`Case (AlERYGRBERSEALISORSEANPSCPPROMECHMEORDER 1 Of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 14
`EXHIBIT 14
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 185-12 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`Gray, Michael W. (SHB)
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Gray, Michael W. (SHB)
`Friday, October 28, 2022 11:46 AM
`Garcia, Edwin O.; Dykal, Ryan (SHB); LaRoque, Sam (SHB); Bergsten, Jordan (SHB); Bell,
`Fiona (SHB); Carlyle, Patrisha L. (SHB); Long, Andrew M. (SHB); Miller, Gary M. (SHB);
`Donoho, Justin R. (SHB)
`Google Touchstream JD; Michael E. Jones; Shaun Hassett
`RE: Touchstream v. Google | Case No. 6:21-CV-569 | Hague Motion
`
`Edwin,
`
`As you know from the extensive discussions between the parties, Touchstream does not agree and does object to any
`deposition under Hague Convention rules for all the reasons we previously stated. Google’s motion is extremely
`unclear. Mr. Levai was a 30(b)(6) topic designee by Google in response to Touchstream’s 30(b)(6) notice. Is Google now
`seeking to depose its own employee? If so, please tell us under what authority Google will depose its own employee,
`since this does not appear to be a deposition that will take place under Touchstream’s 30(b)(6) notice. Please provide
`this information before contacting the court so that we can consider an appropriate response. If Google will not provide
`such information prior to contacting the Court, Google should include this email from Touchstream with any
`correspondence with the Court.
`
`Thanks,
`Michael
`
`Michael W. Gray
`Senior Counsel
`Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
`
`713-546-5669 | mgray@shb.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From: Garcia, Edwin O. <edwingarcia@jonesday.com>
`Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 10:55 AM
`To: Dykal, Ryan (SHB) <RDYKAL@shb.com>; LaRoque, Sam (SHB) <slaroque@shb.com>; Bergsten, Jordan (SHB)
`<JBERGSTEN@shb.com>; Bell, Fiona (SHB) <FBELL@shb.com>; Carlyle, Patrisha L. (SHB) <pcarlyle@shb.com>; Long,
`Andrew M. (SHB) <AMLONG@shb.com>; Gray, Michael W. (SHB) <MGRAY@shb.com>
`Cc: Google Touchstream JD <Google-Touchstream-JD@jonesday.com>; Michael E. Jones
`<mikejones@potterminton.com>; Shaun Hassett <shaunhassett@potterminton.com>
`Subject: Touchstream v. Google | Case No. 6:21-CV-569 | Hague Motion
`
`
`EXTERNAL
`
`Counsel:
`
`
`Please be advised that Google intends to send the below email note today to the Court. Please advise by 2PM CT if
`Touchstream objects.
`
`1
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 185-12 Filed 01/19/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`***********
`Dear Ms. Jahnke:
`
`
`On October 12, Google filed a motion for issuance of letter of request for international judicial assistance for the
`purpose of undertaking the deposition of a witness located in Switzerland in accordance with Swiss law. Touchstream
`did not file a response. In view of the schedule Google therefore wishes to notify the Court that the motion is ripe for a
`decision. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
`
`
`Best regards,
`Edwin
`*************
`
`Edwin O. Garcia
`Associate
`JONES DAY® - One Firm Worldwide®
`51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Office +1.202.879.3695
`(Admitted in Texas; not admitted in District of Columbia; practice limited to cases in federal court and agencies)
`
`***This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected
`by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
`without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected.***
`
`2
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
