`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-802
`
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`eBAY INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Express Mobile, Inc. (“Express Mobile” or “Plaintiff”), by its attorneys,
`
`demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable and for its Complaint against eBay Inc. (“eBay” or
`
`“Defendant”) alleges the following:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This action arises under 35 U.S.C. § 271 for eBay’s infringement of Express
`
`Mobile’s United States Patent Nos. 6,546,397 (“the ’397 patent”) and 7,594,168 (“the ’168
`
`patent”).
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Express Mobile, Inc. is an inventor-owned corporation organized under
`
`the laws of the State of Delaware with a place of business at 38 Washington Street, Novato, CA
`
`94947.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a place of business at 7700 W Parmer Lane,
`
`Austin, TX 78729. eBay may be served through its registered agent for service in Delaware,
`
`Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange St., Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 37
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay provides website marketing services to
`
`millions of customers, including both businesses and individuals.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, jurisdiction and venue for this action are proper in
`
`the Western District of Texas.
`
`7.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over eBay because eBay has purposefully
`
`availed itself of the rights and benefits of the laws of this State and this Judicial District. Upon
`
`information and belief, eBay resides in the Western District of Texas by maintaining a regular
`
`and established place of business at 7700 W Parmer Lane, Austin, TX 78729.
`
`8.
`
`This Court also has personal jurisdiction over eBay because eBay has done and is
`
`doing substantial business in this Judicial District, both generally and, upon information and
`
`belief, with respect to the allegations in this Complaint, including eBay’s one or more acts of
`
`infringement in this Judicial District.
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and §
`
`1400(b). eBay committed acts of infringement through performing a method to allow users to
`
`produce Internet websites in the Western District of Texas and has a regular and established
`
`place of business in this District. eBay’s office in Austin is a physical place in the District, it is
`
`an established location where eBay’s business has been carried out for several years, and eBay
`
`publicly advertises its presence in the District.
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`10.
`
`Express Mobile is the lawful owner of all rights, title, and interest in the ’397
`
`patent titled “Browser Based Web Site Generation Tool and Run Time Engine,” including the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 3 of 37
`
`
`
`
`right to sue and to recover for infringement thereof. The ’397 patent was duly and legally issued
`
`on April 8, 2003, naming Steven H. Rempell as the inventor. A true and correct copy of the ’397
`
`patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`11.
`
`The inventions of the ’397 patent solve technical problems related to website
`
`creation and generation. For example, the inventions enable the creation of websites through
`
`browser-based visual editing tools such as selectable settings panels which describe website
`
`elements, with one or more settings corresponding to commands. These features are exclusively
`
`implemented utilizing computer technology including a virtual machine.
`
`12.
`
`The claims of the ’397 patent do not merely recite the performance of some pre-
`
`Internet business practice on the Internet. Instead, the claims of the ’397 patent recite inventive
`
`concepts that are rooted in computerized website creation technology, and overcome problems
`
`specifically arising in the realm of computerized website creation technologies.
`
`13.
`
`The claims of the ’397 patent recite inventions that are not merely the routine or
`
`conventional use of website creation systems and methods. Instead, the inventions teach a
`
`browser-based website creation system and method in which the user-selected settings
`
`representing website elements are stored in a database, and in which said stored information is
`
`retrieved to generate said website.
`
`14.
`
`The technology claimed in the ’397 patent does not preempt all ways of using
`
`website or web page authoring tools nor any other well-known prior art technology.
`
`15.
`
`Accordingly, each claim of the ’397 patent recites a combination of elements
`
`sufficient to ensure that the claim amounts to significantly more than a patent on an ineligible
`
`concept.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff is the lawful owner of all rights, title, and interest in United States Patent
`
`No. 7,594,168 titled “Browser Based Web Site Generation Tool and Run Time Engine,”
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 4 of 37
`
`
`
`
`including the right to sue and to recover for infringement thereof. The ’168 patent was duly and
`
`legally issued on September 22, 2009, naming Steven H. Rempell as the inventor. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’168 patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`17.
`
`The inventions of the ’168 patent solve technical problems related to website
`
`creation and generation. For example, the inventions enable the creation of websites through
`
`browser-based build tools and a user interface. The inventions greatly improve the productivity
`
`of the designer utilizing an innovative implementation for styles. These features are
`
`implemented utilizing computer technology.
`
`18.
`
`The claims of the ’168 patent do not merely recite the performance of some pre-
`
`Internet business practice on the Internet. Instead, the claims of the ’168 patent recite inventive
`
`concepts that are rooted in computerized website creation technology and overcome problems
`
`specifically arising in the realm of computerized website creation technologies.
`
`19.
`
`The claims of the ’168 patent recite inventions that are not merely the routine or
`
`conventional use of website creation systems and methods. Instead, the inventions teach a
`
`browser-based website creation system including a server comprising a build engine configured
`
`to create and apply styles to, for example, a website with web pages comprised of objects.
`
`20.
`
`The technology claimed in the ’168 patent does not preempt all ways of using
`
`website or webpage authoring tools nor any other well-known or prior art technology.
`
`21.
`
`Accordingly, each claim of the ’168 patent recites a combination of elements
`
`sufficient to ensure that the claim amounts to significantly more than a patent on an ineligible
`
`concept.
`
`22.
`
`In Express Mobile v. KTree Computer Solutions, a case filed in the Eastern
`
`District of Texas, the defendant, KTree Computer Solutions, brought a Motion for Judgment on
`
`the Pleadings asserting that the ’397 patent and the ’168 patent are invalid as claiming abstract
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 5 of 37
`
`
`
`
`subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (C.A. 2:17-00128; Dkt. 9, 17, 22-27). The briefing
`
`associated with the motion is incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`23.
`
`After considering the respective pleadings, Magistrate Judge Payne recommended
`
`denial of KTree’s motion, without prejudice, holding that “the claims appear to address a
`
`problem particular to the internet: dynamically generating websites and displaying web pages
`
`based on stored user-selected settings” and further stating “the asserted claims do not bear all of
`
`the hallmarks of claims that have been invalidated on the pleadings by other courts in the past.
`
`For example, the claims are not merely do-it-on-a-computer claims.” (Dkt. 29, attached as
`
`Exhibit C.) No objection was filed to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and the
`
`decision therefore became final.
`
`24.
`
`In Express Mobile v. Pantheon Systems, Inc., a case filed in the Northern District
`
`of California, the defendant, Pantheon Systems, Inc., brought a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's
`
`First Amended Complaint asserting that the ’397 patent and the ’168 patent were directed to the
`
`abstract idea of creating and displaying webpages based upon information from a user with no
`
`further inventive concept and purportedly ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (Case
`
`No. 3:18-CV-04688-RS; Dkt. 26, 32 and 34). The briefing associated with the motion is
`
`incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`25.
`
`In Express Mobile v. Code and Theory LLC, a case filed in the Northern District
`
`of California, the defendant, Code and Theory LLC, brought a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
`
`Complaint asserting that the ’397 patent and the ’168 patent are not subject matter eligible under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 101 as a matter of law. (Case No. 3:18-CV-04679-RS; Dkt. 35, 40 and 41). The
`
`briefing associated with the motion is incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`26.
`
`After a hearing and a consideration of the respective pleadings, Hon. Richard
`
`Seeborg denied both motions holding that:
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 6 of 37
`
`
`
`
`• “The patents here are directed at a purportedly revolutionary technological solution to
`a technological problem—how to create webpages for the internet in a manner that
`permits ‘what you see is what you get’ editing, and a number of other alleged
`improvements over the then-existing methodologies.” Id. at 5.
`
`• The claims of the ‘397 and ‘168 patents are “directed to a specific improvement to the
`way computers operate,” and “it simply cannot be said on the present record that the
`claims are drawn so broadly as to be divorced from the potentially patent-eligible
`purported technological improvements described in the specification.” Id. at 5-6.
`(Case No. 3:18-CV-04679-RS; Dkt.45; Case No. 3:18-CV-04688-RS Dkt.40; attached
`as Exhibit D.)
`
`27.
`
`In Case Nos. 1:18-CV-01173-RGA and 1:18-CV-01175-RGA, infringement
`
`actions filed by Plaintiff in the District of Delaware, the respective defendants in those actions,
`
`Dreamhost LLC and Hostway Services, Inc., brought Motions to Dismiss claims of the ’397
`
`and ’168 patents on the basis of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (Case No. 1:18-CV-01173-
`
`RGA D.I. 14, D.I. 18-21 and 24 Case No. 1:18-CV-01175-RGA D.I. 17-19 and 23). The
`
`briefing associated with the motion is incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`28.
`
`After consideration of the respective pleadings, Judge Andrews denied both
`
`motions in a joint order, pointing to factual allegations of inventiveness identified by the
`
`Plaintiff, and an expert declaration explaining inventiveness of the claims, noting that such
`
`factual issues preclude a finding of invalidity on a motion to dismiss. (Case No. 1:18-CV-
`
`01173-RGA D.I. 43; Case No. 1:18-CV-01175-RGA D.I. 42; attached as Exhibit E.).
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`29.
`
`Plaintiff Express Mobile is a leader in the business of developing mobile app and
`
`web site design and creation platforms, and has intellectual property including U.S. patents
`
`relating to certain tools useful in the field. Express Mobile is managed by individuals with
`
`decades of technology and business experience. The Chairman of the Board and CTO of
`
`Express Mobile, Steve Rempell, is the inventor of Express Mobile’s patent portfolio. Mr.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 7 of 37
`
`
`
`
`Rempell has over 50 years of experience in technology companies, with much of that work
`
`focused on web-based technologies and applications.
`
`30.
`
`Defendant eBay is a well-known company that facilitates consumer-to-consumer
`
`and business-to-consumer sales through its website. eBay has grown rapidly and now generates
`
`billions of dollars of revenue per year.
`
`COUNT I - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,546,397
`
`31.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 to 30
`
`above.
`
`32.
`
`Using the technology claimed by the ’397 patent, eBay’s listings (e.g., all
`
`registered sellers and eBay stores) including all hardware and software used and/or generated to
`
`provide these functionalities (collectively, the “Accused Instrumentality”) performed a method to
`
`allow users to produce Internet websites by letting users select settings representing website
`
`elements, storing these settings in a database, and retrieving stored information to generate
`
`websites.
`
`33.
`
`During relevant time periods, eBay performed a method to allow users to
`
`produce Internet websites which infringed, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the ’397 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`34.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay directly infringed at least claim 1 of the ’397
`
`patent through its Accused Instrumentality that provided browser-based website authoring tools
`
`in which the user-selected settings representing website elements are stored in a database and in
`
`which said stored information is retrieved to generate said website.
`
`35.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality performed a method to allow users to produce
`
`Internet websites on and for computers having a browser and a virtual machine capable of
`
`generating displays. For example, the Accused Instrumentality enabled a seller-user to produce
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 8 of 37
`
`
`
`
`a website on the eBay site through a browser on the seller-user’s computer. A seller-user could
`
`register through eBay and select an item to sell. This resulted in a web page listing for an item
`
`for sale. This functionality is available to all registered sellers, including sellers who use eBay
`
`stores.
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/adidas-Sportive-Track-Jacket-Mens/153288797367
`(example of a final listing by Adidas for a Track Jacket)
`
`
`36.
`
`eBay’s list of compatible browsers includes the latest versions of the following:
`
`
`
`Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari and Google Chrome.
`
`https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/technical-issues/technical-issues?id=4220. All of these
`
`browsers rely on browser engines to interpret and execute JavaScript and HTML to render web
`
`pages on a computer. Internet Explorer has relied on Trident (code name for MSHTML) which
`
`has included the Chakra JavaScript Engine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSHTML). Edge relies
`
`on EdgeHTML (which also includes the Chakra JavaScript Engine).
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 9 of 37
`
`
`
`
`https://docs.microsoft.com/en- us/microsoft-edge/dev-guide). Safari and Chrome rely on Webkit
`
`(which includes WebCore and JavaScript Core. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit). Firefox
`
`relies on Gecko (which includes Spidermonkey.
`
`http://www.mozilla.org/projects/technologies.html).
`
`37.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality presented a viewable menu having a user selectable
`
`panel of settings describing elements on a website, said panel of settings being presented
`
`through a browser on a computer adapted to accept one or more of said selectable settings in
`
`said panel as inputs therefrom, and where at least one of said user selectable settings in said
`
`panel corresponds to commands to said virtual machine. For example, when a user created a
`
`listing, the Accused Instrumentality presented a visual interface with various options to add
`
`descriptions, add details, or upload an image, which are commands to the virtual machine to
`
`change the contents of the listing, and thus the display of the website.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 10 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`The Accused Instrumentality-compatible browsers all include browser engines
`38.
`(which are process virtual machines) that execute code that generates and displays the user-
`authored web pages on a particular computer, the settings that a user-author selects through the
`eBay visual editor necessarily correspond to virtual machine commands. For example, JavaScript
`and HTML code were used by the browser’s engine to generate and display an eBay web page
`for a user viewing the web page on a computer, the author’s selections through the WYSIWYG
`editor buttons (such as font, font size, text style, and color) being reflected in the displayed page.
`The WYSIWYG editor buttons are created with Javascript.
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 11 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`The Accused Instrumentality generated a display in accordance with one or more
`
`39.
`
`user selected settings substantially contemporaneously with the selection thereof. For example,
`
`when a user selected the font settings as shown above, the changes were reflected in the
`
`WYSIWYG display as the user changed them.
`
`40.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality stored information representative of said one or
`
`more user selected settings in a database. For example, when a user changed the font from the
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 12 of 37
`
`
`
`
`above user interface, the Accused Instrumentality saved information in a database, at least once
`
`the user clicked “List Item” or “Save as draft.”
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/drafts (after saving as draft, the listing, including user
`selected settings such as font styles, appeared in a user’s drafts. Drafts were saved server-side
`in a database because they can be accessed from different browsers in different locations)
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 13 of 37
`
`41.
`
`Because at least some of the Accused Instrumentality runtime files included
`
`several Asynchronous JavaScript And XML (“AJAX”) commands designed for pulling data
`
`from a database to display a web page, the server-side script that processed this form would
`
`send a request for data to an eBay database server from which it could be retrieved. The
`
`following diagram is from a published web tutorial explaining the typical process (using an
`
`email “form” as the example):
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: http://www.javascript-coder.com/html-form/html-form-tutorial-p1.phtml
`
`The Accused Instrumentality generated a website at least in part by retrieving
`
`42.
`
`said information representative of said one or more user selected settings stored in said database.
`
`For example, after the user hit “Preview,” the user’s sales listing was generated, at least in part
`
`by having retrieved user selected settings such as the font settings shown above.
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 14 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/preview/1893755218411?valoff=1
`
`
`43. When a user pressed “List Item” instead of “Preview” to create a new listing, the
`
`Accused Instrumentality also used this information that is stored in its database to create the
`
`
`
`listing webpage.
`
`44.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality built one or more web pages to generate said
`
`website from at least a portion of said database and at least one run time file, where said at least
`
`one run time file utilized information stored in said database to generate virtual machine
`
`commands for the display of at least a portion of said one or more web pages. For example, the
`
`generation of the auction webpage by a buyer/user at run-time reads information from the
`
`database, such as by retrieving settings such as font styles.
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 15 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/preview/1893755218411?valoff=1
`
`
`45.
`
`As another example, the visible source also referenced additional runtime
`
`JavaScript files, such as the JavaScript files used to zoom in to an image on a listing. The
`
`JavaScript and the HTML for having generated and displayed the final page necessarily
`
`represented virtual machine commands because they relied on the underlying browser engine
`
`for execution. The HTML code is used by the browser’s engine to render the page. The
`
`JavaScript Code would rely on the browser engine’s component JavaScript engine to execute
`
`and to either display a portion of the page directly, or to generate HTML to be executed for
`
`display by the main layout functions of the engine.
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 16 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/adidas-Sportive-Track-Jacket-Mens/153288797367
`(showing a final listing by Adidas)
`
`
`eBay was made aware of the ’397 patent and its infringement thereof at least as
`
`46.
`
`
`
`early as December 20, 2018 when Express Mobile provided notice of eBay’s infringement of
`
`the ’397 patent to Ms. Marie Oh Huber, SVP and General Counsel of eBay. Upon information
`
`and belief, since at least the time eBay received notice, eBay had directly infringed at least
`
`claim 1 of the ’397 patent and induced others to infringe at least claim 1 of the ’397 patent under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by, among other things, and with specific intent or willful blindness, by
`
`having actively aided and abetted others to infringe, including but not limited to eBay’s clients,
`
`customers, and end users, whose use of the Accused Instrumentality constituted direct
`
`infringement of at least one claim of the ’397 patent. In particular, eBay’s actions that aided and
`
`abetted others such as customers and end users to infringe included advertising and distributing
`
`the Accused Instrumentality and providing instruction materials, training, and services regarding
`
`the Accused Instrumentality. See e.g., https://www.ebay.com/help/home,
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 17 of 37
`
`
`
`
`https://developer.ebay.com, https://pages.ebay.com/seller-center/,
`
`https://export.ebay.com/en/start-sell/first-steps/how-create-listing/how-create-listing/,
`
`https://www.ebay.com/help/listings/creating-managing-listings/creating-listing?id=4105, and
`
`related domains and subdomains. Upon information and belief, eBay had engaged in such
`
`actions with specific intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting
`
`infringement because eBay had actual knowledge of the ’397 patent and knowledge that its acts
`
`were inducing infringement of the ’397 patent since at least the date eBay received notice that
`
`such activities infringed the ’397 patent.
`
`47.
`
`eBay is liable as a contributory infringer of the ’397 patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(c) by having offered to sell, sold and imported into the United States website or web page
`
`authoring tools to be especially made or adapted for use in an infringement of the ’397 patent.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality is a material component for use in practicing the ’397 patent, is
`
`specifically made and is not a staple article of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing
`
`use.
`
`48.
`
`Upon information and belief, since the date of its receipt of notice, eBay’s
`
`infringement of the ’397 patent has been willful and intentional under the standard announced in
`
`Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., 136 S.Ct. 1923, 195 L.Ed 2d 278 (2016). Since at least
`
`December 20, 2018, eBay has willfully infringed the ’397 patent by refusing to take a license
`
`and having continued to make, use, test, sell, license, and/or offer for sale/license the Accused
`
`Instrumentality. eBay has been aware that it infringes the ’397 patent since at least December
`
`20, 2018 and instead of taking a license, eBay opted to make the business decision to
`
`“efficiently infringe” the ’397 patent. In doing so, eBay willfully infringed the ’397 Patent.
`
`49.
`
`eBay’s infringement has damaged and injured Express Mobile.
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 18 of 37
`
`COUNT II - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,594,168
`
`50.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 to 49
`
`
`
`
`above.
`
`51.
`
`eBay has manufactured, used and/or provided and continues to manufacture, use
`
`and/or provide its eBay.com platform (the “Accused Instrumentality”) that infringes, either
`
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’168 patent in violation
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`52.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay has directly infringed and is directly
`
`infringing at least claim 1 of the ’168 patent by making and using a system for assembling a
`
`website.
`
`53.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality makes and provides a system for assembling a web
`
`site. For example, the Accused Instrumentality enables users to create eBay listings and stores,
`
`which are web sites, through a browser on the user’s computer interacting with the server facility
`
`hosted by eBay.
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://pages.ebay.com/seller-center/run-your-store/why-get-an-ebay-store.html
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 19 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/
`lst/drafts&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`The Accused Instrumentality has a server comprising a build engine. For
`54.
`example, on its servers, the Accused Instrumentality provides a build engine that allows users to
`manage and customize their sites with different customization options. A user may navigate to
`their store by selecting the “Selling” option in the My eBay dropdown, and then clicking
`“Manage Store” in Selling tools. This will open a user’s “Manage My Store” page, where the
`user can create and edit their store.
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/sh/ovw
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 20 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`A user can create a new auction listing by clicking the “sell” button, “Create listing,”
`55.
`and then entering a product in the listing field.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 21 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/
`lst/drafts&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`56.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality’s build engine is configured to accept user input to
`
`create a web site, the web site comprising a plurality of web pages, each web page comprising a
`
`plurality of objects to accept user input to associate a style with objects of the plurality of web
`
`pages. The Accused Instrumentality’s build engine accepts user input to create a web site
`
`comprising a plurality of web pages. For example, the Accused Instrumentality includes a
`
`plurality of individual auction pages. Individual auction pages are comprised of a plurality of
`
`objects, such as at least the main image and sub-images.
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 22 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`57.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality accepts user input to associate a style with objects.
`
`For example, several classes, each with different styles, are associated with the auction image
`
`object.
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 23 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`58. When creating an auction, users may also edit their photos using the Accused
`
`
`
`Instrumentality’s build engine, which is associating a style with the image objects.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 24 of 37
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/drafts&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`Each web page comprises at least one button object or at least one image object.
`
`59.
`
`For example, the auction pages comprise an auction image object that comprises an image
`
`object.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`The at least one button object or at least one image object is associated with a
`
`60.
`
`style that includes values defining transformations and time lines for the at least one button
`
`object or at least one image object. The auction image object in the listing for “king crimson in
`
`the court of the crimson king vinyl SD 8245” comprises an image object, and is associated with
`
`a style that includes values defining transformations and time lines. As shown below, the “time
`
`left” indicator is counting down to the end of the auction (here, showing 2m 49s left).
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 25 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`As seen in the HTML source, the underlying image being displayed as part of
`
`61.
`
`
`
`this object is “img500.”
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 26 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`Once the auction ends, the object is transformed, as shown below, where the
`
`62.
`
`displayed image is smaller and has a “sold” banner overlaid on top of the image.
`
`
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 27 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1&autorefresh=true
`
`
`63.
`
`In the ended auction page, this new auction object still contains a link to the
`
`original image.
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1&autorefresh=true
`
`The timer style in the original auction page can be seen in the HTML source.
`
`64.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`27
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 28 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Electric-Frankenstein-Youre-So-Fake-7-Vinyl-Estrus-
`Records-1998-Garage-Rock/184389998951?hash=item2aee801967:g:HnoAAOSwwQ5e3RXO
`
`
`Additionally, the time left in an item’s auction can be found in eBay’s databases,
`
`65.
`
`
`
`as evidenced from the API calls such as a “WatchedItemEndingSoon Notification,” which will
`
`send a notification to a user watching an item based on the time left in an auction.
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 29 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://developer.ebay.com/devzone/guides/features-guide/content/Notifications/Notif-
`WatchedItemEndingSoon.html
`
`
`Each web page is defined entirely by each of the plurality of objects comprising
`
`66.
`
`
`
`that web page and the style associated with the object. Using the Document Object Model,
`
`modern browsers parse the HTML code that comprises web pages into objects.
`
`The Document Object Model (DOM) connects web pages to scripts or
`programming languages by rep