throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 89-3 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 3
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 89-3 Filed 03/10/23 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`

`

`Mail - Lewis Hudnell - Outlook
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 89-3 Filed 03/10/23 Page 2 of 3
`RE: VoIP Pal v. Amazon, et. al, Civil Action No. 6:20 cv 272 ADA
`Nolan Mcqueen <Nolan_Mcqueen@txwd.uscourts.gov>
`Tue 2/14/2023 8:22 AM
`To: Lewis Hudnell
`lewis@hudnelllaw.com
`Cc: DShvodian@perkinscoie.com <DShvodian@perkinscoie.com>;CTyler@perkinscoie.com
`<CTyler@perkinscoie.com>;CKelley@perkinscoie.com <CKelley@perkinscoie.com>;Valentine, James (PAO)
`<JValentine@perkinscoie.com>;Nick Gikkas <Nick@hudnelllaw.com>;Sean Parmenter
`sean@parmenterip.com ;Kristie Davis Kristie Davis@t wd.uscourts.gov
`Counsel,
`
`The Court provides the following preliminary construcons in advance of the 9:30AM 2/15/2023
`Markman hearing. The purpose of preliminary construcons is to streamline the hearing by providing
`the pares an indicaon of the Court’s current posion for each term Although the pares are, of
`course, free to argue for their originally proposed construcon, it is generally unlikely that the Court will
`select a party’s originally proposed construcon over the preliminary construcon. As such, the Court
`believes that making arguments to fine-tune the preliminary construcon may be more helpful. The
`preliminary construcons are not final as the Court may change some of those construcons based on
`the arguments at the hearing.
`
`Of the below terms, please let me know what terms each side would like to argue by 8:00AM
`tomorrow. Each side may email their list separately (but please CC the other side) or jointly (please
`indicate which side, or both, wants to argue each term). Based on the pares’ lists, the Court will
`provide the order of terms that the Court would like to hear arguments on. Also, by 8:00 AM tomorrow,
`please submit any slides the pares (and CC the other side) wish to use at the Markman hearing.
`
`To assist the court reporter (Krise Davis, CC-ed), please email her a copy of your slides as soon as
`possible (it’s okay if it’s just a dra). When you email her, no need to CC the other side or the Court.
`
`
`
`3/9/23, 10:02 AM
`
`No. Claim Term
`
`Plaintiff’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`“routing message”
`
`claims 1, 8, 14, 19,
`21, 26, 27, 32
`
`“gateway”
`
`claims 14, 26
`
`Plain and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Defendant’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`“a message that
`includes a callee
`user name field, a
`route field, and a
`time to live field”
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning, which is
`“device that
`connects networks
`that use different
`communication
`protocols.”
`
`Court’s
`Preliminary
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`“a device that
`connects networks
`and can adjust a
`protocol of traffic
`moving between
`the networks”
`
`https://outlook.office.com/mail/deeplink?popoutv2=1&version=20230303006.04&view=print
`
`1/7
`
`

`

`Mail - Lewis Hudnell - Outlook
`Case 6:20-cv-00272-ADA Document 89-3 Filed 03/10/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`3/9/23, 10:02 AM
`
`Join ZoomGov Meeng
`hps://txwd-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1613131172?pwd=ek9WOFZLeHZXalNYVmFOdkJabDJoQT09
`
`Meeng ID: 161 313 1172
`Passcode: 167817
`One tap mobile
`+16692545252,,1613131172#,,,,*167817# US (San Jose)
`+16692161590,,1613131172#,,,,*167817# US (San Jose)
`
`
`
`Nolan McQueen
`Law Clerk to the
`Hon. Alan D Albright
`U S District Court
`Western District of Texas
`Office: 254 750 1517
`
`
`
`From: Lewis Hudnell <lewis@hudnelllaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 5 25 PM
`To: Nolan Mcqueen <Nolan_Mcqueen@txwd.uscourts.gov>
`Cc: DShvodian@perkinscoie com; CTyler@perkinscoie com; CKelley@perkinscoie com; Valenne, James (PAO)
`<JValenne@perkinscoie.com>; Nick Gikkas <Nick@hudnelllaw.com>; Sean Parmenter <sean@parmenterip.com>
`Subject: Re VoIP Pal v Amazon, et al, Civil Acon No 6 20 cv 272 ADA
`
`CAUTION - EXTERNAL:
`
`Dear Mr. McQueen,
`
`Further to the pares' inial communicaon regarding postponing the Claim Construcon hearing
`and in view of the transfer of Google and Meta in the related cases, the pares have met and conferred
`regarding narrow ng the terms in dispute and intend to file, likely by tomorrow, a First Amended Joint
`Claim Construcon Statement in this case. Please let us know if you have any quesons or concerns.
`Many thanks.
`
`Respecully submied,
`
`Lewis E. Hudnell, III
`Hudnell Law Group PC
`t: 650.564.7720
`f: 347.772.3034
`m: 917.861.3494
`e lewis@hudnelllaw com
`www.hudnelllaw.com
`
`This e-mail message is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
`nformaon that is confidenal, privileged and/or aorneys' work product Any review or distribuon by
`any other person is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please immediately contact the
`sender and delete all copies.
`
`https://outlook.office.com/mail/deeplink?popoutv2=1&version=20230303006.04&view=print
`
`2/7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket