`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`BY: ________________________________
`
`FILED
`
`DEPUTY
`
`July 21, 2022
`
`CV
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01152-ADA Document 72 Filed 07/21/22 Page 2 of 2
`Case 6:20-cv-01152-ADA Document 72 Filed 07/21/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`extend the scopeofthis lawsuit to other premises unnecessarily since | have nointerestin the
`disputed invention.
`
`Upon reaching out to Microsoft's agent, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, on 7/15/2022 by phone,|
`was told that
`| should expect to spend an entire workday at the deposition scheduled for
`7/29/2022. This is unreasonable as testimony that would take more than 15 minutes is no longer
`factual, but instead expert testimony. The basic facts of this case are well understood.
`
`| specifically asked Don Daybell, an
`This work is being ordered without proper compensation.
`employee of Microsoft’s agent, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, who himself is named in the
`subpoena, on 7/15/2022 at 9:31am how much work without compensation on behalf ofhis client
`is reasonable. Don Daybell, stated that spending many hours without pay was his expectation
`for my collaboration. He said that he would spend many hours of unpaid workif he were in my
`position. When | asked if he or any other employee of his firm would be compensated for any
`effort in connection with the above named case during the deposition, he answered that he or
`any other employeeof his firm present at the deposition would receive remuneration.
`| believe
`that | also have the right to be treated fairly, especially since | do not have anyinterest in this
`case. The only interested parties are conducting this lawsuit purely for commercial purposes.
`
`Please consider my request to quash this subpoena.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`ohn Reumann
`
`8/gene
`
`Attachments:
`A) A photocopyof the objection to the subpoena served to me that | submitted to
`Microsoft's agent Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
`B) A photocopyof the subpoena served by Microsoft's agent Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`LLP.
`
`2/2
`
`(6:20-CV-01152-ADA — request to quash subpoena)
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
