`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
` Solas OLED Ltd., an Irish corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`Apple Inc., a California corporation;
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 6:19-cv-00537
`
`Complaint for Patent
`Infringement
`
`JURY DEMANDED
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement
`
`Plaintiff Solas OLED Ltd. (“Solas”) files this complaint against Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`(“Apple”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,072,450, 7,446,338, and 7,573,068
`
`(“Patents-in-Suit”). The accused products are Apple products with organic light-emitting diode
`
`(“OLED”) displays.
`
`Plaintiff Solas OLED and the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Solas is a technology licensing company organized under the laws of
`
`Ireland, with its headquarters at 4-5 Burton Hall Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18.
`
`2.
`
`Solas is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450, entitled “Display Apparatus,”
`
`which issued June 6, 2000 (the “’450 patent”). A copy of the ’450 patent is attached to this
`
`complaint as Exhibit 1.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 2 of 32
`
`3.
`
`Solas is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338, entitled “Display Panel,” which
`
`issued November 4, 2008 (the “’338 patent”). A copy of the ’338 patent is attached to this
`
`complaint as Exhibit 2.
`
`4.
`
`Solas is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,573,068, entitled “Transistor array
`
`substrate and display panel,” which issued August 11, 2009 (the “’068 patent”). A copy of the
`
`’068 patent is attached to this complaint as Exhibit 3.
`
`Defendant and the Accused Products.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. is a California corporation with regular and established
`
`places of business in this district.
`
`6.
`
`The accused products are Apple products with organic light-emitting diode
`
`(“OLED”) displays. As illustrative examples, this includes iPhone, Apple Watch, and MacBook
`
`Pro models.
`
`Jurisdiction, venue, and joinder.
`
`7.
`
`Solas asserts claims for patent infringement against Apple under the patent laws
`
`of the United States, including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, et seq. The Court has original
`
`jurisdiction over Solas’ patent infringement claims under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`8.
`
`The Court has personal jurisdiction over Apple. Apple has regular and established
`
`places of business within this district and has committed acts of infringement within this district
`
`(e.g., selling and using Accused Products). Apple has established minimum contacts with the
`
`State of Texas such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Apple would not offend traditional
`
`notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`
`9.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §1400(b) and 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1391(c). Apple has regular and established places of business in this district at: 12545 Riata
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 3 of 32
`
`Vista Cir, Austin, TX 78727; 2901 S. Capital of Texas Hwy, Austin, TX 78746; 3121 Palm Way,
`
`Austin, TX 78758; 8401 Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, TX 79925; 15900 La Cantera
`
`Parkway, San Antonio, TX 78256; and 7400 San Pedro Avenue, San Antonio, TX 78216.
`
`Count 1 – Claim for infringement of the ’450 patent.
`
`Solas incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the above paragraphs
`
`10.
`
`and further alleges as follows:
`
`11.
`
`On June 6, 2000, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,072,450, entitled “Display Apparatus.” Ex. 1.
`
`12.
`
`Solas is the owner of the ’450 patent with full rights to pursue recovery of
`
`royalties for damages for infringement, including full rights to recover past and future damages.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`Each claim of the ’450 patent is valid, enforceable, and patent-eligible.
`
`Solas and its predecessors in interest have satisfied the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287(a) with respect to the ’450 patent, and Solas is entitled to damages for Apple’s past
`
`infringement.
`
`15.
`
`Apple has directly infringed (literally and equivalently) and induced others to
`
`infringe the ’450 patent and, unless enjoined, will continue to do so by making, using, selling,
`
`offering for sale, or importing products that infringe the claims of the ’450 patent and by
`
`inducing others to infringe the claims of the ’450 patent without a license or permission from
`
`Solas.
`
`
`
`Direct Infringement
`
`16.
`
`Apple has directly infringed (literally and equivalently) at least one claim of the
`
`’450 patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing the Accused Products.
`
`Apple has infringed multiple claims of the ’450 patent, including independent claim 1. By way
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 4 of 32
`
`of example only, the Apple MacBook Pro infringes an exemplary claim of the ’450 patent, as in
`
`the following description, which Solas provides without the benefit of information about the
`
`accused device obtained through discovery. For example, claim 1 claims a display apparatus as
`
`follows:
`
`[1a] “a substrate;”
`
`The accused MacBook Pro laptops include Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) panels
`
`that include a polyimide substrate:
`
`substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 5 of 32
`
`[1b] “active elements formed over said substrate and driven by an externally
`
`supplied signal;”
`
`The accused MacBook Pro laptops include active elements formed over the substrate:
`
`OLED Removed/ Al Layer
`
`8
`
`7
`
`9
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 6 of 32
`
`These active elements are driven by an externally supplied signal:
`
`OLED Removed/ Al Layer
`
`
`
`[1c] “an insulation film formed over said substrate so as to cover said active
`
`elements, said insulation having at least one contact hole;”
`
`In the accused MacBook Pro laptops, an insulation film is formed over the substrate,
`
`covers the active elements, and has contact holes:
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 7 of 32
`
`insulation film
`
`contact hole
`
`
`
`substrate
`
`
`
`[1d] “at least one first electrode formed on said insulation film so as to cover said
`
`active elements, and connected to said active elements through said at least one contact
`
`hole, said at least one first electrode being made of a material which shields visible light;”
`
`In the accused MacBook Pro laptops, an electrode is formed on the insulation film,
`
`covers active elements, and is connected to active elements through contact holes:
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 8 of 32
`
`insulation film
`
`first
`electrode
`(anode)
`
`8
`
`7
`
`9
`
`1
`
`connected to
`
`contact hole
`
`This electrode is formed of a material which shields visible light:
`
`
`
`first
`electrode
`(anode)
`
`[1e] “an organic electroluminescent layer having an organic electroluminescent
`
`material formed on said at least one first electrode so as to cover said active elements and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 9 of 32
`
`including at least one layer which emits light in accordance with a voltage applied to said at
`
`least one layer;”
`
`In the accused MacBook Pro laptops, a layer of organic electroluminescent material is
`
`formed on the electrode, and covers active elements:
`
`organic
`electroluminescent layer
`
`first
`electrode
`(anode)
`
`
`
`This organic electroluminescent layer emits in accordance with a voltage applied to the
`
`layer using the OLED cathode and anode.
`
`[1f] “and at least one second electrode formed on said organic electroluminescent
`
`layer which covers said active elements.”
`
`In the accused MacBook Pro laptops, a second electrode is formed on the organic
`
`electroluminescent layer:
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 10 of 32
`
`second electrode
`(cathode)
`
`active elements
`
`
`
`Indirect infringement
`
`
`Apple has had knowledge of the ’450 patent, from a date no later than the date it
`
`17.
`
`receives this complaint. Apple has known how the Accused Products are made and has known,
`
`or have been willfully blind to the fact, that making, using, offering to sell, and selling the
`
`accused products within the United States, or importing the Accused Products into the United
`
`States, would constitute infringement.
`
`18.
`
`Apple has induced, and continues to induce, infringement of the ’450 patent by
`
`actively encouraging others (including distributers and end customers) to use, offer to sell, sell,
`
`and import the Accused Products. On information and belief, these acts include providing
`
`information and instructions on the use of the Accused Products; providing information,
`
`education and instructions supporting sales by distributers; providing the Accused Products to
`
`distributers; and indemnifying patent infringement within the United States.
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 11 of 32
`
`Damages
`
`
`Solas has been damaged by Apple’s infringement of the ’450 patent and is
`
`19.
`
`entitled to damages as provided for in 35 U.S.C. § 284, including reasonable royalty damages.
`
`Count 2 – Claim for infringement of the ’338 patent.
`
`Solas incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the above paragraphs
`
`20.
`
`and further alleges as follows:
`
`21.
`
`On November 4, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,446,338, entitled “Flexible touch sensor.” Ex. 2.
`
`22.
`
`Solas is the owner of the ’338 patent with full rights to pursue recovery of
`
`royalties for damages for infringement, including full rights to recover past and future damages.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`Each claim of the ’338 patent is valid, enforceable, and patent-eligible.
`
`Solas and its predecessors in interest have satisfied the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287(a) with respect to the ’338 patent, and Solas is entitled to damages for Apple’s past
`
`infringement.
`
`25.
`
`Apple has directly infringed (literally and equivalently) and induced others to
`
`infringe the ’338 patent and, unless enjoined, will continue to do so by making, using, selling,
`
`offering for sale, or importing products that infringe the claims of the ’338 patent and by
`
`inducing others to infringe the claims of the ’338 patent without a license or permission from
`
`Solas.
`
`
`
`Direct Infringement
`
`26.
`
`Apple has directly infringed (literally and equivalently) at least one claim of the
`
`’338 patent by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing the Accused Products.
`
`Apple has infringed multiple claims of the ’338 patent, including independent claim 1. By way
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 12 of 32
`
`of example only, the Apple iPhone X infringes an exemplary claim of the ’338 patent, as in the
`
`following description, which Solas provides without the benefit of information about the accused
`
`device obtained through discovery. For example, claim 1 claims a display apparatus as follows:
`
`[1a] “a transistor array substrate which includes a plurality of pixels and comprises
`
`a plurality of transistors for each pixel, each of the transistors including a gate, a gate
`
`insulating film, a source, and a drain;”
`
`The accused iPhone X contains a transistor array substrate:
`
`transistor M1
`(cross-section
`view)
`
`The transistor array substrate includes a plurality of pixels and comprises a plurality of
`
`transistors for each pixel, each of the transistors including a gate, a gate insulating film, a source,
`
`transistor array substrate
`
`
`
`and a drain:
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 13 of 32
`
`transistor
`
`source
`
`gate
`
`
`
`[1b] “a plurality of interconnections which are formed to project from a surface of
`
`the transistor array substrate, and which are arrayed in parallel to each other;”
`
`The accused iPhone X includes a plurality of interconnections which are formed to
`
`project from a surface of the transistor array substrate:
`
`interconnection
`
`project from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 14 of 32
`
`These interconnections are arrayed in parallel to each other:
`
`
`
`[1c] “a plurality of pixel electrodes for the plurality of pixels, respectively, the pixel
`
`electrodes being arrayed along the interconnections between the interconnections on the
`
`surface of the transistor array substrate;”
`
`The accused iPhone X includes a plurality of pixel electrodes for the plurality of pixels,
`
`respectively, the pixel electrodes being arrayed along the interconnections between the
`
`interconnections on the surface of the transistor array substrate:
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 15 of 32
`
`[1d] “a plurality of light-emitting layers formed on the pixel electrodes,
`
`
`
`respectively;”
`
`The accused iPhone X includes a plurality of light-emitting layers formed on the pixel
`
`electrodes, respectively:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 16 of 32
`
`[1e] “and a counter electrode which is stacked on the light-emitting layers,”
`
`The accused iPhone X includes a counter electrode which is stacked on the light-emitting
`
`
`
`layers:
`
`
`
`[1f] “wherein said plurality of transistors for each pixel include a driving transistor,
`
`one of the source and the drain of which is connected to the pixel electrode, a switch
`
`transistor which makes a write current flow between the drain and the source of the
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 17 of 32
`
`driving transistor, and a holding transistor which holds a voltage between the gate and
`
`source of the driving transistor in a light emission period.”
`
`In the accused iPhone X, the plurality of transistors for each pixel includes a driving
`
`transistor, one of the source and the drain of which is connected to the pixel electrode:
`
`connected
`
`pixel electrode
`contact
`
`1
`
`drain
`
`driving transistor
`
`
`
`The plurality of transistors includes a switch transistor which makes a write current flow
`
`between the drain and the source of the driving transistor:
`
`driving transistor
`
`1
`
`8
`
`switch transistor
`
`
`
`The plurality of transistors includes a holding transistor which holds a voltage between
`
`the gate and source of the driving transistor in a light emission period:
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 18 of 32
`
`driving transistor
`
`1
`
`7 9
`
`holding transistor
`
`
`
`Indirect infringement
`
`
`Apple has had knowledge of the ’338 patent, from a date no later than the date it
`
`27.
`
`receives this complaint. Apple has known how the Accused Products are made and has known,
`
`or have been willfully blind to the fact, that making, using, offering to sell, and selling the
`
`accused products within the United States, or importing the Accused Products into the United
`
`States, would constitute infringement.
`
`28.
`
`Apple has induced, and continues to induce, infringement of the ’338 patent by
`
`actively encouraging others (including distributers and end customers) to use, offer to sell, sell,
`
`and import the Accused Products. On information and belief, these acts include providing
`
`information and instructions on the use of the Accused Products; providing information,
`
`education and instructions supporting sales by distributers; providing the Accused Products to
`
`distributers; and indemnifying patent infringement within the United States.
`
`Damages
`
`
`Solas has been damaged by Apple’s infringement of the ’338 patent and is
`
`29.
`
`entitled to damages as provided for in 35 U.S.C. § 284, including reasonable royalty damages.
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 19 of 32
`
`Count 3 – Claim for infringement of the ’068 patent.
`
`Solas incorporates by reference each of the allegations in the above paragraphs
`
`30.
`
`and further alleges as follows:
`
`31.
`
`On August 11, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,573,068, entitled “Transistor array substrate and display panel.” Ex. 3.
`
`32.
`
`Solas is the owner of the ’068 patent with full rights to pursue recovery of
`
`royalties for damages for infringement, including full rights to recover past and future damages.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`Each claim of the ’068 patent is valid, enforceable, and patent-eligible.
`
`Solas and its predecessors in interest have satisfied the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287(a) with respect to the ’068 patent, and Solas is entitled to damages for Apple’s past
`
`infringement.
`
`35.
`
`Apple has directly infringed (literally and equivalently) and induced others to
`
`infringe the ’068 patent and, unless enjoined, will continue to do so by making, using, selling,
`
`offering for sale, or importing products that infringe the claims of the ’068 patent and by
`
`inducing others to infringe the claims of the ’068 patent without a license or permission from
`
`Solas.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 20 of 32
`
`
`
`Direct Infringement
`
`36.
`
`Apple has directly infringed (literally and equivalently) at least one claim of the
`
`’068 patent, and continue to do so, by making, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing the
`
`Accused Products. By way of example only, the Apple Watch Series 3 infringes an exemplary
`
`claim of the ’068 patent, as in the following description, which Solas provides without the
`
`benefit of information about the accused device obtained through discovery. For example, claim
`
`13 claims a display panel as follows:
`
`“A display panel comprising: a substrate.”
`
`For example, the Apple Watch Series 3 has a display panel comprising a substrate, as
`
`shown below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Display panel
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 21 of 32
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`“a plurality of driving transistors which are arrayed in a matrix on the substrate,
`
`each of the driving transistors having a gate, a source, a drain, and a gate insulating film
`
`inserted between the gate, and the source and drain.”
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 22 of 32
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a plurality of
`
`driving transistors arrayed in a matrix on the substrate, each having a gate, a source, a drain, and
`
`a gate insulating film between the gate, and the source and drain, as shown below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Driving transistors
`
`arrayed in a matrix
`
`
`
`Gate insulating film
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 23 of 32
`
`“a plurality of signal lines which are patterned together with the gates of said
`
`plurality of driving transistors and arrayed to run in a predetermined direction on the
`
`substrate.”
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a plurality of
`
`signal lines that are patterned together with the gates of the driving transistors and arrayed to run
`
`in a predetermined direction on the substrate, as shown below.
`
`
`
`
`
`“a plurality of supply lines which are patterned together with the sources and drains
`
`of said plurality of driving transistors and arrayed to cross said plurality of signal lines via
`
`the gate insulating film, one of the source and the drain of each of driving transistors being
`
`electrically connected to one of the supply lines.”
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a plurality of
`
`supply lines that are patterned together with the sources and drains of the driving transistors and
`
`arrayed to cross the signal lines via the gate insulating film, where one of the source and the
`
`drain of the driving transistors are electrically connected to one of the supply lines, as shown
`
`below.
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 24 of 32
`
`Signal lines
`
`Supply lines
`
`Crossing
`signal lines
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 25 of 32
`
` “a plurality of feed interconnections which are connected to said plurality of supply
`
`lines along said plurality of supply lines.”
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a plurality of feed
`
`interconnections which are connected to the supply lines along the supply lines, as shown below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 26 of 32
`
`
`
`Supply lines
`
`
`
`Feed
`interconnections
`
`
`
`
`
`
`26
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 27 of 32
`
`“a plurality of pixel electrodes each of which is electrically connected to the other of
`
`the source and the drain of a corresponding one of said plurality of driving transistors.”
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a plurality of pixel
`
`electrodes that are electrically connected to the other of the source and the drain of
`
`corresponding driving transistors, as shown below.
`
`Pixel electrodes
`
`“a plurality of light-emitting layers which are formed on said plurality of pixel
`
`
`
`electrodes, respectively.”
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a plurality of light-
`
`emitting layers that are formed on the pixel electrodes respectively, as shown below.
`
`
`
`
`27
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 28 of 32
`
`Light-emitting
`layers
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 29 of 32
`
`“a counter electrode which covers said plurality of light-emitting layers.”
`
`For example, the display panel of the Apple Watch Series 3 comprises a counter
`
`electrode that covers the light-emitting layers, as shown below.
`
`Counter
`electrode
`
`
`
`
`
`Light-emitting
`layer
`
`
`
`Indirect infringement
`
`
`Apple has had knowledge of the ’068 patent, from a date no later than the date it
`
`37.
`
`receives this complaint. Apple has known how the Accused Products are made and has known,
`
`or have been willfully blind to the fact, that making, using, offering to sell, and selling the
`
`accused products within the United States, or importing the Accused Products into the United
`
`States, would constitute infringement.
`
`
`
`29
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 30 of 32
`
`38.
`
`Apple has induced, and continues to induce, infringement of the ’068 patent by
`
`actively encouraging others (including distributers and end customers) to use, offer to sell, sell,
`
`and import the Accused Products. On information and belief, these acts include providing
`
`information and instructions on the use of the Accused Products; providing information,
`
`education and instructions supporting sales by distributers; providing the Accused Products to
`
`distributers; and indemnifying patent infringement within the United States.
`
`Damages
`
`
`Solas has been damaged by Apple’s infringement of the ’068 patent and is
`
`39.
`
`entitled to damages as provided for in 35 U.S.C. § 284, including reasonable royalty damages.
`
`Jury demand.
`
`40.
`
`Solas demands trial by jury of all issues.
`
`Relief requested.
`
`Solas prays for the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`A judgment in favor of Solas that Apple has infringed the ’450 patent, the ’338
`
`patent, and the ’068 patent and that the ’450 patent, the ’338 patent, and the ’068 patent are valid,
`
`enforceable, and patent-eligible;
`
`B.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Apple to pay Solas all damages provided for
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 284, including compensatory damages, costs, expenses, and pre- and post-
`
`judgment interest for its infringement of the asserted patents;
`
`D.
`
`A permanent injunction prohibiting Apple from further acts of infringement of the
`
`’450 patent, the ’338 patent, and ’068 patent;
`
`E.
`
`A judgment and order requiring Apple to provide an accounting and to pay
`
`supplemental damages to Solas, including, without limitation, pre-judgment and
`
`
`
`
`30
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 31 of 32
`
`post-judgment interest;
`
`F.
`
`A finding that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285, and an award of
`
`Solas’ reasonable attorney’s fees and costs; and
`
`G.
`
`Any and all other relief to which Solas may be entitled.
`
`Dated: September 12, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Reza Mirzaie
`Marc Fenster
`CA State Bar No. 181067
`Reza Mirzaie
`CA State Bar No. 246953
`Neil A. Rubin
`CA State Bar No. 250761
`Kent N. Shum
`CA State Bar No. 259189
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Telephone: 310-826-7474
`Email: mfenster@raklaw.com
`Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`Email: nrubin@raklaw.com
`Email: kshum@raklaw.com
`
`Sean A. Luner
`CA State Bar No. 165443
`Gregory S. Dovel
`CA State Bar No. 135387
`Jonas B. Jacobson
`CA State Bar No. 269912
`DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
`201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`Telephone: 310-656-7066
`Email: sean@dovel.com
`Email: greg@dovel.com
`Email: jonas@dovel.com
`
`
`
`
`
`31
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00537-ADA Document 1 Filed 09/12/19 Page 32 of 32
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`Claire Abernathy Henry
`Texas State Bar No. 24053063
`Andrea L. Fair
`Texas State Bar No. 24078488
`WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC
`PO Box 1231
`Longview, Texas 75606-1231
`(903) 757-6400 (telephone)
`(903) 757-2323 (facsimile)
`E-mail: jw@wsfirm.com
`E-mail: claire@wsfirm.com
`E-mail: andrea@wsfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
`SOLAS OLED, LTD.
`
`32
`
`
`
`
`
`
`