throbber
Case 6:20-cv-01131-ADA Document 43 Filed 07/15/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`)
`) Case No. 6:20-CV-01125-ADA
`)
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`)
`) Case No. 6:20-cv-1126-ADA
`)
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`)
`) Case No. 6:20-cv-1128-ADA
`)
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`)
`) Case No. 6:20-cv-1129-ADA
`)
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`
`
`)
`) Case No. 6:20-CV-01131-ADA
`)
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`STRATOSAUDIO INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA,
`Defendant.
`STRATOSAUDIO INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`MAZDA MOTORS OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Defendant.
`STRATOSAUDIO INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
`Defendant.
`STRATOSAUDIO INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`VOLVO CARS USA, LLC,
`Defendant.
`STRATOSAUDIO INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF
`AMERICA, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01131-ADA Document 43 Filed 07/15/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`FIRST AMENDED JOINT SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s rulings during the June 23, 2021 Discovery Hearing, the Court
`
`hereby sets the following case deadlines1:
`
`Date
`
`Event
`
`May 13, 2021
`
`May 27, 2021
`
`July 8, 2021
`
`Plaintiff shall serve preliminary2 infringement contentions in the form
`of a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s) each element of
`the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall also identify the priority
`date (i.e. the earliest date of invention) for each asserted claim and
`produce: (1) all documents evidencing conception and reduction to
`practice for each claimed invention, and (2) a copy of the file history
`for each patent in suit.
`
`The Parties shall submit an agreed Scheduling Order . If the parties
`cannot agree, the parties shall submit a separate Joint Motion for entry
`of each Order briefly setting forth their respective positions on items
`where they cannot agree. Absent agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff
`shall be responsible for the timely submission of this and other Joint
`filings.
`
`Defendant shall serve preliminary invalidity contentions in the form of
`(1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each element
`of the asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification of any
`limitations the Defendant contends are indefinite or lack written
`description under section 112, and (3) an identification of any claims
`the Defendant contends are directed to ineligible subject matter under
`section 101. Defendant shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced in
`the invalidity contentions and (2) technical documents, including
`software where applicable, sufficient to show the operation of the
`accused product(s).
`
`July 15, 2021
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`1 Defendants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“VW”) and Hyundai Motor America (“HMA”) believe this order
`should not be entered at this time, and this litigation should not go forward in this Court, unless and until their
`respective motions to dismiss for improper venue are denied. VW and HMA join this proposed schedule only
`because they brought these concerns to the Court, and the Court stated on May 17, 2021 via email: “The Court will
`not stay the cases pending rulings on the motions to dismiss/transfer. Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order
`Regarding Motion(s) for Inter-District Transfer, the Court will rule on these motions before Markman hearing.”
`2 The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity contentions without leave
`of court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts to prepare its preliminary contentions and
`the amendment is based on material identified after those preliminary contentions were served, and should do so
`seasonably upon identifying any such material. Any amendment to add patent claims requires leave of court so that
`the Court can address any scheduling issues.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01131-ADA Document 43 Filed 07/15/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`Date
`
`Event
`
`July 29, 2021
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`August 4, 2021
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose any
`extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert witness they
`may rely upon with respect to claim construction or indefiniteness.
`With respect to any expert identified, the parties shall identify the scope
`of the topics for the witness’s expected testimony.3 With respect to
`items of extrinsic evidence, the parties shall identify each such item by
`production number or produce a copy of any such item if not
`previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and exchange
`revised list of terms/constructions.
`Defendant files Opening claim construction brief, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are indefinite.
`September 2, 2021 Plaintiff files Responsive claim construction brief.
`
`August 6, 2021
`
`August 12, 2021
`
`September 13, 2021 Defendant files Reply claim construction brief
`
`September 24, 2021 Plaintiff files a Sur-Reply claim construction brief.
`September 24, 2021 Parties submit optional technical tutorials to the Court and technical
`adviser (if appointed).4
`September 28, 2021 Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement.
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding providing copies of the briefing to
`the Court and the technical adviser (if appointed).
`Date of Markman hearing. 9:30 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per Rule
`26(a)
`November 15, 2021 Deadline to add parties.
`November 29, 2021 Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. After
`this date, leave of Court is required for any amendment to Infringement
`or Invalidity contentions.
`
`October 4, 2021
`
`October 5, 2021
`
`This deadline does not relieve the Parties of their obligation to
`seasonably amend if new information is identified after initial
`contentions.
`
`3 Any party may utilize a rebuttal expert in response to a brief where expert testimony is relied upon by the other
`party.
`4 The parties should contact the law clerk to request a Box link so that the party can directly upload the file to the
`Court’s Box account.
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01131-ADA Document 43 Filed 07/15/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`Event
`Date
`January 24, 2022 Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless the
`amendment adds patents or patent claims. (Note: This includes
`amendments in response to a 12(c) motion.)
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss significantly
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art references at
`issue. Unless the parties agree to the narrowing, they are ordered to
`contact the Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a teleconference with the
`Court to resolve the disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`April 4, 2022
`
`May 2, 2022
`
`May 9, 2022
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`June 6, 2022
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`June 27, 2022
`
`July 5, 2022
`
`July 11, 2022
`
`July 25, 2022
`
`August 8, 2022
`
`August 15, 2022
`
`August 22, 2022
`
`August 29, 2022
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confer to discuss narrowing
`the number of claims asserted and prior art references at issue to triable
`limits. To the extent it helps the parties determine these limits, the
`parties are encouraged to contact the Court’s Law Clerk for an estimate
`of the amount of trial time anticipated per side. The parties shall file a
`Joint Report within 5 business days regarding the results of the meet
`and confer.
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`See General Issues Note #9 regarding providing copies of the briefing
`to the Court and the technical adviser (if appointed).
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists,
`discovery and deposition designations).
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in limine.
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instructions,
`exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and deposition designations); file
`oppositions to motions in limine.
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting. If
`a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is
`requested for trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a
`notice with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at
`kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01131-ADA Document 43 Filed 07/15/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`Event
`Date
`September 7, 2022 File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial disclosures
`and disputes on motions in limine.
`September 12, 2022 Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set these dates at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`October 3, 20225
`
`SIGNED this
`
`15th
`
` day of
`
`July
`
`, 2021
`
`ALAN D. ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`5 If the actual trial date materially differs from the Court’s default schedule, the Court will consider reasonable
`amendments to the case schedule post-Markman that are consistent with the Court’s default deadlines in light of the
`actual trial date.
`
`- 5 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket