`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`DALLAS DIVISION
`
`
`MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS LLC,
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-02353-N
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and
`RESEARCH IN MOTION
`CORPORATION,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS LLC’S REPORT REGARDING PATENTS
`
`On August 16, 2013, the Court entered an Order [402] denying Plaintiff MobileMedia
`
`Ideas LLC’s (“MobileMedia’s”) Motion to Sever or Stay [369] and allowing Defendants Research
`
`in Motion Limited and Research in Motion Corporation’s (collectively, “RIM’s”) motion to exceed
`
`the summary judgment page limit based on the number of asserted patents [401]. The Court also
`
`directed MobileMedia to inform the Court which patents MobileMedia intends to assert at trial,
`
`and stated that it would dismiss with prejudice any claims based on any patents not asserted or
`
`previously stayed. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s Order, MobileMedia states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`MobileMedia intends to assert the following patents at trial: U.S. Patent Nos. Re.
`
`39,231; 5,737,394; 6,070,068; 6,389,301; and 6,871,048.
`
`2.
`
`Application of the Court’s Order [402] would result in the dismissal with
`
`prejudice of MobileMedia’s claims for infringement from its Amended Complaint [164] with
`
`respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,446,080 (“the ’080 patent”), 7,349,012 (“the ’012 patent”), and
`
`5,490,170 (“the ’170 patent”), together with the dismissal without prejudice of the corresponding
`
`counterclaims of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability asserted against the ’080,
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:11-cv-02353-N Document 412 Filed 08/27/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID 9066
`
`
`
`’012 and ’170 patents in RIM’s Answer to MobileMedia’s Amended Complaint and
`
`Counterclaims [178].1
`
`3.
`
`A proposed form of order is attached hereto.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark D. Strachan
`Mark D. Strachan
`State Bar No. 19351500
`Email: mstrachan@swtriallaw.com
`Richard A. Sayles
`State Bar No. 17697500
`Email: dsayles@swtriallaw.com
`SAYLES WERBNER, PC
`1201 Elm Street, 44th Floor
`Dallas, TX 75270
`Tel.: (214) 939-8700
`Fax: (214) 939-8787
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`MobileMedia Ideas LLC
`
`
`
`
`August 27, 2013
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`Steven M. Bauer (admitted pro hac vice)
`Justin J. Daniels (admitted pro hac vice)
`Safraz W. Ishmael (admitted pro hac vice)
`One International Place
`Boston, MA 02110
`(617) 526-9600
`
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`Kenneth Rubenstein (admitted pro hac vice)
`Anthony Coles (admitted pro hac vice)
`Alan Federbush (admitted pro hac vice)
`Eleven Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 969-3000
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 27, 2013, the foregoing document was filed electronically
`in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 and that all counsel of record are being served with a copy of
`the foregoing instrument via email.
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark D. Strachan
`
`
`
`
`1
`MobileMedia and RIM are in the process of finalizing a stipulated dismissal of claims
`relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,732,390 and 6,441,828.
`
` 2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
