Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 32-10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 3
`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 32-10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`EXHIBIT 11
`EXHIBIT 11
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 32-10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Counsel:
`
`William Melsheimer <William_Melsheimer@txwd.uscourts.gov>
`Thursday, February 17, 2022 12:43 PM
`Nicole W inningham
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com; smand ir@daignault iyer.com; Chandran Iyer; Ron Daignault; Cathy
`Pampinella; Christian Samay; 'raymort@austinlaw.com'; LG-ParkerVision;
`melissa@q illamsmithlaw.com; qil@q illamsmithlaw.com
`RE: Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA ParkerVision, Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc.
`
`[EXTERNAL]
`
`The Court approves the request for the parties to collectively brief 30 terms. Please be sure to indicate in the claim
`construction briefs or in the joint claim construction statement that the Court approved this request, and that 28 of the
`terms have been previously argued in other cases.
`
`Thanks,
`Jeff Melsheimer
`
`Jeff Melsheimer
`Law Oerk to the H onorable Alan D Albright
`United States D istrict Court, Western D istrict of Texas
`D irect: 254-7 50-1522
`Cell: 214-532-8940
`William Melsheimer@txwd.uscourts.gov
`
`From: Nicole Winningham <nicole@gillamsmithlaw .com>
`Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 11:17 AM
`To: TXWDml_LawClerks_ WA_JudgeAlbright <TXWDml_LawClerks_ WA_JudgeAlbright@txwd.uscourts.gov>
`Cc: jcharkow@daignault iyer.com; smandir@daignault iyer.com; Chandran Iyer <cbiyer@daignault iyer.com>; Ron
`Daignault <rdaignault@daignault iyer.com>; Cathy Pampinella <cpampinella@daignaultiyer.com>; Christian Samay
`<csamay@daignault iyer.com>; 'raymort@austinlaw .com'; LG-ParkerVision@ropesgray.com; Melissa Smith
`<Melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com>; Gil Gillam <gil @gillamsmithlaw .com>
`Subject: Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA ParkerVision, Inc. v. LG Electronics Inc.
`
`CAUTION · EXTERNAL:
`
`Pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Proceedings - Patent Cases (November 17, 2021) and the Parties' Agreed
`Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 18), Defendant LG Electronics Inc. ("LGE") respectfu lly request s leave for the parties to
`collectively brief 30 terms, 6 terms in excess of the Court' s presumptive 24-term limit (12-term limit per side).
`
`ParkerVision Inc. ("ParkerVision") has asserted ten patents. In an effort to stream line the Markman proceedings, the
`parties have agreed to rely upon existing briefing from other cases pending before this Court concerning identical claim
`terms w ithin the same Asserted Patents. Specifically, for 28 of the 30 total terms proposed for construction, the parties
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 32-10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`will incorporate by reference and rely upon the same constructions, arguments, and posit ions previously presented to
`and considered by this Court in ParkerVision, Inc. v. Intel Corp., No. 6:20-cv-00108-ADA (W.D. Tex.); ParkerVision, Inc. v.
`Intel Corp., No. 6:20-cv-00562-ADA (W.D. Tex.); ParkerVision, Inc. v. TCL Indus. Holdings Co., No. 6:20-cv-00945-ADA
`(W.D. Tex.); and/or ParkerVision, Inc. v. Hisense Co., No. 6:20-cv-00870-ADA (W.D. Tex.) (collectively, the "Prior
`Lit igations").
`
`The 28 terms for which the parties w ill incorporate the posit ions from the Prior Litigations are identified in the attached
`table. For each of these 28 terms, LGE's and ParkerVision' s opening briefs w ill identify the portions of the briefs from
`the Prior Lit igations that each party is seeking to incorporate by reference, attaching those briefs as exhibits for the
`Court's convenience. Thus, under the parties' proposal, there w ill be no new arguments or evidence for the Court to
`consider for these 28 terms. On ly two disputed terms will be argued anew by LGE and/or ParkerVision . Addit ionally,
`where the parties reached agreement on the constructions of particular terms in the Prior Litigations, the parties agree
`to adopt such constructions in this case.
`
`LGE therefore requests permission to construe a total of 30 disputed claim terms, two of which w ill be newly argued by
`the parties, with the parties otherwise incorporating by reference and relying upon briefing from the Prior Litigations for
`the remaining 28 disputed claim terms.
`
`The parties have met and conferred regarding this request, and ParkerVision does not oppose LG E' s request.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Nicole W inningham
`Gillam & Smith, LLP
`102 N. Col lege, Su ite 800
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`903-934-8450
`
`~ GILLAM
`~ &SMITHLLP
`AT TO R N EYS AT LAW
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended
`recipient, and it may contain privileged information. If you received this in error, please do not read, distribute, or take
`action in reliance upon this message. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete th is
`message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-cl ient or work product privilege by
`the transmission of th is message.
`
`CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening
`attachments or clicking on links.
`
`2
`
`