throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/26/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`DEMARAY LLC
`
`vs.
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.
`
`Case No.:
`
`6:20-cv-00636-ADA
`
`MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
`John M. Desmarais
`Comes now , applicant herein, and
`
`moves this Court to grant admission to the United States District Court for the Western District of
`Samsung Defendants
`Texas pro hac vice to represent in this case, and
`
`would respectfully show the Court as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Applicant is an attorney and a member of the law firm (or practices under the name of)
`Desmarais LLP
` with offices at:
`230 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
`Mailing address:
`New York, NY 10169
`City, State, Zip Code:
`212-351-3400
`212-351-3401
`Telephone:
`Facsimile:
`
`March 27, 1989
`Since , Applicant has been and presently is a
`New York
`member of and in good standing with the Bar of the State of .
`2261782
`Applicant's bar license number is .
`
`3.
`
`Applicant has been admitted to practice before the following courts:
`
`Court:
`See Attachment A
`
`
`Admission date:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/26/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`4.
`
`Applicant is presently a member in good standing of the bars of the courts listed above,
`
`except as provided below (list any court named in the preceding paragraph before which
`
`Applicant is no longer admitted to practice):
`
`5.
`
`I have have not previously applied to Appear Pro Hac Vice in this district
`
`court in Case[s]:
`See Attachment B
`Number: on the day of , .
`
`Number: on the day of , .
`
`Number: on the day of , .
`
`6.
`
`Applicant has never been subject to grievance proceedings or involuntary removal
`
`proceedings while a member of the bar of any state or federal court, except as
`
`provided:
`N/A
`
`7.
`
`Applicant has not been charged, arrested, or convicted of a criminal offense or offenses,
`
`except as provided below (omit minor traffic offenses):
`N/A
`
`8.
`
`Applicant has read and is familiar with the Local Rules of the Western District of Texas
`
`and will comply with the standards of practice set out therein.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/26/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`9.
`
`Applicant will file an Application for Admission to Practice before the United States
`
`District Court for the Western District of Texas, if so requested; or Applicant has
`
`co-counsel in this case who is admitted to practice before the United States District
`
`Court for the Western District of Texas.
`Brian C. Nash
`Co-counsel:
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 1700
`Mailing address:
`Austin, TX 78701
`City, State, Zip Code:
`512-580-9629
`Telephone:
`
`Should the Court grant applicant's motion, Applicant shall tender the amount of $100.00 pro hac
`
`vice fee in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-l(f)(2) [checks made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District
`
`Court].
`
`Wherefore, Applicant prays that this Court enter an order permitting the admission of
`John M. Desmarais
` to the Western District of Texas pro hac vice for this case only.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`John M. Desmarais
`[printed name of Applicant]
`
`[signature of Applicant]
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that I have served a true and correct copy of this motion upon each attorney of
`25
`February
`2021
`record and the original upon the Clerk of Court on this the day of , .
`
`John M. Desmarais
`[printed name of Applicant]
`
`[signature of Applicant]
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/26/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`John M. Desmarais
`
`
`
`Attachment A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` (3) “Applicant has been admitted to practice before the following courts:”
`
`Court
`
`State of New York
`
`State of California
`
`Admission Date
`
`March 27, 1989
`
`May 31, 2018
`
`U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
`
`April 11, 1989
`
`U.S. District Court Southern District of New York April 11, 1989
`
`U.S. District Court Central District of California
`
`December 4, 2018
`
`U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
`
`December 11, 2018
`
`U.S. District Court Northern District of California December 6, 2018
`
`U.S. District Court Southern District of California November 15, 2002
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
`
`District of Columbia Court of Appeals
`
`U.S. Supreme Court
`
`April 3, 1989
`
`April 7, 1993
`
`January 27, 1998
`
`February 2, 1990
`
`April 3, 1999
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`February 14, 1996
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 56 Filed 02/26/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`John M. Desmarais
`
`
`
`Attachment B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(5) “I have previously applied to Appear Pro Hac Vice in this district court in Case[s]:”
`
`
`Case Number
`
`Admission Date
`
`5:11-cv-00163-XR
`
`6:20-cv-00090-ADA
`
`6:20-cv-00451-ADA (Transferred to Austin
`Division as 1:20-cv-00692-ADA)
`
`6:20-cv-00452-ADA (Transferred to Austin
`Division as 1:20-cv-00822-ADA)
`
`6:20-cv-00275-ADA
`
`6:20-cv-00969-ADA
`
`6:20-cv-00972-ADA
`
`6:20-cv-00967-ADA
`
`July 21, 2011
`
`April 21, 2020
`
`June 9, 2020
`
`June 9, 2020
`
`July 8, 2020
`
`
`
`October 26, 2020
`
`October 26, 2020
`
`January 20, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket