throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 1 of 8
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`BY: ________________________________
`
`FILED
`
`DEPUTY
`
`October 31, 2022
`
`CV
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 8.
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`at another location in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, under oath or affirmation. Given that the
`
`deposition would take place in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, the competent authority for the
`
`granting of this request is the High Court of the Canton ofZurich, International Judicial Assistance,
`
`Hirschengraben 13/15, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland. As is customary, a copy of the present Letter of
`
`Request is sent to the Federal Office of Justice, Central Authority for the Request for Judicial
`
`Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters, Bundesrain 20, 3003 Bern, Switzerland.
`
`This Court,
`
`therefore,
`
`respectfully requests your assistance pursuant
`
`to the Hague
`
`Convention in obtaining the oral deposition testimony of Mr. Janos Levai underthe terms set forth
`
`in this Letter of Request:
`
`I. SUMMARYOF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`The above-captioned actions are properly under the jurisdiction of and are now
`
`pending before the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division,
`800 Franklin Avenue, Room 301, Waco, Texas 76701, United States of America. The United States
`District Court for the WesternDistrict ofTexasis fully sanctioned as a court of law and equity and
`
`is authorized by Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to direct the taking of evidence
`
`abroad by Letters of Request.
`
`2.
`
`The parties to the civil action pending in the United States District Court for the
`
`Western District of Texas are as follows:
`
`a. Google LLC (“Google”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware, with its headquarters in California, USA. Witness Janos Levai is an
`
`individual who is employed by Google Switzerland GmbHas a Staff Product Manager,
`
`but
`
`is a resident of Switzerland. Google is represented by JONES DAY, 1755
`
`Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. Correspondence to Google can be faxed
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 3 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`to its representatives at +! (650) 739-3900, or emailed at the following email addresses:
`
`tglanier@jonesday.com, emclean@jonesday.com, edwingarcia@jonesday.com,
`
`and_
`
`Google-Touchstream-JD@jonesday.com.
`
`b. Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (“Touchstream”)is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of New York, with headquarters in New York, USA. Plaintiffs are
`
`represented by SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P., 2555 Grand Boulevard, Kansas
`
`City, MO 64108. Correspondence to Touchstream can be faxedto its representatives at
`
`+1 (816) 421-5547 or emailed at the following email addresses: rdykal@shb.com,
`
`mgray@shb.com, and slaroque@shb.com.
`
`3.
`
`In the above-captioned action, Touchstream has sued Google for infringement of
`
`United States Patent Nos. 8,356,251 (the “°251 patent”), 8,782,528 (the “’528 patent”), and
`8,904,289 (the “’289 patent”) (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”) underthe patent laws ofthe United
`States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et. seq.
`|
`
`4,
`
`Google has notified Touchstream ofits intention to conduct the deposition of Mr.
`
`Janos Levai, and to present him as a corporate designee on certain topics, who will be located for
`
`such deposition in Switzerland,in accordance with ChapterII of the Hague Convention.
`
`II. EVIDENCE REQUESTED
`
`5.
`
`Googlehassatisfied this Court that Mr. Janos Levai has material information related
`
`to this pending actionforuseattrial, and that justice cannot be completely done between the parties
`
`withouthis testimony.
`
`6.
`
`Google has requested that this Court issue the present Letter of Request seeking your
`
`assistance in obtaining testimony from Mr. Janos Levai. The evidence to be obtained is oral
`
`testimony to be taken in Switzerland, and is intended to be used as evidence in the trial for this
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 4of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`matter. Mr. Janos Levai, who is a resident of Switzerland, has been apprised of his rights under
`Swiss law and has consented to being deposed in Switzerland.
`.
`|
`
`7.
`
`The Court requests assistance in permitting the commissioners appointed by this
`
`Court to take testimony from Mr. Janos Levai, which will be given voluntarily. The topics of
`
`- examination may include, but are notlimited to:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Mr. Janos Levai’s role and duties as an employee of Google.
`
`Knowledge of the YouTube Remote application.
`
`Knowledge of documentsrelated to and producedin this matter.
`
`Any topic for which Mr. Janos Levai is designated by Google pursuant to Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6).
`
`8._This Court is satisfied that the testamentary evidence is relevant to the pending
`
`proceeding andis likely to be used attrial to assist this Court in resolving the dispute presented in
`
`the civil action before it. With the approval of this Court, Google and this Court therefore seek
`
`permission to have commissioners take this testamentary evidence for the purpose of using such
`
`evidenceattrial.
`
`9.
`
`It is requested that the testamentary evidence be given in the English language, and
`
`on oath or affirmation.
`
`It is also hereby requested that the testimony be in the form of recorded
`
`deposition testimony upon questions communicated to the witness by U.S. counsel of the parties,
`
`acting as commissioners.
`
`It is requested that the testamentary evidence be given at sometime
`
`agreeableto all involved in October 2022 or November2022.
`
`10.
`
`The Court hereby appoints Mr. Olivier Buff to serve as commissioner (“the Swiss
`
`Commissioner”). Mr. Buff is a lawyer with the law firm Quinn Emanuelat Dufourstrasse 29, 8008
`
`Zurich, Switzerland, and admitted to practice as an attorney in Switzerland.
`
`In case Mr. Buff will
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 5of8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`to be unable to perform anyofhis tasks as Swiss Commissioner, including the task to supervise the
`
`testimony of Mr. Janos Levai, he will be allowed to delegate the performance of such task(s) to
`
`another lawyer with the law firm Quinn Emanuel at Dufourstrasse 29, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland,
`
`whichis also admitted to practice as an attorney in Switzerland.
`
`In his capacity as commissioner,
`
`Mr. Olivier Buff (or any delegate) will complete and oversee the following tasks: liaise with the
`
`Swiss authorities, including dispatch/submission of the present Letter of Request to the High Court
`
`of the Canton of Zurich, International Judicial Assistance, Hirschengraben 13/15, 8021 Zurich,
`
`Switzerland, and of a copy of the sameto the Federal Office of Justice, Central Authority for the
`
`Request for Judicial Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters, Bundesrain 20, 3003 Bern,
`
`Switzerland; act as an agentofservice for any communication of the High Court of the Canton of
`
`Zurich and/or the Federal Office of Justice to this Court, the parties and Mr. Janos Levai; invite Mr.
`
`Janos Levai to the deposition once authorization is granted; verify and confirm the identity of Mr.
`
`Janos Levai before testamentary evidence is taken; supervise the testimony of Mr. Janos Levai from
`
`the Swiss offices of Quinn Emanuelat Dufourstrasse 29, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland(or, if required,
`
`from another location in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland); instruct the witness on his rights and
`
`obligations as per Article 21 of the Hague Convention; and ensure that the testimony is conducted
`
`in accordance with those rights and obligations.
`
`li.
`
`The U.S. counselofthe parties, which the Court, upon request ofGoogle, herebyalso
`
`appoints as commissioners are the following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`For Google: Greg Lanier, Evan McLean, and Edwin Garcia from JONES DAY, 1755
`
`Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
`
`For Touchstream: Ryan Dykal, Michael Gray, and Sam LaRoque from SHOOK,
`
`HARDY & BACONL.L.P., 2555 Grand Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64108.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 6 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`12.
`
`In addition to the U.S. counsel and commissioners listed above and to the Swiss
`
`Commissioner,it is also requested that client representatives for each party be allowed to be present,
`
`and that a videographer and a stenographer bepresent to take and record a verbatim transcriptofall
`
`testimony and proceedings in the English language and that the transcript of the testimony be
`
`authenticated. When necessary, persons belongingto the information technology departmentsof the
`
`law firms of U.S. counsel may enter the rooms where U.S. counsel are remotely attending the
`
`deposition. U.S. counsel, the party representatives, the videographer, and the stenographer may
`
`attend the deposition remotely. The Swiss Commissioner, Mr. Janos Levai, and potentially any of
`
`the appointed other commissioners may attend the deposition by videoconference from the same
`
`location in Zurichor,if required, may also attend remotely from separate locations in the canton of
`
`Zurich, Switzerland. When necessary, persons belonging to the IT departmentofthe Quinn Emanuel
`
`law firm where the deposition is held may enter the room where the Swiss Commissioner and/or Mr.
`
`Janos Levai are remotely attending the deposition.
`
`13.
`
`As mentioned,
`
`it
`
`is requested that the commissioners take Mr. Janos Levai’s
`
`testimony in the English language (to which Mr. Levai has agreed) under oath or affirmation, and
`
`that the Swiss Commissioner be allowed to administer such oath or request for affirmation on Mr.
`
`Janos Levai in accordance with United States law, as follows: “Do you swear or affirm that the
`
`testimony youare aboutto provideis the truth, the wholetruth, and nothing but the truth?”
`
`14.
`
`It is also requested that after giving testimony, Mr. Janos Levai be allowed after
`
`completion ofthe transcript to review, submit any errata, and sign the transcript of his testimony,
`
`and that the signed, transcribed, and videotaped testimony together with any documents marked as
`
`exhibits be transmitted to the parties’ U.S. counsel as soon aspossible thereafter.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 7 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`15.
`
`Accordingly, it is hereby requested that you grant assistance and authorize the Swiss
`
`and U.S. commissioners appointed above to question Mr. Janos Levai underoath or affirmation at
`
`the remote deposition at some time agreeable to all involved in October or November 2022 andthat
`
`a verbatim transcript and videotape be prepared and be transmitted to the parties’ U.S. counsel for
`
`submission and use before this Court.
`
`16.
`
`It is also requested that you inform the Swiss Commissioner, this Court, and Google
`
`through its above-mentioned U.S. counsel ofyour approvalofthis Court’s request andofall relevant
`
`dates and times determined by you for the production ofthe aforementioned requested testamentary
`
`evidence of Mr. Janos Levai. This Court and U.S. counsel hereby appoint Mr. Olivier Buff to file
`the necessary application forauthorization with you and act as the agent ofservice in Switzerland
`
`for any and all communication from you in this respect. As mentioned above, Mr. Olivier Buffs
`
`professional address in Switzerland for purpose of your communicationsis: Dufourstrasse 29, 8008
`
`Zurich, Switzerland.
`
`17.
`
`This Court expressesits appreciation to the High Court of the Canton of Zurich and
`
`the Federal Office of Justice for its courtesy and assistance in this matter and states that this Court
`
`shall be ready and willing to assist the courts of Switzerland in a similar manner when required.
`
`This Court is also willing to reimburse (through Google) the competent judicial authorities of
`
`Switzerland for any costs incurred in executing this request for judicial assistance. This Court
`
`extends to the competent judicial authorities of Switzerland the assurances ofits highest
`
`‘consideration.
`
`This Letter of Request is signed and sealed by Orderof the Court made onthe date set forth
`
`below:
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 8 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 8 of 8
`
` SIGNED:
`(© \2 | Ae
`
`HON. ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`
`UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE
`
`Atruecopy oftheorigins;Iceri.
`Clerk, U6. District Court
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket