throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1of5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 6
`EXHIBIT 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLELLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES,INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 5
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Paper 10
`571-272-7822
`Date: October 7, 2022
`
`  ÿÿ
`  
`

` ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`
` !ÿ"#!"ÿ#!ÿ#ÿ$#!%#$&ÿ'' (!ÿ
`)!'$!ÿ*!ÿ#!ÿ$ #+ÿ#ÿ#!#+ÿ)#$ÿ
`,,+!ÿ++(ÿ
`  
`- ÿ ÿ
`(*"$!#%ÿ!(*+, !"ÿ ( ÿ
` - ÿ.- ÿ
` $/0ÿ
` - ÿ/0/ÿ)ÿ
`)1
` ÿ!)$#ÿ& ÿ"!*!"ÿ# !+ÿ2 ÿ,#++ ,#ÿ -3ÿÿ
`#%)!$ÿ+ ÿ*#,4ÿ567898:;<=;8>?ÿA=;?9;ÿBC6D?:Eÿ
`,#++ ,#ÿ567898:;<=;8>?ÿA=;?9;ÿBC6D? ÿÿ
`!( " ÿ
`, - -
ÿ -   
`-ÿ
`1ÿF9;?<ÿA=<;?:ÿ$ .ÿ
`GHÿIEJEKEÿLÿGMNÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Before DEBRA K. STEPHENS, DANIEL J. GALLIGAN,and
`AMBERL. HAGY,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GALLIGAN,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 314
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`   ÿ
`
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ
`ÿ !"#$%ÿ$%ÿ'#((!)ÿ
`*++,-
ÿ..ÿ/0
1 1+
234ÿ51-
6ÿ
`ÿ7
1 1+ ÿ5+2ÿ8$9:!ÿ;!9:<ÿ2
=1
>ÿ
`/
`7
2ÿ?ÿ/0
3ÿ+2ÿ0
1 1+ 344ÿ@A
`--
,1 ,ÿ@-
`1BCÿ?ÿ ÿ
` 6ÿDEÿ+5ÿFÿ
`
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ/GHÿ??ÿ/0I ÿ
`
344ÿÿ+J@AC 2

`Bÿ
`
@A +-+,1
Cÿ @ÿ/0
`
ÿ>
234ÿ 1B
-Kÿ51-
6ÿ
`ÿ 2
-1B1
`2Kÿ
C7+ C
ÿÿ
`
`7
2ÿDÿ/0 2
-1Bÿ
C734ÿÿL1 Aÿ+J2ÿ
`J A+21M
` 1+ ÿ
1 1+
2ÿ51-
6ÿ
`ÿ
7-Kÿ
` +ÿ
`
ÿ>
2NCÿ 2
-1B1
`2Kÿ
C7+ C
ÿ/
`7
2ÿ4ÿ
` 6ÿ
`
ÿ>
2ÿ51-
6ÿ
`ÿ
`FJ22
7-Kÿ +ÿ
1 1+
2NCÿ 2
-1B1
`2Kÿ
7-Kÿ/
`7
2ÿ4ÿ
`A
ÿC
` 6
`26ÿ5+2ÿ1 C 1 J 1 ,ÿ
` ÿ8$9:!ÿ;!9:<ÿ2
=1
>ÿ1CÿC
ÿ5+2 Aÿ1 ÿ
`OPÿFÿQÿO?/
`4ÿ>A1@Aÿ72+=16
Cÿ
`Cÿ5+--+>CRÿ
`/
`4ÿSGFS.TA
ÿ12
@ +2ÿB
`Kÿ + ÿ
`J A+21M
ÿ
` ÿ1
2ÿ7
`2
Cÿ
`2
=1
>ÿ +ÿU
ÿ1 C 1 J
6ÿJ -
CCÿ A
ÿ12
@ +2ÿ6
2B1
Cÿ A
` ÿ A
ÿ
`1 5+2B
` 1+ ÿ72
C
6ÿ1 ÿ A
ÿ7
1 1+ ÿ51-
6ÿJ 6
2ÿC
@ 1+ ÿO??ÿ
` 6ÿ
`
`
` Kÿ2
C7+ C
ÿ51-
6ÿJ 6
2ÿC
@ 1+ ÿO?OÿCA+>Cÿ A
` ÿ A
2
ÿ1Cÿ
`ÿ
`2

`C+
`U-
ÿ-1V
-1A++6ÿ A
` ÿ A
ÿ7
1 1+
2ÿ>+J-6ÿ72
=
`1-ÿ>1 Aÿ
`2
C7
@ ÿ +ÿ
` ÿ-

`C ÿ?ÿ+5ÿ A
ÿ@-
`1BCÿ@A
`--
,
6ÿ1 ÿ A
ÿ7
1 1+ ÿ
`W+2ÿ A
ÿ2

`C+ Cÿ
H7-
`1
6ÿU
-+>ÿ>
ÿ1 C 1 J
ÿ
` ÿ8$9:!ÿ;!9:<ÿ2
=1
>ÿ+5ÿ
`
`--ÿ@A
`--
,
6ÿ@-
`1BCÿ+ ÿ
`--ÿ,2+J 6Cÿ2
`1C
6ÿ1 ÿ A
ÿ
1 1+ ÿÿJ2ÿ72
-1B1
`2Kÿ
`51 61 ,Cÿ+5ÿ5
`@ ÿ
` 6ÿ@+ @-JC1+ Cÿ61C@JCC
6ÿU
-+>ÿ
`2
ÿU
`C
6ÿ+ ÿ A
ÿ
`
=16
1
`2Kÿ2
@+26ÿ6
=
-+7
6ÿ AJCÿ5
`2ÿÿA1Cÿ
@1C1+ ÿ +ÿ1 C 1 J
ÿ 21
`-ÿ1Cÿ + ÿ
`ÿ
`51
`-ÿ6
@1C1+ ÿ
`Cÿ +ÿ A
ÿ7
`

`U1-1 Kÿ+5ÿ
` Kÿ@A
`--
,
6ÿ@-
`1BÿÿX Kÿ51
`-ÿ
`6
@1C1+ ÿ>1--ÿU
ÿU
`C
6ÿ+ ÿ A
ÿ5J--ÿ2
@+26ÿ6
=
-+7
6ÿ6J21 ,ÿ 21
`-ÿ
`ÿY:Zÿ[!98:<ÿ8$ÿ\$9:!:<9ÿ
`
`
`
ÿ>
2ÿC
`
Cÿ A
` ÿ+J@AC 2

`Bÿ
@A +-+,1
Cÿ @ÿ1Cÿ A
ÿ2

`-ÿ
`7
`2 K1 1
2
C ÿÿ
`7
2ÿPÿ
` ÿ?ÿ
` ÿ
`
`

`

`the particular media player.” Pet. 50-52 (citing Ex. 1005 4 113-114;
`
`Ex. 1009, 1:11-13, 1:26—30, 5:61-6:2, Fig. 2); see also Pet. 57-58.
`
`Petitioner relies on Hayward to teach executing the programming
`
`code by the particular media player. Pet. 60—61 (citing Ex. 1005 4 129;
`
`Ex. 1009, 1:11—13, 1:26—30, 5:61-66).
`
`Patent Owner doesnotdispute, at this stage, Petitioner’s arguments
`
`and evidenceasto these limitations. Based on our review ofthe record
`
`before us, we determine Petitioner has shown sufficiently that the
`
`combination of Muthukumarasamy and Haywardteachesthe remaining
`
`limitations recited in independent claim 1 and that the combination renders
`
`obviousclaim 1.
`
`4. Claims 2 and 6-8
`
`Petitioner contends the combination of Muthukumarasamy and
`
`Hayward renders obvious claims 2 and 6-8. Pet. 61-71.
`
`Patent Owner,at this stage, does not offer arguments for these claims
`
`other than those addressed above. See Prelim. Resp. Upon our review of
`
`Petitioner’s asserted contentions, we are persuaded based on the record
`
`before us, Petitioner has made a sufficient showing that the combination of
`
`Muthukumarasamy and Haywardrenders obvious claims 2 and 6-8.
`
`5. Conclusion
`
`Based on the record before us, we determinePetitioner’s proffered
`
`arguments, evidence, and supporting testimony establish a reasonable
`
`likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing that claims 1, 2, and 6-8
`
`would have been obvious over the combination of Muthukumarasamy and
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 4 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 4of5
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`   ÿ
`
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
` 
ÿ
` 
`ÿ

`ÿ
`
ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ   !ÿ"#ÿ$ÿ%%ÿ$$$$&ÿ
`"#ÿ$ÿ$'$$$ÿ$' (ÿ'($(' ÿ)!ÿ *&ÿ+,,ÿ./+0ÿ
ÿÿ
`
 1
ÿ

2ÿ1 ÿ3
`4
`ÿ 1ÿ

`ÿ
#
  !ÿ 
ÿ1!
` !ÿ
`1
ÿ5ÿ 
ÿ
` 
`ÿ

`ÿ
`
ÿÿ
ÿ(($ÿ   !ÿ"#ÿ$ÿ%ÿ$ &ÿ
`"#ÿ$ÿ$'$$$ÿ$' (ÿ'($((*ÿ
`
`
ÿ64
ÿ1
2ÿ 1 ÿ2
ÿ
` ÿ 2ÿ2
`!
ÿ
 1
72ÿ
`!
2ÿ
`
` ÿ
8

ÿ
`2ÿ 1ÿ 
2
ÿ
` 1 2ÿÿ
`2
ÿ1 ÿ1ÿ
8
4ÿ19ÿ 
ÿ
1ÿ
`5
91
ÿ2ÿ4
ÿ

ÿ
 1
ÿ
`2ÿ214 ÿ299
ÿ 
` ÿ 
ÿ
`15
` 1 ÿ19ÿ: ;
`
`2
`ÿ
` ÿ3
`4
`ÿ

`
2ÿ 
ÿ

`  !ÿ
`
` 1 2ÿ

ÿ ÿ 


ÿ
`ÿ$ÿ
` ÿ 
` ÿ 
ÿ15
` 1 ÿ

2ÿ
`15812ÿ
`ÿ$ÿ
`<=ÿ?/.@A+ÿBÿ.CDÿEFGÿ
`
 1
ÿ1
2ÿ 
ÿ15
` 1 ÿ19ÿ: ;
`
`2
`ÿ
` ÿ
`3
`4
`ÿ

2ÿ15812ÿ
`2ÿ ÿ
` ÿ(ÿÿ
ÿ($$ÿ
`
`
ÿ64
ÿ
` ÿ 2ÿ2
`!
ÿ1
2ÿ 1 ÿ199
ÿ
`!
2ÿ91ÿ 
2
ÿ
`2ÿ
`1 
ÿ 
` ÿ 12
ÿ
`
22
ÿ
`518
ÿÿH,,ÿ 
ÿ
2ÿÿI1 ÿ1ÿ
8
4ÿ19ÿ
`
 1
72ÿ
`22

ÿ1
1 2ÿ4
ÿ
`
ÿ
2
`
ÿ5
`2
ÿ1 ÿ 
ÿ
1ÿ
`5
91
ÿ2ÿ
 1
ÿ
`2ÿ
`
ÿ
`ÿ299
ÿ214 !ÿ 
` ÿ 
ÿ15
` 1 ÿ19ÿ
`: ;
`
`2
`ÿ
` ÿ3
`4
`ÿ

2ÿ15812ÿ
`2ÿ ÿ
` ÿ(ÿ
`J=ÿ?0CK/L+@0Cÿ
`
`2
ÿ1 ÿ 
ÿ
1ÿ5
91
ÿ2ÿ4
ÿ

ÿ
 1
72ÿ199

ÿ
`
`!
2ÿ
8

ÿ
` ÿ21  !ÿ
2 1 ÿ
2
`52ÿ
`ÿ

`21
`5
ÿ
`;
11ÿ 
` ÿ
 1
ÿ41ÿ
8
`ÿ ÿ214 !ÿ 
` ÿ
`2ÿ$ÿ ÿ
` ÿ(ÿ
`41ÿ
`8
ÿ5
ÿ15812ÿ18
ÿ 
ÿ15
` 1 ÿ19ÿ: ;
`
`2
`ÿ
` ÿ
`3
`4
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Hayward.
`
`38
`
`

`

`Ill. CONCLUSION
`
`Forthe foregoing reasons, on the record before us, we are persuaded
`
`that the Petition establishes a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would
`
`prevail in showingthat at least one claim of the ’289 Patent is unpatentable.
`
`IV. ORDER
`
`For the reasonsgiven,it is:
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 5 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-6 Filed 01/12/23 Page 5of5
`IPR2022-00794
`Patent 8,904,289 B2
`
`   ÿ
`
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ
`ÿ 
ÿ
 ÿ

`! !ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
"#ÿ$

ÿ%!ÿ&
ÿ
`
ÿ'
!%
`#
#ÿ
` 
` ÿ 
ÿ
 ÿ
!
`$( !
!ÿ
`ÿ

`!
`$(
ÿ( )
( #ÿ 
` ÿ

ÿ&%(#ÿ
`'
*
` (ÿ ÿ!& ÿ +,ÿ+,ÿ./+0,ÿ12/ÿ3.+45ÿ16ÿ,7/ÿ89ÿ
`
ÿ !ÿ% '
`

`$(
ÿ
`ÿ
`:ÿ;<ÿ
`ÿ 
ÿ

`! !ÿ *
ÿ ÿ !=ÿ
`;<<;ÿ 
` ÿ'%!%
` ÿ ÿ>ÿÿ?ÿ@A
`Bÿ
` ÿCDEFGÿIJGEFKÿ !ÿ
`CDKECELEFMÿ ÿ
`((ÿ 
ÿ"
`((

#ÿ"(
` N!ÿ& ÿ
!'
" ÿ ÿ
`((ÿ% #!ÿ!
ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
` 
ÿ
 Oÿ
` #ÿÿ
`PQ<ÿ;<<;ÿ 
` ÿ'%!%
` ÿ ÿ>ÿÿ?ÿ@A
`BÿCDEFGÿ
`IJGEFKÿ
*
&ÿÿ 
ÿR ÿ
`
ÿ !ÿ ! %
#ÿ"NN
" ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
Sÿ#
`
ÿ
`ÿ  !ÿ#
ÿ
` #ÿ'%!%
` ÿ ÿ>ÿÿ?ÿ@A"Bÿ
` #ÿÿÿ?ÿ ÿ
`  "
ÿ !ÿ *
ÿÿ 
ÿ ! %  ÿÿ
`ÿ 
`(ÿ
`ÿ
`
`ORDEREDthat pursuantto 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), an inter partes is
`
`instituted on all the challenged claims with respectto all groundsset forth in
`
`the Petition; and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), inter
`
`partes review of the ’289 Patent is instituted commencingon the entry date
`
`of this Order, and pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(c) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.4,
`
`notice is given ofthe institution ofa trial.
`
`39
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket