`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 1 of 16
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 2 of 16
`
`VoIP-Pal’s
`Claim Construction Presentation
`February 15, 2023
`
`VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. V. AMAZON.COM, INC. ET AL.
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20-cv-272-ADA
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 3 of 16
`
`“routing message”
`
`Term
`
`Court’s Preliminary
`Construction
`
`“routing message”
`(claims 1, 8, 14, 19, 21,
`26, 27, 32)
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Amazon’s Proposal
`
`“a message that
`includes a callee user
`name field, a route field,
`and a time to live field”
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 4 of 16
`
`“routing message”
`
`‘606 patent, 3:30-34
`
`‘606 patent, 5:46-51
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 5 of 16
`
`’606 Patent: Fig. 32
`
`‘606 patent, Fig.32
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 6 of 16
`
`’606 Patent: Fig. 15
`
`…
`
`‘606 patent, Fig. 15
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 7 of 16
`
`’606 Patent: Fig. 30
`
`…
`
`‘606 patent, Fig. 30
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 8 of 16
`
`‘606 Patent: Fig. 31
`
`…
`
`‘606 patent, Fig. 31
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 9 of 16
`
`USP 8,542,815: Claim 1 (RBR Patent Family)
`
`. . .
`
`…
`
`‘815 patent, Claim 1
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 10 of 16
`
`‘815 Patent: Claims 24 and 51 (RBR Patent Family)
`
`…
`. . .
`
`…
`
`‘815 patent, Claim 24
`
`‘815 patent, Claim 51
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 11 of 16
`
`‘005 Patent: Claim 1 (RBR Patent Family)
`
`…
`
`‘005 patent, Claim 1
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 12 of 16
`
`USP 9,179,005: Claims 18, 43, and 67 (RBR Patent Family)
`
`…
`
`…
`
`…
`
`‘005 patent, Claim 18
`
`‘005 patent, Claim 43
`
`‘005 patent, Claim 67
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 13 of 16
`
`USP 11,171,864: Claim 2 (RBR Patent Family)
`
`‘864 patent, Claim 1
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 14 of 16
`
`“routing message”
`
`▪ Claim differentiation can apply across patents in the same family
`– Clare v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 819 F.3d 1323, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (applying
`the doctrine of claim differentiation across different patents)
`– Serverside Grp. Ltd. v. Tactical 8 Techs., L.L.C., 927 F. Supp. 2d 623, 686
`(N.D. Iowa 2013) (“The doctrine of claim differentiation supports the
`conclusion that independent claims of related patents that use different claim
`terms must have different scope.”)
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 15 of 16
`
`“routing message”
`
`‘606 patent, 2:5-11
`
`‘606 patent, 3:18-23
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 91-3 Filed 03/22/23 Page 16 of 16
`
`“routing message”
`
`‘606 patent, 5:22-25
`
`‘606 patent, 5:46-51
`
`15
`
`