`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`STANDING ORDER REGARDING
`NOTICE OF READINESS FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IN PATENT CASES
`
`In all patent cases pending before the undersigned, after all Defendants have responded to
`
`the initial pleadings (whether by Answer or Motion), the Parties are directed to meet-and-confer
`
`within seven (7) days of the last1 Answer or Motion in response to the Original Complaint to
`
`discuss any pre-Markman issues and the Parties shall jointly file the Case Readiness Status
`
`Report (“CRSR”) in the format attached as Exhibit A promptly thereafter. Plaintiff shall be
`
`responsible for ensuring the prompt filing of the CRSR. Plaintiff shall also email the Court
`
`(TXWDml_LawClerks_JudgeAlbright@txwd.uscourts.gov) a courtesy copy of the CRSR and
`
`shall also copy the Defendants.
`
`
`
`SIGNED this 19th day of November, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`1 By “last,” the Court is only referring to the (1) last defendant in a single case with multiple defendants or the (2)
`last defendant in a set of related cases to answer or otherwise respond.
`
`VERSION 2.0
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`BY: ________________________________
`
`FILED
`
`DEPUTY
`
`November 19, 2020
`
`Mark Borchardt
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00158-ADA Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VERSION 2.0
`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00158-ADA Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 3 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`[Plaintiff],
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
` v.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-00000-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`[Defendant],
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE READINESS STATUS REPORT
`
`Plaintiff [name] and Defendant [name(s)], hereby provide the following status report in
`
`advance of the initial Case Management Conference (CMC).
`
`FILING AND EXTENSIONS
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on [filing date]. There have been [one/two] extension[s]
`
`for a total of __ days.
`
`RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
`[Indicate if/when the defendant(s) responded to the Complaint, whether it was an Answer or
`
`Motion, and whether any counterclaims were filed other than counterclaims for non-infringement
`
`or invalidity]
`
`PENDING MOTIONS
`
`[Identify all pending motions]
`RELATED CASES IN THIS JUDICIAL DISTRICT
`
`[Identify all related cases in this Judicial District, including any other cases where a
`common patent is asserted]
`
`
`VERSION 2.0
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-00158-ADA Document 7 Filed 11/19/20 Page 4 of 4
`
`IPR, CBM, AND OTHER PGR FILINGS
`[There are no known IPR, CBM, or other PGR filings.] [Or]
`ALT: IPR2020-00000 was filed on ____ and docketed on ____. A Final Written decision
`is expected on or before _____.]
`NUMBER OF ASSERTED PATENTS AND CLAIMS
`Plaintiff has asserted [Num Patents] patent[s] and a total of [Num Claims] claims.
`[If a Plaintiff has already served Preliminary Infringement Contentions (“PICs”), note the date of
`service. Note: Per the Court’s Order Governing Proceeding, Plaintiff must serve PICs no later
`than 7 days before the CMC]
`APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL ADVISER
`[Indicate whether the parties request a technical adviser to be appointed to the case to assist the
`Court with claim construction or other technical issues]
`MEET AND CONFER STATUS
`Plaintiff and Defendant met and conferred. [The parties have no pre-Markman issues to
`raise at the CMC.] or [The parties identified the following pre-Markman issues to raise at the
`CMC [list].
`
`Dated: ___________
`
`Respectfully Submitted
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/
`
`
`
`VERSION 2.0
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
