throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 228 Filed 09/27/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant
`
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et
`al.,
`
`
`CASE NO. 6:20-cv-00634-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`CASE NO. 6:20-cv-00636-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULE
`
`Plaintiff Demaray LLC (“Demaray”), Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”), and
`
`Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., (a Korean Company), Samsung Austin Semiconductor,
`
`LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively
`
`“Samsung”) (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and subject to
`
`the approval of the Court, hereby jointly move the Court to amend the case deadlines in the two
`
`above-captioned matters to the below agreed-to deadlines.
`
`On September 12, 2022, Demaray filed motions to extend the discovery deadlines in the
`
`respective cases. See Dkt. 230 (6:20-cv-00634); Dkt. 218 (6:20-cv-00636). Thereafter, the Parties
`
`further met and conferred regarding alternative trial dates and determined that a trial date of
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 228 Filed 09/27/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`September 11, 2023 did not pose conflicts and would allow for an extension of discovery and other
`
`deadlines. On September 14, 2022, during discovery hearings, the Parties informed the Court of
`
`the proposed trial date of September 11, 2023 and that they would further meet and confer to align
`
`the remaining deadlines in the cases to that trial date. See Dkt 235 at 4-5 (6:20-cv-00634); see
`
`also Dkt. 222 (6:20-cv-00636). The Court stated that a trial date of September 11, 2023 was
`
`acceptable. Id. The Parties having reached agreement on the remaining deadlines in the cases,
`
`Demaray withdraws its motions to extend the discovery deadlines, and the Parties respectfully
`
`request that the Court grant their joint motion to amend the schedule with the following deadlines:
`
`Date
`
`11/04/2022
`
`2/09/2023
`3/16/2023
`4/27/2023
`5/31/2023
`
`6/05/2023
`
`6/15/2023
`6/29/2023
`
`7/17/2023
`7/20/2023
`7/27/2023
`7/27/2023
`
`Deadline
`
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss significantly
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art references at issue.
`Unless the parties agree to the narrowing, they are ordered to contact the
`Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a teleconference with the Court to resolve the
`disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery
`Opening Expert Reports
`Rebuttal Expert Reports
`Close of Expert Discovery
`
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confer to discuss narrowing the
`number of claims asserted and prior art references at issue to triable limits.
`To the extent it helps the parties determine these limits, the parties are
`encouraged to contact the Court’s Law Clerk for an estimate of the amount
`of trial time anticipated per side. The parties shall file a Joint Report within 5
`business days regarding the results of the meet and confer.
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists,
`designations)
`Parties to jointly email the Court’s law clerk to confirm their pretrial
`conference and trial dates.
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures
`File Motions in limine
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 228 Filed 09/27/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`Date
`
`8/03/2023
`
`8/07/2023
`
`8/18/2023
`
`8/21/2023
`9/11/2023
`
`
`Deadline
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instructions, exhibits
`lists, witness lists, designations); file oppositions to motions in limine
`
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting. If a
`daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is requested for
`trial, the party or parties making said request shall file a notice with the
`Court and e-mail the Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at kmdaviscsr@yahoo.
`com.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and disputes on
`motions in limine
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial disclosures and
`disputes on motions in limine
`Final Pretrial Conference
`Jury Selection/Trial
`
`The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, in the interests of judicial
`
`
`
`
`
`economy, agree and stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and enter
`
`this revised schedule. A proposed order consistent with the above is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 228 Filed 09/27/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2022
`
`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2022
`
`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kat Li
` Kat Li
`
`Attorneys for Defendants, Samsung Electronics
`et al.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE &
`DORR, LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Mary V. Sooter
` Mary V. Sooter
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Intel Corporation
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FOLIO LAW GROUP PLLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ C. Maclain Wells
` C. Maclain Wells
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Demaray LLC
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 228 Filed 09/27/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served on September 27, 2022 with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Kat Li
` Kat Li
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket