throbber
Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1501
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1of3PagelD#: 1501
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 14
`EXHIBIT 14
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 1502
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1502
`
`Nokia Siemens
`
`Nehworks
`
`
`
`Yelephone: +S8adQadagdd
`
`
`
`European Patent Office
`
`80298 Munich
`
`Application No.
`
`09742066.5
`
`Applicant
`
`Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
`
`Office Action dated
`
`14.01.2011
`
`Dear Sirs,
`
`Referring to the Communication dated 14 January 2011 we have
`the following comments.
`
`Enclosed, please find amended claims 1—9, which replace the
`original claims.
`
`The independent claims have been amended with the subject
`matter of claim 3. Original claims 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19
`and 20 have been deleted.
`
`Items in Section VII of the Written Opinion
`
`The items in section VIl have been taken into account when
`amending the claims.
`
`Items in Section VIIl_ of the Written Opinion
`
`1 of the Written Opinion, the claims 1 and 12
`Regarding Item VIII
`have been amended by removing the double initialization.
`In
`addition, claim 6 and claims depending from claim 6 have been
`deleted.
`
`Regarding Items VIII 2 and 3, claim 4 has been amended as
`suggested and newclaim 1 as well.
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 1503
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1503
`
`the applicant respectfully disagrees. The
`Regarding Item VIII 4,
`terms “full path-loss compensation” and “fractional power control”
`are well known in UMTS LTE environment. As an example, a link
`
`http://Awww.springerlink.com/content/n08p61646272352g/
`
`to a telecommunication article “Uplink Power Control
`points
`Performance in UTRAN LTE Networks
`“ by Robert Mullner,
`Carsten F. Ball, Kolio Ivanov, Johann Lienhart and Peter Hic,
`where these terms are mentioned. First page of the article is
`enclosed.
`
`Regarding Item VIII 5, claim 12 has been amended to be a
`computer program claim. Thus, the current claim set comprises a
`method claim 1, a computer program claim 5 and an apparatus
`claim 6.
`
`As claim 3 was indicated allowable in the Communication,
`Applicant believes that the application is in condition for grant.
`
`the
`
`It is believed that all of the Examiner’s objections to the allowance
`of the present application has been addressed and overcome. In
`the event that the Examiner has any outstanding objections for the
`allowanceof the present invention, it is respectfully requested to be
`communicated to us in writing or by telephone. Oral proceedings
`are requested, as a precaution, to be held in the event that this
`opportunity is refused.
`
`Nokia Siamens
`etworks
`
`
`
`Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
`
`Rauni Kittila
`General Authorisation No. 527850.2
`
`Enclosures
`
`
`
`IDNR:3980/26.02.2009
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket