Case 4:24-cr-00287-O Document 51 Filed 01/30/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID 229
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`FORT WORTH DIVISION
`
`

`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`

`v.
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`

`NATHAN REIS and
`
`
`STEPHANIE HOCKRIDGE,
`a/k/a §
`STEPHANIE REIS,
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Defendants.
`
`

`
`Case No. 4:24 CR-00287-O
`
`
`
`(01)
`(02)
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court are Defendants’ Unopposed Joint Motion to Continue (ECF No. 48) and
`
`the Government’s Response (ECF No. 50). After reviewing the motion, the Court finds that the
`
`Motion should be GRANTED in part.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h), a court can grant an “ends of justice” continuance at the
`
`request of a defendant or defendant’s attorney if the court does so on the basis of the finding “that
`
`the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the
`
`defendant in a speedy trial.” Id. One of the factors a court may consider in granting an “ends of
`
`justice” continuance is “[w]hether the failure to grant such a continuance . . . would deny counsel
`
`for the defendant . . . the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account
`
`the exercise of due diligence.” 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
`
`
`
`Based on the reasons in the motion, the Court finds (1) that the ends of justice served by
`
`the granting of a trial continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a
`
`speedy trial; (2) that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel the
`
`reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:24-cr-00287-O Document 51 Filed 01/30/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID 230
`
`
`diligence; and (3) that taking into account the exercise of due diligence by counsel, a continuance
`
`of the duration granted by this order is necessary for effective preparation by defense counsel.
`
`
`
`Defendants request a continuance of 120 days. That length of request is not necessary.
`
`Defendants have known about the investigation since before the indictment was returned. The
`
`current trial setting remains more than a month away. While it is true that the Government has
`
`made available a large number of documents, it has also helped to streamline their review. Finally,
`
`this case has been pending since November. Given this, trial will begin at 9:00 am on April 22,
`
`2025.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED on this 30th day of January, 2025.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
`Reed O’Connor
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Connectivity issues with tsdrapi.uspto.gov. Try again now (HTTP Error 429: ).

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket