throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 35-1 Filed 09/14/21 Page 1 of 4
`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 35-1 Filed 09/14/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CORRECTED EXHIBIT 17
`CORRECTED EXHIBIT17
`(ATTACHMENT 33-18)
`(ATTACHMENT33-18)
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 35-1 Filed 09/14/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`DR. MICHAEL FARMWALD and RPX CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case 1PR2014-00946
`Patent 6,266,518
`
`PARKERVISION, INC. ’S MOTION FOR ADVERSE
`JUDGMENT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 223 13-1450
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 35-1 Filed 09/14/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`Case IPR2014-00946
`Patent 6,266,518
`
`The Board instituted trial in this proceeding for claims 1, 82, 90, and 91.
`
`(See Paper 8, Decision(cid:151)Institution of
`
`Inter Partes Review, p. 31.) No trial was
`
`instituted for claim 27. Petitioners Dr. Farmwald and RPX Corp. requested a
`
`rehearing for claim 27 in view of the Avitabile reference and claims 1 and 27 in
`
`view of the Estabrook reference. (See Paper 10, Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing,
`
`pp. 3-10.) The Board denied Petitioner’s request. (See Paper 14, Decision(cid:151)
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing, p. 6.) Thus, only claims 1, 82, 90, and 91
`
`remain challenged in this proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner ParkerVision, Inc. requests the Board to cancel claims 1, 82,
`
`90, and 91 and to enter adverse judgment against itself. See 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.73(b)(2). As these are the only pending claims in this trial, Patent Owner
`
`requests termination of this proceeding.
`
`Petitioners have informed Patent Oycier that they do not oppose this motion.
`
`tted,
`GOLDSTEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`ee
`iinae-& (cid:9)
`Registration No. 3 5,23 9
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: October 22, 2015
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 35-1 Filed 09/14/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`Case 1PR2014-00946
`Patent 6,266,518
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that PARKERVISION, INC.’S
`
`MOTION FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) was
`
`served electronically via e-mail on October 22, 2015 in its entirety on the
`
`following counsel of record for Petitioner:
`
`W. Todd Baker (Lead Counsel)
`cpdocketbaker@oblon.com
`Oblon Spivak
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Phone: (703) 412-6383
`Fax: (703) 413-2220
`
`James T. Bailey (Back-up Counsel)
`jtbjtbai1eylaw.com
`The Law Office of James T. Bailey
`(No Address Provided)
`
`Phone: (917) 626-1356
`
`SLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`MiØhael Q. Lee
`Registration No. 35,239
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: October 22, 2015
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N. W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket