throbber
Case 6:17-cv-00146-KNM Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT, LLC.
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT, LLC.
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`ZTE CORPORATION, ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT, LLC.
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC., ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`




`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-cv-475

`

`



`
`
`
`




`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-cv-476

`

`



`




`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-251

`

`



`
`
`On May 31, 2016, Cellular Communications Equipment (“CCE”) filed its Complaint in the
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC and ZTE cases, alleging infringement of, among other patents, U.S. Patent No. 7,941,174
`
`(“the ’174 Patent”). On April 7, 2014, CCE filed its Complaint in the Apple case, also alleging
`
`infringement of the ’174 Patent.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:17-cv-00146-KNM Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`On September 23, 2015, the Court stayed all claims and issues pertaining to the ’174 Patent
`
`pending Inter Partes Review in the then-consolidated lead case. No. 6:13-cv-507, Doc. No. 470
`
`(“-507 case”). The PTAB subsequently issued a final written decision holding that Petitioner had
`
`not shown that claims 1, 6, 9, 14, 18, and 19 of the ’174 Patent were unpatentable. The Court then
`
`dismissed all claims regarding the ’174 Patent against HTC, ZTE, and the Carrier Defendants from
`
`the -507 Case, without prejudice, so that they could be included in newly-filed Civil Action Nos.
`
`6:16-cv-475 and 6:16-cv-476 (the -475 and -476 cases). At the final pretrial conference, the Court
`
`severed the claims regarding the ’174 Patent from the Apple case, and ordered the parties to
`
`continue meeting and conferring about how to move the ’174 Patent claims forward.
`
`Before the Court is CCE’s Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Cases for Pretrial (“the
`
`Motion”). Doc. No. 382. In the Motion, CCE requests the Court to: open a new civil action for
`
`proceedings against Apple involving the ’174 Patent that were severed from the Apple case;
`
`consolidate that newly-created action with the -475 and -476 cases for pretrial purposes; and set a
`
`scheduling conference for the newly-consolidated action at the same time as the -475 and -476
`
`cases.
`
`The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to open a new cause number for the Apple
`
`proceeding regarding the ’174 Patent. The Court will issue an Order on the remainder of this
`
`Motion after the new case is opened.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of March, 2017.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket