throbber
Case 1:19—cv-00819-ADA Docu ent 104 Filed 08/25/20 Page 1 of 3
`Case 1:19-cv-00819-ADA Document 104 Filed 08/25/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`FILED
`August 24, 2020
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT W$DEPUTY
`
`Western I-I strict of Texas
`
`Alternative Disput- Resolution Summary
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Style of case; Neodron, Ltd. v. Dell Technologies, nc. (Lead Case)
`
`Civil action number:
`
`-
`
`--
`
`-n: 0-; M .,.
`
`Nature of suit:
`
`330 Patent
`
`Date of Mediation:
`
`Wednesday, July 29, 2020
`
`When did the case settle? D Before ADR
`
`El ln ADR
`
`[Z Did Not Settle
`
`What was your total fee?
`
`5 13,797.70
`
`or Cl Pro Bono
`
`How was this Mediation initiated?
`
`D b court order
`
`or
`
`agreement of the parties
`
`Please provide the names, addresses, and telep one numbers of counsel:
`
`Name:
`
`Reza Mirzaie, Russ August & Kabal
`
`Address:
`
`12424 flushing Bhld 12m Elan:
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`
`Phone:
`
`310-826-7474
`
`Name;
`
`Marc Fenster, Russ August & Kabat
`
`Name:
`
`Address:
`
`Phone:
`
`Name:
`
`
`Ryan Yagura, O'Melveny & Meyers
`
`400 Smith Hope Street 18th Elan:
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899
`
`
`213-430—6189
`
`
`Sean Trainor, O'Melveny & Meyers
`
`Address:
`
`12424 Mlsbite 31m 12m Elm
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`
`Address= Wm
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899
`
`Phone:
`
`
`310-826-7474
`
`Phone:
`
`213-430-6189
`
`9.
`
`Additional comments: The session was conducted uetween PlaintiffNeodron, Ltd, and Defendants Samsung, Member
`
`Case No.71:l9-cv-00903-ADA . The undersigned med ator will continile to work with the parties in an effort to settle.
`
`Signature of Neutral Dav id F0 1 som
`Jackson Walker LLP
`Address
`
`6002 Summerfield Drive, Suite B
`
`Texarkana, TX
`
`75503
`
`Date
`903-255-3251
`Phone
`
`Neutral mustfile completedform in duplicate with t ,
`
`ADR or, i settlement occurs :rior to session, within .
`
` US. District Clerk within 5 days afier completion of
`d s ofneutral’3 notice b the arties a settlement.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00819-ADA Document 104 Filed 08/25/20 Page 2 of 3
`Case 1:19-cv-00819-ADA Docu ent 104 Filed 08/25/20 Page20f3
`
`Kill?I Jackson Walker LLP
`
`US. District Clerk’s Office
`
`800 Franklin Ave, Room 380
`Waco, Texas 76701
`
`Augus 2], 2020
`
`
`
`Re:
`
`Neodron Ltd. V. De]! Technolog'es. Inca;
`USDC WDTX Case No. 1:19—c —00819—ADA (Lead Case)
`
`Dear Sir or Madam:
`
`
`
`Enclosed please find the Alternativ Dispute Resolution Summary reporting the
`outcome of the mediation session conducted y Judge David Folsom on July 29, 2020, in the
`above-styled matter. Please tile according to
`ur normal procedure.
`
`Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have questions or concerns,
`please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
`
`C rdially,
`
`
`
`S aron S. Montgon ry
`ssistant to Chiefjudge David Folsom (rat)
`
`Enclosure
`
`26648457v.1
`
`Jw ITEXARKANA
`
`6002 Summerfield Drive, Suite B - Te arkana. Texas 75503 | www.jw.com | Member of GLOBALAWm
`
`

`

`.
`i,
`XWI Jackson Walker LLP
`6002 Summerneiu
`Suite B
`Texarkana, Texas 75503
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00819-ADA Document 104 Filed 08/25/20 Page 3 of 3
`Case 1:19-cv-00819-ADA Document 104 Eilgfl7 EQ§E$§8IQT Egggfiof
`
`33 AUG. mafia EF'H'E. '1.
`
`
`
`US. District Clerk’s Office
`
`800 Franklin Ave, Room 380
`
`Waco, Texas 76701
`
`=33TE‘
`
`UM“!'l'f'"I“:WI"Hf”'*”‘H'H'h“'u“l'uflillihi'l
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket