resp. 41-54. Petitioner argues we should not discretionarily deny
`
`institution. Pet. 72—76; Paper 7. For the reasons discussed, we do not
`
`exercise discretion to deny institution.
`
` ÿ
`
`
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ !"#ÿ%#& ÿ'(ÿ%)*ÿ+ÿ',-./0ÿ
`
`
`345
`ÿ2
`= 6=5=8 ÿ5 :
`FÿG
`56
`<836ÿ=:
`L#ÿMÿN#!MKÿL#ÿ Dÿ
`O
`3ÿ ÿ Fÿ
`EO3
`9FÿERN#!Mÿ13:
`T83ÿ8Hÿ:
` 3
`345
`3=9>ÿ:
`= 6=5=8 ÿÿ
`O
`68 6ÿ:=6<566
`
`A :
`Fÿ7
`6ÿ:=6<3
` ÿ
`#! ÿI/! ÿ3
`FÿERP7
`3:ÿ= 6=5
`9ÿ
`8 ÿG
`9Hÿ8Hÿ7
`D?@WÿD?WÿEY
`8ÿ= 6=5
` ÿ ÿO38<
`:=6<3
`Fÿ7
`3:ÿ<8 6=:
`27
` <
`ÿO
`3
`99
`3
`ÿG
`6=6ÿ
`H83ÿ
`ÿQ
` :5UÿH38UÿZ=3
`9ÿ=9
` !"#/eÿ #/Jÿ#ÿLÿb"!fg/#!ÿb" &#hÿi!^ÿb//JJ Jÿ!!ÿ
`*"c!ÿj!h/!"#ÿEA P1ÿk5
`7
`7
` ÿ ÿ83ÿ mÿ5 :
`E=Fÿ27
`ÿO
`5 O
`
`G=9=>XÿE==Fÿ27
`ÿ3
`9ÿ5 :
`ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
` ÿT
`=9
`G9
`ÿ
`7O6loo22256O848To6=
`59oH=9
`
`3>p:
`96p
`=
`pO
`3
`99
`=8 pU
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`2 Available at
`https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/interim_proc_discretion
`arydenialsaiaparalleldistrictcourtlitigationmemo20220621_.pdf.
`
`Under§ 314(a), the Director has discretion to deny institution of an
`
`inter partes review (see 37 C.F.R. § 42.4(a) (“The Boardinstitutes thetrial
`
`on behalf of the Director.”); Harmonic Inc. v. Avid Tech., Inc., 815 F.3d
`
`1356, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (“[T]he PTO is permitted, but never compelled,
`
`to institute an IPR proceeding.”)). In determining whetherto exercise
`
`discretion to deny institution under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), the Board considers
`
`whether the circumstances ofa parallel district court proceeding are a basis
`
`for exercising such discretion. Fintiv Order 5-6.
`
`A Memorandum from Director Vidal titled Interim Procedurefor
`
`Discretionary Denials in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings with Parallel District
`
`Court Litigation (USPTO June 21, 2022) (“Interim Procedure”)sets forth
`
`the following:
`
`the PTAB will not deny institution of an IPR or PGR under Fintiv
`(i) when
`a petition presents
`compelling
`evidence of
`unpatentability; (ii) when a request for denial under Fintiv is
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 10 of 41
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`"
`
`ÿ
`
`
`
`#
`ÿ ÿ!
` $ÿ" ÿ!
`ÿ"ÿ!
`%
`
`
`$ÿ
`
`
`'
`ÿ(
`ÿ"
` )ÿ
`
`ÿ"
`
`ÿ(ÿ!
`ÿ "
`
`
`*
` $ÿ" ÿ!
`ÿ+
`
`
`$ÿ"ÿ!
`%
`
`
`
`
`ÿÿ ÿ
`B03C>ÿ DDÿ
`
`ÿDEDÿ FÿG
`.HÿI&J&&ÿKÿ.DHÿLM&ÿDDÿ
`
` ÿ ÿ
`&ÿ
`ÿ!"ÿ ÿ!ÿ(ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`&ÿ
`O>ÿQ2?28ÿ0RÿS3T7<43Uÿ/V788ÿ7<ÿ1W2ÿX31ÿ
`!
`ÿÿ
`ÿ(
`"
`ÿ
` ÿ!
`ÿ%
`ÿ
`#
`$ÿ"
`
`
` ÿ%"
`
`$&ÿÿX8[/712ÿB03C>ÿ?>ÿ
`\/;ÿ;<1]8ÿ;<=>ÿDÿ^&.ÿD.ÿD. ÿ^
`a2232ÿB0>ÿ..ÿI&J&ÿDÿDEDÿDbbÿcUV0ÿ@Rd>ÿB0>ÿ?>ÿef[/143:ÿ;<=>ÿHÿ
`^& ÿDÿDÿ^
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ*
`ÿg hJFNÿ "ÿ
`!
`%
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`!
`ÿ
`
`
` ÿ ÿ$
`ÿ(ÿ
`#
`%
`ÿÿ#
`ÿ
`$
`Yÿ
`$
`
`ÿ
`*+ ,!ÿ#
` ÿ(ÿ
`#
`"
`
` kÿ"$ÿ
`
`
` ÿ
` ÿ
`$ÿ
`&ÿÿJ#
`$ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`
`more experience can substitute for formal education.” Pet. 14 (citing
`
`Ex. 1005 4] 42-46).
`
`Patent Owner doesnot dispute Petitioner’s assertion. See Prelim.
`
`Resp.21.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 11 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 11 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
` ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿÿ
`#ÿ$ÿ%%ÿ &'(ÿ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2ÿ
`2ÿ4ÿ ÿ/
`
`ÿ!5--ÿ
`
`ÿ
` ÿ
`*//ÿ
` ÿ/
` "
`
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
`ÿ
`/
`ÿ
`
`
` ÿ*ÿ2
`ÿÿ
`
`3
`ÿÿ
`ÿ
`2
`4ÿ
`2
`
` ÿ
`ÿ
`
`3
` ÿ
` ÿ
`/ "ÿÿ/
`01ÿ
`
` ÿ/
`ÿÿ
`HIÿI$ÿI$$ÿ!H
`ÿ/
`ÿ
`2ÿ
`
` ÿ
`
`
`(ÿ
`9;ÿ9L>@Aÿ9DM5NFEON@DMÿ
`8
`ÿ
` "ÿÿ/
`
`ÿ
`B;ÿSTUÿ9DFR;ÿ$ÿHIÿIIÿI &ÿ!H
` (ÿÿ
`IÿJHÿVÿ !(ÿ! (ÿÿW
`ÿ
`
`
`6/
`2ÿ
` ÿ
`2ÿ
` " ÿÿPQ@LL@R5ÿ$ÿHIÿ
`ÿI ÿÿ6XYZ/
`
`2ÿ
` ÿ
`2ÿ
` "ÿÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
` "ÿ/
`ÿ/
`
`3
`ÿ
`2ÿ4ÿ ÿ/
`ÿ ÿ7
`ÿ/
`
`ÿIIÿÿ6
` 2ÿ/
`ÿ
`2ÿ4ÿ ÿ/
`ÿÿ
`ÿ/
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ ÿ*//ÿ/
`
`ÿÿ ÿ/
`
`
` ÿÿPQ@LL@R5ÿ$ÿHIÿ
`ÿ
`
`Based on the present record including the disclosure in the ’289
`
`Patent, we apply Petitioner’s definition of the level of ordinary skill in the
`
`art (see Pet. 14) with the exception of the open-ended phrase “at least,”
`
`which expandsthe range of educational experience indefinitely without an
`
`upper bound,i.e. “a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering or computer
`
`science (or equivalent experience) and two years of experience designing or
`
`implementing interactive systems with networked media or media playback
`
`systems.” We determinethis level of skill comports with the qualifications a
`
`person would have needed to understand and implement the teachings of the
`
`’289 Patent and the prior art of record. Cf Okajima v. Bourdeau, 261
`
`F.3d 1350, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (noting that the priorart itself may reflect
`
`an appropriate level of skill in the art).
`
`C. Claim Construction
`
`Weconstrue claim terms according to the standard set forth in Phillips
`
`v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1312-17 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc).
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b) (2021). Under Phillips, claim termsare afforded
`
`“their ordinary and customary meaning.” Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1312. “[T]he
`
`ordinary and customary meaningof a claim term is the meaning that the
`
`term would have to a person of ordinary skill in the art in question at the
`
`time of the invention.” Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1313. “Importantly, the person
`
`of ordinary skill in the art is deemed to read the claim term notonly in the
`
`context of the particular claim in which the disputed term appears, but in the
`
`context of the entire patent, including the specification.” Phillips, 415 F.3d
`
`10
`
`
`
`at 1313. An inventor may rebut that presumption by providing a definition
`
`of the term in the specification “with reasonableclarity, deliberateness, and
`
`precision.” Jn re Paulsen, 30 F.3d 1475, 1480 (Fed. Cir. 1994). In the
`
`absence ofsuch a definition, limitations are not to be read from the
`
`specification into the claims. Jn re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 1184 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 1993).
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 12 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 12 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿÿÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`"ÿ
` ÿ$%ÿ
`
`&
`ÿ
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
` ÿ"ÿ
`
`
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ()ÿ+,ÿ7.)ÿ8,/)1ÿÿ2 ÿÿÿ42
`5ÿ6ÿ
`
`ÿ%
` ÿ#&
`ÿÿ
`9:ÿ#
` ÿ
`ÿÿ$
` 'ÿ
`
` ÿ
` ÿ
`
`ÿ
` !ÿ"ÿ
`&&ÿ
`
`&&
`# 'ÿÿ
`
`
`
`
` ÿ
`#&
`ÿ#&
`ÿ# # ÿ
`ÿÿ
`
`!
`; ÿÿ
`ÿ ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`Mÿ3ÿ42
` ÿÿ
`
`ÿ
`
` ÿ &ÿÿ
`ÿÿ
`
`
`2 ÿ3ÿÿ42
`FKÿS11,+C,PÿYZJD[/1),11ÿ[J,+ÿ\/CR/]/E.+.1.E^ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿÿ ÿ
` ÿM=ÿ
`ÿÿ
`_`
`
`
`ÿÿ
`ÿghÿ
`
`&#
` ÿ&#
` ÿ&
`$i
`
` ÿ&
`>?ÿÿ#
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ$i
`
`5 &ÿh
`ÿ
`&
` ÿ
`
`&
`ÿ
`
`!
`
`ÿ
`
`Petitioner asserts that we “need not construe any claimsto resolve
`
`[this] controversy” andthatit “adopts” Patent Owner’s “proposed plain and
`
`ordinary meaningforall terms [from] the parallel district court action.”
`
`Pet. 14-15 (citing Ex. 1014).
`
`Patent Owner doesnotassert any particular claim constructionat this
`
`stage in the proceeding. Prelim. Resp. 21.
`
`Onthis record, we determine that no terms or phrases in the claims
`
`require express construction. See Realtime Data, LLC v. Iancu, 912 F.3d
`
`1368, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (“The Board is required to construe ‘only those
`
`terms ... that are in controversy, and only to the extent necessary to resolve
`
`the controversy.’” (quoting Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200
`
`F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. Cir. 1999))).
`
`D. Asserted Obviousness over Muthukumarasamy
`
`Petitioner contends Muthukumarasamyrenders claims 1, 2, and 6-8
`
`obvious. Pet. 15—16, 20-72.
`
`I. Muthukumarasamy (Ex. 1008)
`
`Muthukumarasamyis a US patent application publication titled
`
`“Device-Based Control System” and published September23, 2010.
`
`Ex. 1008, codes (43), (54). Muthukumarasamydescribes a “Device-Based
`
`Control System (DBCS) .
`
`.
`
`. that enables consumers, through the use of an
`
`internet-enabled device (IED),” e.g., a smartphone,“to navigate through
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 13 of 41
`
`Intm- -- -i-----
`
`W~
`
`__. RF/Zigbee
`
`ethemet
`cute
`
`\
`\
`
`Commab~
`,,, © over WiFi
`Webiervices
`'
`"'Wffi :: I mZeapp~e I
`.--,
`obil1
`,,----
`®
`Home'
`_,,/ WiFi
`
`Plug
`
`1 to i l
`
`\
`
`I
`\'. In~
`lnfrucd i
`i
`I
`\ i
`I I I
`u 11
`
`~ Ethernet
`' ~
`- - Zelfy System Component
`-
`3rdPartyServices
`
`RF - - - - - - . . . . 1
`
`FIG. l
`
`cl~ ~:,WiFi
`~~~-::: =g wifi Q) ~--,,,,--
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`ÿÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`)
`ÿ)+ÿ
`(
`ÿ,ÿ
`
`"# ÿÿ%ÿ ÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`4ÿ ÿ ÿ
`(
`ÿ,ÿ
` "-ÿÿ56)ÿ ÿ57
` ÿ
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`"# ÿÿ%ÿ ÿÿ4ÿ
`ÿÿ "-ÿÿÿ
`
`1)
`+ÿ
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`(
`
` ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`,ÿ
`ÿ*
`1ÿ,ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`%ÿ ÿÿÿ*;
`ÿ<
` ÿ
`
` ÿ,ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ
`
` ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`"# ÿÿ%ÿ: ÿÿ'ÿ
`
`ÿ
`ÿÿ ÿ
`
`8 ÿÿ)
`1
`
`
`
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
`
`
`Ex. 1008 457. In particular, zHub 2 “receives signals or commands from
`
`the IED 4 via a local or premise network (e.g., router, WiFi, etc.) and
`
`translates [those] received commandsto RF signals;” zNode 3 in turn
`
`receives the translated RF signals and translates those RF signals “to a
`
`protocol(e.g. Infrared) interpretable by the media components.” Ex. 1008
`
`4] 44. For example, “the infrared codes needed to control the media
`
`components”are referenced for such translation. Ex. 1008 4 66. Then,
`
`those translated signals are received by media components,e.g., a television
`
`set, to control the media component, “e.g., volumeselection, channel
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 14 of 41
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 207-5 Filed 04/20/23 Page 14 of 41
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
` ÿ
`
`
`ÿÿÿÿÿ ÿ
`
`ÿ ÿ ÿ!
`#ÿ%ÿ%&&
` '#ÿ(%&ÿ
`)
`ÿ
`ÿ%
`ÿ%ÿ
` 'ÿ
`
` #
`
` '#ÿ%ÿ/ÿ#$
`#34ÿ5%'
`
` #
`
`#ÿ
` 'ÿ
` #
`
`#ÿ!%ÿ
`ÿ
`%%%ÿ-
`
`
`ÿ%&%
`ÿÿÿ/%ÿ
`&
`
`ÿ
`%&%
`
` #
`% ÿÿÿÿÿ77ÿÿ8)
`)%#
` #
`
`#ÿ
`
`ÿ%&%
`ÿ
`#
`ÿ%&%
`
`#
`#
`6ÿ
`:''%
`6ÿ ÿ%
`ÿ
`
` %+#
`
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ% #&% 4ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`
`selection, pause/play, etc.” Ex. 1008 4 50.
`
`Additionally, in one DBCS embodiment, a remote-controlled internet
`
`browser software (RCIBS or ZRCIBS) provides “a remote controll