`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`BY: ________________________________
`
`FILED
`
`DEPUTY
`
`October 31, 2022
`
`CV
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 8.
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 2 of 8
`
`at another location in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, under oath or affirmation. Given that the
`
`deposition would take place in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland, the competent authority for the
`
`granting of this request is the High Court of the Canton ofZurich, International Judicial Assistance,
`
`Hirschengraben 13/15, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland. As is customary, a copy of the present Letter of
`
`Request is sent to the Federal Office of Justice, Central Authority for the Request for Judicial
`
`Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters, Bundesrain 20, 3003 Bern, Switzerland.
`
`This Court,
`
`therefore,
`
`respectfully requests your assistance pursuant
`
`to the Hague
`
`Convention in obtaining the oral deposition testimony of Mr. Janos Levai underthe terms set forth
`
`in this Letter of Request:
`
`I. SUMMARYOF ACTION
`
`1.
`
`The above-captioned actions are properly under the jurisdiction of and are now
`
`pending before the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division,
`800 Franklin Avenue, Room 301, Waco, Texas 76701, United States of America. The United States
`District Court for the WesternDistrict ofTexasis fully sanctioned as a court of law and equity and
`
`is authorized by Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to direct the taking of evidence
`
`abroad by Letters of Request.
`
`2.
`
`The parties to the civil action pending in the United States District Court for the
`
`Western District of Texas are as follows:
`
`a. Google LLC (“Google”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware, with its headquarters in California, USA. Witness Janos Levai is an
`
`individual who is employed by Google Switzerland GmbHas a Staff Product Manager,
`
`but
`
`is a resident of Switzerland. Google is represented by JONES DAY, 1755
`
`Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. Correspondence to Google can be faxed
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 3 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 3 of 8
`
`to its representatives at +! (650) 739-3900, or emailed at the following email addresses:
`
`tglanier@jonesday.com, emclean@jonesday.com, edwingarcia@jonesday.com,
`
`and_
`
`Google-Touchstream-JD@jonesday.com.
`
`b. Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (“Touchstream”)is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of New York, with headquarters in New York, USA. Plaintiffs are
`
`represented by SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P., 2555 Grand Boulevard, Kansas
`
`City, MO 64108. Correspondence to Touchstream can be faxedto its representatives at
`
`+1 (816) 421-5547 or emailed at the following email addresses: rdykal@shb.com,
`
`mgray@shb.com, and slaroque@shb.com.
`
`3.
`
`In the above-captioned action, Touchstream has sued Google for infringement of
`
`United States Patent Nos. 8,356,251 (the “°251 patent”), 8,782,528 (the “’528 patent”), and
`8,904,289 (the “’289 patent”) (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”) underthe patent laws ofthe United
`States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et. seq.
`|
`
`4,
`
`Google has notified Touchstream ofits intention to conduct the deposition of Mr.
`
`Janos Levai, and to present him as a corporate designee on certain topics, who will be located for
`
`such deposition in Switzerland,in accordance with ChapterII of the Hague Convention.
`
`II. EVIDENCE REQUESTED
`
`5.
`
`Googlehassatisfied this Court that Mr. Janos Levai has material information related
`
`to this pending actionforuseattrial, and that justice cannot be completely done between the parties
`
`withouthis testimony.
`
`6.
`
`Google has requested that this Court issue the present Letter of Request seeking your
`
`assistance in obtaining testimony from Mr. Janos Levai. The evidence to be obtained is oral
`
`testimony to be taken in Switzerland, and is intended to be used as evidence in the trial for this
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 4of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 4 of 8
`
`matter. Mr. Janos Levai, who is a resident of Switzerland, has been apprised of his rights under
`Swiss law and has consented to being deposed in Switzerland.
`.
`|
`
`7.
`
`The Court requests assistance in permitting the commissioners appointed by this
`
`Court to take testimony from Mr. Janos Levai, which will be given voluntarily. The topics of
`
`- examination may include, but are notlimited to:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Mr. Janos Levai’s role and duties as an employee of Google.
`
`Knowledge of the YouTube Remote application.
`
`Knowledge of documentsrelated to and producedin this matter.
`
`Any topic for which Mr. Janos Levai is designated by Google pursuant to Federal
`
`Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6).
`
`8._This Court is satisfied that the testamentary evidence is relevant to the pending
`
`proceeding andis likely to be used attrial to assist this Court in resolving the dispute presented in
`
`the civil action before it. With the approval of this Court, Google and this Court therefore seek
`
`permission to have commissioners take this testamentary evidence for the purpose of using such
`
`evidenceattrial.
`
`9.
`
`It is requested that the testamentary evidence be given in the English language, and
`
`on oath or affirmation.
`
`It is also hereby requested that the testimony be in the form of recorded
`
`deposition testimony upon questions communicated to the witness by U.S. counsel of the parties,
`
`acting as commissioners.
`
`It is requested that the testamentary evidence be given at sometime
`
`agreeableto all involved in October 2022 or November2022.
`
`10.
`
`The Court hereby appoints Mr. Olivier Buff to serve as commissioner (“the Swiss
`
`Commissioner”). Mr. Buff is a lawyer with the law firm Quinn Emanuelat Dufourstrasse 29, 8008
`
`Zurich, Switzerland, and admitted to practice as an attorney in Switzerland.
`
`In case Mr. Buff will
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 5of8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 5 of 8
`
`to be unable to perform anyofhis tasks as Swiss Commissioner, including the task to supervise the
`
`testimony of Mr. Janos Levai, he will be allowed to delegate the performance of such task(s) to
`
`another lawyer with the law firm Quinn Emanuel at Dufourstrasse 29, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland,
`
`whichis also admitted to practice as an attorney in Switzerland.
`
`In his capacity as commissioner,
`
`Mr. Olivier Buff (or any delegate) will complete and oversee the following tasks: liaise with the
`
`Swiss authorities, including dispatch/submission of the present Letter of Request to the High Court
`
`of the Canton of Zurich, International Judicial Assistance, Hirschengraben 13/15, 8021 Zurich,
`
`Switzerland, and of a copy of the sameto the Federal Office of Justice, Central Authority for the
`
`Request for Judicial Assistance in Civil and Commercial Matters, Bundesrain 20, 3003 Bern,
`
`Switzerland; act as an agentofservice for any communication of the High Court of the Canton of
`
`Zurich and/or the Federal Office of Justice to this Court, the parties and Mr. Janos Levai; invite Mr.
`
`Janos Levai to the deposition once authorization is granted; verify and confirm the identity of Mr.
`
`Janos Levai before testamentary evidence is taken; supervise the testimony of Mr. Janos Levai from
`
`the Swiss offices of Quinn Emanuelat Dufourstrasse 29, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland(or, if required,
`
`from another location in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland); instruct the witness on his rights and
`
`obligations as per Article 21 of the Hague Convention; and ensure that the testimony is conducted
`
`in accordance with those rights and obligations.
`
`li.
`
`The U.S. counselofthe parties, which the Court, upon request ofGoogle, herebyalso
`
`appoints as commissioners are the following:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`For Google: Greg Lanier, Evan McLean, and Edwin Garcia from JONES DAY, 1755
`
`Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
`
`For Touchstream: Ryan Dykal, Michael Gray, and Sam LaRoque from SHOOK,
`
`HARDY & BACONL.L.P., 2555 Grand Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64108.
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 6 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 6 of 8
`
`12.
`
`In addition to the U.S. counsel and commissioners listed above and to the Swiss
`
`Commissioner,it is also requested that client representatives for each party be allowed to be present,
`
`and that a videographer and a stenographer bepresent to take and record a verbatim transcriptofall
`
`testimony and proceedings in the English language and that the transcript of the testimony be
`
`authenticated. When necessary, persons belongingto the information technology departmentsof the
`
`law firms of U.S. counsel may enter the rooms where U.S. counsel are remotely attending the
`
`deposition. U.S. counsel, the party representatives, the videographer, and the stenographer may
`
`attend the deposition remotely. The Swiss Commissioner, Mr. Janos Levai, and potentially any of
`
`the appointed other commissioners may attend the deposition by videoconference from the same
`
`location in Zurichor,if required, may also attend remotely from separate locations in the canton of
`
`Zurich, Switzerland. When necessary, persons belonging to the IT departmentofthe Quinn Emanuel
`
`law firm where the deposition is held may enter the room where the Swiss Commissioner and/or Mr.
`
`Janos Levai are remotely attending the deposition.
`
`13.
`
`As mentioned,
`
`it
`
`is requested that the commissioners take Mr. Janos Levai’s
`
`testimony in the English language (to which Mr. Levai has agreed) under oath or affirmation, and
`
`that the Swiss Commissioner be allowed to administer such oath or request for affirmation on Mr.
`
`Janos Levai in accordance with United States law, as follows: “Do you swear or affirm that the
`
`testimony youare aboutto provideis the truth, the wholetruth, and nothing but the truth?”
`
`14.
`
`It is also requested that after giving testimony, Mr. Janos Levai be allowed after
`
`completion ofthe transcript to review, submit any errata, and sign the transcript of his testimony,
`
`and that the signed, transcribed, and videotaped testimony together with any documents marked as
`
`exhibits be transmitted to the parties’ U.S. counsel as soon aspossible thereafter.
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 7 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 7 of 8
`
`15.
`
`Accordingly, it is hereby requested that you grant assistance and authorize the Swiss
`
`and U.S. commissioners appointed above to question Mr. Janos Levai underoath or affirmation at
`
`the remote deposition at some time agreeable to all involved in October or November 2022 andthat
`
`a verbatim transcript and videotape be prepared and be transmitted to the parties’ U.S. counsel for
`
`submission and use before this Court.
`
`16.
`
`It is also requested that you inform the Swiss Commissioner, this Court, and Google
`
`through its above-mentioned U.S. counsel ofyour approvalofthis Court’s request andofall relevant
`
`dates and times determined by you for the production ofthe aforementioned requested testamentary
`
`evidence of Mr. Janos Levai. This Court and U.S. counsel hereby appoint Mr. Olivier Buff to file
`the necessary application forauthorization with you and act as the agent ofservice in Switzerland
`
`for any and all communication from you in this respect. As mentioned above, Mr. Olivier Buffs
`
`professional address in Switzerland for purpose of your communicationsis: Dufourstrasse 29, 8008
`
`Zurich, Switzerland.
`
`17.
`
`This Court expressesits appreciation to the High Court of the Canton of Zurich and
`
`the Federal Office of Justice for its courtesy and assistance in this matter and states that this Court
`
`shall be ready and willing to assist the courts of Switzerland in a similar manner when required.
`
`This Court is also willing to reimburse (through Google) the competent judicial authorities of
`
`Switzerland for any costs incurred in executing this request for judicial assistance. This Court
`
`extends to the competent judicial authorities of Switzerland the assurances ofits highest
`
`‘consideration.
`
`This Letter of Request is signed and sealed by Orderof the Court made onthe date set forth
`
`below:
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 8 of 8
`Case 6:21-cv-00569-ADA Document 102-2 Filed 10/31/22 Page 8 of 8
`
` SIGNED:
`(© \2 | Ae
`
`HON. ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`
`UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE
`
`Atruecopy oftheorigins;Iceri.
`Clerk, U6. District Court
`
`
`
`