`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1210-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-01211-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1212-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc.
`(“MediaTek”),
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`NVIDIA Corporation,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`NXP USA, Inc.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01213-ADA Document 70-1 Filed 03/04/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1213-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1214-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1215-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Renesas Electronics Corporation and Renesas
`Electronics America, Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Silicon Laboratories Inc.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`STMicroelectronics, Inc.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01213-ADA Document 70-1 Filed 03/04/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1216-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`ORDER FOR MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF LETTERS ROGATORY
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff Ocean Semiconductor LLC’s Motion for Issuance of Letters
`
`Rogatory (the “Motion”).
`
`Having considered the Motion presented by Plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion that this
`
`Motion should be GRANTED.
`
`It is therefore ORDERED that the Court will return (a) one original copy of the signed
`
`and issued Letters Rogatory; and (b) one certified copy, to Plaintiff’s counsel.
`
`It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff will transmit the issued Letters Rogatory to the
`
`United States Department of State to oversee transmission of the Letters Rogatory to Japan
`
`through diplomatic channels as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1781(a)(2).
`
`
`
`Entered this _____ day of March, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. District Judge Alan D Albright
`
`
`
`