throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 18
`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX 1
`APPENDIX 1
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 2 of 18
`
`Matthew B. Shoemake
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`Last updated August 12, 2021
`Personal Information
`Born February 1971 in Pauls Valley, Oklahoma, USA
`Citizenship United States of America
`Marital Status Married to Bobbie Jo DeKay Shoemake since August 1998
`Children One daughter, age 19, and one son, age 15
`Education
`1999 Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
`1997 M.S. in Electrical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
`1994 B.S. in Computer Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas,
`with honors.
`1994 B.S. in Electrical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station,
`Texas, with honors.
`1989 Valedicatorian, Mexia High School, Mexia, Texas.
`Work Experience
`2016–Present Owner & President, Peritum LLC, Fairview, Texas.
`(cid:123) Peritum provides expert consulting services.
`(cid:123) Providing services since 2008. Incorporated in 2016.
`2008–2018 President & CEO, Biscotti Inc., Allen, Texas.
`(cid:123) Biscotti develops high-definition, video calling systems for the home and office.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`1/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 3 of 18
`
`2003–2008 President & CEO, WiQuest Communications, Inc., Allen, Texas.
`(cid:123) Developed world’s first 1 Gbps ultrawideband chipset
`(cid:123) Developed world’s first wireless VGA/DVI system for notebook computers
`(cid:123) Customers put into product: Dell, Toshiba, Lenovo, Belkin, D-Link and Kensington
`(cid:123) Built company from inception to 120 employees with offices and personnel in Texas,
`India, California, Taiwan and Japan.
`2000–2003 Director Advanced Technology, Wireless Networking Business Unit,
`Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, Texas.
`(cid:123) Lead development of Bluetooth and Wi-Fi coexistence technology
`(cid:123) Lead TI efforts to enhance the IEEE 802.11 standards with quality of service
`extensions
`(cid:123) Lead development of very low power Wi-Fi technology for mobile phones
`(cid:123) Designed Wi-Fi into Nokia Communicator
`1998–2000 Manager, Baseband Systems Team, Alantro Communications, Inc.,
`Dallas, Texas.
`(cid:123) Developed 802.11b compliant physical layer
`(cid:123) Shipped over 100M units in 2nd generation of Intel’s Centrino technology
`(cid:123) Company backed by Cisco and Vantage Point Venture Partners
`(cid:123) Acquired by Texas Instruments for $300MM
`1991–1995 Intern and Engineer, Digital Signal Processing Group, Texas Instru-
`ments, Inc., Stafford, Texas.
`(cid:123) Product engineering for TMS320C2X Digital Signal Processors
`(cid:123) Applications engineering for TMS320C3X Digital Signal Processors
`Ph.D. Dissertation
`Title Turbo Codes: Bounds and Applications, Ph.D., August 1999.
`Supervisor Professor Chris D. Heegard
`Committee
`Professors Toby Berger, Chris D. Heegard, Dexter Kozen, Venugopal V. Veeravalli
`Members
`and Stephen Wicker
`Masters Thesis
`Title Topics in Turbo Coding, M.S., May 1997.
`Supervisor Professor Chris D. Heegard
`Fundraising
`2010-2016 $10M Series A, Palomar Ventures, Biscotti Inc.
`2009, 2016 $1.35M Seed Investment, Texas Emerging Technology Fund, Wham! Inc.
`2008 $50k Grant, Allen Economic Development Center, Wham! Inc.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`2/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 4 of 18
`
`Standards
`and Protocols
`
`2008 $420k Seed Round, Private Individual Investors, Wham! Inc.
`2007 $5M Debt Line, Triple Point Capital, for WiQuest Communications, Inc.
`2007 $23M Series C, Lead by Adams Street Capital, WiQuest Communications,
`Inc.
`2006 $18M Series B, Lead by Sequoia Capital, WiQuest Communications, Inc.
`2005 $50k Grant, Allen Economic Development Center, WiQuest Communications,
`Inc.
`2004 $15M Series A, Menlo Ventures, Palomar Ventures and iD Ventures America,
`WiQuest Communications, Inc.
`2003 $827k Seed Round, Private Individual Investors, WiQuest Communications,
`Inc.
`Computer Skills
`Languages C, C++, Fortran, Python, Pascal, Java, Verilog, VHDL, BASIC, Matlab,
`LATEX, Spice, Perl, shell scripting, various assembly languages, Lisp, Swift.
`IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.11, ADSL, HDSL, DOCSIS, Bluetooth, I2C, I2S, USB,
`CAN bus, HDMI, 3GPP, LTE, IS-95, EDGE, LTO, RS-232, HTTP, FTP, Telnet,
`Internet Protocol (IP), TCP, UDP, RTP, RTCP, SIP, STUN, TURN, ICE,
`CSMA/CD, CSMA/CA, ITU-T G.8031/8032, ITU, ITU-T J83B, MQTT, IEEE
`802.15, IEEE 802.16, SSL, TLS, WEP, WPA, WPA2.
`Professional Activities
`2006-2020 External Advisory Committee, Texas A&M University, Department of
`Electrical and Computer Engineering
`2008-2010 Board Member, TeXchange, Dallas Chapter TeXchange is a non-for-profit
`organization dedicated to helping entrepreneurs succeed.
`2003-2004 Chairperson, IEEE 802.11n Task Group Lead committee of over 300 en-
`gineers through initial stages of standardization of data rate enhancements in
`excess of 100 Mbps
`Jan. 2002 IEEE 802.11 Meeting Organizer and Host, Wyndham Anatole, Dallas,
`Texas
`2000-2003 Chairperson, IEEE 802.11g Task Group Lead committee of over 200 engi-
`neers to set standard for 54 Mbps data rates in the 2.4 GHz band in a fashion
`that is backward compatible with IEEE 802.11b. Standard become the basis for
`the most widely used version of Wi-Fi.
`Sept. 1999 IEEE 802.11 Meeting Organizer and Host, Hilton Sonoma County,
`Santa Rosa, California.
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`3/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 5 of 18
`
`1991-Present
`
`2021–Present
`
`1999 Chairperson, IEEE 802.11g Study GroupLead committee of 20 engineers
`to set project requirements for IEEE 802.11g.
`IEEE Member
`Awards
`2012 CES Innovation Award for the Biscotti TV Phone
`2008 CES Innovation Award for Wireless Digital Video Technology This high-
`speed digital video technology shipped in notebook computers from Toshiba.
`2006 Intel Technology Innovation Award Awarded to WiQuest for innovations in
`Wireless USB technology.
`2003 PC Magazine Technology Excellence Award for IEEE 802.11g This award
`was bestowed on the IEEE 802.11 Working Group and the Wi-Fi Alliance for
`the protocols incorporated in the IEEE 802.11g standard under my leadership.
`2002 Texas Instruments Senior Member Technical Staff
`1997-1998 Intel Foundation Graduate Fellowship Award
`Consulting & Litigation Services
`2021–Present Qualcomm Inc., Retained by Qualcomm’s counsel Norton Rose Fulbright for
`consulting related to Wi-Fi.
`2021–Present AGIS Software Development LLC v. Lyft Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-
`cv-00072-JRG (E.D. Tex.), Retained by Lyft’s counsel, Baker Botts LLP.
`Intellectual Ventures LLC I and II v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Com-
`pany, Case No. 6:21-cv-226 (W.D. Tex.), Retained by HPE’s counsel
`GreenBerg Traurig, LLP. Case involves U.S. Patent No. 6,816,464 and VOIP.
`2021–Present WSOU v. NEC, Retained by NEC’s counsel, Jones Day. Western District of
`Texas, Case Nos. 6:20-cv-00923-ADA, -00924, -00925, -00926, -00927.
`2021–Present Parker Vision v. Hisense and TCL, Retained by Hisense and TCL via
`their counsel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP. Generally related to direct
`conversion receivers.
`In the Matter of Certain LTE-Compliant Cellular Communication De-
`vices, ITC Inv.No. 337-TA-1253, Retained by Samsung via their counsel
`Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP..
`2021–Present OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. matter, Retained via their
`counsel Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. Technologies relate to random access
`channels, power adjustment, qualify feedback, battery charge estimation, link
`adaptation, and buffer reporting.
`
`2021–Present
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`4/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 6 of 18
`
`2021–Present
`
`2021–Present Wi-Fi Matter, Retained for Wi-Fi patent owner via their counsel Hiem, Payne
`& Chorush, L.L.P. Matter relates to IEEE 802.11 and Wi-Fi patents.
`Intelligent Agency v. NeighborFavor, Inc., Relating mobile applications.
`Retained via NeighborFavor’s counsel, Baker Botts LLP.
`2021–Present FK Ironworks, et al., Related wireless power charging systems.
`2020-Present TrickStar v. American Conservation Group, Related to efficient power
`distribution technology.
`2020–Present MediaTek Inc. v. NXP, Related to Wi-Fi.
`Intelligent Agency v. 7-Eleven Inc., Relating mobile applications. Retained
`2020–Present
`via 7-Eleven’s counsel, Baker Botts LLP.
`2020–Present Caltech, Related to Wi-Fi and error correction coding.
`2020-2021 Quartz Auto Technologies LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case No.
`1:20-cv-00720 (W.D. Tex.), Retained by Uber via their counsel Gibson Dunn
`& Crutcher LLP.
`2020–Present Blitzsafe Texas, LLC v. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, N.V. et al., E.D.
`Tex., Retained by FCA US LLC and Maserati North America, Inc. via their
`counsel Venable LLP. Matter relates to use of USB and Bluetooth in automobiles.
`2020–2021 Blitzsafe Texas, LLC v. Navistar, Inc. and Navistar International Corp.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00403-JRG (E.D. Tex.), Retained by Navistar via their
`counsel DLA Piper. Matter relates to use of USB and Bluetooth in automobiles.
`2020–2021 Blitzsafe Texas, LLC v. General Motors, LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-00377-
`JRG (E.D. Tex.), Retained by GM via their counsel Quinn Emanuel. Matter
`relates to use of USB and Bluetooth in automobiles.
`2020–Present Traeger v. GMG Grills in ITC case, Relating to Wi-Fi features.
`2020–Present Cornell University, Relating to communication networks, specifically inventions
`related to Wi-Fi.
`2020 Castlemorton Wireless, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Civil Action
`No. 6-20-cv-00026 (W.D. Tex.), Retained for Juniper via their counsel
`Covington & Burling LLP. Matter relates to IEEE 802.11 products.
`2020–Present Essential WiFi v. MediaTek, et al., Civil Case No. 6:20-cv-225 (W.D.
`Tex.), Retained for by MediaTek via their counsel Quinn Emanuel. Also retained
`by Texas Instruments and Acer. Related to Wi-Fi including MIMO and wide
`channels.
`2020–Present DeCurtis LLC v. Carnival Corp., Case No. 6:20-cv-00607 (M.D. Fla)
`and Carnival Corp. v. DeCurtis Corp., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-21547
`(S.D. Fla), Retained for DeCurtis LLC via their counsel Quinn Emanuel.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`5/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 7 of 18
`
`2020–Present Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Retained for Samsung via their counsel Quinn
`Emanuel. Related to analysis of patent infringement in cellular phones, e.g.
`antenna subsystems.
`2020–2021 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v Verizon Communications, Inc., et.
`al., 6:20-cv-00090 (E.D. Tex., Retained by Verizon via their counsel Quinn
`Emanuel. Case related to network communication systems including fiber rings.
`Case also related to ITU-T Recommendations G.709 and G.8032. Patents Case
`settled mid-trial the day before I was to testify. Invalidity and non-infringement
`reports submitted in case and deposition testimony provided. Worked on U.S.
`Patent No. 8,995,253. Also submitted standards report regarding violations of
`ITU-T patent policy.
`2020–Present KAIFI LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al., Civil Case No. 2:19-cv-138 (E.D.
`Tex.), Retained for AT&T via their counsel Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
`2020 Castlemorton Wireless, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al Civil Action
`No. 6:20-cv-00027-ADA (W.D. Tex.), Retained for T-mobile via their
`counsel McGuireWoods LLP.
`2020–Present Sonos v. Google, Retained for Google via their counsel Quinn Emanuel.
`Deposition and ITC trial testimony.
`2020–Present Sisvel International S.A. and 3G Licensing S.A. v. Cradlepoint, Inc.,
`Civil Case No. 1:19- CV-1142-MN (D. Del.), Retained for Cradlepoint,
`Inc. and Sierra Wireless, Inc. via their counsel Perkins Coie LLP.
`2020–2021 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company
`America, Civil Case No. 2:19-cv-9474 (C.D. Cal.), Retained for Hisense
`via their counsel Covington & Burling LLP.
`2020 Blitzsafe Texas, LLC v. PACCAR Inc., Retained for PACCAR via their
`counsel Baker Botts LLP.
`2020 Castlemorton Wireless, LLC v. Sprint Corporation, et al. (W.D. Tex.),
`Retained for Sprint via their counsel McGuireWoods LLP. Patent at issue is US
`7,835,421. The accused products are alleged “to practice IEEE 802.11b and/or
`IEEE 802.11g” standards.
`2019–Present Wapp Tech Ltd., et al. v. Seattle SpinCo, Inc., Micro Focus LLC, et
`al. (“Micro Focus”) (E.D. Tex., D. Del.), Retained for Micro Focus by
`Gibson Dunn and Shelton Coburn. Patents at issue in case are US 9,971,678,
`9,298,864, and 8,924,192 . Patents relate to emulation of mobile devices and
`application development. Deposition and trial testimony.
`2019 Blitzsafe v. Bosch (N. D. Tex.), Retained by Bosch via their counsel DLA
`Piper. Patents asserted against the use of USB and Bluetooth in vehicles.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`6/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 8 of 18
`
`2019–2021 Linksmart Wireless Technology LLC v. Panasonic Avionics Corp. (C.
`D. Cal.), Retained by Panasonic Avionics via their counsel Haynes & Boone LLP.
`Case related to Wi-Fi, Internet access on airplanes, satellite communications,
`DHCP, IEEE 802.3, gateways, redirection servers and proxies. Patent at issue
`was US RE46,459 to Ikudome and Yeung. Submitted experts reports. No
`deposition testimony. No trial. Case No. 8:18-cv-00662-AG-JDE (C. D. Cali.).
`2019–2021 United Access Technologies, LLC v. CenturyTel Broadband Services
`LLC and Qwest Corporation (D. Del.), Retained by defendants, collectively
`“CenturyLink,” via their via their counsel Duane Morris LLP. Patents at issue were
`U.S. 5,844,596, 6,243,446 and 6,542,585. Accused products were splitterless
`ADSL systems with POTS. Wrote non-infringement report. Court found non-
`infringement on motion for summary judgement. No trial nor trial testimony..
`2019–Present Uniloc v. Blackberry (N. D. Tex.), Retained by Blackberry via their counsel
`Baker Botts LLP. Case No. 3:18-cv-03068-N (N.D. Texas) Patents in-suit are
`US6,868,079, US6,993,049, US7,020,106 and US7,167,487.
`2019 Traxcell v. Sprint and Verizon (E. D. Tex.), Retained by Sprint via their
`counsel McGuireWoods. Retained by Verizon via their counsel Holland &
`Knight LLP. Patents deal with network tuning, location determination and
`navigation. Patents at issue are US Patents 8,977,284, 9,510,320, 9,642,024
`and 9,549,399. Wrote invalidity reports for Sprint and Verizon, and wrote a
`non-infringement report for Verizon. Depositions taken. No trial testimony, since
`cases settled shortly before trial due to granted summary judgement motions on
`non-infringement.
`2019 Blitzsafe v. Daimler (E. D. Tex.), Retained by Daimler via their counsel
`Quinn Emmanuel. Patents asserted against the use of USB and Bluetooth in
`vehicles.
`2018–2020 Sol IP v. Sprint (E. D. Tex.), Retained by Sprint via their counsel McGuire-
`Woods. Sol IP, LLC v. Sprint Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-00527
`(E.D. Tex.).
`(E. D. Tex.),
`2018–2019 Parity Networks v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
`Retained by HPE via their counsel Morgan Lewis. No reports, testimony nor
`depositions. HPE was dismissed from the case in March 2019 for unknown
`reasons.
`2018–Present Uniloc v. AT&T (E. D. Tex.), Retained by AT&T via their counsel Baker
`Botts LLP. Matter pertains to LTE License Assisted Access (LAA).
`2018–2019 Bell North Research LLC v. Kyocera Corp. (S. D. Cali.), Retained by
`Kyocera. via their counsel Jones Day. Bell Northern Research LLC v. Kyocera
`Corp. Case No. 3:18-cv-1785 (S.D. Cal.).
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`7/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 9 of 18
`
`2018–2019 Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., et al. (D. Del.), Retained
`by Sierra Wireless Inc. via their counsel Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Matter involves
`ETSI and TIA licensing obligations. Expert report(s) submitted.
`2018–2019 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company v. ChriMar Systems, Inc., Re-
`tained by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company via their counsel Morgan Lewis.
`Matter involves inter partes review of certain US Patents. Matter relates
`to power-over-ethernet (PoE). Patents owned by ChriMar Systems include
`8,155,012, 8,942,107, 8,902,760, 9,019,838, 9,049,019, and 9,812,825.
`2018–2020 Hera Wireless and Sisvel v. Belkin Int’l. and ARRIS Group, Retained by
`Belkin International and ARRIS Group via their counsel Duane Morris LLP. Case
`Nos. 1:17-cv-00948-RGA and 1:17-cv-00949-RGA. No reports, declarations nor
`deposition testimony. Case resolved before trial.
`2018–2020 Blackberry v. Facebook, Retained by Blackberry in patent case dealing with
`text messaging and user interfaces.
`Fundamental Innovation systems v. ZTE Corporation, Retained in USB
`2018–Dec
`power case by ZTE via their counsel McDermott Will & Emory.
`2019
`2018 Intel Corporation, Retained via Intel’s counsel, Kirkland & Ellis, in matter
`related to Wi-Fi in notebook computers.
`2017–2018 Intel Corporation, Retained via Intel’s counsel, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.
`Matter relates to patents asserted against MIMO and/or beamforming in wireless
`OFDM communication systems.
`2017–2018 PrefNet v. Sprint, Working with Sprint’s counsel, McGuireWoods. Case
`relates to management of bandwidth in network servers.
`2017–Present XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies v. Cisco Systems,
`Inc., 2:17-cv-02951 (C.D. Cal. 2017), Patent case regarding US Pat. No.
`6,611,231 and adaptive antenna arrays. Retained via Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
`2017–2018 Sharp Corporation, Retained by Sharp’s counsel, K&L Gates. Matter concerns
`intellectual property and Wi-Fi. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`2017 Harmon International Industries, Retained by Harmon’s counsel, McDermott,
`Will & Emory. Matter relates to car stereos and audio equipment in vehicles.
`No deposition nor trial testimony. .
`2017-2018 Wistron Corporation, Retained by Wistron’s counsel, JW Law Group. Matter
`relates to alleged Wi-Fi patents.
`2017–2019 Blitzsafe v. Mitsubishi, Retained via Mitsubishi Electric Corporation’s counsel,
`Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman LLP. Case relates to the use of Bluetooth
`and USB in vehicles. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`8/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 10 of 18
`
`2016–2017 Mtel v. Google, Retained by Quinn Emanuel for Google. Case is a patent
`infringement case regarding US Patents 5,809,428, 5,894,506, 5,581,804 and
`5,754,946. Case no. is 2:16-cv-00002 in E.D. Texas Marshall Division.
`2016–2017 SPH America LLC v. Huawei Technology Co. Ltd., Retained by Foley
`and Lardner LLP for Huawei. Case no.
`is 13-cv-2323-CAB-KSC (S.D. Cal).
`Draft invalidity report written but not served. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`Huawei joined JDG with Blackberry.
`2016–2017 IV v. AT&T, Retained by AT&T. AT&T’s counsel is Baker Botts. Case is a
`patent infringement case related to DSL. No depositions nor trial testimony at
`this time.
`2016–2019 Fujifilm v. Sony, Retained on half of Fujifilm by their counsel Baker Botts.
`Cases relate to alleged standards and LTO data storage products. The matters
`are being heard in the ITC and in an associated district court case. Deposition
`and trial testimony.
`2016–2017 Blitzsafe v. Honda, Retained via Honda’s counsel, Jones Day. Case relates
`patent infringement and use of Bluetooth and USB in vehicles. Deposition take.
`No trial testimony.
`2016 Network-1 vs. Dell Inc., Retained via Dell’s counsel K&L Gates in a patent
`litigation related to power over Ethernet. No depositions nor trial testimony.
`2016–Present California Institute of Technology (Caltech) vs. Broadcom Corporation
`and Apple Inc., Retained via Caltech’s counsel, Quinn Emanuel. Case relates to
`use of forward error correction in Wi-Fi products. Technology tutorial presented
`to district court. Expert reports submitted. Testimony provide to court at
`various hearings. Testified on infringement and technical value of patents at
`trial in January 2020. Was sole expert witness for Caltech. Jury found Apple
`and Broadcom infringe and awarded $1.1B in damages.
`2015–2016 California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Analysis of IEEE 802.11
`patents. No depositions nor trial testimony.
`2015–2016 Wistron Corporation, Retained to analyze certain communication system
`patents in the LTE space. No depositions nor trial testimony.
`2015–2016 Wistron Corporation, Retained via Wistron’s counsel, K&L Gates, to perform
`analysis related to Wi-Fi. No depositions nor trial testimony.
`2015–2016 LSI v. Funai, Retained by Baker & Hostetler to provide services in connection
`with LSI Corp. et al. v. Funai Electric Co. Ltd. Case relates OFDM patent
`asserted against Wi-Fi products. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`2015–2016 Mtel v. Blackberry, Retained by Blackberry via their counsel McDermott
`Will & Emery LLP. Patent case related to pagers. Patents asserted against
`mobile phones. Deposition taken. No trial testimony.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`9/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 11 of 18
`
`2015 Ericsson v. Apple, Retained by Apple via their counsel Fish & Richardson.
`Patent case related to Wi-Fi and cellular. Deposition and trial testimony in ITC
`case..
`2015 Antennatech LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Retained by Mercedes-
`Benz via their counsel Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. Patent case
`related to Wi-Fi inside vehicles. No deposition nor trial testimony..
`2015 Samsung, Retained via Williams & Connolly LLP on behalf of their their client
`Samsung. Case relates to cross license between two parties, including access by
`Samsung to Nokia’s Wi-Fi patent portfolio. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`2015 Cablevision v. Verizon, Retained via Kirkland & Ellis on behalf of their client
`Verizon. Matter relates to false advertising claims tied to use of IEEE 802.11ac
`routers. No deposition. Testified at trial.
`2014 Blitz Stream Video LLC, Retained as consultant related to portfolio of video
`patents. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`2014-2016 SPH America v. Blackberry Limited, Retained by Blackberry via their
`counsel Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. No deposition nor trial
`testimony.
`2014-2015 CSIRO v. MediaTek, Nokia, Texas Instruments, Realtek and Barnes & Noble
`via a joint defense group including Covington & Burling LLP. Serving both as
`expert for JDG and 30(b)(6) witness for Texas Instruments. No trial testimony.
`2014-2018 ChriMar v. Cisco, Retained by Cisco via their counsel Kirkland & Ellis. Matter
`relates to power over Ethernet. Deposition. No trial testimony.
`2014-2016 Intellectual Ventures v. CenturyLink, et al., Retained by CenturyLink via
`their counsel O’Melveny & Myers LLP. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`2013-2015 Intellectual Ventures v. Canon Inc., et al., Retained by Canon Inc, et al.
`via their counsel Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. Deposition. No trial
`testimony.
`2013-2017 Intellectual Ventures v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., Retained by Sprint
`Spectrum LP via their counsel McGuireWoods LLP. Case relates to security in
`IEEE 802.11 networks. No deposition nor trial testimony.
`2014 NXP v. Blackberry, Services retained by Blackberry via their counsel McDer-
`mott Will & Emery. No deposition. Testified at trial..
`2013-2014 Realtek Semiconductor Corp v. LSI Corporation et al., Retained by
`Realtek Semiconductor Corp via their counsel ReedSmith. Deposition and trial
`testimony.
`2013-2017 CSIRO v. Cisco System Inc., Retained by Cisco via their counsel Duane
`Morris. Deposition and trial testimony..
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`10/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 12 of 18
`
`2013 Cisco Systems, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. v.
`Innovatio IP
`Ventures LLC, Retained by Kirkland and Ellis on behalf of Cisco Systems,
`Motorola Solutions, Inc. and NETGEAR. Deposition and trial testimony.
`2013 Wi-LAN v. HTC, et al., Retained HTC Corporation, HTC America Inc., and
`Exedea, Inc. via their counsel Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Novatel via
`their counsel K&L Gates, and Sierra Wireless via their counsel Nixon Peabody.
`Expert reports also filed on behalf of other defendants including Apple and
`Alcatel Lucent. Deposition. Case settled prior to trial.
`2012-2013 Ericsson, et al. v. D-Link, et al., Retained via Intel via their counsel Kirkland
`& Ellis. Deposition and trial testimony.
`2011-2013 Mosaid Technologies Incorporated v. Dell, Inc. et al., Retained by Intel
`via their counsel WilmerHale, and retained by Marvell via their counsel Quinn
`Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. No deposition. Case settled prior to trial..
`2011-2012 Broadcom Corporation and Atheros Communications, Inc. vs. Com-
`monwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization., Retained by
`Broadcom via Potter Minton. Deposition. Case settled prior to trial.
`2010-2011 Wi-LAN vs. RIM, PCD, Motorola, LG, et al., Was an expert witness for
`the defense. Retained by PCD and a major Korean cell phone manufacturer.
`PCD distributes phones made by HTC. Deposition. No trial testimony.
`2009-2011 Wi-LAN vs. Acer, Intel, Broadcom, Atheros, Marvell, et al., Was expert
`witness for defense. Focused specifically on US Patent 5,282,222 related to
`OFDM technology. Served as expert related to wireless, the IEEE standards
`process and provided testimony related to damages. Retained by Intel, Broadcom
`and Marvell. Deposition. Case settled on the eve of trial.
`2008-2009 CSIRO vs. Intel, Broadcom, Microsoft, HP, Dell, D-Link, et al., Served
`as fact witness related to 802.11 standardization, rules, process and events
`related to the formation of the 802.11 standard. Testified at trial.
`Articles
`[1] Chris Heegard et al. “High Performance Wireless Ethernet”. In: IEEE Commu-
`nications Magazine 39 (11 Nov. 2001), pp. 64–73. doi: 10.1109/35.965361.
`url: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/965361/.
`[2] Chris Heegard et al. “Combined Equalization and Decoding for IEEE 802.11b
`Devices”. In: IEEE Selected Areas in Communications 21 (2 Feb. 2002). doi:
`10.1109/JSAC.2002.807558. url: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
`document/1177178/.
`[3] Matthew B. Shoemake and Sridhar Rajagopal. “IEEE 802.11g Jells as Applica-
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`11/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 13 of 18
`
`tions Mount”. In: EE Times (2002-04-02). url: https://www.eetimes.com/
`document.asp?doc_id=1205335.
`[4] Matthew Shoemake Michael Yonker and Jie Liang. “Merging WLAN, WWAN
`Radios in Mobile Designs”. In: EE Times (2002-06-19). url: https://www.
`eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1277665.
`[5] Matthew B. Shoemake and Sridhar Rajagopal. “Low Peak-to-Average Ratio
`Channel Estimation Sequences for MultiBand OFDM systems”. In: EE Times
`(2004-05-17). url: https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=
`1271119.
`[6] Jason Wilcox and Steve Cherny. “Standardised uncertainty”. In: IAM Mag-
`azine (2014-12-01). url: https://www.iam- media.com/law- policy/
`standardised-uncertainty.
`Books
`[1] Chris Heegard et al. “Wireless Local Area Networks - The New Wireless Revo-
`lution”. In: Evolution of 2.4 GHz Wireless LANs. Ed. by B. Bing. John Wiley,
`2002. Chap. 2. isbn: 978-0-471-22474-7.
`Conferences and Standard Meetings
`[1] Matthew Shoemake and Chris Heegard. “Computationally Efficient Turbo Decod-
`ing with Bi-Directional Viterbi”. In: 1997 IEEE Information Theory Symposium.
`Ulm, Germany, June 1997.
`[2] Chris Heegard and Matthew B. Shoemake. “Proposal for High Data Rate 2.4
`GHz PHY With Variable Rate Binary Convolutional Coding on QPSK”. In: IEEE
`802.11 Working Group. IEEE 802.11-98/82. Mar. 11, 1998.
`[3] Chris Heegard, Matthew B. Shoemake, and Stanley Ling. “Short Preamble for
`High Performance 802.11 Physical Layer”. In: IEEE 802.11 Working Group.
`IEEE 802.11-98/366. Oct. 7, 1998. url: http://www.ieee802.org/11/
`Documents/DocumentArchives/1998_docs/83667A-Short%20Preamble%
`20for%20High%20Performance.pdf.
`[4] Matthew B. Shoemake, Chris Heegard, and Stanley Ling. “Replacement Descrip-
`tion of CCK”. In: IEEE 802.11 Working Group. IEEE 802.11-98/367. Nov. 4,
`1998.
`[5] Matthew B. Shoemake, Stanley Ling, and Chris Heegard. “Performance of
`PBCC”. In: IEEE 802.11 Working Group. IEEE 802.11-98/304. Sept. 16, 1998.
`
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`12/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 14 of 18
`
`[6] Matthew Shoemake and Chris Heegard. “A New Turbo Code for 8-PSK Modu-
`lation”. In: 1998 IEEE Information Theory Symposium. Cambridge, MA, Aug.
`1998.
`[7] Matthew Shoemake, Chris Heegard, and Eric Rossin. “Turbo Codes for High
`Order Constellations”. In: IEEE Information Theory Workshop. IEEE 802.11-
`98/304. Killarney, Kerry, Ireland, June 1998.
`[8] Chris Heegard et al. “Texas Instruments Proposal for IEEE 802.11 TGg High
`Rate Standard”. In: IEEE 802.11 Working Group. IEEE 802.11-00/384. 2000.
`[9] Matthew B. Shoemake and Paul Lowry. “IEEE 802.11b Coexistence Test-
`ing Data”. In: IEEE 802.15 Working Group. IEEE 802.15-01/84. Jan. 2001.
`url: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2001/Jan01/
`01084r0P802- 15_TG2- IEEE- 802.11b- and- Bluetooth- Coexistence-
`Testing-Results.ppt.
`[10] Matthew B. Shoemake and Sridhar Rajagopal. “Proposal for Reduced PAR
`Channel Estimation Sequence for MB-OFDM”. In: IEEE 802.15 Working Group.
`IEEE 802.15-04/106. Mar. 13, 2004.
`[11] Matthew B. Shoemake. “UWB: Performance Matters”. In: Texas Wireless
`Symposium. Oct. 27, 2005.
`[12] Matthew B. Shoemake. “How to Raise Capital from Tier 1 VCs”. In: Dallas
`Blue. Aug. 21, 2008.
`[13] Matthew B. Shoemake. “Entrepreneurship”. In: Texas A&M University Honors
`Engineering Program Seminar. College Station, TX, Apr. 24, 2009.
`Patents
`[1] Chris Heegard and Matthew B. Shoemake. “Packet Binary Convolutional Codes”.
`U.S. pat. 6,823,488. Aug. 4, 1999.
`[2] Chris Heegard, Matthew B. Shoemake, and Scott Petler. “Fast Search-Based
`Decoding Scheme”. U.S. pat. 6,701,483. Aug. 18, 2000.
`[3] Chris Heegard and Matthew B. Shoemake. “Joint Equalization and Decoding
`using a Search-Based Decoding Algorithm”. U.S. pat. 6,961,392. Aug. 3, 2001.
`[4] Matthew B. Shoemake. “Adaptive Fragmentation for Wireless Network Commu-
`nications”. U.S. pat. 7,039,038. Dec. 21, 2001.
`[5] Anuj Batra, Kofi Anim-Appiah, and Matthew B. Shoemake. “Channelization
`Scheme for Wireless Local Area Networks”. U.S. pat. 7,272,358. July 3, 2002.
`1401 Red Oak Trail – Fairview, TX 75069
`(cid:72) (214) 727 3951 • (cid:84) (214) 296 9294 • (cid:117) (214) 272 0637
`(cid:66) matthew.shoemake@peritum.com • (cid:205) www.peritum.com
`
`13/17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00945-ADA Document 33-21 Filed 08/23/21 Page 15 of 18
`
`[6] Jie Liang and Matthew B. Shoemake. “Low Power Packet Detector for Low
`Power WLAN Devices”. U.S. pat. 7,403,511. Oct. 30, 2002.
`[7] Yonghe Liu, Matthew B. Shoemake, and Jin-Meng Ho. “Adaptive Adjustment
`of Backoff Times in Wireless Network Communications”. U.S. pat. 7,209,467.
`Nov. 26, 2002.
`[8] Yonghe Liu, Matthew B. Shoemake, and Sid B. Schrum. “Implementing En-
`hanced Distribution Coordinating Function (EDCF) with

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket