throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 1 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-802
`
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`eBAY INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Express Mobile, Inc. (“Express Mobile” or “Plaintiff”), by its attorneys,
`
`demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable and for its Complaint against eBay Inc. (“eBay” or
`
`“Defendant”) alleges the following:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This action arises under 35 U.S.C. § 271 for eBay’s infringement of Express
`
`Mobile’s United States Patent Nos. 6,546,397 (“the ’397 patent”) and 7,594,168 (“the ’168
`
`patent”).
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Express Mobile, Inc. is an inventor-owned corporation organized under
`
`the laws of the State of Delaware with a place of business at 38 Washington Street, Novato, CA
`
`94947.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
`
`under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a place of business at 7700 W Parmer Lane,
`
`Austin, TX 78729. eBay may be served through its registered agent for service in Delaware,
`
`Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange St., Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 37
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay provides website marketing services to
`
`millions of customers, including both businesses and individuals.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, jurisdiction and venue for this action are proper in
`
`the Western District of Texas.
`
`7.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over eBay because eBay has purposefully
`
`availed itself of the rights and benefits of the laws of this State and this Judicial District. Upon
`
`information and belief, eBay resides in the Western District of Texas by maintaining a regular
`
`and established place of business at 7700 W Parmer Lane, Austin, TX 78729.
`
`8.
`
`This Court also has personal jurisdiction over eBay because eBay has done and is
`
`doing substantial business in this Judicial District, both generally and, upon information and
`
`belief, with respect to the allegations in this Complaint, including eBay’s one or more acts of
`
`infringement in this Judicial District.
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and §
`
`1400(b). eBay committed acts of infringement through performing a method to allow users to
`
`produce Internet websites in the Western District of Texas and has a regular and established
`
`place of business in this District. eBay’s office in Austin is a physical place in the District, it is
`
`an established location where eBay’s business has been carried out for several years, and eBay
`
`publicly advertises its presence in the District.
`
`PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`10.
`
`Express Mobile is the lawful owner of all rights, title, and interest in the ’397
`
`patent titled “Browser Based Web Site Generation Tool and Run Time Engine,” including the
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 3 of 37
`
`
`
`
`right to sue and to recover for infringement thereof. The ’397 patent was duly and legally issued
`
`on April 8, 2003, naming Steven H. Rempell as the inventor. A true and correct copy of the ’397
`
`patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`11.
`
`The inventions of the ’397 patent solve technical problems related to website
`
`creation and generation. For example, the inventions enable the creation of websites through
`
`browser-based visual editing tools such as selectable settings panels which describe website
`
`elements, with one or more settings corresponding to commands. These features are exclusively
`
`implemented utilizing computer technology including a virtual machine.
`
`12.
`
`The claims of the ’397 patent do not merely recite the performance of some pre-
`
`Internet business practice on the Internet. Instead, the claims of the ’397 patent recite inventive
`
`concepts that are rooted in computerized website creation technology, and overcome problems
`
`specifically arising in the realm of computerized website creation technologies.
`
`13.
`
`The claims of the ’397 patent recite inventions that are not merely the routine or
`
`conventional use of website creation systems and methods. Instead, the inventions teach a
`
`browser-based website creation system and method in which the user-selected settings
`
`representing website elements are stored in a database, and in which said stored information is
`
`retrieved to generate said website.
`
`14.
`
`The technology claimed in the ’397 patent does not preempt all ways of using
`
`website or web page authoring tools nor any other well-known prior art technology.
`
`15.
`
`Accordingly, each claim of the ’397 patent recites a combination of elements
`
`sufficient to ensure that the claim amounts to significantly more than a patent on an ineligible
`
`concept.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff is the lawful owner of all rights, title, and interest in United States Patent
`
`No. 7,594,168 titled “Browser Based Web Site Generation Tool and Run Time Engine,”
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 4 of 37
`
`
`
`
`including the right to sue and to recover for infringement thereof. The ’168 patent was duly and
`
`legally issued on September 22, 2009, naming Steven H. Rempell as the inventor. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ’168 patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`17.
`
`The inventions of the ’168 patent solve technical problems related to website
`
`creation and generation. For example, the inventions enable the creation of websites through
`
`browser-based build tools and a user interface. The inventions greatly improve the productivity
`
`of the designer utilizing an innovative implementation for styles. These features are
`
`implemented utilizing computer technology.
`
`18.
`
`The claims of the ’168 patent do not merely recite the performance of some pre-
`
`Internet business practice on the Internet. Instead, the claims of the ’168 patent recite inventive
`
`concepts that are rooted in computerized website creation technology and overcome problems
`
`specifically arising in the realm of computerized website creation technologies.
`
`19.
`
`The claims of the ’168 patent recite inventions that are not merely the routine or
`
`conventional use of website creation systems and methods. Instead, the inventions teach a
`
`browser-based website creation system including a server comprising a build engine configured
`
`to create and apply styles to, for example, a website with web pages comprised of objects.
`
`20.
`
`The technology claimed in the ’168 patent does not preempt all ways of using
`
`website or webpage authoring tools nor any other well-known or prior art technology.
`
`21.
`
`Accordingly, each claim of the ’168 patent recites a combination of elements
`
`sufficient to ensure that the claim amounts to significantly more than a patent on an ineligible
`
`concept.
`
`22.
`
`In Express Mobile v. KTree Computer Solutions, a case filed in the Eastern
`
`District of Texas, the defendant, KTree Computer Solutions, brought a Motion for Judgment on
`
`the Pleadings asserting that the ’397 patent and the ’168 patent are invalid as claiming abstract
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 5 of 37
`
`
`
`
`subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (C.A. 2:17-00128; Dkt. 9, 17, 22-27). The briefing
`
`associated with the motion is incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`23.
`
`After considering the respective pleadings, Magistrate Judge Payne recommended
`
`denial of KTree’s motion, without prejudice, holding that “the claims appear to address a
`
`problem particular to the internet: dynamically generating websites and displaying web pages
`
`based on stored user-selected settings” and further stating “the asserted claims do not bear all of
`
`the hallmarks of claims that have been invalidated on the pleadings by other courts in the past.
`
`For example, the claims are not merely do-it-on-a-computer claims.” (Dkt. 29, attached as
`
`Exhibit C.) No objection was filed to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and the
`
`decision therefore became final.
`
`24.
`
`In Express Mobile v. Pantheon Systems, Inc., a case filed in the Northern District
`
`of California, the defendant, Pantheon Systems, Inc., brought a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's
`
`First Amended Complaint asserting that the ’397 patent and the ’168 patent were directed to the
`
`abstract idea of creating and displaying webpages based upon information from a user with no
`
`further inventive concept and purportedly ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (Case
`
`No. 3:18-CV-04688-RS; Dkt. 26, 32 and 34). The briefing associated with the motion is
`
`incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`25.
`
`In Express Mobile v. Code and Theory LLC, a case filed in the Northern District
`
`of California, the defendant, Code and Theory LLC, brought a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
`
`Complaint asserting that the ’397 patent and the ’168 patent are not subject matter eligible under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 101 as a matter of law. (Case No. 3:18-CV-04679-RS; Dkt. 35, 40 and 41). The
`
`briefing associated with the motion is incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`26.
`
`After a hearing and a consideration of the respective pleadings, Hon. Richard
`
`Seeborg denied both motions holding that:
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 6 of 37
`
`
`
`
`• “The patents here are directed at a purportedly revolutionary technological solution to
`a technological problem—how to create webpages for the internet in a manner that
`permits ‘what you see is what you get’ editing, and a number of other alleged
`improvements over the then-existing methodologies.” Id. at 5.
`
`• The claims of the ‘397 and ‘168 patents are “directed to a specific improvement to the
`way computers operate,” and “it simply cannot be said on the present record that the
`claims are drawn so broadly as to be divorced from the potentially patent-eligible
`purported technological improvements described in the specification.” Id. at 5-6.
`(Case No. 3:18-CV-04679-RS; Dkt.45; Case No. 3:18-CV-04688-RS Dkt.40; attached
`as Exhibit D.)
`
`27.
`
`In Case Nos. 1:18-CV-01173-RGA and 1:18-CV-01175-RGA, infringement
`
`actions filed by Plaintiff in the District of Delaware, the respective defendants in those actions,
`
`Dreamhost LLC and Hostway Services, Inc., brought Motions to Dismiss claims of the ’397
`
`and ’168 patents on the basis of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101. (Case No. 1:18-CV-01173-
`
`RGA D.I. 14, D.I. 18-21 and 24 Case No. 1:18-CV-01175-RGA D.I. 17-19 and 23). The
`
`briefing associated with the motion is incorporated by reference into this Complaint.
`
`28.
`
`After consideration of the respective pleadings, Judge Andrews denied both
`
`motions in a joint order, pointing to factual allegations of inventiveness identified by the
`
`Plaintiff, and an expert declaration explaining inventiveness of the claims, noting that such
`
`factual issues preclude a finding of invalidity on a motion to dismiss. (Case No. 1:18-CV-
`
`01173-RGA D.I. 43; Case No. 1:18-CV-01175-RGA D.I. 42; attached as Exhibit E.).
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`29.
`
`Plaintiff Express Mobile is a leader in the business of developing mobile app and
`
`web site design and creation platforms, and has intellectual property including U.S. patents
`
`relating to certain tools useful in the field. Express Mobile is managed by individuals with
`
`decades of technology and business experience. The Chairman of the Board and CTO of
`
`Express Mobile, Steve Rempell, is the inventor of Express Mobile’s patent portfolio. Mr.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 7 of 37
`
`
`
`
`Rempell has over 50 years of experience in technology companies, with much of that work
`
`focused on web-based technologies and applications.
`
`30.
`
`Defendant eBay is a well-known company that facilitates consumer-to-consumer
`
`and business-to-consumer sales through its website. eBay has grown rapidly and now generates
`
`billions of dollars of revenue per year.
`
`COUNT I - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,546,397
`
`31.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 to 30
`
`above.
`
`32.
`
`Using the technology claimed by the ’397 patent, eBay’s listings (e.g., all
`
`registered sellers and eBay stores) including all hardware and software used and/or generated to
`
`provide these functionalities (collectively, the “Accused Instrumentality”) performed a method to
`
`allow users to produce Internet websites by letting users select settings representing website
`
`elements, storing these settings in a database, and retrieving stored information to generate
`
`websites.
`
`33.
`
`During relevant time periods, eBay performed a method to allow users to
`
`produce Internet websites which infringed, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,
`
`one or more claims of the ’397 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`34.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay directly infringed at least claim 1 of the ’397
`
`patent through its Accused Instrumentality that provided browser-based website authoring tools
`
`in which the user-selected settings representing website elements are stored in a database and in
`
`which said stored information is retrieved to generate said website.
`
`35.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality performed a method to allow users to produce
`
`Internet websites on and for computers having a browser and a virtual machine capable of
`
`generating displays. For example, the Accused Instrumentality enabled a seller-user to produce
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 8 of 37
`
`
`
`
`a website on the eBay site through a browser on the seller-user’s computer. A seller-user could
`
`register through eBay and select an item to sell. This resulted in a web page listing for an item
`
`for sale. This functionality is available to all registered sellers, including sellers who use eBay
`
`stores.
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/adidas-Sportive-Track-Jacket-Mens/153288797367
`(example of a final listing by Adidas for a Track Jacket)
`
`
`36.
`
`eBay’s list of compatible browsers includes the latest versions of the following:
`
`
`
`Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari and Google Chrome.
`
`https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/technical-issues/technical-issues?id=4220. All of these
`
`browsers rely on browser engines to interpret and execute JavaScript and HTML to render web
`
`pages on a computer. Internet Explorer has relied on Trident (code name for MSHTML) which
`
`has included the Chakra JavaScript Engine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSHTML). Edge relies
`
`on EdgeHTML (which also includes the Chakra JavaScript Engine).
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 9 of 37
`
`
`
`
`https://docs.microsoft.com/en- us/microsoft-edge/dev-guide). Safari and Chrome rely on Webkit
`
`(which includes WebCore and JavaScript Core. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit). Firefox
`
`relies on Gecko (which includes Spidermonkey.
`
`http://www.mozilla.org/projects/technologies.html).
`
`37.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality presented a viewable menu having a user selectable
`
`panel of settings describing elements on a website, said panel of settings being presented
`
`through a browser on a computer adapted to accept one or more of said selectable settings in
`
`said panel as inputs therefrom, and where at least one of said user selectable settings in said
`
`panel corresponds to commands to said virtual machine. For example, when a user created a
`
`listing, the Accused Instrumentality presented a visual interface with various options to add
`
`descriptions, add details, or upload an image, which are commands to the virtual machine to
`
`change the contents of the listing, and thus the display of the website.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 10 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`The Accused Instrumentality-compatible browsers all include browser engines
`38.
`(which are process virtual machines) that execute code that generates and displays the user-
`authored web pages on a particular computer, the settings that a user-author selects through the
`eBay visual editor necessarily correspond to virtual machine commands. For example, JavaScript
`and HTML code were used by the browser’s engine to generate and display an eBay web page
`for a user viewing the web page on a computer, the author’s selections through the WYSIWYG
`editor buttons (such as font, font size, text style, and color) being reflected in the displayed page.
`The WYSIWYG editor buttons are created with Javascript.
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 11 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`The Accused Instrumentality generated a display in accordance with one or more
`
`39.
`
`user selected settings substantially contemporaneously with the selection thereof. For example,
`
`when a user selected the font settings as shown above, the changes were reflected in the
`
`WYSIWYG display as the user changed them.
`
`40.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality stored information representative of said one or
`
`more user selected settings in a database. For example, when a user changed the font from the
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 12 of 37
`
`
`
`
`above user interface, the Accused Instrumentality saved information in a database, at least once
`
`the user clicked “List Item” or “Save as draft.”
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/draft s&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/drafts (after saving as draft, the listing, including user
`selected settings such as font styles, appeared in a user’s drafts. Drafts were saved server-side
`in a database because they can be accessed from different browsers in different locations)
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 13 of 37
`
`41.
`
`Because at least some of the Accused Instrumentality runtime files included
`
`several Asynchronous JavaScript And XML (“AJAX”) commands designed for pulling data
`
`from a database to display a web page, the server-side script that processed this form would
`
`send a request for data to an eBay database server from which it could be retrieved. The
`
`following diagram is from a published web tutorial explaining the typical process (using an
`
`email “form” as the example):
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: http://www.javascript-coder.com/html-form/html-form-tutorial-p1.phtml
`
`The Accused Instrumentality generated a website at least in part by retrieving
`
`42.
`
`said information representative of said one or more user selected settings stored in said database.
`
`For example, after the user hit “Preview,” the user’s sales listing was generated, at least in part
`
`by having retrieved user selected settings such as the font settings shown above.
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 14 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/preview/1893755218411?valoff=1
`
`
`43. When a user pressed “List Item” instead of “Preview” to create a new listing, the
`
`Accused Instrumentality also used this information that is stored in its database to create the
`
`
`
`listing webpage.
`
`44.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality built one or more web pages to generate said
`
`website from at least a portion of said database and at least one run time file, where said at least
`
`one run time file utilized information stored in said database to generate virtual machine
`
`commands for the display of at least a portion of said one or more web pages. For example, the
`
`generation of the auction webpage by a buyer/user at run-time reads information from the
`
`database, such as by retrieving settings such as font styles.
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 15 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/preview/1893755218411?valoff=1
`
`
`45.
`
`As another example, the visible source also referenced additional runtime
`
`JavaScript files, such as the JavaScript files used to zoom in to an image on a listing. The
`
`JavaScript and the HTML for having generated and displayed the final page necessarily
`
`represented virtual machine commands because they relied on the underlying browser engine
`
`for execution. The HTML code is used by the browser’s engine to render the page. The
`
`JavaScript Code would rely on the browser engine’s component JavaScript engine to execute
`
`and to either display a portion of the page directly, or to generate HTML to be executed for
`
`display by the main layout functions of the engine.
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 16 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/adidas-Sportive-Track-Jacket-Mens/153288797367
`(showing a final listing by Adidas)
`
`
`eBay was made aware of the ’397 patent and its infringement thereof at least as
`
`46.
`
`
`
`early as December 20, 2018 when Express Mobile provided notice of eBay’s infringement of
`
`the ’397 patent to Ms. Marie Oh Huber, SVP and General Counsel of eBay. Upon information
`
`and belief, since at least the time eBay received notice, eBay had directly infringed at least
`
`claim 1 of the ’397 patent and induced others to infringe at least claim 1 of the ’397 patent under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by, among other things, and with specific intent or willful blindness, by
`
`having actively aided and abetted others to infringe, including but not limited to eBay’s clients,
`
`customers, and end users, whose use of the Accused Instrumentality constituted direct
`
`infringement of at least one claim of the ’397 patent. In particular, eBay’s actions that aided and
`
`abetted others such as customers and end users to infringe included advertising and distributing
`
`the Accused Instrumentality and providing instruction materials, training, and services regarding
`
`the Accused Instrumentality. See e.g., https://www.ebay.com/help/home,
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 17 of 37
`
`
`
`
`https://developer.ebay.com, https://pages.ebay.com/seller-center/,
`
`https://export.ebay.com/en/start-sell/first-steps/how-create-listing/how-create-listing/,
`
`https://www.ebay.com/help/listings/creating-managing-listings/creating-listing?id=4105, and
`
`related domains and subdomains. Upon information and belief, eBay had engaged in such
`
`actions with specific intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting
`
`infringement because eBay had actual knowledge of the ’397 patent and knowledge that its acts
`
`were inducing infringement of the ’397 patent since at least the date eBay received notice that
`
`such activities infringed the ’397 patent.
`
`47.
`
`eBay is liable as a contributory infringer of the ’397 patent under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(c) by having offered to sell, sold and imported into the United States website or web page
`
`authoring tools to be especially made or adapted for use in an infringement of the ’397 patent.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality is a material component for use in practicing the ’397 patent, is
`
`specifically made and is not a staple article of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing
`
`use.
`
`48.
`
`Upon information and belief, since the date of its receipt of notice, eBay’s
`
`infringement of the ’397 patent has been willful and intentional under the standard announced in
`
`Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., 136 S.Ct. 1923, 195 L.Ed 2d 278 (2016). Since at least
`
`December 20, 2018, eBay has willfully infringed the ’397 patent by refusing to take a license
`
`and having continued to make, use, test, sell, license, and/or offer for sale/license the Accused
`
`Instrumentality. eBay has been aware that it infringes the ’397 patent since at least December
`
`20, 2018 and instead of taking a license, eBay opted to make the business decision to
`
`“efficiently infringe” the ’397 patent. In doing so, eBay willfully infringed the ’397 Patent.
`
`49.
`
`eBay’s infringement has damaged and injured Express Mobile.
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 18 of 37
`
`COUNT II - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,594,168
`
`50.
`
`Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 to 49
`
`
`
`
`above.
`
`51.
`
`eBay has manufactured, used and/or provided and continues to manufacture, use
`
`and/or provide its eBay.com platform (the “Accused Instrumentality”) that infringes, either
`
`literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’168 patent in violation
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`52.
`
`Upon information and belief, eBay has directly infringed and is directly
`
`infringing at least claim 1 of the ’168 patent by making and using a system for assembling a
`
`website.
`
`53.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality makes and provides a system for assembling a web
`
`site. For example, the Accused Instrumentality enables users to create eBay listings and stores,
`
`which are web sites, through a browser on the user’s computer interacting with the server facility
`
`hosted by eBay.
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://pages.ebay.com/seller-center/run-your-store/why-get-an-ebay-store.html
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 19 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/
`lst/drafts&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`The Accused Instrumentality has a server comprising a build engine. For
`54.
`example, on its servers, the Accused Instrumentality provides a build engine that allows users to
`manage and customize their sites with different customization options. A user may navigate to
`their store by selecting the “Selling” option in the My eBay dropdown, and then clicking
`“Manage Store” in Selling tools. This will open a user’s “Manage My Store” page, where the
`user can create and edit their store.
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/sh/ovw
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 20 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`A user can create a new auction listing by clicking the “sell” button, “Create listing,”
`55.
`and then entering a product in the listing field.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 21 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/
`lst/drafts&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`
`56.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality’s build engine is configured to accept user input to
`
`create a web site, the web site comprising a plurality of web pages, each web page comprising a
`
`plurality of objects to accept user input to associate a style with objects of the plurality of web
`
`pages. The Accused Instrumentality’s build engine accepts user input to create a web site
`
`comprising a plurality of web pages. For example, the Accused Instrumentality includes a
`
`plurality of individual auction pages. Individual auction pages are comprised of a plurality of
`
`objects, such as at least the main image and sub-images.
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 22 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`57.
`
`The Accused Instrumentality accepts user input to associate a style with objects.
`
`For example, several classes, each with different styles, are associated with the auction image
`
`object.
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 23 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`58. When creating an auction, users may also edit their photos using the Accused
`
`
`
`Instrumentality’s build engine, which is associating a style with the image objects.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 24 of 37
`
`
`
`
`Source:
`https://bulksell.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SingleList&&DraftURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh
`/lst/drafts&ReturnURL=https://www.ebay.com/sh/lst/active
`
`Each web page comprises at least one button object or at least one image object.
`
`59.
`
`For example, the auction pages comprise an auction image object that comprises an image
`
`object.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`The at least one button object or at least one image object is associated with a
`
`60.
`
`style that includes values defining transformations and time lines for the at least one button
`
`object or at least one image object. The auction image object in the listing for “king crimson in
`
`the court of the crimson king vinyl SD 8245” comprises an image object, and is associated with
`
`a style that includes values defining transformations and time lines. As shown below, the “time
`
`left” indicator is counting down to the end of the auction (here, showing 2m 49s left).
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 25 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`As seen in the HTML source, the underlying image being displayed as part of
`
`61.
`
`
`
`this object is “img500.”
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 26 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1
`
`
`Once the auction ends, the object is transformed, as shown below, where the
`
`62.
`
`displayed image is smaller and has a “sold” banner overlaid on top of the image.
`
`
`
`26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 27 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1&autorefresh=true
`
`
`63.
`
`In the ended auction page, this new auction object still contains a link to the
`
`original image.
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king-vinyl-SD-
`8245/184388484431?hash=item2aee68fd4f:g:XA0AAOSwya1fKLv1&autorefresh=true
`
`The timer style in the original auction page can be seen in the HTML source.
`
`64.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 28 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Electric-Frankenstein-Youre-So-Fake-7-Vinyl-Estrus-
`Records-1998-Garage-Rock/184389998951?hash=item2aee801967:g:HnoAAOSwwQ5e3RXO
`
`
`Additionally, the time left in an item’s auction can be found in eBay’s databases,
`
`65.
`
`
`
`as evidenced from the API calls such as a “WatchedItemEndingSoon Notification,” which will
`
`send a notification to a user watching an item based on the time left in an auction.
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00802-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/01/20 Page 29 of 37
`
`
`
`
`
`Source: https://developer.ebay.com/devzone/guides/features-guide/content/Notifications/Notif-
`WatchedItemEndingSoon.html
`
`
`Each web page is defined entirely by each of the plurality of objects comprising
`
`66.
`
`
`
`that web page and the style associated with the object. Using the Document Object Model,
`
`modern browsers parse the HTML code that comprises web pages into objects.
`
`The Document Object Model (DOM) connects web pages to scripts or
`programming languages by rep

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket