throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1of5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLELLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES,INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-00793
`Patent 8,782,528 B2
`
`
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 5
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Paper 10
`571-272-7822
`Date: October 7, 2022
`
`  ÿÿ
`  
`

` ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿÿÿ
`ÿ
`
` !ÿ"#!"ÿ#!ÿ#ÿ$#!%#$&ÿ'' (!ÿ
`)!'$!ÿ*!ÿ#!ÿ$ #+ÿ#ÿ#!#+ÿ)#$ÿ
`,,+!ÿ++(ÿ
`  
`- ÿ ÿ
`(*"$!#%ÿ!(*+, !"ÿ ( ÿ
` - ÿ.- ÿ
` $/0ÿ
` - ÿÿ)ÿ
`)1
` ÿ!)$#ÿ& ÿ"!*!"ÿ# !+ÿ2 ÿ,#++ ,#ÿ -3ÿÿ
`#%)!$ÿ+ ÿ*#,4ÿ567898:;<=;8>?ÿA=;?9;ÿBC6D?:Eÿ
`"!*!"ÿ567898:;<=;8>?ÿA=;?9;ÿBC6D? ÿÿ
`!( " ÿ
`, - -
ÿ -   
`-ÿ
`1ÿF9;?<ÿA=<;?:ÿ$ .ÿ
`GHÿIEJEKEÿLÿGMNÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`
`Before DEBRA K. STEPHENS, DANIEL J. GALLIGAN,and
`AMBERL. HAGY,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`STEPHENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 314
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`   ÿ
`
`
ÿ  ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ
`ÿ !"#$%&ÿ%&ÿ($))"*ÿ
`+,,-.
ÿ//ÿ01
2 2,
345ÿ62.
7ÿ
`ÿ8
2 2, ÿ6,3ÿ9%:;"ÿ<":;=ÿ3
>2
?ÿ
`0
`8
3ÿ@ÿ01
4ÿ,3ÿ1
2 2, 455ÿAB
`..
-2 -ÿA.
`2CDÿ@Eÿÿ@@ÿ@ ÿ@Fÿ@ÿ ÿ
`
` 7ÿ ÿ,6ÿGÿ
`
ÿ  ÿ ÿ0HIÿ@@ÿ01J ÿ
`
455ÿÿ
`,KABD 3

`Cÿ
AB ,.,-2
Dÿ Aÿ01
`
ÿ?
345ÿ 2C
.Lÿ62.
7ÿ
`ÿ 3
.2C2
`3Lÿ
`
D8, D
ÿ0
`8
3ÿMÿ01 3
.2Cÿ
D8455ÿÿN2 Bÿ,K3ÿ
`K B,32O
` 2, ÿ
2 2,
3ÿ
`62.
7ÿ
`ÿ
8.Lÿ ,ÿ
`
ÿ?
3PDÿ 3
.2C2
`3Lÿ
D8, D
ÿ0
`8
3ÿÿ01
ÿ
8.Lÿ
` ,ÿ  455ÿ
` 7ÿ
`
ÿ?
3ÿ62.
7ÿ
`ÿGK33
8.Lÿ ,ÿ
2 2,
3PDÿ 3
.2C2
`3Lÿ
`
8.Lÿ0
`8
3ÿÿ01 ÿGK33
8.Lÿ ,ÿ
ÿ
8.L455ÿ
`B
ÿD
` 7
`37ÿ6,3ÿ2 D 2 K 2 -ÿ
` ÿ9%:;"ÿ<":;=ÿ3
>2
?ÿ2DÿD
ÿ6,3 Bÿ2 ÿ
`ÿGÿQÿ@F0
`5ÿ?B2ABÿ83,>27
Dÿ
`Dÿ6,..,?DRÿ
`0
`5ÿSHGS/TB
ÿ23
A ,3ÿC
`Lÿ , ÿ
`K B,32O
ÿ
` ÿ2
3ÿ8
`3
Dÿ
`3
>2
?ÿ ,ÿU
ÿ2 D 2 K
7ÿK .
DDÿ B
ÿ23
A ,3ÿ7
3C2
Dÿ B
` ÿ B
ÿ
`2 6,3C
` 2, ÿ83
D
7ÿ2 ÿ B
ÿ8
2 2, ÿ62.
7ÿK 7
3ÿD
A 2, ÿ@@ÿ
` 7ÿ
`
`
` Lÿ3
D8, D
ÿ62.
7ÿK 7
3ÿD
A 2, ÿ@ÿDB,?Dÿ B
` ÿ B
3
ÿ2Dÿ
`ÿ
`3

`D,
`U.
ÿ.2V
.2B,,7ÿ B
` ÿ B
ÿ8
2 2,
3ÿ?,K.7ÿ83
>
`2.ÿ?2 Bÿ
`3
D8
A ÿ ,ÿ
` ÿ.

`D ÿ@ÿ,6ÿ B
ÿA.
`2CDÿAB
`..
-
7ÿ2 ÿ B
ÿ8
2 2, ÿ
`
2 2,
3ÿAB
`..
-
DÿA.
`2CDÿ@Eÿÿ@@ÿ@ ÿ@Fÿ@ÿ ÿ
` 7ÿ ÿ
`Dÿ
`K 8
`

`U.
ÿK 7
3ÿÿGÿQÿ@ÿ2 ÿ ?,ÿ-3,K 7Dÿ,6ÿK 8
`

`U2.2 Lÿ
`0
ÿ E5ÿÿ+
3
`..Lÿ
`
ÿ?
3ÿA,
7Dÿ B
` ÿ B
ÿ
2 2, ÿDB,K.7ÿU
ÿ
`7
2
7ÿ
`Dÿ ,ÿ
`..ÿAB
`..
-
7ÿA.
`2CDÿ0=;;ÿ 3
.2Cÿ
D85ÿÿ
`D
7ÿ, ÿ,K3ÿ3
>2
?ÿ
`,6ÿ B
ÿ3
A,37ÿ?
ÿA, A.K7
ÿ B
` ÿ
2 2,
3ÿ2Dÿ3

`D,
`U.Lÿ.2V
.Lÿ ,ÿ83
>
`2.ÿ2 ÿ
`7
C, D 3
` 2 -ÿ B
` ÿ
` ÿ.

`D ÿ,
ÿ,6ÿ B
ÿAB
`..
-
7ÿA.
`2CDÿ2Dÿ , ÿ8
`

`U.
ÿ
` ÿW832.ÿ Fÿ @ÿ B
ÿGK83
C
ÿ,K3 ÿB
.7ÿ B
` ÿ
`ÿ62
`.ÿ?32
ÿ
`7
A2D2, ÿK 7
3ÿÿGÿQÿ@0
`5ÿCKD ÿ7
A27
ÿ B
ÿ8
`

`U2.2 Lÿ,6ÿ
`..ÿA.
`2CDÿ
`AB
`..
-
7ÿ2 ÿ B
ÿ8
2 2, ÿ0((ÿX%=:YÿX%ÿZÿX%$ÿ@ÿGÿ ÿ@Fÿ0 @5[ÿ
`=;;ÿ\=#ÿÿ]ÿQÿF @0
`5ÿ01NB
ÿ2 D 2 K 2 -ÿÿÿÿ3
>2
?ÿ B
ÿ,
`37ÿ?2..ÿ
` ÿ
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 4 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 4of5
`IPR2022-00793
`Patent 8,782,528 B2
`
`authorize the review to proceed onall of the challenged claims andonall
`
`groundsof unpatentability asserted for each claim” ). Accordingly, we
`
`institute inter partes review onall of the challenged claims based onall of
`
`the groundsidentified in the Petition.
`
`Our preliminary findings of fact and conclusions discussed below are
`
`based on the evidentiary record developed thus far. This Decision to
`
`institute trial is not a final decision as to the patentability of any challenged
`
`claim. Any final decision will be based on the full record developed during
`
`trial.
`
`B. Real Parties in Interest
`
`Patent Ownerstates that Touchstream Technologies,Inc., is the real-
`
`party-in-interest (Paper 5, 1).
`
`Petitioner states that Google LLCis the real-party-in-interest
`
`(Pet. 78).!
`
`C. Related Matters
`
`   ÿ
`
`
ÿ  ÿ ÿ
`
` 
ÿ 
ÿ

ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ 
ÿ
`

ÿ
` !ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`
` !ÿÿ 
`

`" #ÿ
`!!

ÿÿ

`ÿ
` $ÿ&'ÿÿ( #ÿ
ÿ
` !  
ÿ)*+,-ÿ./-+,0ÿ

ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ 
ÿ
`

ÿ
` !ÿ"
`!
ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ
` 
ÿ !ÿ

ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
  'ÿ
`1ÿ
 
`#ÿ  !ÿÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ ! !ÿ!!!
ÿ"
ÿ
`
ÿ
`"
`!
ÿ ÿ 
ÿ


`#ÿ
ÿ


ÿ !ÿ
`'ÿÿ2!ÿ3
! ÿ ÿ
` !  
ÿ 
`ÿ!ÿ  ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
! ÿ
`!ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
`

`" #ÿÿ
` #ÿ
`

ÿ
`
` 'ÿÿ( #ÿ
`ÿ
! ÿÿ"
ÿ"
`!
ÿ ÿ 
ÿÿ
ÿ


ÿ ÿ
` 
`'ÿ
`45ÿ7,/8ÿ9/-+),0ÿ)*ÿ:*+,-,0+ÿ
`
`
ÿ1
ÿ!
`
!ÿ 
` ÿ2! 

` ÿ2
 
!ÿ 'ÿ!ÿ 
ÿ

`
`
` # 

! ÿ;
`
ÿÿ<&'ÿ
`
 
ÿ!
`
!ÿ 
` ÿ=
ÿ>>?ÿ!ÿ 
ÿ

`
` # 

! ÿ
`;
'ÿ&'<ÿÿÿ
`@5ÿ7,8/+,AÿB/++,-0ÿ
`
 
ÿ
` ÿ
`
ÿ1
ÿ 
`
ÿ 
ÿC ÿ
`
ÿ
`!ÿ
`!!

ÿ ÿ
` 
ÿ ÿ!  ÿ ÿ
 DÿEFGHI0+-,/JÿE,HI05Kÿ:*H5ÿL5ÿMFFN8,Kÿ
`OO@ÿP'ÿQ <Qÿ;R'3'ÿ2
S'&ÿ;
'ÿTÿ
`
ÿÿ<&'ÿÿ
 
ÿ
` 
ÿ 
`
!ÿ 
` ÿ 
ÿC ÿ
`
ÿ
`!ÿ
`!!

ÿ ÿ 
ÿ ÿ!  ÿ
` ÿ
 DÿEFGHI0+-,/JÿE,HI05Kÿ:*H5ÿL5ÿU)VW,,Kÿ:*H5ÿPÿ<<
`Q Xÿ;Y'3'P'Z'&ÿ;
'ÿ&'ÿ
`ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
`<ÿ=
ÿ>>?ÿ!ÿ
`ÿ!"!
`#ÿÿ[[\ÿ] !ÿ 'ÿÿ!ÿ
`ÿ!"!
`#ÿ
`ÿ(
`"
ÿ ÿ;
'ÿÿ 'X&'ÿÿ
 
ÿ!
`
!ÿ 
` ÿ[[\ÿ] !ÿ 'ÿ
` ÿ
`(
`"
ÿ 'ÿ
`
ÿ  ÿ

`ÿ
` 
! 

! ÿ ÿ !ÿ
 ÿ;)A5&'ÿ
`ÿ
`
`' Google LLCis a subsidiary of XXVI Holdings Inc., which is a subsidiary
`of Alphabet Inc (Pet. 78, n.4). Petitioner states that XXVI Holdings Inc. and
`AlphabetInc. are not real parties-in-interest to this proceeding (id.).
`
`Petitioner and Patent Ownerindicate the 528 Patent was asserted in
`
`the following district court proceeding: Touchstream Techs., Inc. v. Google,
`
`LLC, No. 6-21-cv-00569 (W.D. Tex.) (Pet. 78; Paper 5, 1). Petitioner
`
`further indicates that the ’528 Patent was asserted in the followingdistrict
`
`court proceeding: Touchstream Techs., Inc. v. Vizbee, Inc., No, 1-17-cv-
`
`06247 (S.D.N.Y.) (Pet. 78).
`
`3
`
`

`

`Muthukumarasamy and Hayward renders obvious claims 2-5, 8, 11, 12, 14,
`
`15, 27, and 28.
`
`5. Conclusion
`
`Based on the record before us, we determinePetitioner’s proffered
`
`arguments, evidence, and supporting testimony establish a reasonable
`
`likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing that claims 1-5, 8, 11,
`
`12, 14, 15, 27, and 28 would have been obvious over the combination of
`
`Muthukumarasamy and Hayward.
`
`II. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, on the record before us, we are persuaded
`
`that the Petition establishes a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would
`
`prevail in showingthat at least one claim of the ’528 Patent is unpatentable.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 5 of 5
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 149-5 Filed 01/12/23 Page 5of5
`IPR2022-00793
`Patent 8,782,528 B2
`
`   ÿ
`
`
ÿ  ÿ ÿ
` 
`
`
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
`ÿ

ÿ !"ÿ#$
`"ÿ %ÿÿÿ ÿÿ
`ÿ ÿ
` ÿ &ÿ
`ÿ
`'(ÿ*+,-./01+,ÿ
`
`
ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
#ÿ
3
ÿÿ
ÿ
"
ÿ
" "
4ÿ533

ÿ
`
`6
ÿ
!"
#
ÿ
` ÿ55 " 6ÿ
 " ÿ

` $"ÿ
`ÿ

`
` $
ÿ
`$"
$"ÿ 
` ÿ
" "
ÿ$ÿ5
!
`"$ÿ" ÿ" 6ÿ 
` ÿ#$
`"ÿ%ÿÿÿ
` ÿÿÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ$ÿ
`!
ÿ
ÿ !"ÿ!
ÿ 
ÿ# "
` " ÿ3ÿ
` 
`
`
`ÿ
` ÿ
`
`&ÿ
`ÿ
`&ÿ89:8;<=9:ÿ
`>ÿ 
ÿ3
6" 6ÿ

` ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
#ÿ
3
ÿÿ
ÿ
`
ÿ5

`
ÿ
` 
` ÿ 
ÿ
" " ÿ

` $"
ÿ
`ÿ

`
` $
ÿ$"
$"ÿ 
` ÿ
" "
ÿ$ÿ
`5
!
`"$ÿ" ÿ" 6ÿ 
` ÿ
` ÿ$

` ÿ
ÿ#$
`"ÿ?@ÿBCDÿE ÿ
`
ÿ"ÿ 5
`

` $
&ÿ
`ÿ
`F&ÿ9GHÿ
`>ÿ 
ÿ

` ÿ6"!
ÿ" ÿ"Iÿ
`9GHHGÿ 
` ÿ5
` ÿ ÿÿ<&=&8&ÿJÿK
`Lÿ
` ÿ1,MNOÿPQOMN0ÿ"ÿ
`1,0M1M/MNRÿ ÿ
`$$ÿ 
ÿ#
`$$
6
ÿ#$
`"ÿ" ÿ
5
# ÿ ÿ
`$$ÿ6 ÿ
ÿ3 ÿ" ÿ
` 
ÿ
" " Sÿ
` ÿÿ
`><THÿ9GHHGÿ 
` ÿ5
` ÿ ÿÿ<&=&8&ÿJÿK
`Lÿ1,MNOÿ
`PQOMN0ÿ
!"
ÿ3ÿ 
ÿ4 ÿ
`
ÿ"ÿ"  " 
ÿ#
#" 6ÿ ÿ 
ÿ
ÿ
`
ÿ
`3ÿ "ÿ9
ÿ
` ÿ5
` ÿ ÿÿ<&=&8&ÿJÿK#Lÿ
` ÿÿ8&>&&ÿJÿ &ÿ
`
`  "#
ÿ"ÿ6"!
ÿ3ÿ 
ÿ"  "  " ÿ3ÿ
`ÿ "
`$&ÿ
`ÿ
`
`IV. ORDER
`
`For the reasonsgiven,it is:
`
`ORDEREDthatpursuantto 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), an inter partes is
`
`instituted on all the challenged claims with respectto all groundsset forth in
`
`the Petition; and
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatpursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), inter
`
`partes review of the ’528 Patent is instituted commencingon the entry date
`
`of this Order, and pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(c) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.4,
`
`notice is given ofthe institution ofa trial.
`
`41
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket