throbber
Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 34 Filed 07/15/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-1215-ADA
`
`v.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`STMicroelectronics, Inc.,
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`Defendant.
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The Court having considered the positions of the parties as to an appropriate schedule, it
`
`is ORDERED that the pre-trial schedule for this action is set as follows:
`
`Deadline
`
`July 2, 2021
`
`August 27, 2021
`
`Item
`Plaintiff serves preliminary1 infringement contentions in the
`form of a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s)
`each element of the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall
`also identify the earliest priority date (i.e. the earliest date of
`invention) for each asserted claim and produce: (1) all
`documents evidencing conception and reduction to practice for
`each claimed invention, and (2) a copy of the file history for
`each patent in suit.
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the form
`of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each
`element of the asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification
`of any limitations the Defendant contends are indefinite or lack
`written description under section 112, and (3) an identification
`
`1 The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity
`contentions without leave of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts
`to prepare its preliminary contentions and the amendment is based on material identified after
`those preliminary contentions were served, and should do so seasonably upon identifying any
`such material. Any amendment to add patent claims requires leave of court so that the Court can
`address any scheduling issues.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 34 Filed 07/15/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`of any claims the Defendant contends are directed to ineligible
`subject matter under section 101. Defendant shall also produce
`(1) all prior art referenced in the invalidity contentions, and (2)
`technical documents, including software where applicable,
`sufficient to show the operation of the accused product(s).
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose any
`extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert witness
`they may rely upon with respect to claim construction or
`indefiniteness. With respect to any expert identified, the parties
`shall identify the scope of the topics for the witness’s expected
`testimony.2
`With respect to items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall
`identify each such item by production number or produce a copy
`of any such item if not previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and
`exchange revised list of terms/constructions.
`Defendant files Opening claim construction brief, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are not indefinite.
`Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.
`
`Defendant files Reply claim construction brief
`
`Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding providing copies of the
`briefing to the Court and the technical adviser (if appointed).
`Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court and
`technical adviser (if appointed).3
`Markman Hearing at 9:00 a.m. This date is a placeholder and the
`Court may adjust this date as the Markman hearing approaches.
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per
`Rule 26(a).
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`September 1, 2021
`
`September 15, 2021
`
`September 22, 2021
`
`September 29, 2021
`
`October 6, 2021
`
`October 25, 2021
`
`November 8, 2021
`
`November 19, 2021
`
`November 23, 2021
`
`November 24, 2021
`
`December 8, 2021
`
`December 9, 2021
`
`January 19, 2022
`
`2 Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied
`upon by the other party.
`3 The parties should contact the law clerk to request a Box link so that the party can directly
`upload the file to the Court’s Box account.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 34 Filed 07/15/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`February 2, 2022
`
`March 30, 2022
`
`June 8, 2022
`
`July 6, 2022
`
`July 13, 2022
`
`August 10, 2022
`
`August 31, 2022
`
`September 7, 2022
`
`September 14, 2022
`
`September 28, 2022
`
`October 12, 2022
`
`October 19, 2022
`
`October 26, 2022
`
`November 2, 2022
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions.
`After this date, leave of Court is required for any amendment to
`Infringement or Invalidity contentions. This deadline does not
`relieve the Parties of their obligation to reasonably amend if new
`information is identified after initial contentions.
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless
`the amendment adds patents or patent claims. (Note: This
`includes amendments in response to a 12(c) motion.)
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior
`art references at issue. Unless the parties agree to the narrowing,
`they are ordered to contact the Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a
`teleconference with the Court to resolve the disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confers to discuss
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art references
`at issue to triable limits. To the extent it helps the parties
`determine these limits, the parties are encouraged to contact the
`Court’s Law Clerk for an estimate of the amount of trial time
`anticipated per side. The parties shall file a Joint Report within 5
`business days regarding the results of the meet and confer.
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding providing copies of the
`briefing to the Court and the technical adviser (if appointed).
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists,
`witness lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in
`limine.
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and deposition
`designations); file oppositions to motions in limine
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting. If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties making
`said request shall file a notice with the Court and e-mail the
`Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 34 Filed 07/15/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`November 11, 2022
`
`November 16, 2022
`
`December 7, 2022
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial
`disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set this date at
`the conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set these dates at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`15th
`Entered this _____ day of July, 2021
`
`Honorable Alan D. Albright
`United States District Judge
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket