`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 37-2 Filed 03/30/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`EXHIBIT 32-1
`EXHIBIT 32-1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 117-1 Filed 03/21/22 Page 1 of 2Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 37-2 Filed 03/30/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00108-ADA
`
` JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF SARAH B. PETTY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT INTEL
`CORPORATION’S OPPOSED MOTION FOR FURTHER CLAIM CONSTRUCTION IN
`LIGHT OF PARKERVISION’S REPRESENTATIONS IN IPR PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`I, Sarah B. Petty, declare under penalty of perjury that:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP,
`
`counsel for Intel Corporation (“Intel”).
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Patent Owner ParkerVision’s
`
`Response to Intel’s Petition for Inter Partes Review of United States Patent No. 7,539,474
`
`(IPR2020-01302), filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) on May 18, 2021.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the PTAB’s Final Written
`
`Decision (IPR2020-01302), dated January 21, 2022.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Intel’s Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,539,474 (IPR2020-01302), filed with the PTAB on September 2,
`
`2020.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the Decision Granting Institution
`
`of Inter Partes Review (IPR2020-01302), dated January 28, 2021.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00108-ADA Document 117-1 Filed 03/21/22 Page 2 of 2Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 37-2 Filed 03/30/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Patent Owner ParkerVision’s
`
`Notice of Statutory Disclaimer (IPR2020-01302), filed with the PTAB on October 30, 2021.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of Petitioner Intel’s Reply to Patent
`
`Owner ParkerVision’s Response (IPR2020-01302), filed with the PTAB on September 7, 2021.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of Patent Owner ParkerVision’s
`
`Sur-Reply to Petitioner Intel’s Reply (IPR2020-01302), filed with the PTAB on September 28,
`
`2021.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of the transcript of Petitioner Intel
`
`and Patent Owner ParkerVision’s Conference Call Before the PTAB (IPR2020-01302), dated
`
`November 10, 2021.
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of Intel’s Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444 (IPR2020-01265), filed with the PTAB July 13, 2020.
`
`11.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of Patent Owner ParkerVision’s
`
`Response to Petition for Inter Partes Review of United States Patent No. 7,110,444 (IPR2020-
`
`01265), filed with the PTAB May 11, 2021.
`
`12.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of Patent Owner ParkerVision’s
`
`Notice of Statutory Disclaimer (IPR2020-01265), filed with the PTAB October 30, 2021.
`
`13.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of the PTAB’s Final Written
`
`Decision (IPR2020-01265), dated January 21, 2022.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Massachusetts that the
`foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed on March 21, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sarah B. Petty
`Sarah B. Petty
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
