throbber
Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 87 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 570
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-982
`
`CONSOLIDATED LEAD CASE
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-983
`
`
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
`INC., et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO
`DEFENDANT SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC.
`
`Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC (“CCE”) and Defendants Sony
`
`
`
`
`Mobile Communications Inc. and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. submit the
`
`following Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant Sony Mobile
`
`Communications Inc. and in support thereof state:
`
`1.
`
`On December 19, 2014, Plaintiff CCE filed suit against Sony Mobile
`
`Communications Inc., Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., and others for infringement of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,385,966, U.S. Patent No. 8,868,060, and U.S. Patent No. 8,848,556. On
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 87 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 571
`
`
`
`February 18, 2015, this suit was consolidated with TXED-6:14-cv-982, which has been
`
`designated the lead case.
`
`2.
`
`Sony Mobile Communications Inc. and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`represent and warrant that:
`
`a. Sony Mobile Communications Inc. is a Japanese corporation and does not make,
`
`import, market, sell, test or distribute the allegedly infringing products in the
`
`United States and does not otherwise engage in any activities specified in 35
`
`U.S.C. §271. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. is the entity exclusively
`
`responsible for the importation, marketing, sales, testing and distribution in the
`
`United States of the allegedly infringing products identified by CCE in its May
`
`15, 2015 Infringement Contentions;
`
`b.
`
`Sony Mobile Communications Inc. and Sony Mobile Communications
`
`(USA) Inc. agree that for purposes of discovery in this case, to the extent
`
`discoverable documents and information not otherwise in the possession, custody
`
`and control of Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. are in the possession,
`
`custody, or control of Sony Mobile Communications, Inc., Sony Mobile
`
`Communications (USA) Inc. will obtain and produce such discoverable
`
`documents and information. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. will not
`
`object to a request for a deposition on the grounds that the prospective deponent is
`
`an employee of Sony Mobile Communications Inc. (though nothing in this
`
`stipulation prevents Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. from objecting to a
`
`deposition on other grounds);
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 87 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 572
`
`
`
`c.
`
`Sony Mobile Communication (USA), Inc. is the proper party to defend
`
`against allegations made in this patent infringement lawsuit. Furthermore, Sony
`
`Mobile Communication (USA), Inc. or any assignee of Sony Mobile
`
`Communication (USA), Inc. is able to satisfy any judgment in this patent
`
`infringement lawsuit against it. Sony Mobile Communications Inc. and Sony
`
`Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. each warrant and represent that they will not
`
`take any action that will cause Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. to be
`
`unable to fully satisfy any such judgment;
`
`d.
`
`Any and all claims or causes of action by CCE against Sony Mobile
`
`Communications Inc., if any, relating to the patents-in-suit are tolled from the
`
`filing date of this dismissal and for such time as Sony Mobile Communications
`
`(USA) Inc. remains a party to this case; and
`
`e.
`
`Upon being dismissed without prejudice from this case, Sony Mobile
`
`Communications Inc. (as well as any successor-in-interest thereto) will not initiate
`
`a declaratory judgment action under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 against CCE based on
`
`liability under the patents-in-suit.
`
`3.
`
`CCE expressly does not stipulate or agree to any of the foregoing facts, and
`
`reserves its right to dispute any of the foregoing factual representations with evidence to the
`
`contrary.
`
`4.
`
`In reliance upon the representations and warranties made in paragraphs 2(a) – 2(e)
`
`above, CCE agrees to dismiss Sony Mobile Communications Inc. without prejudice as allowed
`
`under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 87 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 573
`
`
`
`5.
`
`CCE has not released, and nothing in this Stipulation should be construed as a
`
`release or discharge of, any claim CCE has or may have in the future against any defendant
`
`named in this action of any other asserted infringer of the patents-in-suit. All other rights have
`
`been expressly reserved.
`
`Accordingly, CCE, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., and Sony Mobile
`
`Communications Inc. request that the Court enter the attached order dismissing Sony Mobile
`
`Communications Inc. without prejudice.
`
`Dated: June 23, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III
`
`Edward R. Nelson III
`ed@nelbum.net
`Texas State Bar No. 00797142
`S. Brannon Latimer
`brannon@nelbum.com
`Texas State Bar No. 24060137
`Thomas C. Cecil
`tom@nelbum.com
`Texas State Bar No. 24069489
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Phone: (817) 377-9111
`Fax: (817) 377-3485
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`J. Wesley Hill
`Texas State Bar No. 24032294
`Claire Abernathy Henry
`Texas State Bar No. 24053063
`WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM
`P.O. Box 1231
`1127 Judson Rd. Ste. 220
`Longview, Texas 75606-1231
`
`/s/ Chelsea A. Loughran
`
`Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 24003214
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh St., Suite 1500
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`214.969.1386
`214.880.3267 (Fax)
`richard.wynne@tklaw.com
`
`
`Michael N. Rader (pro hac vice)
`Charles T. Steenburg (pro hac vice)
`Chelsea A. Loughran (pro hac vice)
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`(617) 646-8000
`mrader@wolfgreenfield.com
`csteenburg@wolfgreenfield.com
`cloughran@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
`(USA) INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 87 Filed 06/23/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 574
`
`(903) 757-6400
`(903) 757-2323 (fax)
`jw@jwfirm.com
`wh@wsfirm.com
`ch@wsfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed
`electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5 on this 23rd day of June, 2015. As of this
`date, all counsel of record have consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy
`of this document through the Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
`
`
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket