throbber
Case 3:22-cv-02868-S Document 18 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID 331
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`DALLAS DIVISION
`
`
`R2 Solutions LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`7-Eleven, Inc.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`3:22-cv-02868
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Plaintiff R2 Solutions LLC (“R2” or “Plaintiff”) respectfully requests a seven-day
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extension of time to file a response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF 11. Currently,
`
`Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Dismiss is due March 10, 2023. Plaintiff requests an
`
`extension up to and through March 17, 2023, to file its response.
`
`
`
`Good cause exists for the requested extension. The patents at issue in Defendant’s Motion
`
`to Dismiss overlap significantly with the patents at issue in another motion to dismiss in a
`
`parallel litigation. See R2 Solutions LLC v. Southwest Airlines Co., Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-
`
`02869, ECF 14 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2023). Plaintiff is also filing an unopposed request for
`
`extension of time in that case to extend the response deadline to March 17, 2023. Plaintiff
`
`believes that aligning the response deadlines is efficient because there is extensive overlap
`
`between the motions. Counsel for Plaintiff also seeks the requested extensions because of
`
`scheduling conflicts in other cases and limited availability of counsel because of a pre-planned
`
`family vacation.
`
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff has conferred with counsel for Defendant, and Defendant is not
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-02868-S Document 18 Filed 03/07/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID 332
`
`opposed to the extension of time sought in this motion.
`
`
`Dated: March 7, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Carder W. Brooks
`EDWARD R. NELSON III
`State Bar No. 00797142
`ed@nelbum.com
`BRENT N. BUMGARDNER
`State Bar No. 00795272
`brent@nelbum.com
`CHRISTOPHER G. GRANAGHAN
`State Bar No. 24078585
`chris@nelbum.com
`JOHN P. MURPHY
`State Bar No. 24056024
`murphy@nelbum.com
`CARDER W. BROOKS
`State Bar No. 24105536
`carder@nelbum.com
`NELSON BUMGARDNER CONROY PC
`3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`817.377.9111
`
`COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF
`R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been
`
`served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on March 7, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Carder W. Brooks
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:22-cv-02868-S Document 18 Filed 03/07/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID 333
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I hereby certify that Counsel for Plaintiff and Counsel for Defendant have complied with
`
`the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule 7.1. Defendant is unopposed to the relief sought
`
`herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Carder W. Brooks
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket