throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 38
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`PARKERVISION,INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00520-ADA
`
`LG ELECTRONICS,INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`TO THE APPROPRIATE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY OF TAIWAN:
`
`The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas presentsits
`
`compliments to the Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan, and requests judicial
`
`assistance to obtain evidenceto be used in a civil proceeding before this Court in the
`
`above-captioned matters.
`
`I
`
`Request.
`
`The Court respectfully requests that the Appropriate Judicial Authority of
`
`Taiwan compel production of documents and testimony of a representative or
`
`representatives from the following corporate entity:
`
`MediaTekInc.
`No.1, Dusing 1% Rd.,
`Hsinchu Science Park,
`Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
`
`Specifically, the Court requests MediaTekInc. (“MediaTek”) to produce the
`
`documents and things set forth in Attachment A to this Request and thereafter produce
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 2 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 2 of 38
`
`a witness or witnessesto testify regarding the deposition topics set forth in Attachment
`
`B. The Court requests the witness to be placed under oath, subject to questioning by
`
`counsel for the parties to the above-captioned matters, and that a verbatim transcript of
`
`the testimony be taken.
`
`The Court understandsthat the documents and information requested maybe of
`
`a confidential nature. As such,there is a Protective Orderin this case to protect the
`
`confidentiality of any documents produced. A copyof the Protective Order is appended
`
`as Attachment C.
`
`If service cannot be effected at the address indicated above, this Court
`
`respectfully requests judicial assistance to effect service by any means permitted under
`
`Taiwanese law.
`
`This Court further requests that the executed Letters Rogatory and any evidence
`
`producedin responsebesent by international courier and through a secure FTPlink via
`
`email directly to counsel for the Requesting Party, ParkerVision,Inc. (“ParkerVision”),
`
`at the following mailing and email addresses:
`
`Ronald M.Daignault
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive - Suite 105
`Vienna, VA 22182
`rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com
`
`with copiesto:
`ChandranB. Iyer at cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`and Cathy Pampinella at cpampinella@daignaultiyer.com.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 3 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 3 of 38
`
`II.
`
`Facts.
`
`Plaintiff ParkerVision filed a lawsuit against Defendant LG Electronics,Inc.
`
`(“LGE”)in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
`
`ParkerVision seeks a judgment that LGE infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6,049,706; 6,266,518;
`
`6,580,902; 7,110,444; 7,292,835; 8,588,725; 8,660,513; 9,118,528; 9,246,736 and 9,444,673
`
`(the “Asserted Patents”). The technology described and claimed in the Asserted Patents
`
`relates to, among other things, integrated circuit chips used for wi-fi, Bluetooth and
`
`cellular communications. ParkerVision alleges that LGE televisions, and other products,
`
`use integrated circuit chips that MediaTek manufactures andsells to LGE either directly
`
`or throughthird parties and that these chips read on claimsin the Asserted Patents
`
`(“MediaTek Chips”). ParkerVision seeks an award of damages from LGE to compensate
`
`ParkerVision for LGE’s use of the MediaTek Chipsin its products and alleged patent
`
`infringement.
`
`In response to ParkerVision’s infringement claims, LGE has asserted defenses
`
`that include noninfringementand patent invalidity. The documents requested in
`
`Attachment A providecircuit-level detail of the accused chips used in LGE’s accused
`
`products, technical information regarding the MediaTek Chips that MediaTek has sold
`
`or otherwise provided to LGE directly or through a third party, the agreements between
`
`MediaTek and LGEandotherthird parties relating to the MediaTek Chips, and the
`
`marketing and sale of the MediaTek Chips. The deposition topics recited in Attachment
`
`B relate to the documents requested in AttachmentA, as described generally above, and
`
`the authentication and business-record nature of the requested documents. The
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 4 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 4 of 38
`
`requested documents and deposition testimony are therefore important to
`
`ParkerVision’s ability to demonstrate LGE’s infringement of the Asserted Patents and to
`
`properly and fully respond to LGE’s defenses.
`
`III.
`
`Offer of Reciprocal Assistance.
`
`The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas is willing to
`
`provide similar assistance to the Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan. See 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1782.
`
`IV.
`
`Reimbursementfor Costs.
`
`This Court, through Plaintiff ParkerVision, is willing to reimburse the
`
`Appropriate Judicial Authority of Taiwan for costs and expenses incurred in executing
`
`these Letters Rogatory.
`
`DATEDthis
`
`day of
`
`, 2022.
`
`Respectfully Requested,
`
`The Honorable Alan D Albright
`United States District Judge
`for the Western District of Texas
`800 Franklin Avenue
`Waco, Texas 76701
`United States of America
`Tel.: +1 (254) 750-1519
`
`(SEAL OF THE COURT)
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 5 of 38
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`Asusedin herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
`
`1.
`
`“And”and “or” shall have both the conjunctive and disjunctive meaning
`
`andshall be construedto include, rather than exclude material from the scope of the
`
`request.
`
`2.
`
`“Any”or “each” shall be construed to encompass“all.” “Any” includes
`
`both “any” and “every.” “All” shall be construed to include and encompass“any.”
`
`3.
`
`“Concerning,”
`
`“referring to,” or “relating to” means pertainingto,
`
`ut
`
`mentioning, commenting on, connected with, discussing, describing, analyzing,
`
`explaining, showing,reflecting, dealing with, comprising, consisting of, containing,
`
`constituting, referring to, resulting from, or recording a particular subject in wholeor in
`
`part and either directly or indirectly.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`“Communication” means the transmittal of information.
`
`“Component Provider” means any entity that manufacturers, sells, offers
`
`for sale, and/or provides any module, componentor part containing a MediaTek Chip
`
`where such module, componentor part is incorporated into, intended to be
`
`incorporated into, or used in any LGE Products.
`
`6.
`
`“Control” shall mean actual and constructive control, custody,
`
`knowledge, and/or possession by any one or a combination of the following persons:
`
`a.
`
`MediaTek;
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 6 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 6 of 38
`
`b.
`
`Anycorporation or other entity controlled by, directed by, or
`
`affiliated with MediaTek;
`
`c.
`
`Anyofficer, principal, director, trustee, employee, staff member,
`
`agent, joint venturer, partner, accountant, consultant, advisor, investigator, or
`
`any other representative of MediaTek;
`
`d.
`
`Anyofficer, principal, director, trustee, employee, staff member,
`
`agent, joint venturer, partner, accountant, consultant, advisor, investigator, or
`
`any other representative belonging to a corporation or other entity controlled by,
`
`directed by,oraffiliated with MediaTek;
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`Counsel for MediaTek; and
`
`Counsel for any corporation or other entity controlled by, directed
`
`by,or affiliated with MediaTek.
`
`7.
`
`“Document” is used in a comprehensive senseasset forth in Rule 34(a) of
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including withoutlimitation, electronic or
`
`computerized data compilations. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document
`
`within the meaning of this term.
`
`8.
`
`“MediaTek” means MediaTekInc. and(a) any of its present or former
`
`divisions, departments, businesses, subsidiaries, or other organization or operational
`
`units; (b) all predecessor, successor, or assignee entities; (c) all present or former
`
`member companies, corporations, partnerships, associations, or other businessentities;
`
`and (d) present or formerofficers, directors, employees, agents, consultants,
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 7 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 7 of 38
`
`accountants, attorneys (including in-house and outside counsel), or other
`
`representatives (in their individual or representative capacities).
`
`9.
`
`“MediaTek Chip(s)” means any andall receiver, transmitter and/or
`
`transceiver integrated circuits, and/or components/ modules containing or
`
`incorporating any andall receiver, transmitter and/or transceiver integrated circuits
`
`that (a) MediaTek has sold to LGE from 2014 to the present including, but not limited
`
`to, the MediaTek MT7612UN; or (b) MediaTek has sold to a Component Provideror
`
`any other third party from 2015 to the present and that is incorporated into, intended to
`
`be incorporated into, or used in any LGE Products including, but not limited to, the
`
`MediaTek MT7612UN.
`
`10.
`
`“LGE Products” means any product that LGE has made, used,sold,
`
`imported in/into the United States and/or offered for sale, including but not limited to
`
`modules, LGE-brandedtelevisions, Sharp-brandedtelevisions, or televisions sold under
`
`any other brand that incorporate and use MediaTek Chip(s).
`
`11.
`
`“ParkerVision” or “Plaintiff” means ParkerVision, Inc. and any parents,
`
`divisions, subsidiaries, and affiliates, or any present or formerofficers, directors,
`
`employees, agents, consultants, or other representatives thereof.
`
`12.
`
`“Patents-in-suit” mean U.S. Patent Nos. 6,049,706; 6,266,518; 6,580,902;
`
`7,110,444; 7,292,835; 8,588,725; 8,660,513; 9,118,528; 9,246,736 and 9,444,673.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`The following instructions are applicable to terms in each discovery request
`
`unless otherwise explicitly stated:
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 8 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 8 of 38
`
`1.
`
`In producing the documents and things requested, you shall furnishall
`
`documents and things knownoravailable to you within your possession, custody, or
`
`control, including all documents and things in possession, custody, or control of your
`
`attorneys, as well as anyoneacting on your behalf.
`
`2.
`
`These Requests extendto all things within your actual or constructive
`
`possession, custodyor control, or the possession, custody, or control of those acting at
`
`yourdirection or on your behalf.
`
`3.
`
`All documents produced in response to a discovery request should be
`
`producedin their full and complete form, includingall their original unredacted
`
`material. If an English language version or translation of non-English documents or
`
`business records exists, both the non-English documents or business records and the
`
`English languageversion or translation should be produced.
`
`4.
`
`If any documents are withheld on the basis of any claim of privilege or
`
`immunity from discovery, please produce a log of such documents with enough detail
`
`to assess the claim, including without limitation:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`the reasons the documentis not being produced.If the documentis
`withheld on the basis of privilege, identify the nature of the privilege
`(including work product);
`
`the general nature of the document or communication (memorandum,
`pamphlet, report, etc.);
`
`the general subject matter of the document or communication;
`
`the date of the document or communication;
`
`the identity of each person involved in preparation of the document or
`communication;
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 9 of 38
`
`the identity of each person whosigned the document or communication;
`
`the identity of each person designated as an addressee;
`
`the identity of each person designated to receive a copy of the document
`or communication;
`
`the date and mannerof distribution or publication of the original and each
`copy of the document;
`
`the identity of each person whoreceived the original of the document;
`
`the identity of each person whoreceived a copy of the document; and
`
`the present location of the documentandthefiles within which the
`documentwasfound.
`
`5.
`
`If the meaning of any term in these Requests is unclear, you should
`
`assumea reasonable meaning, state what the assumed meaningis, and produce
`
`documents based on that assumed meaning.
`
`6.
`
`If any requested document is knownor believed to have existed and
`
`cannot nowbelocated or has been destroyed or discarded, identify the documentby:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`nature(e.¢., letter, memorandum, email, invoice);
`
`subject matter;
`
`numberof pages;
`
`title, file name, and any identifying codeor file number;
`
`date of creation;
`
`date of transmittal;
`
`author(s) and/or last known custodian of the document;
`
`actual and intended recipient(s);
`
`the identity of each person whoactually read the original or a copy of the
`document(to the extent that the identity can be ascertained from the
`original or any copy);
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 10 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 10 of 38
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`1.
`
`7.
`
`the date, manner, and reason for the document’sloss or destruction;
`
`the persons authorizing, responsible for, and participating in the
`document's loss or destruction; and
`
`the efforts made to locate such document.
`
`Each Request shall be answered separately, and you shall indicate for each
`
`answerthe Request to which they respond.
`
`REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.1.
`
`Documents sufficient to show the design, layout, architecture, configuration,
`
`operation, manufacture, and/or implementation of each MediaTek Chip, including
`
`withoutlimitation, (1) the system architecture and design of each MediaTek Chip,(2) any
`
`andall design guidelines and specifications, including withoutlimitation, guidelines and
`
`specifications that MediaTek or a third party acting on MediaTek’s behalf provided to
`
`LGErelating to a MediaTek Chip,(3) the correlation between each MediaTek Chip code
`
`name(s) and model number(s) of each LGE Product, (4) any andall operating bands and
`
`operating modesof each LGE Product, (5) the foundry used to make each MediaTek Chip,
`
`(6) any and all process nodesfor each MediaTek Chip,(7) any andall register settings for
`
`each of the operating bands and operating modes of each LGE Product, (8) any and all
`
`components values including, without limitation, the values of any andall capacitors and
`
`resistors, (9) chip top including, withoutlimitation,all internal and external labels/names
`
`of connections, and (10) any andall configurations of, modifications to, and/or changes
`
`to the MediaTek Chip that resulted in the reduction and/or elimination of components
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 11 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 11 of 38
`
`(including, without limitation, pads, connections, SAW filters and/or BAW filters) on
`
`andoff chip.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.2.
`
`All schematics for each of the MediaTek Chips.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.3.
`
`Anyand all documentsrelated to (1) research and developmentand(2) design
`
`review of each MediaTek Chip.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.4.
`
`For each MediaTek Chip, documents sufficient to show (1) design document
`
`hierarchy and (2) the hierarchy of schematics with library nameandcell name for each
`
`cell.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.5.
`
`All documents related to product roadmapsfor each MediaTek Chip and/or
`
`MediaTek products incorporating MediaTek Chips.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.6.
`
`Anyandall documents relating to whether a MediaTek Chip for use in an LGE
`
`Product can be used with, and/or is compatible with, wireless technologies and/or
`
`standards(including, but not limited to Bluetooth and 802.11) in the United States.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.7.
`
`Anyand all documentsrelating to the testing of each MediaTek Chip
`
`incorporated into each LGE Product.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 12 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 12 of 38
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.8.
`
`Documents sufficient to identify each and every model of MediaTek Chip that
`
`LGEhas purchased from MediaTek and/or from any third party for use in a LGE
`
`Product.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.9.
`
`Documents sufficient to identify any and all LGE Products incorporating a
`
`MediaTek Chip.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.10.
`
`Any andall documentsrelated to the marketing of the MediaTek Chips and/or
`
`MediaTek products incorporating MediaTek Chips.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.11.
`
`Regarding any MediaTek Chip and/or LGE Products incorporating MediaTek
`
`Chips, any and all communications between MediaTek and LGEregarding the design,
`
`layout, architecture, configuration, operation, manufacture, implementation, research,
`
`development, specifications, guidelines, requirements, features, testing, operating
`
`bands, operating modes, componentvalues, and register settings for each of the
`
`operating bands and operating modes.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.12.
`
`All agreements (1) between MediaTek and LGErelating to any MediaTek Chip
`
`and/or any LGE Product; (2) between MediaTek and any manufacturer of a MediaTek
`
`Chip; (3) between MediaTek and any manufacturer of a LGE Product containing a
`
`MediaTek Chip (4) between MediaTek and any Component Provider, and/or (5)
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 13 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 13 of 38
`
`between MediaTek and anythird party providing MediaTek Chipsdirectly or indirectly
`
`to a ComponentProvider.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.13.
`
`Anyandall reseller agreements relating to each MediaTek Chip and/or
`
`MediaTek products incorporating MediaTek Chips.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.14.
`
`From 2013 to the present, documents sufficient to show on a quarterly basis(1)
`
`the total unit number of MediaTek Chips sold or provided to LGE or a Component
`
`Provider (or any third party providing MediaTek Chipsdirectly or indirectly to a
`
`ComponentProvider) and the unit price for each such MediaTek Chip, and (2) with
`
`regardto (1), the identity of the entity to which MediaTek Chips weresold, offered for
`
`sale, provided or delivered and the location where (and entity to which) such MediaTek
`
`Chips were delivered.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIONNO.15.
`
`Anyand all documents referencing ParkerVision or any ParkerVision patents
`
`(including, without limitation, the Patents-in-suit) or any code nameoridentifier for
`
`ParkerVision including, withoutlimitation, any and all documentsrelating to any
`
`effort(s) or attempt(s) to (1) design, redesign, or modify any MediaTek Chips and/or
`
`MediaTek products incorporating MediaTek Chips in view of any ParkerVision patents
`
`(including, withoutlimitation, the Patents-in-suit) and/or (2) design around any
`
`ParkerVision patents (including, withoutlimitation, the Patents-in-suit).
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 14 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 14 of 38
`
`ATTACHMENTB
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`Asusedin herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
`
`1.
`
`“And” and “or” shall have both the conjunctive and disjunctive meaning
`
`andshall be construedto include, rather than exclude material from the scope of the
`
`request.
`
`2.
`
`“Any”or “each” shall be construed to encompass“all.” “Any” includes
`
`both “any” and “every.” “All” shall be construed to include and encompass“any.”
`
`3.
`
`“Concerning,”
`
`“referring to,” or “relating to” means pertainingto,
`
`ut
`
`mentioning, commenting on, connected with, discussing, describing, analyzing,
`
`explaining, showing,reflecting, dealing with, comprising, consisting of, containing,
`
`constituting, referring to, resulting from, or recording a particular subject in whole or in
`
`part and either directly or indirectly.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`“Communication” means the transmittal of information.
`
`“Component Provider” means any entity that manufacturers, sells, offers
`
`for sale, and/or provides any module, componentor part containing a MediaTek Chip
`
`where such module, componentor part is incorporated into, intended to be incorporated
`
`into, or used in any LGE Products.
`
`6.
`
`“Control” shall mean actual and constructive control, custody, knowledge,
`
`and/or possession by any oneor a combination of the following persons:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`MediaTek;
`
`Anycorporation or other entity controlled by, directed by, or
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 15 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 15 of 38
`
`affiliated with MediaTek;
`
`c.
`
`Anyofficer, principal, director, trustee, employee, staff member,
`
`agent, joint venturer, partner, accountant, consultant, advisor, investigator, or any
`
`other representative of MediaTek;
`
`d.
`
`Anyofficer, principal, director, trustee, employee, staff member,
`
`agent, joint venturer, partner, accountant, consultant, advisor, investigator, or any
`
`other representative belonging to a corporation or other entity controlled by,
`
`directed by,or affiliated with MediaTek;
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`Counsel for MediaTek; and
`
`Counsel for any corporation or other entity controlled by, directed
`
`by,or affiliated with MediaTek.
`
`7.
`
`“Document”is used in a comprehensive senseasset forth in Rule 34(a) of
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including withoutlimitation, electronic or
`
`computerized data compilations. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document
`
`within the meaning of this term.
`
`8.
`
`“MediaTek” means MediaTekInc. and(a) any of its present or former
`
`divisions, departments, businesses, subsidiaries, or other organization or operational
`
`units; (b) all predecessor, successor, or assignee entities; (c) all present or former member
`
`companies, corporations, partnerships, associations, or other business entities; and (d)
`
`present or formerofficers, directors, employees, agents, consultants, accountants,
`
`attorneys(including in-house and outside counsel), or other representatives (in their
`
`individual or representative capacities).
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 16 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 16 of 38
`
`9.
`
`“MediaTek Chip(s)” means any andall receiver, transmitter and/or
`
`transceiver integrated circuits, and/or components/ modules containing or incorporating
`
`any andall receiver, transmitter and/or transceiver integrated circuits that (a) MediaTek
`
`has sold to LGE from 2014 to the present including, but not limited to, the MediaTek
`
`MT7612UN;or (b) MediaTek has sold to a ComponentProvider or any other third party
`
`from 2015 to the present and that is incorporated into, intended to be incorporated into, or
`
`used in any LGE Products including, but not limited to, the MediaTek MT7612UN.
`
`10.
`
`“LGE Products” means any product that LGE has made, used,sold,
`
`imported in/into the United States and/or offered for sale, including but not limited to
`
`modules, LGE-brandedtelevisions, Sharp-brandedtelevisions, or televisions sold under
`
`any other brand that incorporate and use MediaTek Chip(s).
`
`11.
`
`“ParkerVision” or “Plaintiff” means ParkerVision, Inc. and any parents,
`
`divisions, subsidiaries, and affiliates, or any present or formerofficers, directors,
`
`employees, agents, consultants, or other representatives thereof.
`
`12.
`
`“Patents-in-suit” mean U.S. Patent Nos. 6,049,706; 6,266,518; 6,580,902;
`
`7,110,444; 7,292,835; 8,588,725; 8,660,513; 9,118,528; 9,246,736 and 9,444,673.
`
`TOPICS FOR DEPOSITION
`
`You are required to provide one or more individuals who are knowledge and
`
`competent to provide testimony aboutthe following topics:
`
`Topic No.1.
`
`The design, layout, architecture, configuration, operation, manufacture, and/or
`
`implementation of each MediaTek Chip including, without limitation, (1) system
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 17 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 17 of 38
`
`architecture and design, (2) any andall design guidelines and specifications including,
`
`withoutlimitation, guidelines and specifications that MediaTek madeor makesavailable
`
`to any third party including, without limitation, LGE, (3) correspondence between
`
`MediaTek Chip code name(s) and model number(s), (4) any andall operating bands and
`
`operating modes, (5) the foundry used to make the MediaTek Chip,(6) any andall
`
`process nodesfor the MediaTek Chip,(7) any andall register settings for each of the
`
`operating bands and operating modes,(8) any and all components valuesincluding,
`
`withoutlimitation, the values of any andall capacitors andresistors, (9) chip top
`
`including, withoutlimitation, all internal and external labels/names of connections, and
`
`(10) any andall configurations of, modifications to, and/or changes to the MediaTek Chip
`
`that resulted in the reduction and/or elimination of components (including, without
`
`limitation, pads, connections, SAW filters and/or BAWfilters) on and off chip.
`
`Topic No.2.
`
`All schematics for each of the MediaTek Chips.
`
`Topic No.3.
`
`For each MediaTek Chip, documents sufficient to show (1) design document
`
`hierarchy and (2) the hierarchy of schematics with library name and cell name for each
`
`cell.
`
`Topic No.4.
`
`The research and development, and design review of each MediaTek Chip.
`
`Topic No.5.
`
`The testing of each MediaTek Chip incorporated into each LGE Product.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 18 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 18 of 38
`
`Topic No.6.
`
`Marketing of the MediaTek Chips and/or MediaTek products incorporating
`
`MediaTek Chips.
`
`Topic No.7.
`
`The identification of each and every model of MediaTek Chip that LGE has
`
`purchased from MediaTek and/or from any third party for use in a LGE Product.
`
`Topic No.8.
`
`Communications between MediaTek and LGEregardingthe design, layout,
`
`architecture, configuration, operation, manufacture, implementation, research,
`
`development, specifications, guidelines, requirements, features, testing, operating bands,
`
`operating modes, componentvalues, and register settings for each of the operating bands
`
`and operating modes.
`
`Topic No.9.
`
`All agreements (1) between MediaTek and LGErelating to any MediaTek Chip
`
`and/or any LGE Product; (2) between MediaTek and any manufacturer of a MediaTek
`
`Chip; (3) between MediaTek and any manufacturer of an LGE Product containing a
`
`MediaTek Chip; (4) between MediaTek and any ComponentProvider; and/or(5)
`
`between MediaTek and anythird party providing MediaTek Chipsdirectly or indirectly
`
`to a ComponentProvider.
`
`Topic No. 10.
`
`From 2014to the present, (1) the total unit number of MediaTek Chipssold or
`
`provided to LGE or a ComponentProvider(or any third party providing MediaTek Chips
`
`directly or indirectly to a Component Provider) and the unit price for each such
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 19 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 19 of 38
`
`MediaTek Chip, and (2) with regardto (1), the identity of the entity to which MediaTek
`
`Chips were sold, offered for sale, provided or delivered and the location where (and
`
`entity to which) such MediaTek Chips were delivered.
`
`Topic No. 11.
`
`Anyeffort(s) or attempt(s) to (1) design, redesign, or modify any MediaTek Chips
`
`and/or MediaTek products incorporating MediaTek Chips in view of any ParkerVision
`
`patents (including, without limitation, the Patents-in-suit) and/or (2) design around any
`
`ParkerVision patents (including, withoutlimitation, the Patents-in-suit).
`
`Topic No. 12.
`
`The authentication and business-record nature of the documents MediaTek
`
`produced in response to ParkerVision’s document subpoena.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 20 of 38
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 20 of 38
`
`ATTACHMENT C
`ATTACHMENT C
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 21 of 38
`Céss6 @PD-rcQOGR2AABRA DBnoura6ha Riedl OG/29/22 Page 2 doiss
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`WACODIVISION
`
`-cv-520-
`1
`Case No. 6:21-cv-520-ADA
`
`§ §
`
`§ §
`
`§ §
`


`
`§ § § §
`
`PARKERVISION,INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`LG ELECTRONICS,INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff PARKERVISION,INC. and Defendant LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`hereafter referred to individually as a “Party”! and collectively as “the Parties,” believe that certain
`
`informationthat is or will be encompassed by discovery demandsbythe Parties involves the
`
`production or disclosure of trade secrets, confidential business information, or other proprietary
`
`information;
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties seek a protective orderlimiting disclosure thereofin accordance with
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c):
`
`THEREFORE,it is hereby stipulated among the Parties and ORDEREDthat:
`
`' This Protective Order also protects confidential documents, information, or materials produced
`in this litigation by a non-party to the litigation (“Third Party”) pursuant to subpoena or other
`similar discovery request. Such Third Party will be considered a producing “Party” for purposes
`of this Protective Order. Nothing in the Protective Order prevents such a Third Party from
`seeking a supplement or addendum to this Protective Order with provisionsthat are different or
`morerestrictive than the provisions herein.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 22 of 38
`Céss6 @PD-rcOOGR2AABRA DBnouaa6ha Riedl OG/2222 Page 2d0iS8
`
`1.
`
`Each Party may designate as confidential for protection underthis Order, in wholeorin part,
`
`any document, information, or material that constitutes or includes, in whole orin part,
`
`confidential or proprietary information ortradesecrets ofthe Party or a Third Party” to
`
`whom the Party reasonably believes it owes an obligation of confidentiality with respect
`
`to such document, information, or material (“Protected Material”). Protected Material
`
`shall be designated by the Party producing it by affixing a legend or stamp on such
`
`document, information, or material as follows: “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL-
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY,”or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE”(“DESIGNATED MATERIAL”).?
`
`The designation shall be placed clearly on each pageofthe Protected Material (except
`
`deposition and hearing transcripts) for which such protection is sought. For deposition
`
`and hearing transcripts, the designation shall be placed on the cover page ofthe transcript
`
`(if not already present on the cover page of the transcript when received from the court
`
`reporter) by each attorney receiving a copy of the transcript after that attorney
`
`receives notice of the designation of someorall of that transcript as DESIGNATED
`
`MATERIAL.
`
`2.
`
`Any documentproduced before issuance of this Order, including pursuant to the Court’s
`
`Order Governing Proceedings- Patent Case, with the designation “Confidential” or the
`
`* Nothing in this Protective Order obligates a Party to produce confidential documents,
`information, or materials in violation of a legal or contractual obligation of nondisclosure to a
`Third Party. The parties agree to use best efforts to obtain consent to produce Third Party
`materials subject to a legal or contractual restriction.
`3 The term DESIGNATED MATERIAL.”is used throughoutthis Protective Orderto refer to the
`class of Protected Material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL-
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,”
`or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE,”individually and collectively.
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 61-1 Filed 07/12/22 Page 23 of 38
`Céssé6 @P-rcVOS22-AADA DBnouaab5a Filed OG/A922 Paye 280188
`
`like, shall receive the same treatmentas if designated “CONFIDENTIAL”underthis
`
`order and any such documents produced with the designation “Confidential - Outside
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”shall receive the same treatmentas if designated
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”underthis Order, unless
`
`and until such documentis re-designated to have a different classification underthis
`
`Order.
`
`With respect to documents, information, or material designated as DESIGNATED
`
`MATERIALsubject to the provisions herein and unless otherwise stated, this Order
`
`governs, without limitation: (a) all documents, electronically stored information, and/or
`
`things as defined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;(

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket