`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1210-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`NOTICE OF PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings – Patent Case, Plaintiff Ocean
`
`
`
`Semiconductor LLC (“Ocean”) provides this notice of the filing of Inter Partes Review
`
`Proceedings (“IPR”) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`On August 3, 2021, Applied Materials, Inc. (“Applied Materials”) filed IPR2021-01339
`
`challenging certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,676,538, which Ocean has asserted against
`
`Defendants MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc (“Mediatek”) in the above-captioned action.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(b), a PTAB decision as to whether or not to institute inter partes
`
`review is expected in IPR2021-01339 on approximately February 12, 2022. Pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 316(a)(11) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(c), should the PTAB institute review, a final written
`
`decision is anticipated on approximately February 12, 2023.
`
`Also on August 3, 2021, Applied Materials filed IPR2021-01340 challenging certain
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,725,402, which Ocean has asserted against Mediatek in the above-
`
`captioned action. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(b), a PTAB decision as to whether or not to
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01210-ADA Document 33 Filed 08/17/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`institute inter partes review is expected in IPR2021-01340 on approximately February 12, 2022.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(11) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(c), should the PTAB institute review,
`
`a final written decision is anticipated on approximately February 12, 2023.
`
`Also on August 3, 2021, Applied Materials filed IPR2021-01342 challenging certain
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,968,248, which Ocean has asserted against Mediatek in the above-
`
`captioned action. As of today, IPR2021-01342 has not been accorded a filing date. Pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 314(b) and § 316(a)(11), a PTAB decision as to whether or not to institute inter
`
`partes review is expected in IPR2021-01342 six months after the date of filing accorded to the
`
`IPR2021-01342 petition (i.e., no earlier than February 17, 2022), and, should the PTAB institute
`
`review, a final written decision is anticipated approximately eighteen months after the date of
`
`filing accorded to the IPR2021-01342 petition (i.e., no earlier than February 17, 2023).
`
`Also on August 3, 2021, Applied Materials filed IPR2021-01344 challenging certain
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,907,305, which Ocean has asserted against Mediatek in the above-
`
`captioned action. As of today, IPR2021-01344 has not been accorded a filing date. Pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 314(b) and § 316(a)(11), a PTAB decision as to whether or not to institute inter
`
`partes review is expected in IPR2021-01344 six months after the date of filing accorded to the
`
`IPR2021-01344 petition (i.e., no earlier than February 17, 2022), and, should the PTAB institute
`
`review, a final written decision is anticipated approximately eighteen months after the date of
`
`filing accorded to the IPR2021-01344 petition (i.e., no earlier than February 17, 2023).
`
`Also on August 3, 2021, Applied Materials filed IPR2021-01348 challenging certain
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,836,691, which Ocean has asserted against Mediatek in the above-
`
`captioned action. As of today, IPR2021-01348 has not been accorded a filing date. Pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 314(b) and § 316(a)(11), a PTAB decision as to whether or not to institute inter
`
`partes review is expected in IPR2021-01348 six months after the date of filing accorded to the
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01210-ADA Document 33 Filed 08/17/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`IPR2021-01348 petition (i.e., no earlier than February 17, 2022), and, should the PTAB institute
`
`review, a final written decision is anticipated approximately eighteen months after the date of
`
`filing accorded to the IPR2021-01348 petition (i.e., no earlier than February 17, 2023).
`
`
`
`Dated: August 17, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Alex Chan
`Timothy Devlin
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`Henrik D. Parker
`hparker@devlinlawfirm.com
`Alex Chan (State Bar No. 24108051)
`achan@devlinlawfirm.com
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, Delaware 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01210-ADA Document 33 Filed 08/17/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 17, 2021, a true and correct copy of the above and
`
`foregoing document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`/s/ Alex Chan
`Alex Chan
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
