throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 14 Filed 10/13/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
` v.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00520-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff ParkerVision, Inc. and Defendant LG Electronics Inc., hereby provide the
`
`following status report:
`
`FILING AND EXTENSIONS
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on May 22, 2021. There has been one extension for
`
`a total of ninety days.
`
`RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
`
`Defendant LG Electronics Inc. answered on September 29, 2021. There are no
`
`asserted counterclaims.
`
`PENDING MOTIONS
`
`There are no pending motions.
`
`RELATED CASES
`
`The following are cases in this Judicial District where a common patent is
`
`asserted:
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`PAGE | 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 14 Filed 10/13/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`ParkerVision, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, 6:20-cv-00108-ADA;
`
`ParkerVision, Inc. v. Intel Corporation, 6:20-cv-00562-ADA;
`
`ParkerVision, Inc. v. Hisense Co., Ltd., 6:20-cv-00870-ADA;
`
`ParkerVision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., 6:20-cv-00945-ADA.
`
`IPR, CBM, AND OTHER PGR FILINGS
`
`Intel Corporation v. ParkerVision, Inc., IPR2020-01265 was filed on July 13, 2020
`
`and docketed on August 21, 2020. Trial was instituted on January 28, 2021. A Final
`
`Written Decision is expected on or before January 28, 2022.
`
`Intel Corporation v. ParkerVision, Inc., IPR2020-01302 was filed on September 2,
`
`2020 and docketed on September 30, 2020. Trial was instituted on January 28, 2021. A
`
`Final Written Decision is expected on or before January 28, 2022.
`
`TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., Hisense Co., Ltd. and ZyXEL Commc’ns Corp. v.
`
`ParkerVision, Inc., IPR2021-00985 was filed on May 20, 2021 and docketed on May 26,
`
`2021. An institution decision is expected on or before November 26, 2021. A Final Written
`
`Decision is expected on or before November 26, 2022.
`
`TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. and Hisense Co., Ltd. v. ParkerVision, Inc.,
`
`IPR2021-00990 was filed on May 20, 2021 and docketed on May 26, 2021. An institution
`
`decision is expected on or before November 26, 2021. A Final Written Decision is expected
`
`on or before November 26, 2022.
`
`Intel Corporation v. ParkerVision, Inc., IPR2020-00346 was filed on January 14,
`
`2021 and docketed on January 27, 2021. Trial was instituted on July 22, 2021. A Final
`
`Written Decision is expected on or before July 22, 2022.
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`PAGE | 2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 14 Filed 10/13/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`NUMBER OF ASSERTED PATENTS AND CLAIMS
`
`Plaintiff has asserted ten (10) patents. The asserted patents are U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`6,049,706; 6,266,518; 6,580,902; 7,110,444; 7,292,835; 8,588,725; 8,660,513; 9,118,528;
`
`9,246,736 and 9,444,673. Plaintiff has not yet served its preliminary infringement
`
`contentions.
`
`APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL ADVISOR
`
`
`
`The parties do not request the appointment of any technical advisor at this time,
`
`but the Parties do not oppose the appointment of a technical advisor should the Court
`
`deem it appropriate or helpful to the Court.
`
`MEET AND CONFER STATUS
`
`Plaintiff and Defendant conducted a meet & confer conference. The parties have
`
`no pre-Markman issues to raise at the CMC hearing.
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`PAGE | 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 14 Filed 10/13/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`Dated: October 13, 2021
`
`Respectfully Submitted
`
`
`
`/s/ Raymond W. Mort, III
`Raymond W. Mort, III
`Texas State Bar No. 00791308
`raymort@austinlaw.com
`
`THE MORT LAW FIRM, PLLC
`100 Congress Ave, Suite 2000
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Tel/Fax: (512) 865-7950
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Ronald M. Daignault
`Chandran B. Iyer
`Jason S. Charkow
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`
`Daignault Iyer LLP
`rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com*#
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com*
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com*#
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com*
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`
`*Pro hace vice to be filed
`#Not admitted to practice in Virginia
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`TX State Bar No. 24001351
`303 S. Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`
`PAGE | 4
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00520-ADA Document 14 Filed 10/13/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`David S. Chun
`CA State Bar No. 315958
`(Admitted in W.D. Tex.)
`Stepan Starchenko
`(Admission application forthcoming)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2284
`Telephone: (650) 617-4000
`Facsimile: (650) 617-4090
`david.chun@ropesgray.com
`stepan.starchenko@ropesgray.com
`
`Steven Pepe
`(Admitted in W.D. Tex.)
`Matthew R. Shapiro
`(Admission application pending
`approval)
`James P. Stevens
`(Admission application forthcoming)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1211 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036-8704
`Telephone: (212) 596-9000
`Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
`steven.pepe@ropesgray.com
`matthew.shapiro@ropesgray.com
`james.stevens@ropesgray.com
`
`Scott Taylor
`(Admission application forthcoming)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`Prudential Tower
`800 Boylston Street
`Boston, MA 02199-3600
`Telephone: (617) 951-7000
`Facsimile: (617) 951-7050
`scott.taylor@ropesgray.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant LG
`Electronics Inc.
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`PAGE | 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket