throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 133 Filed 11/03/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`DEFENDANT.
`
`
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD (A
`KOREAN COMPANY), SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and
`SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR,
`LLC,
`
`
`DEFENDANTS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00634-
`ADA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-CV-00636-
`ADA
`
`
`
`
`
































`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 133 Filed 11/03/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`The Court will conduct a further status conference with the parties to address discovery
`
`and other issues approximately a month after the September 27 hearing and hereby ORDERS the
`
`following relief:
`
`Issue
`Whether the Court should strike
`strike Demaray’s infringement
`claims for claims 2, 4, 6-7, 10-
`12, 14, 17, 20 and 21 of the ’657
`patent and any forthcoming
`supplementations which
`Defendants assert Demaray did
`not chart on February 5, 2021 for
`which Demaray has indicated it
`intends to include in its
`infringement contentions?
`
`Whether the Court should strike
`or compel Plaintiff to provide
`more detail on its doctrine of
`equivalents theories?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`SIGNED this _____________ day of ___________________, 2021.
`
`Disposition
`The Court denies Defendants’ request. Plaintiff may
`include contentions regarding claims 2, 4, 6-7, 10-12,
`14, 17, 20 and 21 of the ’657 patent in its infringement
`contentions. The Court will move the close of fact
`discovery and close of expert discovery by 60
`days. The trial date has been reset to June 13,
`2022. The parties will meet and confer and submit a
`proposed schedule. The parties will meet and confer
`on whether further claim construction is necessary
`and, if so, propose a schedule for briefing. The Court
`may set another Markman hearing if necessary.
`
`If Plaintiff has not articulated doctrine of equivalents
`theories prior to the next status conference,
`Defendants may raise the issue with the Court at that
`time.
`
`
`By:
`HON. ALAN D. ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 133 Filed 11/03/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`The parties consent as to the form of this order.
`
`By: /s/ J. Stephen Ravel
`By: /s/ Richard D. Milvenan
`
`
`J. Stephen Ravel
`Richard D. Milvenan
`Texas State Bar No. 16584975
`State Bar No. 14171800
`steve.ravel@kellyhart.com
`Travis C. Barton
`KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP
`State Bar No. 00790276
`303 Colorado, Suite 2000
`MCGINNIS LOCHRIDGE LLP
`Austin, Texas 78701
`600 Congress Ave., Suite 2100
`Tel: (512) 495-6429
`Austin, Texas 78701
`
`Telephone: (512) 495-6005
`Yar R. Chaikovsky
`Facsimile: (512) 505-6305
`yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`rmilvenan@mcginnislaw.com
`Philip Ou
`tcbarton@mcginnislaw.com
`philipou@paulhastings.com
`
`Allan M. Soobert
`Morgan Chu (pro hac vice)
`allansoobert@paulhastings.com
`Benjamin W. Hattenbach (pro hac vice)
`Joseph J. Rumpler, II
`Annita Zhong (pro hac vice)
`josephrumpler@paulhastings.com
`C. Maclain Wells (pro hac vice)
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`Bita Assad (pro hac vice)
`1117 S. California Avenue
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1106
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Telephone:
`1(650) 320-1800
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`Facsimile:
`1(650) 320-1900
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`Sonal N. Mehta (pro hac vice)
`mchu@irell.com
`Sonal.Mehta@wilmerhale.com
`bhattenbach@irell.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`azhong@irell.com
`DORR LLP
`mwells@irell.com
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`bassad@irell.com
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`
`Tel.: (650) 858-6000
`Darish Huynh (pro hac vice)
`Fax: (650) 858-6100
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Claire M. Specht (pro hac vice)
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Claire.Specht@wilmerhale.com
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`DORR LLP
`dhuynh@irell.com
`60 State Street
`
`Boston, MA 02109
`Attorneys for Demaray LLC
`Tel.: (617) 526-6000
`Fax: (617) 526-5000
`
`Attorneys for Intel Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00636-ADA Document 133 Filed 11/03/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`By: /s/ Brian C. Nash
`
`Brian C. Nash
`Texas Bar No. 24051103
`Brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
`PITTMAN LLP
`401 Congress Ave., Suite 1700
`Austin, Texas 78701-3797
`Phone: (512) 580-9629
`Fax: (512) 580-9601
`
`Yar R. Chaikovsky
`yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`Philip Ou
`philipou@paulhastings.com
`Allan M. Soobert
`allansoobert@paulhastings.com
`Joseph J. Rumpler, II
`josephrumpler@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1106
`Telephone:
`1(650) 320-1800
`Facsimile:
`1(650) 320-1900
`
`John M. Desmarais (pro hac vice)
`jdesmarais@desmaraisllp.com
`Yung-Hoon Ha (pro hac vice)
`yha@desmaraisllp.com
`Cosmin Maier (pro hac vice)
`cmaier@desmaraisllp.com
`Christian Dorman (pro hac vice)
`cdorman@desmaraisllp.com
`DESMARAIS LLP
`230 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: (212) 351-3400
`Fax: (212) 351-3401
`
`Attorneys for Samsung Defendants
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket