`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1of3PagelD#: 1501
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 14
`EXHIBIT 14
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 1502
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1502
`
`Nokia Siemens
`
`Nehworks
`
`
`
`Yelephone: +S8adQadagdd
`
`
`
`European Patent Office
`
`80298 Munich
`
`Application No.
`
`09742066.5
`
`Applicant
`
`Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
`
`Office Action dated
`
`14.01.2011
`
`Dear Sirs,
`
`Referring to the Communication dated 14 January 2011 we have
`the following comments.
`
`Enclosed, please find amended claims 1—9, which replace the
`original claims.
`
`The independent claims have been amended with the subject
`matter of claim 3. Original claims 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19
`and 20 have been deleted.
`
`Items in Section VII of the Written Opinion
`
`The items in section VIl have been taken into account when
`amending the claims.
`
`Items in Section VIIl_ of the Written Opinion
`
`1 of the Written Opinion, the claims 1 and 12
`Regarding Item VIII
`have been amended by removing the double initialization.
`In
`addition, claim 6 and claims depending from claim 6 have been
`deleted.
`
`Regarding Items VIII 2 and 3, claim 4 has been amended as
`suggested and newclaim 1 as well.
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 1503
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 147-14 Filed 11/09/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1503
`
`the applicant respectfully disagrees. The
`Regarding Item VIII 4,
`terms “full path-loss compensation” and “fractional power control”
`are well known in UMTS LTE environment. As an example, a link
`
`http://Awww.springerlink.com/content/n08p61646272352g/
`
`to a telecommunication article “Uplink Power Control
`points
`Performance in UTRAN LTE Networks
`“ by Robert Mullner,
`Carsten F. Ball, Kolio Ivanov, Johann Lienhart and Peter Hic,
`where these terms are mentioned. First page of the article is
`enclosed.
`
`Regarding Item VIII 5, claim 12 has been amended to be a
`computer program claim. Thus, the current claim set comprises a
`method claim 1, a computer program claim 5 and an apparatus
`claim 6.
`
`As claim 3 was indicated allowable in the Communication,
`Applicant believes that the application is in condition for grant.
`
`the
`
`It is believed that all of the Examiner’s objections to the allowance
`of the present application has been addressed and overcome. In
`the event that the Examiner has any outstanding objections for the
`allowanceof the present invention, it is respectfully requested to be
`communicated to us in writing or by telephone. Oral proceedings
`are requested, as a precaution, to be held in the event that this
`opportunity is refused.
`
`Nokia Siamens
`etworks
`
`
`
`Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
`
`Rauni Kittila
`General Authorisation No. 527850.2
`
`Enclosures
`
`
`
`IDNR:3980/26.02.2009
`
`