`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`CANON, INC.
`
`vs.
`
`ROKU INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19-cv-00245
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CANON, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
`TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
`CANON’S CLAIMS AGAINST ROKU
`
`Plaintiff Canon, Inc. (“Canon” or “Plaintiff”) for the limited purpose of this case,
`
`in consideration of mutual agreements with Defendant Roku Inc. (“Roku” or
`
`“Defendant”) (collectively, “Parties”), agree and move the Court as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Parties agree that Roku, including its subsidiaries and affiliates, will not
`
`file a declaratory judgment action in any court in connection with U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`7,746,413 (“the ’413 Patent”), 8,078,767 (“the ’767 Patent”), 8,346,986 (“the ’986 Patent”),
`
`8,713,206 (“the ’206 Patent”), and 7,810,130 (“the ’130 Patent”) (collectively, “Asserted
`
`Patents”) during the pendency (through settlement or final appeal, whichever occurs later)
`
`of the following dispute between Canon and TCL entities: Canon, Inc. v. TCL
`
`Electronics Holdings Ltd., et al., Civ. No. 2:18-cv-00546 (E.D. Tex.).
`
`2.
`
`Parties agree that Canon, in consideration of Roku’s agreement above,
`
`will move this Court to dismiss without prejudice Canon’s claims against Roku in this
`
`LEGAL_JP # 4245943.2
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00245-ADA Document 9 Filed 07/31/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`action.
`
`3.
`
`Parties agree that, if Canon files claims against Roku in any court in
`
`connection with the Asserted Patents, the restrictions set forth in paragraph 1 above
`
`automatically terminate concurrently with any such filing.
`
`THEREFORE, under Parties’ mutual agreements, Canon moves that this Court
`
`dismiss without prejudice Canon’s claims against Roku in this action.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00245-ADA Document 9 Filed 07/31/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`DATED:
`
`July 31, 2019
`
` By:
`
`/s/John P. Palmer
`John P. Palmer
`State Bar No. 15430600
`palmer@namanhowell.com
`John A. "Andy" Powell
`State Bar No. 24029775
`USPTO Reg. No. 71,533
`powell@namanhowell.com
`NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE, PLLC
`400 Austin Ave., Suite 800
`Waco, Texas 76701
`Tel.: (254) 755-4100
`Fax: (254) 754-6331
`LOCAL COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`YAR R. CHAIKOVSKY (CA Bar #175421
`admitted pro hac vice and admission to be
`submitted) yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`DAVID OKANO (CA Bar #278485 pro hac vice
`and admission to be submitted)
`davidokano@paulhastings.com
`NOBUMASA HIROI (CA Bar # 289592 pro hac
`vice and admission to be submitted)
`nobumasahiroi@paulhastings.com
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Avenue Palo Alto, California
`94304-1106
`Tel.: (650) 320-1800
`Fax.: (650) 320-1900
`
`HIROYUKI HAGIWARA (NY Bar #3063690 pro
`hac vice and admission to be submitted)
`hiroyukihagiwara@paulhastings.com
`KYOTARO OZAWA (NY Bar # 5142567 pro
`hac vice and admission to be submitted)
`kyotaroozawa@paulhastings.com
`
`PAUL HASTINGS FOREIGN LAW JOINT
`ENTERPRISE
`Ark Hills Sengokuyama Mori Tower
`Fortieth Floor
`1-9-10 Roppongi
`Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0032 Japan
`Tel.: 81-3-6229-6015
`Fax.: 81-3-6229-7015
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:19-cv-00245-ADA Document 9 Filed 07/31/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that on July 31, 2019, I served the foregoing instrument on all counsel of record
`via the Court’s ECF system and/or via email.
`
`/s/ John P. Palmer
` John P. Palmer
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
